FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Vet Med Sci / Do tight nosebands have an effect on the upper airways of ho...
Veterinary medicine and science2024; 10(4); e1478; doi: 10.1002/vms3.1478

Do tight nosebands have an effect on the upper airways of horses?

Abstract: The public perception relating to the welfare of horses involved with equestrian sports is associated with training methods used and the presentation of horses at events. In this context, very tight nosebands, which are intended to prevent the horse from opening its mouth, also attract a lot of attention. Various studies have evaluated the impact of tight nosebands on stress parameters, whereas the effect of tight nosebands on upper airway function is unknown. Therefore, the aim of the study was to use overground endoscopy to evaluate changes in pharyngeal and laryngeal function when a tight noseband is fitted. Moreover, the ridden horse pain ethogram (RHpE) was applied to investigate signs of discomfort (Dyson et al., 2018). A randomized, blinded, and prospective study was performed. Sixteen warmblood horses consisting of twelve mares and four geldings with a mean age of 11.63 ± 3.53 years were ridden on 2 consecutive days with either loose or tight nosebands (two fingers or no space between bridge of the nose and noseband, respectively) and inserted endoscope in a random order. Videos were taken in a riding arena during a standardized exercise protocol involving beginner level tasks for 30 min in all gaits. For video analysis, freeze frames were prepared and analyzed at the beginning of the expiration phase. Pharyngeal diameter was measured using the pharynx-epiglottis ratio. Other findings (swallowing, pharyngeal collapse, soft palate movements, and secretion) were also evaluated. Moreover, the RHpE was applied. Descriptive statistics and generalized linear mixed effects models were used. Results with a p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. While the pharynx-epiglottis ratio did not change significantly in horses ridden with loose versus tight nosebands, there was an increase in mean grade and total counts of parameters assessed in the pharyngeal region, for example, grade of secretion (1.5 [±SD 0.89] vs. 3.13 [±SD 0.96]; p = 0.0001), axial deviation of the aryepiglottic folds (0.29 [±SD 0.73] vs. 1.33 [±SD 1.44]; p = 0.01), and pharyngeal collapse (0.69 [±SD 0.87] vs. 1.88 [±SD 1.54]; p = 0.005) in horses ridden with tight nosebands. There was no RHpE score above 8 indicating musculoskeletal pain, but the RHpE scores were significantly higher in horses ridden with tight nosebands (p < 0.001). Video quality was limited when horses showed large amounts of secretion. Another limitation was the small number of horses. Results add to the evidence obtained in other studies that tight nosebands do not only cause adverse reactions based on the RHpE score such as head behind the vertical or intense staring but also contribute to changes in the pharyngeal region, such as increased secretion and collapse of pharyngeal structures. This may provide further support for future decisions regarding regulations on nosebands.
© 2024 The Author(s). Veterinary Medicine and Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-06-17 PubMed ID: 38885311PubMed Central: PMC11182419DOI: 10.1002/vms3.1478Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates the impact of tight nosebands on the upper airway function of horses, and whether this causes discomfort or negatively affects their health and performance.

Objective and Methodology of the Study

  • The study was aimed at assessing whether the use of tight nosebands impacts the upper respiratory function in horses. It specifically examined changes in pharyngeal and laryngeal function and evaluated signs of discomfort using the ridden horse pain ethogram (RHpE).
  • The research followed a randomized, blinded, and prospective study design, involving sixteen warmblood horses.
  • The horses were ridden over two consecutive days with either loose or tight nosebands and inserted endoscope in a random order for overground endoscopy.
  • Videos of each horse were created during a regulated exercise protocol and subsequently analyzed. Pharyngeal diameter, swallowing, pharyngeal collapse, and other parameters were evaluated.

Key Findings

  • The study found that while the pharynx-epiglottis ratio did not change drastically between horses ridden with loose versus tight nosebands, there were notable variations in other parameters in the pharyngeal region.
  • Specifically, there was a noted increase in grade of secretion, axial deviation of the aryepiglottic folds, and pharyngeal collapse in horses fitted with tight nosebands.
  • Although there was no RHpE score (a scale assessing signs of discomfort or pain) above 8, signifying musculoskeletal pain, the RHpE scores were significantly higher in horses with tight nosebands, indicating discomfort.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The video quality was affected when horses showed large amounts of secretion, limiting the scope of the study. Additionally, the small number of horses involved may limit the general applicability of the results.
  • Despite these limitations, the research adds to the evidence suggesting that tight nosebands cause not only discomfort as shown by the higher RHpE scores, but also changes in the pharyngeal region such as increased secretion and collapse of pharyngeal structures.
  • This research might influence future decisions about the use and regulation of nosebands in equestrian sports and could potentially improve the welfare of horses involved.

