Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2025; 54(5); 851-859; doi: 10.1111/vsu.14181

Effect of an adjustable ceiling to prevent premature rising attempts after general anesthesia in healthy ponies and horses: A pilot study.

Abstract: This study aimed to assess and compare the recovery of ponies and horses following general anesthesia in two different settings: a recovery box with an inflexible, adjustable ceiling, and free recovery without restraints. Our primary objective was to evaluate the effect of adjustable ceilings on the prevention of premature attempts to rise during recovery. The secondary aim was to compare the physiological stress indicators during recovery. Methods: Prospective, randomized, experimental study. Methods: Six healthy ponies and 10 healthy horses. Methods: This study used a crossover design with two settings: an inflexible, adjustable ceiling and free recovery. Recovery was scored using a quality scoring system. Heart rate, and lactate, glucose, and cortisol levels were analyzed and compared between the animals and recoveries. Results: All animals had a higher recovery quality (p = .026) with an adjustable ceiling than with free recovery. No differences were observed in glucose level or heart rate between the two settings. However, horses had higher blood lactate, 2.9 ± 1.2 mmol/L versus 1.6 ± 0.7 mmol/L (p = .025), and serum cortisol, 184 ± 81 nmol/L versus 93 ± 20 nmol/L (p = .031) in restricted recovery than free recovery, respectively. Conclusions: An inflexible, adjustable ceiling improved the quality of recovery and prevented premature rising attempts; however, it was associated with increased lactate and cortisol levels, indicating an increased level of stress. Conclusions: Limiting premature rising attempts with an adjustable ceiling during recovery phase has the potential to improve the quality of recovery in horses. Further research is needed to draw conclusions for clinical use.
Publication Date: 2025-01-30 PubMed ID: 39887480PubMed Central: PMC12282034DOI: 10.1111/vsu.14181Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Veterinary

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the effects of using an adjustable ceiling in recovering areas post-general anesthesia on preventing premature rising attempts in ponies and horses. It also investigates the impact of this intervention on physiological stress indicators.

Objective and Methodology of the Study

  • The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an adjustable ceiling in recovery boxes, designed to prevent premature attempts by the horses and ponies to get up following general anesthesia. The secondary aim was to compare the physiological stress indicators, such as heart rate, glucose, lactate, and cortisol levels during recovery.
  • This was a prospective, randomized, experimental study involving six healthy ponies and ten healthy horses.
  • The researchers utilized a crossover design, wherein the recovery process took place in two different settings: one with an adjustable, inflexible ceiling, and the other with free recovery i.e., without any restraints.
  • The recovery quality was assessed using a scoring system. Further, a comparison was drawn between heart rate, glucose, lactate, and cortisol levels of the animals in both recovery settings.

Study Results

  • All the subjects (horses and ponies) showed a higher recovery quality with the adjustable ceiling in place as compared to free recovery. However, there were no visible differences in terms of glucose levels or heart rate.
  • The study showed that horses had increased lactate and cortisol levels in the setting with restricted recovery compared to free recovery. The levels of these two indicators suggest an increased level of stress in the recovery process.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Based on the findings, the researchers conclude that the use of an adjustable ceiling can significantly improve the recovery quality after general anesthesia, by preventing premature attempts to rise.
  • However, the researchers also noted that the use of an adjustable ceiling was associated with an increased level of stress in horses, as demonstrated by higher lactate and cortisol levels.
  • While the study suggested promising results in improving recovery quality, the researchers recommended further research to fully determine its implications for clinical use.

Cite This Article

APA
Lindqvist A, Nyman G, Rydén A, Wattle O. (2025). Effect of an adjustable ceiling to prevent premature rising attempts after general anesthesia in healthy ponies and horses: A pilot study. Vet Surg, 54(5), 851-859. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14181

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 54
Issue: 5
Pages: 851-859

Researcher Affiliations

Lindqvist, Anna
  • Swedish University of Agriculture Science, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nyman, Görel
  • Swedish University of Agriculture Science, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rydén, Anneli
  • Swedish University of Agriculture Science, Uppsala, Sweden.
Wattle, Ove
  • Swedish University of Agriculture Science, Uppsala, Sweden.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Pilot Projects
  • Anesthesia, General / veterinary
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Male
  • Female
  • Hydrocortisone / blood
  • Anesthesia Recovery Period
  • Heart Rate
  • Prospective Studies
  • Lactic Acid / blood

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this report.

