Analyze Diet
Scientific reports2025; 15(1); 9951; doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94279-5

Digital droplet PCR-based detection and quantification of ovine papillomavirus DNA from the vaginal virobiota of healthy mares.

Abstract: There are four genotypes of ovine papillomaviruses (OaPVs): OaPV1, OaPV2, and OaPV4, which are ovine delta papillomaviruses responsible for epithelial and mesenchymal cell infections, and OaPV3, an epitheliotropic Dyokappapapillomavirus associated with cutaneous tumors in sheep, including squamous cell carcinoma. Vaginal swabs of healthy mares were evaluated for the presence of PVs to investigate whether the vaginal virobiota of asymptomatic mares harbored OaPVs. High-performance digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was used to quantitatively detect OaPV types 1-4 DNA in 94 vaginal swabs collected at the National Reference Center for Veterinary and Comparative Oncology (CEROVEC), Genoa, Italy. All samples were comparatively evaluated for OaPV DNA loading using real-time quantitative PCR. ddPCR detected OaPV DNA in 25 vaginal swab samples (26.6%), whereas qPCR revealed 13 vaginal swabs (11.7%). Differences between the two molecular protocols were determined to be statistically significant using McNemar's test (p < 0.0005). The detected OaPV types were OaPV1 and OaPV3. Both methods failed to detect OaPV2 or OaPV4 DNA, which could be attributed to the limited number of samples examined. OaPV1 is the most prevalent OaPV in equine vaginal virobiota . This study is the first to provide evidence of the presence of OaPV DNA in vaginal swabs of healthy mares. This comparative detection approach underscores the superior sensitivity of ddPCR over qPCR.
Publication Date: 2025-03-22 PubMed ID: 40121289PubMed Central: PMC11929744DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-94279-5Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores the detection of ovine papillomavirus (OaPV) in the vaginal virobiota of healthy mares using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). The study has identified OaPV1 as the most prevalent type in equine vaginal virobiota and suggested ddPCR as a more sensitive method for detection compared to real-time quantitative PCR.

Examination of Vaginal Virobiota

  • The research assessed the presence of ovine papillomaviruses (OaPVs) in healthy mares. There are four types of OaPVs: OaPV1, OaPV2, OaPV3, and OaPV4. The first three are responsible for both epithelial and mesenchymal cell infections while OaPV3 is associated with cutaneous tumors in sheep.
  • This study used vaginal swabs from healthy mares to determine if these asymptomatic mares harbored OaPVs in their vaginal virobiota.

Detection and Quantification Method

  • High-performance digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was utilized to detect OaPV types 1-4 DNA in the samples.
  • The sample comprised of 94 vaginal swabs collected at the National Reference Center for Veterinary and Comparative Oncology in Italy.
  • All the collected samples were comparatively evaluated for OaPV DNA loading using both ddPCR and real-time quantitative PCR.

Results and Significance

  • The ddPCR detected OaPV DNA in 26.6% of the samples, while qPCR revealed the presence in 13 samples, constituting 11.7% of the total count. The variation in detection rates between the two methods was statistically significant.
  • The detected OaPV types were specifically OaPV1 and OaPV3, with none of the methods managing to detect OaPV2 or OaPV4. This was attributed to the limited number of samples tested.
  • OaPV1 emerged as the most prevalent OaPV type in equine vaginal virobiota.
  • These findings are significant as they demonstrated for the first time the presence of OaPV DNA in vaginal swabs from healthy mares. The results highlighted the superior sensitivity of ddPCR over qPCR, presenting a more effective method for detection.

Cite This Article

APA
(2025). Digital droplet PCR-based detection and quantification of ovine papillomavirus DNA from the vaginal virobiota of healthy mares. Sci Rep, 15(1), 9951. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94279-5

Publication

ISSN: 2045-2322
NlmUniqueID: 101563288
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 1
Pages: 9951
PII: 9951

Researcher Affiliations

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / virology
  • Female
  • Vagina / virology
  • DNA, Viral / genetics
  • Papillomaviridae / genetics
  • Papillomaviridae / isolation & purification
  • Papillomavirus Infections / virology
  • Papillomavirus Infections / diagnosis
  • Papillomavirus Infections / veterinary
  • Sheep / virology
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Horse Diseases / virology
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: Vaginal swabs were performed in horses admitted to the Veterinary Teaching Hospitals of Turin (OVU) for causes not related to pathologies of the genital system. All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d’Aosta (approval number 14047 of 11/28/2019). Permission to collect vaginal swabs was obtained from the animals’ owners who were previously informed and in agreement with the purpose and methods used.