Cite This Article

APA
Scholler D, Wittenberg J, Zablotski Y, May A. (2024). Do tight nosebands have an effect on the upper airways of horses? Vet Med Sci, 10(4), e1478. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1478

Publication

Veterinary medicine and science
ISSN: 2053-1095
NlmUniqueID: 101678837
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 4
Pages: e1478

Researcher Affiliations

Scholler, Dominik
  • Equine Clinic of Ludwig Maximilians University, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Wittenberg, Jana
  • Equine Clinic of Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Zablotski, Yury
  • Clinic for Ruminants, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
May, Anna
  • Equine Clinic of Ludwig Maximilians University, Oberschleissheim, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Female
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pharynx / physiology
  • Nose / physiology
  • Larynx / physiology
  • Physical Conditioning, Animal / physiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 58 references
  1. Ahern T. Mouth opening during ridden exercise in sports horses: An evasive behaviour, an Indication of pain or discomfort or a physical adjustment to facilitate the oral passage of air during inspiratory efforts. World 7, 10–13.
  2. Ahern T. The modified oral plalatopharyngoplasty or modified Ahern procedure. World Journal of Veterinary 6, 33–37.
  3. Ashley FH, Waterman‐Pearson AE, Whay HR. Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: Application to clinical practice and future studies. Equine Veterinary Journal 37, 565–575.
    pubmed: 16295937
  4. Barton AK, Troppenz A, Klaus D, Lindenberg I, Merle R, Gehlen H. Tongue ties do not widen the upper airways in racehorses. Equine Veterinary Journal 55, 642–648.
    pubmed: 36102425
  5. Boyle AG, Martin BB, Davidson EJ, Durando MM, Birks EK. Dynamic pharyngeal collapse in racehorses. Equine Veterinary Journal. Supplement 38, 546–550.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05602.xpubmed: 17402481google scholar: lookup
  6. Casey V, Mcgreevy PD, O'muiris E, Doherty O. A preliminary report on estimating the pressures exerted by a crank noseband in the horse. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 8, 479–484.
  7. Cehak A, Rohn K, Barton AK, Stadler P, Ohnesorge B. Effect of head and neck position on pharyngeal diameter in horses. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 51, 491–497.
    pubmed: 20973380
  8. Clayton HM, Williams JM. Know your noseband: An exploration of factors that influence riders’ choice of noseband. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 47, 1–11.
  9. Crago F, Shea G, James O, Schemann K, Mcgreevy PD. An opportunistic pilot study of radiographs of equine nasal bones at the usual site of nosebands. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 29, 70–76.
  10. Doherty O. An investigation into the oro‐nasal pressures used in the control of the ridden horse [Unpublished thesis]. University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  11. Doherty O, Casey V, Mcgreevy P, Arkins S. Noseband use in equestrian sports—An international study. PLoS One 12, e0169060.
    pmc: PMC5207535pubmed: 28045961
  12. Doherty O, Casey V, McGreevy P, Arkins S. An investigation into noseband tightness levels on competition horses. .
  13. Doherty O, Conway T, Conway R, Murray G, Casey V. An objective measure of noseband tightness and its measurement using a novel digital tightness gauge. PLoS One 12, e0168996.
    pmc: PMC5207410pubmed: 28045955
  14. Duke D. The effects of a variation in noseband tightness on the rein tension of the ridden horse. University of Plymouth.
  15. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of a ridden horse pain ethogram and its relationship with gait in a convenience sample of 60 riding horses. Animals 10(6), 1044.
    pmc: PMC7341225pubmed: 32560486
  16. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of the ridden horse pain ethogram to horses competing at the Hickstead‐Rotterdam Grand Prix Challenge and the British Dressage Grand Prix National Championship 2020 and comparison with World Cup Grand Prix competitions. Animals 11(6), 1820.
