[Differentiation of equine influenza viruses subtype 2 with monoclonal antibodies].
Abstract: Infections and clinical diseases caused by equine 2 influenza A viruses are observed worldwide. The frequency of these outbreaks supports the hypothesis that antigenic variation of the surface proteins may play an important role. For the demonstration of these variations, monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) were prepared. They are directed against the hemagglutinin or the neuraminidase of the prototype strain a/eq/Miami/1/63. In hemagglutination-inhibition assays with Mabs two reaction patterns were observed: four Mabs inhibited 14 out of 17 strains tested. Another Mab recognized the hemagglutinin of only 4 strains. One strain was not inhibited by any of the Mabs. This reaction pattern was not changed by purification of the Mabs using different techniques. Following tween 80/ether treatment of some strains, the Mab reacting more strain-specific had higher titers against the four closely related strains. Tween 80/ether treatment did not affect the titers of the Mabs reacting more subtype-specific. Analysis of the neuraminidase of 17 strains revealed a marked variation in two strains. Different purification procedures had some influence on the titers of the Mabs but did not alter the pattern of the reaction. The antigenic variation of surface proteins detected by Mabs are not seen so clearly when conventional antisera are used. Therefore, antigenic variations are probably not responsible for outbreaks of equine influenza in vaccinated animals.
Publication Date: 1987-01-01 PubMed ID: 3590159
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- English Abstract
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This article primarily discusses how the differentiation of equine influenza viruses subtype 2 can be achieved through the use of monoclonal antibodies. The study measured differences in reactions among various strains of the virus, concluding that antigenic variations may not be responsible for outbreaks among vaccinated animals.
Objective and Methodology
- The research seeks to understand the infections and diseases caused by equine influenza A viruses, specifically subtype 2, as they occur globally.
- The researchers hypothesize that antigenic variations (changes in the protein structures on the outside of the virus) may play a significant role in these outbreaks.
- To demonstrate these potential variations, they prepare monoclonal antibodies (Mabs), which are antibodies made from identical immune cells that target a specific antigen, in this case, the hemagglutinin or neuraminidase of the prototype strain a/eq/Miami/1/63. These proteins are critical to the virus’s ability to bind and enter host cells.
- The researchers conducted hemagglutination-inhibition assays, which are tests to identify and quantify viruses, using these Mabs on seventeen different strains of the virus.
Findings
- The study found two reaction patterns in the assays: four Mabs managed to inhibit 14 out of the 17 strains tested, while one Mab recognized only the hemagglutinin of four strains. One strain was not inhibited by any of the Mabs.
- Even after using different techniques to purify the Mabs, these reaction patterns remained consistent.
- Following treatment of some strains with Tween 80/ether, one Mab that reacted more strain-specific demonstrated higher titers against the related four strains. These treatment did not affect the reaction of the other Mabs, those reacting on a subtype-specific level.
- With 17 strains, analyses of neuraminidase protein variations revealed marked variation in two strains.
Conclusion
- Different purification procedures slightly influenced the titers of the Mabs, but these procedures did not alter the reaction patterns.
- The potential antigenic variations evidenced by Mabs are not as easily recognizable when using conventional antisera.
- Based on their findings, the researchers surmise that antigenic variations are likely not the cause of outbreaks of equine influenza in animals that have been vaccinated, suggesting other factors may be responsible.
Cite This Article
APA
Eichhorn W.
(1987).
[Differentiation of equine influenza viruses subtype 2 with monoclonal antibodies].
Tierarztl Prax Suppl, 2, 41-46.
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Antibodies, Monoclonal / immunology
- Antibody Specificity
- Antigens, Viral / immunology
- Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests
- Hemagglutinins, Viral / immunology
- Horses
- Humans
- Hybridomas
- Influenza A virus / classification
- Influenza A virus / immunology
- Mice
- Neuraminidase / immunology
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists