Direct current stimulation of bone production in the horse: preliminary study with a “gap healing” model.
Abstract: The effect of a 20-microA direct-current implantable bone growth stimulator (BGS) on bone production with a "gap healing" model in the horse was evaluated. The right and left 4th metatarsal bones (Mt-4) were used in 7 adult horses to create the "gap healing" model. A 4-mm section of the Mt-4 bone was resected bilaterally in each horse. The BGS was surgically placed into the 7 left Mt-4 defects. The 7 right Mt-4 defects served as controls. Six horses survived the 16-week experimental period. Signs of pain, decreased range of limb motion, or lameness was not observed in any animal during the 16 weeks. None of the animals showed complete healing radiographically. Four stimulated sites showed less periosteal reaction and 2 showed greater reaction than the 6 controls. The greatest amount of periosteal reaction or bone resorption was seen around the screws and plates in both groups. Uptakes of 99mTc-MDP in counts/pixel for control sites and stimulated sites were 7.90 and 8.25 in the "gap defect" and 5.19 and 5.06 in the areas adjacent to the gap defect. The ratio of uptake between the gap defect and adjacent area was 1.5 and 1.58 respectively. Biocompatability of the BGS was excellent; however, 1 horse had a broken cathode wire 5 cm from the generator capsule at 6 weeks. All polyethylene cathode sheaths were fluid filled at 16 weeks. The average mineralization rates were 1.57 +/- 0.34, 1.71 +/- 0.28 mm/day and bone formation activity was 0.0182 +/- 0.171, and 0.0168 +/- 0.0149 mm2/day for control limbs and stimulated limbs, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in any of the histomorphometric values measured. Direct current (20 microA) did not increase bone production in this experiment. Methods to objectively evaluate electrically induced osteogenesis and a "gap defect" model for BGS research on the horse are discussed. The results provide a basis for additional research on electrical stimulation of fractures in the horse and for dose-response studies.
Publication Date: 1985-03-01 PubMed ID: 3873190
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This study investigated the impact of a 20-microA direct-current (DC) bone growth stimulator (BGS) on healing gaps in horse bones. The results suggested that the method did not significantly enhance bone production, paving the way for further research into electrical stimulation techniques for promoting bone healing in horses.
Study Design
- The study took place using seven adult horses. The researchers created a “gap healing” model using the right and left 4th metatarsal bones (Mt-4) of each horse. A 4-mm section of the Mt-4 bone was surgically removed (reseected) on each side.
- The researchers then surgically implanted the BGS into the left Mt-4 defects, leaving the right MT-4 defects as control sites.
- The study lasted for 16 weeks, with six of the seven horses surviving the full duration of the experimental period.
Observations and Findings
- Throughout the 16 weeks, none of the horses showed signs of pain, decreased range of limb motion, or lameness. This suggests that the BGS did not cause any observable adverse health effects.
- Direct current (20 microA) did not increase bone production. Although none of the animals showed complete healing radiographically, four of the stimulated sites showed less periosteal reaction (bone inflammation) and two showed greater reaction than the control sites.
- The bone resorption (breakdown and absorption into the blood) was primarily seen around the screws and plates implanted in both groups.
- The BGS proved excellent biocompatibility, indicating it was well-tolerated by the biological systems of the horses. However, there was one instance of a broken cathode wire in a horse, and all polyethylene cathode sheaths were found to be fluid-filled at the end of 16 weeks.
- There was no significant difference between the control limbs and the limbs with implanted BGS in terms of the histomorphometric values measured. These included mineralization rates and bone formation activity.
Conclusions and Future Directions
- The results suggested that the direct current BGS does not significantly increase bone production in horses.
- However, the findings provide a useful starting point for future research on the effectiveness of electrical stimulation for treating fractures in horses and for exploring potential dose-response relationships.
Cite This Article
APA
Collier MA, Brighton CT, Norrdin R, Twardock AR, Rendano VT.
(1985).
Direct current stimulation of bone production in the horse: preliminary study with a “gap healing” model.
Am J Vet Res, 46(3), 610-621.
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Disease Models, Animal
- Electric Stimulation Therapy / instrumentation
- Electric Stimulation Therapy / methods
- Electric Stimulation Therapy / veterinary
- Female
- Fracture Fixation, Internal / veterinary
- Fractures, Bone / surgery
- Fractures, Bone / therapy
- Fractures, Bone / veterinary
- Horse Diseases / surgery
- Horse Diseases / therapy
- Horses
- Male
- Metacarpus / diagnostic imaging
- Metacarpus / injuries
- Osteogenesis
- Osteotomy / veterinary
- Radiography
- Radionuclide Imaging
- Wound Healing
Citations
This article has been cited 1 times.- Gigliuto C, De Gregori M, Malafoglia V, Raffaeli W, Compagnone C, Visai L, Petrini P, Avanzini MA, Muscoli C, Viganò J, Calabrese F, Dominioni T, Allegri M, Cobianchi L. Pain assessment in animal models: do we need further studies?. J Pain Res 2014;7:227-36.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists