FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Vet Intern Med / Dysbiosis is not present in horses with fecal water syndrome...
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2020; 34(4); 1614-1621; doi: 10.1111/jvim.15778

Dysbiosis is not present in horses with fecal water syndrome when compared to controls in spring and autumn.

Abstract: Fecal water syndrome (FWS) is long-standing and common in horses, particularly in central Europe. No large epidemiological data sets exist, and the cause remains elusive. Dysbiosis could play a role in pathogenesis. Objective: To evaluate whether dysbiosis is present in horses with FWS when compared to stable-matched control horses in spring and autumn. Methods: Fecal samples were collected from horses with FWS (n = 16; 9 mares, 7 geldings) and controls (n = 15; 8 mares, 7 geldings). Methods: The bacterial microbiome of samples collected in spring and autumn of 2016 was analyzed using high-throughput sequencing. Differences in relative abundance of bacterial taxa, alpha diversity, and beta diversity indices were assessed between horses with FWS and controls based on season. Results: Differences in microbial community composition based on time point and health status were not observed on any taxonomic level. Limited differences were seen on linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis. No difference in alpha diversity indices was observed including richness, diversity based on health status, or time point. No effect of health status on microbial community membership structure was observed. Conclusions: Limited differences were found in the bacterial microbiota of horses with and without FWS, regardless of season. Further research is needed to elucidate the role of microbiota in the development of FWS.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-06-26 PubMed ID: 32588473PubMed Central: PMC7379055DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15778Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates whether an imbalance of gut bacteria, known as dysbiosis, is a factor in a horse’s development of Fecal Water Syndrome (FWS), a common issue for horses in central Europe. The study found no significant differences in the bacterial microbiome between horses diagnosed with FWS and control horses, indicating that dysbiosis is not a characteristic feature of FWS.

Methods

In this study, the researchers collected fecal samples from two groups of horses:

  • 16 with Fecal Water Syndrome (9 mares and 7 geldings)
  • 15 without the syndrome which acted as the control group (8 mares and 7 geldings)

These samples were collected in spring and autumn of 2016 with the aim to understand whether there were differences in the bacterial microbiome according to season.

The bacterial composition of these samples was then analyzed using high-throughput sequencing, a method that allows for the simultaneous sequencing of a large number of DNA. This approach provided the researchers with detailed information regarding the different types of bacteria present in the horses’ guts and their relative abundances.

The study used various indices to evaluate the bacterial diversity inside the horse’s gut, including alpha diversity indices such as richness and diversity. The alpha diversity provides insights into the diversity within a particular area or ecosystem, and can be used for comparing the diversities of different ecosystems (in this case, the gut microbiomes of horses).

The other index used was the beta diversity indices, which measures the diversity between different communities or ecosystems, allowing for a comparison between the horse groups’ microbiomes.

Results

The study found that there were no significant differences in the horses’ bacterial microbiomes in relation to their health status (whether they had FWS or not) or the time of year the samples were collected.

Even though there were limited differences identified through linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis (a statistical approach used to identify features that are significantly different between biological classes), the researchers found no effect of health status on the microbial community structure.

Conclusion

The research concluded that there were slight differences in the gut bacteria of horses with and without Fecal Water Syndrome. However, these differences were not substantial enough to indicate a dysbiosis or imbalance in the gut microbiome.

The study ends with the recommendation for further research to illuminate any potential role of the gut microbiota in the development of Fecal Water Syndrome. However, as per the study’s findings, dysbiosis does not appear to be a characteristic of FWS.

Cite This Article

APA
Schoster A, Weese JS, Gerber V, Nicole Graubner C. (2020). Dysbiosis is not present in horses with fecal water syndrome when compared to controls in spring and autumn. J Vet Intern Med, 34(4), 1614-1621. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15778

Publication

Journal of veterinary internal medicine
ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 34
Issue: 4
Pages: 1614-1621

Researcher Affiliations

Schoster, Angelika
  • University of Zurich, Equine Department, Zurich, Switzerland.
Weese, J Scott
  • University of Guelph, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Gerber, Vinzenz
  • Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Bern, Switzerland.
Nicole Graubner, Claudia
  • Equine Clinic - Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Berne, Switzerland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Bacteria / classification
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Diarrhea / etiology
  • Diarrhea / microbiology
  • Diarrhea / veterinary
  • Dysbiosis / veterinary
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Microbiome
  • Horse Diseases / etiology
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Seasons

Conflict of Interest Statement

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 37 references
  1. Ertelt A, Gehlen H. Free fecal water in the horse ‐ an unsolved problem.. Pferdeheilkunde 2015;31:261‐268.
  2. Kienzle E, Zehnder C, Pfister K, Gerhards H, Sauter‐Louis C, Harris P. Field study on risk factors for free fecal water in pleasure horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;44:32‐36.
  3. Costa MC, Weese JS. The equine intestinal microbiome.. Animal health research reviews/Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases 2012:1‐8.
  4. Costa MC, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Stämpfli HR, Kim PT, Sturgeon A, Weese JS. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses and horses with colitis by high throughput sequencing of the V3-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene.. PLoS One 2012;7(7):e41484.
    pmc: PMC3409227pubmed: 22859989doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041484google scholar: lookup
  5. Milinovich GJ, Trott DJ, Burrell PC, Croser EL, Al Jassim RA, Morton JM, van Eps AW, Pollitt CC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of hindgut bacteria associated with the development of equine laminitis.. Environ Microbiol 2007 Aug;9(8):2090-100.
    pubmed: 17635552doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01327.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  6. Steelman SM, Chowdhary BP, Dowd S, Suchodolski J, Janečka JE. Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes in fecal samples reveals high diversity of hindgut microflora in horses and potential links to chronic laminitis.. BMC Vet Res 2012 Nov 27;8:231.
    pmc: PMC3538718pubmed: 23186268doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-231google scholar: lookup
  7. Garrett LA, Brown R, Poxton IR. A comparative study of the intestinal microbiota of healthy horses and those suffering from equine grass sickness.. Vet Microbiol 2002 Jun 5;87(1):81-8.
    pubmed: 12079749doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00018-4google scholar: lookup
  8. Weese JS, Holcombe SJ, Embertson RM, Kurtz KA, Roessner HA, Jalali M, Wismer SE. Changes in the faecal microbiota of mares precede the development of post partum colic.. Equine Vet J 2015 Nov;47(6):641-9.
    pubmed: 25257320doi: 10.1111/evj.12361google scholar: lookup
  9. Kuhl J, Winterhoff N, Wulf M, Schweigert FJ, Schwendenwein I, Bruckmaier RM, Aurich JE, Kutzer P, Aurich C. Changes in faecal bacteria and metabolic parameters in foals during the first six weeks of life.. Vet Microbiol 2011 Aug 5;151(3-4):321-8.
    pubmed: 21511405doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.017google scholar: lookup
  10. Schoster A, Staempfli HR, Guardabassi LG, Jalali M, Weese JS. Comparison of the fecal bacterial microbiota of healthy and diarrheic foals at two and four weeks of life.. BMC Vet Res 2017 May 30;13(1):144.
    pmc: PMC5450145pubmed: 28558788doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1064-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  11. Scheidegger MD, Gerber V, Ramseyer A, Schüpbach-Regula G, Bruckmaier RM, van der Kolk JH. Repeatability of the ACTH stimulation test as reflected by salivary cortisol response in healthy horses.. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2016 Oct;57:43-7.
    pubmed: 27565229doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.04.002google scholar: lookup
  12. Schoster A, Guardabassi L, Staempfli HR, Abrahams M, Jalali M, Weese JS. The longitudinal effect of a multi-strain probiotic on the intestinal bacterial microbiota of neonatal foals.. Equine Vet J 2016 Nov;48(6):689-696.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12524pubmed: 26509834google scholar: lookup
  13. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41.
    pmc: PMC2786419pubmed: 19801464doi: 10.1128/aem.01541-09google scholar: lookup
  14. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools.. Nucleic Acids Res 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6.
    pmc: PMC3531112pubmed: 23193283doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219google scholar: lookup
  15. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection.. Bioinformatics 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200.
    pmc: PMC3150044pubmed: 21700674doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381google scholar: lookup
