Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2008; 40(4); 337-341; doi: 10.2746/042516408X284673

Effect of paddock vs. stall housing on 24 hour gastric pH within the proximal and ventral equine stomach.

Abstract: Stall housing has been suggested as a risk factor for ulcer development in the equine stomach; however, the exact pathogenesis for this has not been established. Objective: To investigate the effect of 3 environmental situations (grass paddock, stall alone or stall with adjacent companion) on pH in the proximal and the ventral stomach. Methods: Six horses with permanently implanted gastric cannulae were used in a randomised, cross-over, block design. Each horse rotated through each of three 24 h environmental situations. Horses remained on their normal diet (grass hay ad libitum and grain b.i.d.) throughout the study. Intragastric pH was measured continuously for 72 h just inside the lower oesophageal sphincter (proximal stomach) and via a pH probe in the gastric cannula (ventral stomach). Results: Neither proximal nor ventral 24 h gastric pH changed significantly between the 3 environmental situations. Mean hourly proximal gastric pH decreased significantly in the interval from 01.00-09.00 h compared to the interval from 13.00-20.00 h, regardless of environmental situation. Median hourly proximal pH only differed in the interval from 06.00-07.00 h compared to the interval 14.00-19.00 h. Neither mean nor median hourly ventral gastric pH varied significantly with the time of day. Conclusions: The change in housing status used in the current study did not affect acid exposure within either region of the equine stomach. The pH in the ventral stomach was uniformly stable throughout the study, while the proximal pH demonstrated a 24 h circadian pattern.
Publication Date: 2008-02-13 PubMed ID: 18267880DOI: 10.2746/042516408X284673Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the potential impact of different housing situations on the pH levels in various parts of a horse’s stomach. The study reveals that changing the housing status does not cause any significant alteration in the acid exposure within the horse’s stomach, contrasting prior suggestions that stall housing may be a risk factor for equine gastric ulcers.

Research Objective

  • The primary objective of this research was to investigate whether different environmental situations, including grass paddock, stall alone, or stall with an adjacent companion, have a significant impact on the pH levels in the proximal and the ventral areas of a horse’s stomach.

Methodology

  • The researchers used a group of six horses fitted with gastric cannulae, a tube used for nutrient delivery or monitoring of gas and pH levels, to measure intragastric pH levels. The horses went through each of the three environmental situations for 24 hours.
  • The horses were kept on their usual diet of grass hay and grain twice a day throughout the experiment. The team continuously measured the intragastric pH levels for 72 hours, both at the lower oesophageal sphincter (proximal stomach) and through a pH probe in the gastric cannula (ventral stomach).

Results and Findings

  • The research found that neither the proximal nor ventral 24-hour gastric pH significantly changed between the three environmental situations.
  • Although there was a significant decrease in mean hourly proximal gastric pH between 01:00-09:00 compared to 13.00-20.00, irrespective of environmental situation, such variation did not occur in the ventral stomach. The change in housing status therefore did not affect acid exposure within either region of the equine stomach.
  • The pH of the ventral stomach remained stable throughout the study, with the proximal pH exhibiting a 24-hour circadian pattern.

Research Conclusion

  • This research concluded that changing the housing situation—from grass paddock to stall alone or stall with a companion—does not cause a significant alteration in the pH levels within the horse’s stomach. Despite changing environmental conditions, the pH in the ventral stomach remained stable throughout the study, with the circadian pattern being observed in the proximal pH. This contradicts any previous suggestions that stall housing may increase the risk of gastric ulcers in horses due to alteration of gastric pH.