References

This article includes 44 references
  1. Wagner AE. Complications in equine anesthesia.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2008;24:735‐752.
    pubmed: 19203709
  2. Dugdale AH, Obhrai J, Cripps PJ. Twenty years later: a single‐centre, repeat retrospective analysis of equine perioperative mortality and investigation of recovery quality.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2016;43:171‐178.
    pubmed: 26081190
  3. Johnston GM, Eastment JK, Wood J, Taylor PM. The confidential enquiry into perioperative equine fatalities (CEPEF): mortality results of phases 1 and 2.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2002;29:159‐170.
    pubmed: 28404360
  4. Gozalo‐Marcilla M, Bettschart‐Wolfensberger R, Johnston M, Taylor PM, Redondo JI. Data collection for the fourth multicentre confidential enquiry into perioperative equine fatalities (CEPEF4) study: new technology and preliminary results.. Animals (Basel) 2021;11:11.
    pmc: PMC8472153pubmed: 34573515
  5. Brodbelt DC, Blissitt KJ, Hammond RA. The risk of death: the confidential enquiry into perioperative small animal fatalities.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2008;35:365‐373.
    pubmed: 18466167
  6. Bainbridge D, Martin J, Arango M, Cheng D, Evidence‐based Peri‐operative Clinical Outcomes Research (EPiCOR) Group. Perioperative and anaesthetic‐related mortality in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta‐analysis.. Lancet 2012;380:1075‐1081.
    pubmed: 22998717
  7. Arndt S, Hopster K, Sill V, Rohn K, Kästner SBR. Comparison between head‐tail‐rope assisted and unassisted recoveries in healthy horses undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgeries.. Vet Surg 2020;49:329‐338.
    pubmed: 31705685
  8. Nicolaisen ASK, Bendix Nygaard A, Christophersen MT, Jensen DB, Lindegaard C. Effect of head and tail rope‐assisted recovery of horses after elective and emergency surgery under general anaesthesia.. Equine Vet Educ 2020;34:126‐133.
  9. Taylor EL, Galuppo LD, Steffey EP. Use of the Anderson sling suspension system for recovery of horses from general anesthesia.. Vet Surg 2005;34:559‐564.
    pubmed: 16343142
  10. Sullivan EK, Klein LV, Richardson DW, Ross MW, Orsini JA, Nunamaker DM. Use of a pool‐raft system for recovery of horses from general anesthesia: 393 horses (1984‐2000).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;221:1014‐1018.
    pubmed: 12369680
  11. Tidwell SA, Schneider RK, Ragle CA, Weil AB, Richter MC. Use of a hydro‐pool system to recover horses after general anesthesia: 60 cases.. Vet Surg 2002;31:455‐461.
    pubmed: 12209416
  12. Elmas CR, Cruz AM, Kerr CL. Tilt table recovery of horses after orthopedic surgery: fifty‐four cases (1994–2005).. Vet Surg 2007;36:252‐258.
    pubmed: 17461950
  13. Ray‐Miller WM, Hodgson DS, McMurphy RM, Chapman PL. Comparison of recoveries from anesthesia of horses placed on a rapidly inflating‐deflating air pillow or the floor of a padded stall.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;229:711‐716.
    pubmed: 16948582
  14. Kästner SBR. How to manage recovery from anaesthesia in the horse to assist or not to assist?. Pferdeheilkunde Equine Med 2010;26:604‐608.
  15. Rüegg M, Bettschart‐Wolfensberger R, Hartnack S, Junge KH, Theiss F, Ringer SK. Comparison of non‐assisted versus head and tail rope‐assisted recovery after emergency abdominal surgery in horses.. Pferdeheilkunde Equine Med 2016;32:469‐478.
  16. Wattle O, Ekfalck A, Funkquist B, Obel N. Behavioural studies in healthy ponies subjected to short‐term forced recumbency aiming at an adjunctive treatment in an acute attack of laminitis.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;42:62‐68.
    pubmed: 8592881
  17. E H. Behavioral studies in healthy standardbred Trottes subjected to short time forced recumbency aiming at an adjunctive treatment in an acute attack of laminitis.. Master Thesis: Swedish University of Agriculture Science. 2011.
  18. Young SS, Taylor PM. Factors influencing the outcome of equine anaesthesia: a review of 1,314 cases.. Equine Vet J 1993;25:147‐151.
    pubmed: 8467775
  19. Edner AH, Nyman GC, Essen‐Gustavsson B. Metabolism before, during and after anaesthesia in colic and healthy horses.. Acta Vet Scand 2007;49:34.
    pmc: PMC2206032pubmed: 18001483
  20. Santos M, Fuente M, Garcia‐Iturralde R. Effects of alpha‐2 adrenoceptor agonists during recovery from isoflurane anaesthesia in horses.. Equine Vet J 2003;35:170‐175.
    pubmed: 12638794
  21. Auckburally A, Wiklund MK, Lord PF, Hedenstierna G, Nyman G. Effects of pulsed inhaled nitric oxide delivery on the distribution of pulmonary perfusion in spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated anesthetized ponies.. Am J Vet Res 2022;83:171‐179.
    pubmed: 34851855
