Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2022; 55(1); 48-58; doi: 10.1111/evj.13856

Diagnosis and outcome following tenoscopic surgery of the digital flexor tendon sheath in German sports and pleasure horses.

Abstract: Digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) pathology is an important cause of lameness in horses. The outcome after surgical treatment is variable and depends on the exact diagnosis. Objective: To (1) describe the prevalence of lesions associated with lameness caused by nonseptic DFTS tenosynovitis in a large population of German sports and pleasure horses; (2) determine the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic imaging techniques for identifying lesions within the DFTS with tenoscopic diagnosis being the gold standard; (3) explore associations between tenoscopically diagnosed lesions and signalment, purpose, and limb affected; and (4) describe the outcome following DFTS tenoscopy with nonseptic DFTS tenosynovitis in this population. Methods: Retrospective case series. Methods: Medical records of horses admitted for tenoscopic surgery of nonseptic DFTS tenosynovitis between 2011 and 2020 were reviewed. Follow-up information was obtained via telephone contact. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography and contrast tenography were determined using tenoscopic diagnosis as gold standard and univariable analysis was used to explore associations between signalment, case history, and tenoscopic diagnosis. Results: Medical records from 131 horses were retrieved, of which 8 horses had bilateral disease and 6 horses were presented for tenoscopy on two separate occasions (3 for tenoscopy in the same limb, 3 in a different limb), thus, making a total of 145 limbs. Lesions were most commonly diagnosed in the deep (DDFT; n = 55 limbs) and superficial (SDFT; n = 55 limbs) digital flexor tendons. Manica flexoria (MF) lesions were detected in 44 limbs and palmar/plantar annular ligament (PAL) constriction in 99 limbs. In 36 limbs, only one structure within the DFTS was injured, whereas in 109 limbs a combination of lesions was noted, the most common being the combination of a SDFT lesion with PAL constriction. All affected limbs were examined with diagnostic ultrasonography; contrast tenography was performed in 86 limbs. For diagnosis of MF and DDFT tears, tenography was more sensitive (89% [confidence interval, CI: 65.4%-95.2%]; 72% [CI: 46.4%-89.3%], respectively) than specific (64% [CI: 52.5%-77.6%]; 53% [CI: 42.2%-73.3%], respectively) whereas ultrasonography was more specific (92% [CI: 84.5%-96.3%]; 92% [CI: 83.6%-96.0%]) with lower sensitivity (64% [CI: 47.7%-77.2%]; 54% [CI: 39.5%-67.9%]). For SDFT lesions, ultrasonography was highly specific (94% [CI: 86.9%-97.9%]) with lower sensitivity (66% [CI: 51.3%-77.4%]). Follow-up information following first surgery was obtained for 118 horses (132 limbs): 18 (15.3%) of 118 horses remained chronically lame, 40 (33.8%) performed at a reduced level and 60 (50.8%) performed at the same or higher level following rehabilitation after tenoscopy. Horses with DDFT lesions had the poorest outcomes with only 36.6% returning to the same or higher level of exercise. Conclusions: Retrospective analysis of clinical records and subjective outcome assessment based on owner follow-up with potential recall bias. Findings on diagnostic imaging are impacted by many factors including equipment quality and operator expertise and experience. Conclusions: Diagnostic imaging techniques were complimentary and contrast tenography was sensitive and ultrasonography was specific for the diagnosis of MF and DDFT lesions. Following tenoscopic surgery for nonseptic tenosynovitis of the DFTS, approximately half the cases were able to return to preinjury level of exercise.
Publication Date: 2022-10-11 PubMed ID: 35822486DOI: 10.1111/evj.13856Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper evaluates the prevalence of lameness caused by nonseptic Digital Flexor Tendon Sheath (DFTS) tenosynovitis in German sports and pleasure horses and the effectiveness of diagnostic imaging techniques for identifying such lesions. It also analyses the relationship between diagnosed lesions and the horse’s specifics, as well as the outcome after DFTS tenoscopy.

