Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal. Supplement2011; (38); 688-694; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00196.x

Dynamic mobilisations in cervical flexion: Effects on intervertebral angulations.

Abstract: Based upon human data, it is probable that many conditions associated with neck pain in horses may benefit from performing mobilisation exercises as part of the rehabilitation protocol. Objective: To compare sagittal plane intervertebral angulations in a neutral standing position with the angulations at end range of motion in 3 dynamic mobility exercises performed in cervical flexion. Methods: Sagittal plane motion of the head, neck and back were measured in 8 sound horses standing in a neutral position and in 3 end-of-range neck flexion positions: chin-to-chest, chin-between-carpi, and chin-between-fore fetlocks. Skin markers on the head, transverse processes of C1-C6, and dorsal spinous processes of T6, T8, T10, T16, L2, L6, S2 and S4 were tracked and adjacent markers connected to form rigid segments. Intersegmental angles, measured between segments on the ventral surface, in the 4 positions were compared using repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests (P<0.05). Results: The largest angular differences involved the cranial and caudal cervical joints with smaller angular differences (<10°) in the mid-neck. The angle at C1 was significantly more extended for chin-between-carpi (98 ± 11°) and chin-between-fetlocks (132 ± 11°) than for the neutral position (86 ± 8°) or chin-to-chest (92 ± 8°) positions. The intersegmental angle at C6 indicated progressive lowering of the neck from neutral through chin-to-chest and chin-between-carpi to chin-between-fetlocks. The intersegmental angles from T6-L1 were more flexed by 3-7° in the cervical flexions compared with the neutral position with the differences being significant for at least one of the dynamic mobilisations at each vertebral level. Conclusions: The articulations at the extremities of the cervical vertebral column are primarily responsible for sagittal plane position and orientation of the head and neck. Dynamic cervical flexion also flexes the thoracic intervertebral joints. Conclusions: The results indicate that dynamic mobilisation exercises performed in cervical flexion have applications in mobilising the cervical and thoracic intervertebral joints, which may have some clinical applications in rehabilitation.
Publication Date: 2011-05-27 PubMed ID: 21059082DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00196.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the impact of dynamic mobilisation exercises on the angulations of the vertebral joints in horses, particularly targeting those in the neck. It concludes that the exercises were effective in modifying such angulations and might have potential benefits in horse rehabilitation protocols.

Research Methodology

  • This study involved eight healthy horses. Their head, neck, and back movements in the sagittal plane (imaginary vertical plane which divides the body into left and right sides), were observed under four different conditions.
  • The four conditions comprised a neutral standing position and three varying neck flexion positions. These flexion positions were chin-to-chest, chin-between-carpi (chin between the front knee joints), and chin-between-fetlocks (chin between the front ankles).
  • Markers were placed on the heads of the horses, extending to several points along the spine. These markers were used to form rigid segments, and angles between these segments were measured to determine the degree of flexion in each position.
  • These measurements were compared using repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc tests to determine the statistical significance of the differences observed.

Research Findings

  • The study found significant differences in the angular flexion of the vertebral joints at the top (cranial) and bottom (caudal) of the horses’ necks. Fewer and lesser differences were observed in the middle section of the neck.
  • Specifically, the angle at the C1 vertebra (the first cervical vertebra near the skull) was markedly more extended when the horses placed their chins between carpi and fetlocks than in neutral or chin-to-chest positions. Moreover, the angle at C6 (the sixth cervical vertebra) indicated a progressive neck lowering across the three flexions.
  • Interestingly, the angles from T6 to L1 (in the torso region of the horses) were also more flexed during the cervical flexion positions compared to the neutral position. The study noted that this change in flexion was significant for at least one of the dynamic mobilisations at each vertebral level.
  • This implies that dynamic mobilisation exercises do not just alter the angulations in the cervical (neck) vertebrae but also those situated along the horses’ back (thoracic vertebrae).