Cite This Article

APA
Husted L, Sanchez LC, Olsen SN, Baptiste KE, Merritt AM. (2008). Effect of paddock vs. stall housing on 24 hour gastric pH within the proximal and ventral equine stomach. Equine Vet J, 40(4), 337-341. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516408X284673

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 40
Issue: 4
Pages: 337-341

Researcher Affiliations

Husted, L
  • Department of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 48, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Sanchez, L C
    Olsen, S N
      Baptiste, K E
        Merritt, A M

          MeSH Terms

          • Animal Husbandry / methods
          • Animals
          • Circadian Rhythm
          • Cross-Over Studies
          • Female
          • Gastric Acid / physiology
          • Gastric Acidity Determination / veterinary
          • Gastric Mucosa / pathology
          • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
          • Horse Diseases / etiology
          • Horse Diseases / pathology
          • Horses
          • Housing, Animal
          • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
          • Male
          • Risk Factors
          • Stomach Ulcer / epidemiology
          • Stomach Ulcer / etiology
          • Stomach Ulcer / pathology
          • Stomach Ulcer / veterinary

          Citations

          This article has been cited 12 times.
          1. Hodgson E, Thirouin M, Narayanan P, Romano TR, Wise J, Bond S. A novel placement method of a calibration-free pH capsule for continuous wireless measurement of intragastric pH in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2025 Jan-Feb;39(1):e17273.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.17273pubmed: 39715411google scholar: lookup
          2. Busechian S, Bindi F, Orvieto S, Zappulla F, Marchesi MC, Nisi I, Rueca F. Prevalence and Risk Factors for the Presence of Gastric Ulcers in Pleasure and Breeding Horses in Italy. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jun 17;14(12).
            doi: 10.3390/ani14121806pubmed: 38929425google scholar: lookup
          3. Luthersson N, Þorgrímsdóttir ÚÝ, Harris PA, Parkin T, Hopster-Iversen C, Bennet ED. Risk Factors for Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome Incidence in Adult Icelandic Riding Horses. Animals (Basel) 2023 Nov 14;13(22).
            doi: 10.3390/ani13223512pubmed: 38003130google scholar: lookup
          4. Alshut F, Venner M, Martinsson G, Vervuert I. The effects of feeding sodium chloride pellets on the gastric mucosa, acid-base, and mineral status in exercising horses. J Vet Intern Med 2023 Nov-Dec;37(6):2552-2561.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.16851pubmed: 37776109google scholar: lookup
          5. Vokes J, Lovett A, Sykes B. Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome: An Update on Current Knowledge. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 5;13(7).
            doi: 10.3390/ani13071261pubmed: 37048517google scholar: lookup
          6. Hewetson M, Tallon R. Equine Squamous Gastric Disease: Prevalence, Impact and Management. Vet Med (Auckl) 2021;12:381-399.
            doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S235258pubmed: 35004264google scholar: lookup
          7. Wise JC, Hughes KJ, Edwards S, Jacobson GA, Narkowicz CK, Raidal SL. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of 2 registered omeprazole preparations and varying dose rates in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Jan;35(1):620-631.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.15971pubmed: 33340169google scholar: lookup
          8. Conner AL, Davis AJ, Porr CA. Effects of a dietary supplement on gastric ulcer number and severity in exercising horses. Transl Anim Sci 2018 Apr;2(2):119-124.
            doi: 10.1093/tas/txy005pubmed: 32704695google scholar: lookup
          9. Padalino B, Davis GL, Raidal SL. Effects of transportation on gastric pH and gastric ulceration in mares. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Mar;34(2):922-932.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.15698pubmed: 32009244google scholar: lookup
          10. Sykes BW, Bowen M, Habershon-Butcher JL, Green M, Hallowell GD. Management factors and clinical implications of glandular and squamous gastric disease in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Jan;33(1):233-240.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.15350pubmed: 30499188google scholar: lookup
          11. Sykes BW, Hewetson M, Hepburn RJ, Luthersson N, Tamzali Y. European College of Equine Internal Medicine Consensus Statement--Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in Adult Horses. J Vet Intern Med 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):1288-99.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.13578pubmed: 26340142google scholar: lookup
          12. Hellings IR, Larsen S. ImproWin® in the treatment of gastric ulceration of the squamous mucosa in trotting racehorses. Acta Vet Scand 2014 Mar 13;56(1):13.
            doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-56-13pubmed: 24625291google scholar: lookup