References

This article includes 61 references
  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Vol. 90, Human Papillomaviruses, WHO, Lyon, France, (2007).
  2. Van Doorslaer K. ICTV Virus taxonomy profile: Papillomaviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 99, 989–990 (2018).
    pmc: PMC6171710pubmed: 29927370
  3. PaVE. The papillomavirus episteme available from http://pave.niaid.nih.gov (accessed on 15 January, 2025). .
  4. Ghorani M, Esmaeili H, Khordadmehr M. Clinico-histopathological and molecular detection of small ruminants’ papillomaviruses in Iran. Vet. Med. Sci. 10, e1516 (2024).
    pmc: PMC11245566pubmed: 39001593doi: 10.1002/vms3.1516google scholar: lookup
  5. Munday J S, Klobukowska H, Nicholson K. Amplification of Ovis aries papillomavirus type 2 DNA from an ovine cutaneous fibropapilloma. Vet. Dermatol. 35, 226–229 (2024).
    pubmed: 37704588
  6. Tore G. Host cell tropism, genome characterization, and evolutionary features of OaPV4, a novel Deltapapillomavirus identified in sheep fibropapilloma. Vet. Microbiol. 204, 151–158 (2017).
    pubmed: 28532795
  7. Alberti A. Ovis aries papillomavirus 3: a prototype of a novel genus in the family Papillomaviridae associated with ovine squamous cell carcinoma. Virology 407, 352–359 (2010).
    pubmed: 20863546
  8. De Falco F. Evidence of a novel cross-species transmission by ovine papillomaviruses. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 69, 3850–3857 (2022).
    pubmed: 36335589
  9. De Falco F. Possible etiological association of ovine papillomaviruses with bladder tumors in cattle. Virus Res. .
  10. De Falco F, Cutarelli A, Fedele F L, Catoi C, Roperto S. Molecular findings and virological assessment of bladder papillomavirus infection in cattle. Vet. Quart. 44, 1–7 (2024).
    pmc: PMC11299453pubmed: 39097798
  11. Cutarelli A. Molecular detection of transcriptionally active ovine papillomaviruses in commercial equine semen. Front. Vet. Sci. 11, 1427370 (2024).
    pmc: PMC11253197pubmed: 39021410doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1427370google scholar: lookup
  12. De Falco F, Cutarelli A, Pellicanò R, Brandt S, Roperto S. Molecular detection and quantification of ovine papillomavirus DNA in equine sarcoid. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2024, 6453158 (2024).
    doi: 10.1155/2024/6453158google scholar: lookup
  13. Munger K, Howley R M. Human papillomavirus immortalization and transformation functions. Virus Res. 89, 213–228 (2002).
    pubmed: 12445661
  14. Talbert-Slage K, DiMaio D. The bovine papillomavirus E5 protein and the PDGF β receptor: it takes two to tango. Virology 384, 345–351 (2009).
    pmc: PMC2661243pubmed: 18990418
  15. Roperto S. Bovine papillomavirus type 2 (BPV-2) E5 oncoprotein binds to the subunit D of the V1-ATPase proton pump in naturally occurring urothelial tumors of the urinary bladder of cattle. PLoS One .
  16. Garcia-Vallvé S, Alonso A, Bravo I C. Papillomaviruses: Different genes have different histories. Trends. Microbiol. 13, 514–521 (2005).
    pubmed: 16181783
  17. DiMaio D, Petti L. The E5 proteins. Virology 445, 99–114 (2013).
    pmc: PMC3772959pubmed: 23731971
  18. Karabadzhak A G. Two transmembrane dimers of the bovine papillomavirus E5 oncoprotein clamp the PDGF β receptor in an active dimeric conformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7262–E7271 (2017).
    pmc: PMC5584431pubmed: 28808001
  19. Tore G. Transforming properties of ovine papillomaviruses E6 and E7 oncogenes. Vet. Microbiol. 230, 14–22 (2019).
    pubmed: 30827380
  20. Darnell G A. Human papillomavirus E7 requires the protease calpain to degrade the retinoblastoma protein. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 37492–37500 (2007).
    pubmed: 17977825
  21. Scarth J A, Patterson M R, Morgan E L, Macdonald A. The human papillomavirus oncoproteins: A review of the host pathways targeted on the road to transformation. J. Gen. Virol. .
    pmc: PMC8148304pubmed: 33427604doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001540google scholar: lookup
  22. Ojima K, Hata S, Shinkai-Ouchi F, Ono Y, Muroya S. Calpain-3 not only proteolyzes calpain-1 and-2 but also is a substrate for calpain-1 and -2. J. Biochem. 174, 421–431 (2023).
    pubmed: 37491733