  16. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7.
    pmc: PMC1950982pubmed: 17586664doi: 10.1128/aem.00062-07google scholar: lookup
  17. Morgan XC, Huttenhower C. Chapter 12: Human microbiome analysis.. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8(12):e1002808.
    pmc: PMC3531975pubmed: 23300406doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002808google scholar: lookup
  18. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation.. Genome Biol 2011 Jun 24;12(6):R60.
    pmc: PMC3218848pubmed: 21702898doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60google scholar: lookup
  19. Codling C, O'Mahony L, Shanahan F, Quigley EM, Marchesi JR. A molecular analysis of fecal and mucosal bacterial communities in irritable bowel syndrome.. Dig Dis Sci 2010 Feb;55(2):392-7.
    pubmed: 19693670doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0934-xgoogle scholar: lookup
  20. Carroll IM, Ringel-Kulka T, Siddle JP, Ringel Y. Alterations in composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012 Jun;24(6):521-30, e248.
    pmc: PMC3975596pubmed: 22339879doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01891.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  21. Saunders PR, Santos J, Hanssen NP, Yates D, Groot JA, Perdue MH. Physical and psychological stress in rats enhances colonic epithelial permeability via peripheral CRH.. Dig Dis Sci 2002 Jan;47(1):208-15.
    pubmed: 11852879doi: 10.1023/a:1013204612762google scholar: lookup
  22. Bradesi S, Schwetz I, Ennes HS, Lamy CM, Ohning G, Fanselow M, Pothoulakis C, McRoberts JA, Mayer EA. Repeated exposure to water avoidance stress in rats: a new model for sustained visceral hyperalgesia.. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2005 Jul;289(1):G42-53.
    pubmed: 15746211doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00500.2004google scholar: lookup
  23. Distrutti E, Sediari L, Mencarelli A, Renga B, Orlandi S, Antonelli E, Roviezzo F, Morelli A, Cirino G, Wallace JL, Fiorucci S. Evidence that hydrogen sulfide exerts antinociceptive effects in the gastrointestinal tract by activating KATP channels.. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006 Jan;316(1):325-35.
    pubmed: 16192316doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.091595google scholar: lookup
  24. Cryan JF, O'Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, Sandhu KV, Bastiaanssen TFS, Boehme M, Codagnone MG, Cussotto S, Fulling C, Golubeva AV, Guzzetta KE, Jaggar M, Long-Smith CM, Lyte JM, Martin JA, Molinero-Perez A, Moloney G, Morelli E, Morillas E, O'Connor R, Cruz-Pereira JS, Peterson VL, Rea K, Ritz NL, Sherwin E, Spichak S, Teichman EM, van de Wouw M, Ventura-Silva AP, Wallace-Fitzsimons SE, Hyland N, Clarke G, Dinan TG. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis.. Physiol Rev 2019 Oct 1;99(4):1877-2013.
    pubmed: 31460832doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2018google scholar: lookup
  25. Linden DR. Hydrogen sulfide signaling in the gastrointestinal tract.. Antioxid Redox Signal 2014 Feb 10;20(5):818-30.
    pmc: PMC3910452pubmed: 23582008doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5312google scholar: lookup
  26. MacLean D, Jones JD, Studholme DJ. Application of 'next-generation' sequencing technologies to microbial genetics.. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009 Apr;7(4):287-96.
    pubmed: 19287448doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2122google scholar: lookup
  27. Suchodolski JS, Markel ME, Garcia-Mazcorro JF, Unterer S, Heilmann RM, Dowd SE, Kachroo P, Ivanov I, Minamoto Y, Dillman EM, Steiner JM, Cook AK, Toresson L. The fecal microbiome in dogs with acute diarrhea and idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease.. PLoS One 2012;7(12):e51907.
    pmc: PMC3530590pubmed: 23300577doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051907google scholar: lookup
  28. Honneffer JB, Minamoto Y, Suchodolski JS. Microbiota alterations in acute and chronic gastrointestinal inflammation of cats and dogs.. World J Gastroenterol 2014 Nov 28;20(44):16489-97.
    pmc: PMC4248192pubmed: 25469017doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16489google scholar: lookup
  29. Singh P, Teal TK, Marsh TL, Tiedje JM, Mosci R, Jernigan K, Zell A, Newton DW, Salimnia H, Lephart P, Sundin D, Khalife W, Britton RA, Rudrik JT, Manning SD. Intestinal microbial communities associated with acute enteric infections and disease recovery.. Microbiome 2015 Sep 22;3:45.