Research Methodology

  • The study is a retrospective case series that reviews the medical records of horses that had undergone tenoscopic surgery for nonseptic DFTS tenosynovitis from 2011 to 2020.
  • The researchers used telephone contact to collect follow-up information.
  • The sensitivity and specificity of the ultrasonography and contrast tenography imaging techniques were determined using tenoscopic diagnosis as the benchmark.
  • Univariable analysis was employed to investigate associations between the horse’s specifics (signalment), case history, and tenoscopic diagnosis.

Results of the Study

  • Medical records from 131 horses were examined, with 145 limbs in total, due to some horses having bilateral diseases or needing multiple tenoscopies.
  • The most commonly diagnosed lesions were in the deep (DDFT) and superficial (SDFT) digital flexor tendons.
  • Manica flexoria (MF) lesions were detected in 44 limbs and palmar/plantar annular ligament (PAL) constriction in 99 limbs.
  • In 36 limbs, only one structure within the DFTS was injured, while 109 limbs had a combination of lesions, most commonly a SDFT lesion with PAL constriction.
  • For the diagnosis of MF and DDFT tears, tenography proved more sensitive but less specific than ultrasonography.
  • I>Ultrasonography was highly specific with lower sensitivity when used for diagnosing SDFT lesions.
  • From the follow-up of 118 horses, 15.3% remained chronically lame, 33.8% performed at a reduced level, and 50.8% performed at the same or higher level following rehabilitation after tenoscopy. Horses with DDFT lesions had the poorest outcomes.

Conclusions of the Study

  • The retrospective analysis of clinical records and subjective outcome assessment were based on owner follow-up, which may be impacted by recall bias.
  • Diagnostic imaging findings can be influenced by many factors, such as equipment quality and operator expertise and experience.
  • It was concluded that diagnostic imaging techniques, such as contrast tenography and ultrasonography, were complementary and useful for the exploration of DFTS tenosynovitis.
  • Approximately half of the horses that underwent tenoscopic surgery for nonseptic tenosynovitis of the DFTS were able to return to their pre-injury level of exercise.

Cite This Article

APA
Cender AN, Mählmann K, Ehrle A, Merle R, Pieper L, Lischer CJ. (2022). Diagnosis and outcome following tenoscopic surgery of the digital flexor tendon sheath in German sports and pleasure horses. Equine Vet J, 55(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13856

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 55
Issue: 1
Pages: 48-58

Researcher Affiliations

Cender, Andrea N
  • Equine Clinic at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Mählmann, Kathrin
  • Equine Clinic at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ehrle, Anna
  • Equine Clinic at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Merle, Roswita
  • Equine Clinic at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Pieper, Laura
  • Equine Clinic at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lischer, Christoph J
  • Equine Clinic at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Forelimb / pathology
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / surgery
  • Horse Diseases / pathology
  • Horses
  • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis
  • Pleasure
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tendons / surgery
  • Tendons / pathology
  • Tenosynovitis / diagnosis
  • Tenosynovitis / surgery
  • Tenosynovitis / veterinary

