FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Viruses / Diagnostic Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests to Detect Equi...
Viruses2025; 17(3); 413; doi: 10.3390/v17030413

Diagnostic Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests to Detect Equine Rotavirus A.

Abstract: This study describes a comparison of the detection of rotavirus in clinical samples from foals using two commercially available rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits, with the detection of rotavirus nucleic acid via a laboratory-based, in-house, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. One hundred and forty freeze-thawed samples (70 that were RT-PCR-positive and 70 that were RT-PCR-negative on original tests) submitted to the diagnostic laboratory over a seven-year period were tested in addition to 123 fresh samples (15 RT-PCR-positive and 108 RT-PCR-negative) submitted over a four- month period in 2024. The analyst performing the RAD tests was blinded to the RT-PCR result as were the two individuals who read the results. Samples with discordant results were re-tested in duplicate using RT-PCR and the two RAD kits. Both kits demonstrated a high level of concordance with the RT-PCR (>95%). However, testing of serial dilutions of RT-PCR positive faeces samples indicated that the RADs failed to detect the virus at the higher dilutions. In conclusion, the RADs evaluated are potentially useful for screening individual foals and for the determination of the urgency of the appropriate treatment and isolation. Negative samples from suspect cases and weak positives should always be submitted to a specialist laboratory for real-time RT-PCR testing.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-03-14 PubMed ID: 40143340PubMed Central: PMC11946396DOI: 10.3390/v17030413Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Comparative Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study compares two commercially available rapid antigen detection (RAD) kits against a laboratory-based real-time RT-PCR test for the detection of rotavirus in foals. Both RAD kits showed a high level of agreement with the PCR test (>95%) yet failed to detect the virus at higher dilutions. Despite this, the study concludes that RAD kits can still be effective for initial screenings and determining treatment urgency for individual foals.

Research Context and Methodology

  • The research was conducted within the context of equine health, specifically focused on the detection of rotavirus in foals. Rotavirus is a common source of gastroenteritis in foals and is notoriously difficult to efficiently diagnose.
  • The scientists compared the performance of two commonly used RAD kits against a laboratory-based real-time RT-PCR test, which is the current gold standard for rotavirus detection.
  • Data for the research were compiled from two sets of samples: 140 samples submitted over a seven-year period, and 123 fresh samples submitted over a four-month period in 2024.
  • The two individuals reading the RAD results, as well as the analyst performing the tests, were blinded to the original RT-PCR result in order to ensure an unbiased comparison.

Research Findings

  • Both rapid antigen detection kits demonstrated a high level of concordance with the RT-PCR test, with over 95% agreement. This implies that the kits are generally effective at diagnosing rotavirus.
  • However, the research also found that these RAD tests were unable to detect the virus at higher dilutions, indicating a potential limitation in their diagnostic ability.

Conclusion and Recommendations

  • The researchers concluded that despite the limitation at higher dilutions, RAD tests can still be useful for preliminary screenings and determining treatment urgency for foals.
  • However, in order to confirm negative results from suspect cases or weak positives, those samples should be submitted to a specialist laboratory for more accurate real-time RT-PCR testing.

Cite This Article

APA
Cullinane A, Nelly M, Dayot L, Lukaseviciute G, Garvey M, Healy J, Gallagher R. (2025). Diagnostic Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests to Detect Equine Rotavirus A. Viruses, 17(3), 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17030413

Publication

Viruses
ISSN: 1999-4915
NlmUniqueID: 101509722
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 3
PII: 413

Researcher Affiliations

Cullinane, Ann
  • Virology Unit, The Irish Equine Centre, Johnstown, Naas, Co., W91 RH93 Kildare, Ireland.
Nelly, Maura
  • Virology Unit, The Irish Equine Centre, Johnstown, Naas, Co., W91 RH93 Kildare, Ireland.
Dayot, Laura
  • Virology Unit, The Irish Equine Centre, Johnstown, Naas, Co., W91 RH93 Kildare, Ireland.
Lukaseviciute, Gabija
  • Virology Unit, The Irish Equine Centre, Johnstown, Naas, Co., W91 RH93 Kildare, Ireland.
Garvey, Marie
  • Virology Unit, The Irish Equine Centre, Johnstown, Naas, Co., W91 RH93 Kildare, Ireland.
Healy, Jennifer
  • Virology Unit, The Irish Equine Centre, Johnstown, Naas, Co., W91 RH93 Kildare, Ireland.
Gallagher, Robert
  • Virology Unit, The Irish Equine Centre, Johnstown, Naas, Co., W91 RH93 Kildare, Ireland.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Rotavirus Infections / diagnosis
  • Rotavirus Infections / veterinary
  • Rotavirus Infections / virology
  • Rotavirus / isolation & purification
  • Rotavirus / immunology
  • Rotavirus / genetics
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / virology
  • Antigens, Viral / analysis
  • Antigens, Viral / immunology
  • Feces / virology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary

Grant Funding

  • 22/ETS/2024 / Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine Ireland

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 32 references
  1. Omatola C.A., Olaniran A.O.. Rotaviruses: From Pathogenesis to Disease Control-A Critical Review.. Viruses 2022;14:875.
    doi: 10.3390/v14050875pmc: PMC9143449pubmed: 35632617google scholar: lookup
  2. Bailey K.E., Gilkerson J.R., Browning G.F.. Equine rotaviruses—Current understanding and continuing challenges.. Vet Microbiol 2013;167:135–144.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.07.010pmc: PMC7117381pubmed: 23932076google scholar: lookup
  3. Kumar D., Shepherd F.K., Springer N.L., Mwangi W., Marthaler D.G.. Rotavirus Infection in Swine: Genotypic Diversity, Immune Responses, and Role of Gut Microbiome in Rotavirus Immunity.. Pathogens 2022;11:1078.
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens11101078pmc: PMC9607047pubmed: 36297136google scholar: lookup
  4. Pauly M., Oni O.O., Sausy A., Owoade A.A., Adeyefa C.A.O., Muller C.P., Hübschen J.M., Snoeck C.J.. Molecular epidemiology of Avian Rotaviruses Group A and D shed by different bird species in Nigeria.. Virol. J. 2017;14:111.
    doi: 10.1186/s12985-017-0778-5pmc: PMC5469043pubmed: 28606119google scholar: lookup
  5. Papp H., Matthijnssens J., Martella V., Ciarlet M., Bányai K.. Global distribution of group A rotavirus strains in horses: A systematic review.. Vaccine 2013;31:5627–5633.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.045pubmed: 23994380google scholar: lookup
  6. Carossino M., Barrandeguy M.E., Li Y., Parreño V., Janes J., Loynachan A.T., Balasuriya U.B.R.. Detection, molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of G3P[12] and G14P[12] equine rotavirus strains co-circulating in central Kentucky.. Virus Res. 2018;255:39–54.
    doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2018.05.025pubmed: 29864502google scholar: lookup
  7. Payment P., Morin É.. Minimal infective dose of the OSU strain of porcine rotavirus.. Arch. Virol. 1990;112:277–282.
    doi: 10.1007/BF01323172pubmed: 2165770google scholar: lookup
  8. Woode G.N., Crouch C.F.. Naturally occurring and experimentally induced rotaviral infections of domestic and laboratory animals.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1978;173:522–526.
    pubmed: 212392
  9. Crawford S.E., Ramani S., Tate J.E., Parashar U.D., Svensson L., Hagbom M., Franco M.A., Greenberg H.B., O’Ryan M., Kang G.. Rotavirus infection.. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017;3:17083.
    doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.83pmc: PMC5858916pubmed: 29119972google scholar: lookup
  10. Nemoto M., Ryan E., Lyons P., Cullinane A.. Molecular characterisation of equine group A rotaviruses in Ireland (2011–2015). Vet. J. 2017;226:12–14.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.05.004pubmed: 28911835google scholar: lookup
  11. Woode G.N.. Epizootiology of bovine rotavirus infection.. Vet. Rec. 1978;103:44–46.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.103.3.44pubmed: 211696google scholar: lookup
  12. Keswick B.H.. Survival of enteric viruses adsorbed on electropositive filters.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1983;46:501–502.
    doi: 10.1128/aem.46.2.501-502.1983pmc: PMC239430pubmed: 6312886google scholar: lookup
  13. Ansari S.A., Sattar S.A., Springthorpe V.S., Wells G.A., Tostowaryk W.. Rotavirus survival on human hands and transfer of infectious virus to animate and nonporous inanimate surfaces.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1988;26:1513–1518.
    doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1513-1518.1988pmc: PMC266652pubmed: 2844846google scholar: lookup
  14. Collinet-Adler S., Babji S., Francis M., Kattula D., Premkumar P.S., Sarkar R., Mohan V.R., Ward H., Kang G., Balraj V.. Environmental Factors Associated with High Fly Densities and Diarrhea in Vellore, India.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:6053–6058.
    doi: 10.1128/AEM.01236-15pmc: PMC4551260pubmed: 26116684google scholar: lookup
  15. Strickland K.L., Lenihan P., O’Connor M.G., Condon J.C.. Diarrhoea in foals associated with rotavirus.. Vet. Rec. 1982;111:421.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.111.18.421pubmed: 7147670google scholar: lookup
  16. Higgins W.P., Gillespie J.H., Schiff E.I., Pennow N.N., Tanneberger M.J.. Infectivity and immunity studies in foals with cell culture-propagated equine rotaviruses. 1987;pp. 241–247.
  17. Dwyer R.M., Powell D.G., Roberts W., Donahue M., Lyons E.T., Osborne M., Wood G.. A study of the etiology and control of infectious diarrhea among foals in central Kentucky. 1990;pp. 337–355.
  18. Powell D.G., Dwyer R.M., Traub-Dargatz J.L., Fulker R.H., Whalen J.W. Jr., Srinivasappa J., Acree W.M., Chu H.J.. Field study of the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of an inactivated equine rotavirus vaccine.. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1997;211:193–198.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.1997.211.02.193pubmed: 9227750google scholar: lookup
  19. Slovis N.M.. Rotavirus.. 2009;pp. 144–151.
  20. Dywer R.M.. Equine rotavirus.. 2007;pp. 181–183.
  21. Toptan T., Eckermann L., Pfeiffer A.E., Hoehl S., Ciesek S., Drosten C., Corman V.M.. Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: Potential to help reduce community spread?. J. Clin. Virol. 2021;135:104713.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104713pmc: PMC7832367pubmed: 33352470google scholar: lookup
  22. Velayudhan B.T., Naikare H.K.. Point-of-care testing in companion and food animal disease diagnostics.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022;9:1056440.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1056440pmc: PMC9732271pubmed: 36504865google scholar: lookup
  23. . Principles and Methods of Validation of Diagnostic Assays for Infectious Diseases.. .
  24. Nemoto M., Hata H., Higuchi T., Imagawa H., Yamanaka T., Niwa H., Bannai H., Tsujimura K., Kondo T., Matsumura T.. Evaluation of rapid antigen detection kits for diagnosis of equine rotavirus infection.. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2010;72:1247–1250.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.10-0064pubmed: 20453452google scholar: lookup
  25. Browning G.F.. Equine Rotavirus Infections.. 1996;pp. 127–135.
  26. Carossino M., Balasuriya U.B.R.. Quadruplex Real-Time TaqMan(®) RT-qPCR Assay for Differentiation of Equine Group A and B Rotaviruses and Identification of Group A G3 and G14 Genotypes.. Viruses 2023;15:1626.
    doi: 10.3390/v15081626pmc: PMC10459720pubmed: 37631969google scholar: lookup
  27. Carossino M., Barrandeguy M.E., Erol E., Li Y., Balasuriya U.B.R.. Development and evaluation of a one-step multiplex real-time TaqMan(®) RT-qPCR assay for the detection and genotyping of equine G3 and G14 rotaviruses in fecal samples.. Virol. J. 2019;16:49.
    doi: 10.1186/s12985-019-1149-1pmc: PMC6482509pubmed: 31023319google scholar: lookup
  28. Mak G.C., Lau S.S., Wong K.K., Chow N.L., Lau C.S., Lam E.T., Chan R.C., Tsang D.N.. Analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity of the three rapid antigen detection kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.. J. Clin. Virol. 2020;133:104684.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104684pmc: PMC7598567pubmed: 33176236google scholar: lookup
  29. . Veterinary Point of Care Diagnostics Market to Witness Growth 12.3% by 2030.. .
  30. . The OIE ASF Reference Laboratory Network’s Overview of African Swine Fever Diagnostic Tests for Field Application.. .
  31. Halpin K.T.L., Hobbs E., Singanallur N.B.. Perspectives and challenges in validating new diagnostic technologies.. Sci. Tech. Rev. 2021;40:145–147.
    doi: 10.20506/rst.40.1.3214pubmed: 34140734google scholar: lookup
  32. . Rabies (Infection With Rabies Virus And Other Lyssaviruses). .

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.