    pmc: PMC8235099pubmed: 34207251
  17. Dyson S, Ellis AD. Application of a Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram to horses competing at 5‐star three‐day‐events: Comparison with performance. Equine Veterinary Education 34, 306–315.
  18. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of the ridden horse pain ethogram to elite dressage horses competing in World Cup Grand Prix competitions. Animals 11(5), 1187.
    pmc: PMC8143096pubmed: 33919208
  19. Dyson S, Pollard D. Application of the ridden horse pain ethogram to horses competing in British Eventing 90, 100 and Novice one‐day events and comparison with performance. Animals 12(5), 590.
    pmc: PMC8909886pubmed: 35268159
  20. Dyson S, Berger J, Ellis AD, Mullard J. Development of an ethogram for a pain scoring system in ridden horses and its application to determine the presence of musculoskeletal pain. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 23, 47–57.
  21. Engelke E, Gasse H. An anatomical study of the rostral part of the equine oral cavity with respect to position and size of a snaffle bit. Equine Veterinary Education 15, 158–163.
  22. FEI Inside. FEI Guidelines on use of tack, equipment and dress (2023). Inside.FEI 2023.
  23. Fenner K, Yoon S, White P, Starling M, Mcgreevy P. The effect of noseband tightening on horses' behavior, eye temperature, and cardiac responses. PLoS One 11, e0154179.
    pmc: PMC4854461pubmed: 27140187
  24. Franklin SH. Dynamic collapse of the upper respiratory tract: A review. Equine Veterinary Education 20(4), 212–224.
  25. Franklin SH, Allen KJ. Assessment of dynamic upper respiratory tract function in the equine athlete. Equine Veterinary Education 29(2), 92–103.
  26. Franklin SH, Naylor JRJ, Lane JG. Videoendoscopic evaluation of the upper respiratory tract in 93 sport horses during exercise testing on a high‐speed treadmill. Equine Veterinary Journal. Supplement 36, 540–545.
    pubmed: 17402480
  27. Freire R, Buckley P, Cooper JJ. Effects of different forms of exercise on post inhibitory rebound and unwanted behaviour in stabled horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 41, 487–492.
    pubmed: 19642410
  28. Go L‐M, Barton AK, Ohnesorge B. Pharyngeal diameter in various head and neck positions during exercise in sport horses. BMC Veterinary Research 10, 1–9.
    pmc: PMC4057621pubmed: 24886465
  29. Hall C, Goodwin D, Heleski C, Randle H, Waran N. Is there evidence of learned helplessness in horses?. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 11(3), 249–266.
    pubmed: 18569222
  30. Hall C, Huws N, White C, Taylor E, Owen H, Mcgreevy P. Assessment of ridden horse behavior. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 8, 62–73.
  31. Hanche‐Olsen S, Rannem L, Strand E. Bilateral dynamic laryngeal collapse associated with collection in high poll flexion in a gaited Icelandic horse. Pferdeheilkd 26, 810–813.
  32. Kienapfel K, Preuschoft H. Much too tight! On the effects of nosebands. Pferdeheilkunde 26, 178–185.
  33. Ladewig J, Mclean AN, Wilkins CL, Fenner K, Christensen JW, Mcgreevy PD. A review of the ridden horse pain ethogram and its potential to improve ridden horse welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 54, 54–61.
  34. Lane JG, Bladon B, Little DRM, Naylor JRJ, Franklin SH. Dynamic obstructions of the equine upper respiratory tract. Part 1: Observations during high‐speed treadmill endoscopy in 600 thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Veterinary Journal 38, 393–399.
    pubmed: 16986598
  35. Manfredi JM, Rosenstein D, Lanovaz JL, Nauwelaerts S, Clayton HM. Fluoroscopic study of oral behaviours in response to the presence of a bit and the effects of rein tension. Comparative Exercise Physiology 6, 143–148.
  36. Martin BB, Reef VB, Parente EJ, Sage AD. Causes of poor performance of horses during training, racing, or showing: 348 Cases (1992‐1996). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 216, 554–558.
    pubmed: 10687012
  37. McGreevy P. Right under our noses. Equine Veterinary Education 27, 503–504.
  38. Mcgreevy P, Warren‐Smith A, Guisard Y. The effect of double bridles and jaw‐clamping crank nosebands on temperature of eyes and facial skin of horses. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 7, 142–148.