    pmc: PMC4579588pubmed: 26395244doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0109-2google scholar: lookup
  30. Minamoto Y, Otoni CC, Steelman SM, Büyükleblebici O, Steiner JM, Jergens AE, Suchodolski JS. Alteration of the fecal microbiota and serum metabolite profiles in dogs with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease.. Gut Microbes 2015;6(1):33-47.
    pmc: PMC4615558pubmed: 25531678doi: 10.1080/19490976.2014.997612google scholar: lookup
  31. Guard BC, Barr JW, Reddivari L, Klemashevich C, Jayaraman A, Steiner JM, Vanamala J, Suchodolski JS. Characterization of microbial dysbiosis and metabolomic changes in dogs with acute diarrhea.. PLoS One 2015;10(5):e0127259.
    pmc: PMC4441376pubmed: 26000959doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127259google scholar: lookup
  32. Schoster A, Mosing M, Jalali M, Staempfli HR, Weese JS. Effects of transport, fasting and anaesthesia on the faecal microbiota of healthy adult horses.. Equine Vet J 2016 Sep;48(5):595-602.
    pubmed: 26122549doi: 10.1111/evj.12479google scholar: lookup
  33. Fernandes KA, Kittelmann S, Rogers CW, Gee EK, Bolwell CF, Bermingham EN, Thomas DG. Faecal microbiota of forage-fed horses in New Zealand and the population dynamics of microbial communities following dietary change.. PLoS One 2014;9(11):e112846.
    pmc: PMC4226576pubmed: 25383707doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112846google scholar: lookup
  34. Blackmore TM, Dugdale A, Argo CM, Curtis G, Pinloche E, Harris PA, Worgan HJ, Girdwood SE, Dougal K, Newbold CJ, McEwan NR. Strong stability and host specific bacterial community in faeces of ponies.. PLoS One 2013;8(9):e75079.
    pmc: PMC3770578pubmed: 24040388doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075079google scholar: lookup
  35. Tedjo DI, Jonkers DM, Savelkoul PH, Masclee AA, van Best N, Pierik MJ, Penders J. The effect of sampling and storage on the fecal microbiota composition in healthy and diseased subjects.. PLoS One 2015;10(5):e0126685.
    pmc: PMC4449036pubmed: 26024217doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126685google scholar: lookup
  36. Vandeputte D, Tito RY, Vanleeuwen R, Falony G, Raes J. Practical considerations for large-scale gut microbiome studies.. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2017 Aug 1;41(Supp_1):S154-S167.
    pmc: PMC7207147pubmed: 28830090doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux027google scholar: lookup
  37. Weese JS, Jalali M. Evaluation of the impact of refrigeration on next generation sequencing-based assessment of the canine and feline fecal microbiota.. BMC Vet Res 2014 Sep 30;10:230.
    pmc: PMC4189626pubmed: 25267144doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0230-7google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Sacy A, Karges K, Apper E. Gastro-Intestinal Microbiota in Equines and Its Role in Health and Disease: The Black Box Opens. Microorganisms 2022 Dec 19;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122517pubmed: 36557769google scholar: lookup
  2. Laustsen L, Edwards JE, Hermes GDA, Lúthersson N, van Doorn DA, Okrathok S, Kujawa TJ, Smidt H. Free Faecal Water: Analysis of Horse Faecal Microbiota and the Impact of Faecal Microbial Transplantation on Symptom Severity. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 23;11(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102776pubmed: 34679798google scholar: lookup
  3. Lindroth KM, Dicksved J, Pelve E, Båverud V, Müller CE. Faecal bacterial composition in horses with and without free faecal liquid: a case control study. Sci Rep 2021 Feb 26;11(1):4745.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83897-4pubmed: 33637818google scholar: lookup
  4. Porter MM, Davis DJ, McAdams ZL, Townsend KS, Martin LM, Wilhite C, Johnson PJ, Ericsson AC. Alterations in the Microbiome of Horses Affected with Fecal Water Syndrome. Vet Sci 2025 Jul 31;12(8).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci12080724pubmed: 40872676google scholar: lookup
  5. Wester RJ, Baillie LL, McCarthy GC, Keever CC, Jeffery LE, Adams PJ. Dysbiosis not observed in Canadian horse with free fecal liquid (FFL) using 16S rRNA sequencing. Sci Rep 2024 Jun 5;14(1):12903.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63868-1pubmed: 38839848google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.