Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2007; 68(9); 946-952; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.9.946

Dorsolateral approach for arthrocentesis of the centrodistal joint in horses.

Abstract: To develop a dorsolateral approach to the centrodistal (distal intertarsal) joint in horses and compare its success rate with that of the traditional medial approach in that joint. Methods: 25 cadaveric equine hind limbs, ultrasonographic images, and radiographic views of the tarsal region of 5 and 59 healthy horses, respectively, and 22 horses with a clinical indication for centrodistal joint centesis. Methods: The dorsolateral approach was established anatomically (3 cadaveric limbs), ultrasonographically (5 horses), and radiographically (59 horses). Centrodistal joint arthrocentesis was performed in 22 cadaveric hind limbs and 22 horses; the number of needle repositionings required for procedure completion via the medial (in vitro) and the dorsolateral approach (in vitro and in vivo) was determined. Results: For the dorsolateral approach to the centrodistal joint, the injection site was 2 to 3 mm lateral to the long digital extensor tendon and 6 to 8 mm proximal to a line drawn perpendicular to the axis of the third metatarsal bone through the proximal end of the fourth metatarsal bone. The needle was directed plantaromedially (angle of approx 70 degrees from the sagittal plane). The number of needle repositionings required to complete centrodistal joint centesis via the dorsolateral and medial approaches was not significantly different. Conclusions: In a clinical setting, the dorsolateral approach to the centrodistal joint in horses appears to have some advantages over the traditional medial approach. The success rate of arthrocentesis was similar via either approach, and palpation of the anatomic landmarks was easy.
Publication Date: 2007-09-04 PubMed ID: 17764408DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.68.9.946Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores an approach to perform arthrocentesis (joint fluid aspiration) in horses through the dorsolateral part of the centrodistal joint. It compares this method’s success rate with the traditional medial technique, concluding that the dorsolateral approach has some advantages.

Research Methodology

  • The study was conducted using 25 equine hind limb cadavers, ultrasonographic imagery and radiographic views of the tarsal region from 5 and 59 healthy horses respectively. Additionally, 22 horses with a clinical requirement for centrodistal joint centesis were used for real-world application while developing the dorsolateral approach.
  • The dorsolateral approach was established anatomically using the cadavers, and further validated through ultrasonography and radiography.
  • The study also compared the number of needle repositionings required for procedure completion through both the traditional medial and the newly proposed dorsolateral approach.

Results

  • The ideal injection site for the dorsolateral approach is identified to be 2 to 3 mm lateral to the long digital extensor tendon and 6 to 8 mm proximal to a line perpendicular to the axis of the third metatarsal bone through the proximal end of the fourth metatarsal bone. The needle should be directed plantaromedially at an angle of approximately 70 degrees from the sagittal plane
  • The number of needle repositionings required to complete the centrodistal joint centesis via the dorsolateral and medial approaches was found to be statistically similar. This suggests that the efficacy of both approaches appears to be largely equivalent in this regard.

Conclusions

  • The dorsolateral approach showed some clinical advantages over the traditional medial approach, although the article does not specify what these advantages are.
  • The success rates of arthrocentesis via both approaches were similar, indicating the dorsolateral approach could be a viable alternative to the traditional medial method. Additionally, palpation of the anatomical landmarks was found to be easy, further supporting the practicality of this approach.

Cite This Article

APA
Just EM, Patan B, Licka TF. (2007). Dorsolateral approach for arthrocentesis of the centrodistal joint in horses. Am J Vet Res, 68(9), 946-952. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.68.9.946

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 68
Issue: 9
Pages: 946-952

Researcher Affiliations

Just, Elisabeth M
  • Clinic of Orthopaedics in Large Animals, Department of Horses and Small Animals, Vienna University of Veterinary Medicine, A-1210 Vienna, Austria.
Patan, Bianca
    Licka, Theresia F

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Arthrography / methods
      • Arthrography / veterinary
      • Female
      • Hindlimb / diagnostic imaging
      • Hindlimb / pathology
      • Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
      • Horse Diseases / pathology
      • Horse Diseases / surgery
      • Horses
      • Male
      • Osteoarthritis / diagnostic imaging
      • Osteoarthritis / pathology
      • Osteoarthritis / surgery
      • Osteoarthritis / veterinary
      • Paracentesis / methods
      • Paracentesis / veterinary
      • Synovial Fluid

      Citations

      This article has been cited 1 times.
      1. Al-Sobayil F, Sadan MA, El-Shafaey EA, Allouch J. Intra-articular injection in the hind limb joints of dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) using anatomical and arthrographic-guided landmarks.. Vet World 2021 Aug;14(8):2055-2063.