  23. Roperto S. Calpain3 is expressed in a proteolytically active form in papillomavirus associated urothelial tumors of the urinary bladder in cattle. PLoS One .
  24. Li H. Application of droplet digital PCR to detect the pathogens of infectious diseases. Biosci. Rep. (2018).
    pmc: PMC6240714pubmed: 30341241
  25. Kockerols C C B. Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 quantification in CML: current applications in clinical practice. Hemasphere (2020).
    pmc: PMC7710259pubmed: 33283168
  26. Bernardi S. Digital PCR 8dPCR) is able to anticipate the achievement of stable deep molecular response in adult chronic myeloid leukemia patients: results of the DEMONSTRATE study. Ann. Hematol. .
    pmc: PMC11868186pubmed: 39611878doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-06100-4google scholar: lookup
  27. Biron V L. Detection of human papillomavirus type 16 in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Cancer 122, 1544–1551 (2016).
    pubmed: 26989832
  28. Isaac A. Ultrasensitive detection of oncogenic human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal tissue swabs. J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 46, 5 (2017).
    pmc: PMC5237494pubmed: 28088212doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0177-8google scholar: lookup
  29. De Falco F, Corrado F, Cutarelli A, Leonardi L, Roperto S. Digital droplet PCR for the detection and quantification of circulating bovine Deltapapillomavirus. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 68, 1345–1352 (2021).
    pubmed: 33350088
  30. Roperto S, Cutarelli A, Corrado F, De Falco F, Buonavoglia C. Detection and quantification of bovine deltapapillomavirus DNA by digital droplet PCR in sheep blood. Sci. Rep. 11, 10292 (2021).
    pmc: PMC8119674pubmed: 33986444doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89782-4google scholar: lookup
  31. De Falco F. Molecular epidemiology of ovine papillomavirus infections among sheep in southern Italy. Front. Vet. Sci. .
    pmc: PMC8645557pubmed: 34881323doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.790392google scholar: lookup
  32. Cutarelli A. Prevalence and genotype distribution of caprine papillomavirus in peripheral blood of healthy goats in farms from three European countries. Front. Vet. Sci. 10, 1213150 (2023).
    pmc: PMC10310300pubmed: 37396991doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1213150google scholar: lookup
  33. Holdcroft A M, Ireland D J, Payne M S. The vaginal microbiome in health and disease what role do common intimate hygiene practices play?. Microorganisms 11, 298 (2023).
  34. Barba M. Vaginal microbiota is stable throughout the estrus cycle in Arabian mares. Animals 10, 2020 (2020).
    pmc: PMC7692283pubmed: 33153053doi: 10.3390/ani10112020google scholar: lookup
  35. Honorato L. Viruses in the female lower reproductive tract: a systematic descriptive review of metagenomic investigations. NPJ Biofilm Microb. 10, 137 (2024).
    pmc: PMC11589587pubmed: 39587088doi: 10.1038/s41522-024-00613-6google scholar: lookup
  36. Malaluang P. Bacteria in the healthy equine vagina during the estrous cycle. Theriogenology 213, 11–18 (2024).
    pubmed: 37793220
  37. Jakobsen R R. Characterization of the vaginal DNA viruses in health and dysbiosis. Viruses 12, 1143 (2020).
    pmc: PMC7600586pubmed: 33050261doi: 10.3390/v12101143google scholar: lookup
  38. Cubie H A. Diseases associated with human papillomavirus infection. Virology 445, 21–34 (2013).
    pubmed: 23932731
  39. Domjanič G G. First report of Phodopus sungorus papillomavirus type 1 infection in Roborovski hamsters (Phodopus roborovskii). Viruses 13, 739 (2021).
    pmc: PMC8145573pubmed: 33922632doi: 10.3390/v13050739google scholar: lookup
  40. Lane E A. Key factors affecting reproductive success of thoroughbred mares and stallions on a commercial stud farm. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 51, 181–187 (2016).
    pubmed: 26815482
  41. de Mestre A M, Rose B V, Chang Y M, Wathes D C, Verheyen K L P. Multivariable analysis to determine risk factors associated with early pregnancy loss in thoroughbred broodmares. Theriogenology 124, 18–23 (2019).
    pubmed: 30326374
  42. Greenwood S. Prevalence of Equus caballus papillomavirus type-2 infection and seropositivity in asymptomatic western Canadian horses. Vet. Pathol. 57, 632–641 (2020).