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Denoix J-M. Functional anatomy of tendons and ligaments in the distal limbs (manus and pes).. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1994;10:273-322.
  2. Fraser BS, Bladon BM. Tenoscopic surgey for treatment of lacerations of the digital flexor tendon sheath.. Equine Vet J 2004;36:528-31.
  3. Wilderjans H, Boussauw B, Madder K, Simon O. Tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendon sheath and annular ligament constriction syndrome caused by longitudinal tears in the deep digital flexor tendon: a clinical and surgical report of 17 surgeries in warmblood horses.. Equine Vet J 2003;35:270-5.
  4. Findley JA, De Oliveira F, Bladon B. Tenoscopic surgical treatment of tears of the manica flexoria in 53 horses.. Vet Surg 2012;41:924-30.
  5. Smith MRW, Wright IM. Noninfected tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendon sheath: a retrospective analysis of 76 surgeries.. Equine Vet J 2006;38:134-41.
  6. Arensburg L, Wilderhans H, Simon O, Dewulf J, Boussauw B. Nonseptic tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendon sheath caused by longitudinal tears in the digital flexor tendons: a retrospective study of 135 tenoscopic procedures.. Equine Vet J 2011;43:660-8.
  7. McIlwraith CW, Wright IM, Nixon AJ. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the carpal joints.. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy in the horse 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2005. p. 368-71.
  8. Kent AV, Chesworth MJ, Wells G, Gerdes C, Bladon BM, Smith RKW. Improved diagnostic criteria for digital flexor tendon sheath pathology using contrast tenography.. Equine Vet J 2019;52:205-12.
  9. Fiske-Jackson AR, Barker WHJ, Eliashar E, Foy K, Smith RKW. The use of intrathecal analgesia and contrast radiography as preoperative diagnostic methods for digital flexor tendon sheath pathology.. Equine Vet J 2013;45:36-40.
  10. Dik KJ, Dyson SJ, Vail TB. Aseptic tenosynovitis of the digital flexor tendon sheath, fetlock and pastern annular ligament constriction.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1995;11:151-62.
  11. Fortier LA. Indications and techniques for tenoscopic surgery of the digital flexor tendon sheath.. Equine Vet Educ 2010;17:218-24.
  12. Gonzalez LM, Schramme MC, Robertson ID, Thrall DE, Redding RW. MRI features of metacarpo(tarso)phalangeal region lameness in 40 horses.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010;51:404-14.
  13. King JN, Zubrod CJ, Schneider RK, Sampson SN, Roberts G. MRI findings in 232 horses with lameness localized to the metacarpo(tarso)phalangeal region and without a radiographic diagnosis.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2013;54:36-47.
  14. Hassel DM, Stover SM, Yarbrough TB. Palmar-plantar axial sesamoidean approach to the digital flexor tendon sheath in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;217:1343-7.
  15. Nixon AJ. Endoscopy of the digital flexor tendon sheath in horses.. Vet Surg 1990;19:266-71.
  16. Noguera Cender A, Mählmann K, Lischer CJ. Ex vivo evaluation of an alternative technique for resection of the proximal manica flexoria in horses.. Vet Surg 2020;49(2):401-8.
  17. Hawkins D, Churchill E. Extrasynovial palmar-plantar annular ligament desmotomy.. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1998;44:210-2.
  18. Wright IM, McMahon PJ. Tenosynovitis associated with longitudinal tears of the digital flexor tendons in horses: a report of 20 surgeries.. Equine Vet J 1999;31:12-8.
  19. Back W, Schamhardt HC, Savelberg HH, Bogert AJ, Bruin G, Hartman W. How the horse moves: 1. Significance of graphical representations of equine forelimb kinematics.. Equine Vet J 1995;27:31-8.
  20. Back W, Schamhardt HC, Savelberg HH, Bogert AJ, Bruin G, Hartman W. How the horse moves: 2. Significance of graphical representations of equine hind limb kinematics.. Equine Vet J 1995;27:39-45.
  21. Owen KR, Dyson SJ, Parkin TD, Singer ER, Kristoffersen M, Mair TS. Retrospective study of palmar/plantar annular ligament injury in 71 horses: 2001-2006.. Equine Vet J 2008;40:237-44.
  22. Kummerle JM, Theis F, Smith RKW. Diagnosis and management of tendon and ligament disorders.. Equine surgery In: Auer JA, Stick JA, editors. 5th ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2018. p. 1411-44.
  23. Thünker F, Oosterlinck M, Vanderperren K, Martens A. Long-term results of tenoscopic treatment of lesions in the digital flexor tendon sheath: a retrospective study of fifty horses.. Vlaams Diergeneeskd Tijdschr 2019;88:9-18.
  24. Smith LJ, Mellor DJ, Marr CM, Mair TS. What is the likelihood that a horse treated for septic digital tenosynovitis will return to its previous level of athletic function?. Equine Vet J 2006;38(4):337-41.
  25. Bertuglia A, Mollo G, Bullone M, Riccio B. Identification of surgically-induced longitudinal lesions of the equine deep digital flexor tendon in the digital flexor tendon sheath using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: an ex-vivo pilot study.. Acta Vet Scand 2014;25:56-8.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.