Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2023; doi: 10.1111/evj.14001

Digitalisation in pre-purchase examination and prospects for an equine health database in Germany-Results of an online survey among equine veterinarians.

Abstract: Digital recording and storage of health data are becoming increasingly important in the fields of both human and veterinary medicine. There is currently a lack of information on the level of digitalisation among equine veterinarians in Germany and their attitudes towards advanced digitalisation. Objective: To collect opinions of equine veterinarians about (1) digital data collection in pre-purchase examinations (PPEs), and (2) the establishment of an equine health database in Germany. Methods: Cross-sectional survey. Methods: An online survey was developed and distributed via email exclusively to equine veterinarians in Germany. After 40 days of data collection, answers were used for descriptive statistical analyses. Results: The survey was sent to 1055 recipients, of which 147 (13.9%) participated and 130 survey responses from equine veterinarians could be used for analyses. Most respondents were working in an equine practice (77.9%) and performing PPEs (93.8%), for which they mostly used printed protocols (86.0%). The PPE protocol of the German Equine Veterinary Association as a paper print was the format most frequently used (47.1%). The majority of participating equine veterinarians (90.2%) would use a digital protocol for PPEs if available. Concerns were expressed about user-friendliness (55.9%) and integration into the daily veterinary routine (54.6%). Regarding the establishment of an equine health database, 72.3% of the respondents stated they would appreciate it. However, about one-third would support such a development only under certain conditions: guaranteed data safety, collection of objective data or involving the opinion of other stakeholders. Conclusions: Low response rate, potential non-response bias and wide range of question topics. Conclusions: A positive attitude towards digital PPEs and an equine health database in Germany became apparent. To facilitate further progress, it would be crucial to consider the concerns and conditions identified in this study to generate maximum compliance. Unassigned: Digitale Erfassung und Speicherung von Gesundheitsdaten gewinnen sowohl in Human- als auch der Tiermedizin an Wichtigkeit. Derzeit existiert ein Informationsdefizit bezüglich des Digitalisierungsstandes bei deutschen Pferdetierärzt*innen sowie deren Einstellung zu fortschrittlicher Digitalisierung. Unassigned: Die Meinungserfassung von Pferdetierärzt*innen in Bezug auf (1) digitale Datenerfassung bei Kaufuntersuchungen und (2) die Etablierung einer Gesundheitsdatenbank für Pferde in Deutschland. Methods: Querschnittsumfrage. Methods: Eine Onlineumfrage wurde erstellt und per E-Mail an Pferdetierärzt*innen in Deutschland verschickt. Nach 40-tägiger Datensammlung wurden die Antworten deskriptiv analysiert. Unassigned: Die Umfrage wurde an 1055 Empfänger*innen gesendet, von denen 147 (13.9%) teilnahmen. Davon konnten 130 Antworten der Pferdetierärzt*innen für die Auswertung verwendet werden. Die meisten Teilnehmer arbeiteten in einer Pferdepraxis (77.9%) und führten Kaufuntersuchungen durch (93.8%), für welche überwiegend gedruckte Protokolle verwendet wurden (86.0%). Das gedruckte Kaufuntersuchungsprotokoll der Gesellschaft für Pferdemedizin wurde am häufigsten verwendet (47.1%). Die Mehrzahl der praktizierenden Tierärzt*innen (90.2%) würde ein digitales Protokoll für Kaufuntersuchungen verwenden, sollte es verfügbar sein. Zweifel wurden in Hinblick auf die Benutzerfreundlichkeit (55.9%) und die Integration in den tiermedizinischen Alltag (54.6%) geäußert. In Bezug auf die Etablierung einer Gesundheitsdatenbank für Pferde erklärten 72.3%, dass sie dies begrüßen würden. Allerdings würde circa ein Drittel solch eine Entwicklung nur unter folgenden Bedingungen unterstützen: bei garantierter Datensicherheit, Sammlung objektiver Daten oder unter Einbeziehung von Meinungen anderer Interessenvertreter. HAUPTEINSCHRÄNKUNGEN: Geringe Antwortrate, potenzielle Schweigeverzerrung und große Bandbreite an Fragethemen. Unassigned: Insgesamt zeichnete sich eine positive Einstellung gegenüber der digitalen Kaufuntersuchung und einer Gesundheitsdatenbank für Pferde in Deutschland ab. Zur Förderung weiteren Fortschritts wäre es wichtig, die in dieser Studie bezeichneten Bedenken und Konditionen zu berücksichtigen, um größtmögliche Akzeptanz zu erreichen.
Publication Date: 2023-09-12 PubMed ID: 37699747DOI: 10.1111/evj.14001Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study samples opinions of equine veterinarians in Germany on the adoption of digital data collection in pre-purchase examinations (PPEs), and the establishment of an equine health database. Results show a positive attitude towards digitalisation coupled with concerns about the technology’s user-friendliness and integration into daily practices.