Conclusions

  • The articulations at the ends of the cervical vertebral column mainly determine the position and orientation of the head and neck in the sagittal plane. However, dynamic neck flexion also flexes the thoracic intervertebral joints.
  • The findings suggest potential clinical benefits of dynamic mobilisation exercises, especially in rehabilitating horses suffering from neck and back pain. These exercises seem to mobilise not just the cervical but also the thoracic intervertebral joints.

Cite This Article

APA
Clayton HM, Kaiser LJ, Lavagnino M, Stubbs NC. (2011). Dynamic mobilisations in cervical flexion: Effects on intervertebral angulations. Equine Vet J Suppl(38), 688-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00196.x

Publication

NlmUniqueID: 9614088
Country: United States
Language: English
Issue: 38
Pages: 688-694

Researcher Affiliations

Clayton, H M
  • Mary Anne McPhail Equine Performance Center, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, USA.
Kaiser, L J
    Lavagnino, M
      Stubbs, N C

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Biomechanical Phenomena
        • Cervical Vertebrae / physiology
        • Horses / physiology
        • Neck / physiology

        Citations

        This article has been cited 11 times.
        1. Saitua A, Pérez-Umbría J, García-Álamo K, Muñoz A. Dynamic Mobilization Exercises Improve Activity and Stride Parameters Measured with Accelerometry in Sedentary Horses. Animals (Basel) 2025 Oct 10;15(20).
          doi: 10.3390/ani15202943pubmed: 41153872google scholar: lookup
        2. Patricio CR, Winter GHZ, Garbade P. Spinal articular dysfunction is common in athletic horses. Equine Vet J 2025 Sep;57(5):1357-1362.
          doi: 10.1111/evj.14541pubmed: 40452204google scholar: lookup
        3. König von Borstel U, Kienapfel K, McLean A, Wilkins C, McGreevy P. Hyperflexing the horse's neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2024 Oct 2;14(1):22886.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72766-5pubmed: 39358404google scholar: lookup
        4. Maldonado MD, Parkinson SD, Story MR, Haussler KK. The Effect of Chiropractic Treatment on Limb Lameness and Concurrent Axial Skeleton Pain and Dysfunction in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 19;12(20).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12202845pubmed: 36290230google scholar: lookup
        5. Atalaia T, Prazeres J, Abrantes J, Clayton HM. Equine Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 22;11(6).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11061508pubmed: 34067449google scholar: lookup
        6. Story MR, Haussler KK, Nout-Lomas YS, Aboellail TA, Kawcak CE, Barrett MF, Frisbie DD, McIlwraith CW. Equine Cervical Pain and Dysfunction: Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 6;11(2).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11020422pubmed: 33562089google scholar: lookup
        7. Shakeshaft A, Tabor G. The Effect of a Physiotherapy Intervention on Thoracolumbar Posture in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 28;10(11).
          doi: 10.3390/ani10111977pubmed: 33126478google scholar: lookup
        8. Tabor G, Nankervis K, Fernandes J, Williams J. Generation of Domains for the Equine Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Outcome Score: Development by Expert Consensus. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jan 25;10(2).
          doi: 10.3390/ani10020203pubmed: 31991716google scholar: lookup
        9. Jones JC, Kimmett KL, Sharp JL, Sanders SR, Wilmoth TA. CT measures of lumbosacral paraspinal muscle size are not correlated with CT measures of lumbosacral stability in military working Labrador Retrievers. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2019 Sep;60(5):513-524.
          doi: 10.1111/vru.12775pubmed: 31155806google scholar: lookup
        10. Horseman SV, Buller H, Mullan S, Whay HR. Current Welfare Problems Facing Horses in Great Britain as Identified by Equine Stakeholders. PLoS One 2016;11(8):e0160269.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160269pubmed: 27501387google scholar: lookup
        11. Valentin S, Licka TF. Spinal Motion and Muscle Activity during Active Trunk Movements - Comparing Sheep and Humans Adopting Upright and Quadrupedal Postures. PLoS One 2016;11(1):e0146362.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146362pubmed: 26741136google scholar: lookup