  22. Voulgaris DA, Hofmeister EH. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with post‐anesthetic times to standing in isoflurane‐anesthetized horses: 381 cases.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2009;36:414‐420.
    pubmed: 19558369
  23. Portier K, Ida KK. The ASA physical status classification: what is the evidence for recommending its use in veterinary anesthesia? a systematic review.. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:204.
    pmc: PMC6128170pubmed: 30234133
  24. Suthers JM, Christley RM, Clutton RE. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of three scoring systems for assessing recovery quality after general anaesthesia in horses.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2011;38:352‐362.
    pubmed: 21672127
  25. Schmidt A, Hödl S, Möstl E, Aurich J, Müller J, Aurich C. Cortisol release, heart rate, and heart rate variability in transport‐naive horses during repeated road transport.. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2010;39(3):205‐213.
    pubmed: 20688463
  26. Lundblad J, Rashid M, Rhodin M, Haubro Andersen P. Effect of transportation and social isolation on facial expressions of healthy horses.. PLoS One 2021;16:e0241532.
    pmc: PMC8177539pubmed: 34086704
  27. Edner A, Nyman G, Essen‐Gustavsson B. The relationship of muscle perfusion and metabolism with cardiovascular variables before and after detomidine injection during propofol‐ketamine anaesthesia in horses.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2002;29:182‐199.
    pubmed: 28404362
  28. Hauss AA, Stablein CK, Fisher AL, Greene HM, Nout‐Lomas YS. Validation of the lactate plus lactate meter in the horse and its use in a conditioning program.. J Equine Vet Sci 2014;34:1064‐1068.
  29. Piccione G, Messina V, Casella S, Giannetto C, Caola G. Blood lactate levels during exercise in athletic horses.. Comp Clin Pathol 2010;19:535‐539.
  30. Tateo A, Padalino B, Boccaccio M, Maggiolino A, Centoducati P. Transport stress in horses: effects of two different distances.. J Vet Behav 2012;7:33‐42.
  31. Onmaz AC, van der Hoven R, Gunes V. Oxidative stress in horses after a 12‐hours transport period.. Revue Méd Vét 2011;162:213‐217.
  32. Gregić M, Bobić T, Baban M, Bunevski G, Gantner V. Variability of stress indicators in jumping horses in parkour due to horse age and competitive season.. Macedonian Vet Rev 2020;43:169‐173.
  33. Box JR, Karikoski NP, Tanskanen HE, Raekallio MR. The effects of an alpha‐2‐adrenoceptor agonist, antagonist, and their combination on the blood insulin, glucose, and glucagon concentrations in insulin sensitive and dysregulated horses.. Vet J 2021;269:105610.
    pubmed: 33593492
  34. Cayado P, Munoz‐Escassi B, Dominguez C. Hormone response to training and competition in athletic horses.. Equine Vet J 2006;36:274‐278.
    pubmed: 17402431
  35. Taylor PM. Equine stress responses to anaesthesia.. Br J Anaesth 1989;63:702‐709.
    pubmed: 2692673
  36. Fazio E, Medica P, Aronica V, Grasso L, Ferlazzo A. Circulating beta‐endorphin, adrenocorticotrophic hormone and cortisol levels of stallions before and after short road transport: stress effect of different distances.. Acta Vet Scand 2008;50:6.
    pmc: PMC2268694pubmed: 18315878
  37. Fazio E, Medica P, Cravana C, Ferlazzo A. Cortisol response to road transport stress in calm and nervous stallions.. J Vet Behav 2013;8:231‐237.
  38. Padalino B, Raidal SL. Effects of transport conditions on behavioural and physiological responses of horses.. Animals (Basel) 2020;10:10.
    pmc: PMC7022509pubmed: 31963529
  39. Fureix C, Benhajali H, Henry S. Plasma cortisol and faecal cortisol metabolites concentrations in stereotypic and non‐stereotypic horses: do stereotypic horses cope better with poor environmental conditions?. BMC Vet Res 2013;9:1‐10.
    pmc: PMC3544618pubmed: 23289406
  40. . Isoflurane [MAK Value Documentation, 1996].. The MAK‐collection for occupational health and safety Wiley; 2012:128‐140.
  41. Auer JA, Garner HE, Amend JF. Recovery from anaesthesia in ponies: a comparative study of the effects of isoflurane, enflurane, methoxyflurane and halothane.. Equine Vet J 1978;10:18‐23.
    pubmed: 631101
  42. Garcia‐Villar R, Toutain PL, Alvinerie M. The pharmacokinetics of xylazine hydrochloride: an interspecific study.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1981;4:87‐92.
    pubmed: 7349331
  43. Loomes K, Louro LF. Recovery of horses from general anaesthesia: a systematic review (2000‐2020) of risk factors and influence of interventions during the recovery period.. Equine Vet J 2022;54:201‐218.
    pubmed: 34537994
  44. Valverde A, Gunkelt C, Doherty TJ, Giguère S, Pollak AS. Effect of a constant rate infusion of lidocaine on the quality of recovery from sevoflurane or isoflurane general anaesthesia in horses.. Equine Vet J 2005;37:559‐564.
    pubmed: 16295936