Methodology

  • An online survey was specially designed and circulated via email to equine veterinarians in Germany.
  • After a period of 40 days set for data collection, the responses obtained were subsequently analysed descriptively.

Survey Results

  • Of the 1055 recipients targeted for the survey, a total of 147 (13.9%) actively participated, yielding 130 valid responses from equine veterinarians which were used for analysis.
  • Most respondents (77.9%) worked in an equine practice and were involved in PPEs (93.8%), with a preference for printed protocols (86.0%).
  • The PPE protocol of the German Equine Veterinary Association in paper print was the most frequently used (47.1%).
  • A majority (90.2%) indicated that they would willingly adopt a digital protocol for PPEs if it were available.
  • There were however doubts about the user-friendliness (55.9%) and compatibility with daily veterinary routine (54.6%).

Attitude Towards Equine Health Database

  • When asked about the establishment of an equine health database, 72.3% of the respondents expressed approval.
  • About a third displayed conditional support which hinged on factors such as: guarantee of data safety, collection of objective data, and the inclusion of opinions from other stakeholders.

Conclusion

  • Despite a low response rate and potential non-response bias, the results of this survey revealed a general positive disposition towards digital PPEs and equine health database in Germany.
  • The study however stressed on the need to address identified concerns and conditions in order to increase acceptability and compliance.

Cite This Article

APA
Folgmann MS, Kleinsorgen C, Stock KF, Meister D, Hellige M, Feige K, Delling U. (2023). Digitalisation in pre-purchase examination and prospects for an equine health database in Germany-Results of an online survey among equine veterinarians. Equine Vet J. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14001

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Folgmann, Muriel Sarah
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Kleinsorgen, Christin
  • Center for E-Learning, Didactics and Educational Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Stock, Kathrin Friederike
  • IT Solutions for Animal Production, Verden, Germany.
Meister, Daniel
  • Equine Medical Center Stephansmühle, Hipoltstein, Germany.
Hellige, Maren
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Feige, Karsten
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Delling, Uta
  • Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