    pubmed: 32812517
  43. Fischer N M. Serum antibodies and DNA indicate a high prevalence of equine papillomavirus 2 (EcPV2) among horses in Switzerland. Vet Dermatol. 25, 210-e54 (2014).
    pubmed: 24840327doi: 10.1111/vde.12129google scholar: lookup
  44. Sikora S. EcPV-2 is transcriptionally active in equine SCC but only rarely detectable in swabs and semen from healthy horses. Vet. Microbiol. 158, 194–198 (2012).
    pubmed: 22386674
  45. Kanat Ö. Equine and bovine papillomaviruses from Turkish brood horses: A molecular identification and immunohistochemical study. Vet. Arhiv 89, 601–611 (2019).
  46. Lee S K, Lee J K, Lee I. Molecular detection of Equus caballus papillomavirus type 2 in genital swaps from healthy horses in the Republic of Korea. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 72, 97–100 (2019).
    pubmed: 30929791
  47. Allen W R, Wilsher S. Half a century of equine reproduction research and application: A veterinary tour de force. Equine Vet. J. 50, 10–21 (2018).
    pubmed: 28971522
  48. Malaluang P, Wilén E, Lindahl J, Hansson I, Morrell J M. Antimicrobial resistance in equine reproduction. Animals 11, 3035 (2021).
    pmc: PMC8614435pubmed: 34827768doi: 10.3390/ani11113035google scholar: lookup
  49. Bai M. Assisted reproductive technology treatment failure and the detection of intrauterine HPV through spent embryo transfer media sample. J. Med. Virol. .
    pubmed: 38415499doi: 10.1002/jmv.29468google scholar: lookup
  50. De Falco F, Cutarelli A, Leonardi L, Marcus I, Roperto S. Vertical intrauterine bovine and ovine papillomavirus coinfection in pregnant cows. Pathogens 13, 453 (2024).
    pmc: PMC11206582pubmed: 38921751doi: 10.3390/pathogens13060453google scholar: lookup
  51. Zhou Y, Shi X, Liu J, Zhang L. Correlation between human papillomavirus viral load and cervical lesions classification: A review of current research. Front. Med. 10, 1111269 (2023).
    pmc: PMC9988912pubmed: 36895724doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1111269google scholar: lookup
  52. Chen Z. Study on the clinical characteristics, persistent infection capability and viral load of human papillomavirus type 26 single infection. Virol. J. 21, 301 (2024).
    pmc: PMC11585215pubmed: 39578879doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02582-wgoogle scholar: lookup
  53. Koch C. Genomic comparison of bovine papillomavirus 1 isolates from bovine, equine and asinine lesional tissue samples. Virus Res. 244, 6–12 (2018).
    pubmed: 29113823
  54. Garcia-Pérez R. Novel papillomaviruses in free-ranging Iberian bats: No virus-host co-evolution, no strict host specificity, and hints for recombination. Genome Biol. Evol. 6, 94–104 (2014).
    pmc: PMC3914694pubmed: 24391150
  55. Liang G, Bushman F D. The human virome: assembly, composition and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 514–527 (2021).
    pmc: PMC8008777pubmed: 33785903
  56. Tramontano L, Sciorio R, Bellaminutti S, Esteves S C, Petignat P. Exploring the potential impact of human papillomavirus on infertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Reprod. Biol. .
    pubmed: 36889139doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2023.100753google scholar: lookup
  57. Roperto S, Russo V, De Falco F, Taulescu M, Roperto F. Congenital papillomavirus infection in cattle: Evidence for transplacental transmission. Vet. Microbiol. 230, 95–100 (2019).
    pubmed: 30827412
  58. Cantόn G J. Equine abortion and stillbirth in California: a review of 1,774 cases received at a diagnostic laboratory, 1990–2022. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 35, 153–162 (2023).
    pmc: PMC9999402pubmed: 36744759
  59. Van Loo H. Retrospective study of factors associated with bovine infectious abortion and perinatal mortality. Prev. Vet. Med. .
  60. Pascottini O B. Perspectives in cattle reproduction for the next 20 years – A European context. Theriogenology 233, 8–23 (2025).
    pubmed: 39577272
  61. Cappelli K. Detection of Equus caballus papillomavirus type-2 in asymptomatic Italian horses. Viruses 14, 1696 (2022).
    pmc: PMC9412442pubmed: 36016317doi: 10.3390/v14081696google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.