  39. Mclean AN, Mcgreevy PD. Horse‐training techniques that may defy the principles of learning theory and compromise welfare. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 5, 187–195.
  40. Merkies K, Copelin C, Small N, Young J. Noseband fit: Measurements and perceptions of Canadian equestrians. Animals 12(19), 2685.
    pmc: PMC9559623pubmed: 36230425
  41. Nicol CJ. Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction. Animal Behaviour 35, 1709–1719.
  42. Pérez‐Manrique L, León‐Pérez K, Zamora‐Sánchez E, Davies S, Ober C, Wilson B, Mcgreevy P. Prevalence and distribution of lesions in the nasal bones and mandibles of a sample of 144 riding horses. Animals 10(9), 1661.
    pmc: PMC7552251pubmed: 32947819
  43. Perruccio F, Scofield R. A preliminary investigation into noseband tightness and oral soft tissue damage in elite and non‐elite horses [Unpublished dissertation]. Oxford Brooks University, Oxford, UK.
  44. Petsche VM, Derksen FJ, Berney CE, Robinson NE. Effect of head position on upper airway function in exercising horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 27, 18–22.
  45. Pollock PJ, Reardon RJM. Dynamic respiratory endoscopy without a treadmill: Initial experiences. Equine Veterinary Education 21, 367–370.
  46. Rehder RS, Ducharme NG, Hackett RP, Nielan GJ. Measurement of upper airway pressures in exercising horses with dorsal displacements of the soft palate. American Journal of Veterinary Research 56(3), 269–274.
    pubmed: 7771690
  47. Rietmann TR, Stuart AEA, Bernasconi P, Staﾬher M, Auer JA, Weishaupt MA. Assessment of mental stress in warmblood horses: Heart rate variability in comparison to heart rate and selected behavioural parameters. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 88, 121–136.
  48. Scholler D, Zablotski Y, May A. Evaluation of substance P as a new stress parameter in horses in a stress model involving four different stress levels. Animals (Basel) 13.
    pmc: PMC10093602pubmed: 37048398
  49. Strand E, Fjordbakk CT, Holcombe SJ, Risberg A, Chalmers HJ. Effect of poll flexion and dynamic laryngeal collapse on tracheal pressure in Norwegian Coldblooded Trotter racehorses. Equine Veterinary Journal 41, 59–64.
    pubmed: 19301583
  50. Tamzali Y, Serraud N, Baup B. How to perform endoscopy during exercise without a treadmill. American Association of Equine Practitioners .
  51. Tan RHH, Dowling BA, Dart AJ. High‐speed treadmill video‐endoscopic examination of the upper respiratory tract in the horse: The results of 291 clinical cases. Veterinary Journal 170, 243–248.
    pubmed: 16129344
  52. Tilley P, Simões J, Sales Luis JP. Effects of a 15° variation in poll flexion during riding on the respiratory systems and behaviour of high‐level dressage and show‐jumping horses. Animals 13, 1714.
    pmc: PMC10215520pubmed: 37238147
  53. Uldahl M, Clayton HM. Lesions associated with the use of bits, nosebands, spurs and whips in Danish competition horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 51, 154–162.
    pubmed: 29502345
  54. Valera M, Bartolomé E, Sánchez MJ, Molina A, Cook N, Schaefer A. Changes in eye temperature and stress assessment in horses during show jumping competitions. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 32, 827–830.
  55. Van Erck E. Dynamic respiratory videoendoscopy in ridden sport horses: Effect of head flexion, riding and airway inflammation in 129 cases. Equine Veterinary Journal 43, 18–50.
    pubmed: 22082441
  56. Visser EK, Kuypers MMF, Stam JSM, Riedstra B. Practice of noseband use and intentions towards behavioural change in Dutch equestrians. Animals 9(12), 1131.
    pmc: PMC6940946pubmed: 31842468
  57. Weller D, Franklin S, Shea G, White P, Fenner K, Wilson B, Wilkins C, Mcgreevy P. The reported use of nosebands in racing and equestrian pursuits. Animals 10(5), 776.
    pmc: PMC7278451pubmed: 32365844
  58. Zebisch A, May A, Reese S, Gehlen H. Effects of different head–neck positions on the larynges of ridden horses. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 98, 894–900.
    pubmed: 24329611

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,001 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.