Grant Funding

  • H. Wilhelm Schaumann Stiftung

References

This article includes 33 references
  1. Kretschmer I. Digitalisierung aller Lebensbereiche. Digitalisierung als Chancengeber: Wie KI, 3D-Druck, Virtual Reality und Co neue berufliche Perspektiven eröffnen.. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2020. p. 7-9.
  2. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG). Die elektronische Patientenakte (ePA). 2021.
  3. Deutsche Reiterliche Vereinigung e.V. (FN). Annual Report 2021. 2021.
  4. Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung Landwirtschaft und Forsten (StMELF). Equiden-Datenbank. Kennzeichnung und Registrierung von Equiden. .
  5. Gesellschaft für Pferdemedizin (GPM). Kaufuntersuchung [digital]. 2022.
  6. Stock KF, Sarnowski S, Ahlswede L, Merz A, Boening K-J, Dohms-Warnecke T. Gesundheitsmerkmale in der Pferdezucht - Perspektiven der gemeinsamen Initiative von Tierärzteschaft und Pferdezucht zur Verbesserung der Pferdegesundheit. Praktische Tierarzt 2014;95:828-831.
  7. Deutsche Reiterliche Vereinigung e.V. (FN). FN-Jahrestagung: Gesundheitsdatenbank für Pferde. 2014.
  8. Stock KF. Gemeinsamer Einsatz für die Pferde-Gesundheit: Start der Datenerfassung für die zentrale Gesundheitsdatenbank für Pferde. 2016.
  9. Vereinigte Informationssysteme Tierhaltung w.V. (vit). serv.it VET - Hintergrundinformationen zur zentralen Gesundheitsdatenbank für Pferde. 2018.
  10. Stock KF, Wobbe M, Reents R. Gesundheitsdatenbank für Pferde - Stand und Perspektiven. EQUITAG 2017 - Spezialseminar für Zucht, Haltung und Bewertung von Pferden Göttingen 2017.
  11. Mair TS, White NA II. The creation of an international audit and database of equine colic surgery: survey of attitudes of surgeons. Equine Vet J 2008;40:400-404.
  12. Mair TS, White NA. Improving quality of care in colic surgery: time for international audit?. Equine Vet J 2005;37:287-288.
  13. Vanderman KS, Dreschel NA, Swinker AM, Kniffen D. Equine veterinarians' and health care professionals' concerns related to the implementation of the national equine identification system. J Equine Vet 2009;29:823-827.
  14. Vanderman KS, Swinker AM, Gill BE, Radhakrishna RB, Kniffen DM, Stanier WB. Survey on the implementation of national equine identification in the United States. J Equine Vet 2009;29:819-822.
  15. Hartig W, Houe H, Andersen PH. Monitoring of equine health in Denmark: a survey of the attitudes and concerns of potential database participants. Prev Vet Med 2013;109:83-91.
  16. Hartig W, Houe H, Andersen PH. Monitoring of equine health in Denmark: the importance, purpose, research areas and content of a future database. Prev Vet Med 2013;109:92-105.
  17. Lenzner T, Menold N. Frageformulierung (Version 1.1). DEU, Mannheim: Germany, Europe; 2018.
  18. Mayring P. Qualitative inhalts analyse; Qualitative content analysis; Análisis de contenido cualitativo. Forum Qual Sozialforschung/Qual Soc Res 2000;1:2.
  19. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277-1288.
  20. Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur (BMVI). Aktuelle Breitbandverfügbarkeit in Deutschland. 2021.
  21. European Commission. Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2021 - Germany. 2021.
  22. Deutsche Reiterliche Vereinigung e.V. (FN). Gendefekte und genetische Besonderheiten bei Zuchtpferden und -ponys. 2022.
  23. Denoix JM, Jeffcott LB, McIlwraith CW, van Weeren PR. A review of terminology for equine juvenile osteochondral conditions (JOCC) based on anatomical and functional considerations. Vet J 2013;197:29-35.
  24. Teyssèdre S, Dupuis MC, Guérin G, Schibler L, Denoix JM, Elsen JM. Genome-wide association studies for osteochondrosis in French Trotter horses. J Anim Sci 2012;90:45-53.
  25. van Grevenhof EM, Schurink A, Ducro BJ, van Weeren PR, van Tartwijk JMFM, Bijma P. Genetic variables of various manifestations of osteochondrosis and their correlations between and within joints in Dutch warmblood horses. J Anim Sci 2009;87:1906-1912.
  26. Büttgen L, Geibel J, Simianer H, Pook T. Simulation study on the integration of health traits in horse breeding programs. Animals (Basel) 2020;10(7):1153.
  27. KWPN. DNA-predicate osteochondrosis (D-OC) - Genomic breeding value OC. 2016.
  28. Stock KF, Wobbe M, Häusler M, Alkhoder H, Nolte W, Kühn C. Infrastructure for routine implementation of genomically enhanced applications for horse breeding in Germany. Züchtungskunde 2022;94:321-329.
  29. Stock KF, Sarnowski S, Kalm E, Reents R. Systematization of recording and use of equine health data and its potential for horse breeding. 65th Annual Meeting of the EAAP Copenhagen 2014.
  30. Fosnacht K, Sarraf S, Howe E, Peck LK. How important are high response rates for college surveys?. Review High Ed 2017;40:245-265.
  31. Wu M-J, Zhao K, Fils-Aime F. Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Comp Hum Behav Rep 2022;7:100206.
  32. Kromrey H, Roose J, Strübing J. Empirische Sozialforschung: Modelle und Methoden der standardisierten Datenerhebung und Datenauswertung. utb GmbH: Stuttgart; 2016.
  33. Bundestierärztekammer e.V.. Tierärztestatistik 2021 - Zusammenstellung der Daten aus den Landes-/Tierärztekammern. 2022.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.