Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2022; 51(4); 665-673; doi: 10.1111/vsu.13789

Effect of perfusate volume on amikacin concentrations after saphenous intravenous regional limb perfusion in standing, sedated horses.

Abstract: To determine the influence of perfusate volume on synovial fluid amikacin concentrations in the joints of the hind limb after standing saphenous intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP). Methods: Randomized crossover design. Methods: Six adult horses. Methods: Saphenous IVRLP was performed in 6 standing horses with 1 g of amikacin diluted with 0.9% NaCl to volumes of 10 ml, 60 ml, and 120 ml. Samples of synovial fluid from the tarsocrural, metatarsophalangeal, and hind limb distal interphalangeal joints were collected at 15 and 30 min after perfusate administration. Concentrations of 40 μg/ml and 160 μg/ml were considered therapeutic for susceptible and resistant pathogens, respectively. Results: No difference in synovial fluid amikacin concentrations was detected between volumes in any joint (P = .4). All synovial fluid amikacin concentrations were higher at 30 min compared to 15 min (P = .003). All median synovial fluid amikacin concentrations at 30 min were > 40 μg/ml using the 60 ml and 120 ml volumes. Synovial fluid amikacin concentrations >40 μg/ml were only reached in the hind limb distal interphalangeal joint when the 10 ml volume was used. All median synovial fluid amikacin concentrations observed were < 160 μg/ml. Conclusions: Target concentrations for pathogens that were considered susceptible were consistently reached with perfusate volumes of 60 ml and 120 ml. However, median synovial fluid amikacin concentrations did not reach target levels for resistant pathogens. Conclusions: Perfusate volumes of 60 ml or 120 ml are recommended to treat infections due to susceptible pathogens in the joints of the distal hind limb. These results justify investigation of saphenous IVRLP with different perfusate volumes using higher doses of amikacin.
Publication Date: 2022-03-02 PubMed ID: 35234300DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13789Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examined the impact of perfusate volume, or the liquid infused into a horse’s limb, on the concentrations of the antibiotic amikacin in the synovial fluid of the horse’s hind limb joints. The study found that perfusate volumes of 60 ml or 120 ml achieved desirable antibiotic concentrations for certain pathogens, but not for resistant ones, which calls for further research using higher doses of amikacin.

Methods

  • The study followed a randomized crossover design using six adult horses.
  • The method under investigation, known as saphenous intravenous regional limb perfusion (IVRLP), involved introducing amikacin, an antibiotic, into the horse’s limb for treating joint infections.
  • Three different volumes of perfusate were used — 10 ml, 60 ml, and 120 ml — each diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) and mixed with one gram of amikacin.
  • Samples of synovial fluid from three different joints in the horse’s hind limb were collected at two different time intervals — 15 minutes and 30 minutes after introducing the perfusate.
  • The study defined two therapeutic concentrations of amikacin: 40 μg/ml for susceptible pathogens and 160 μg/ml for resistant pathogens.

Results

  • There was no measurable difference in antibiotic concentration between the varying volumes of perfusate in any of the joints studied.
  • The concentration of amikacin in the synovial fluid increased from the 15-minute mark to the 30-minute mark in all examples.
  • Sufficient therapeutic levels (> 40 μg/ml) for treating susceptible pathogens were achieved in all instances using the 60 ml and 120 ml volumes. For the 10 ml volume, this level was only achieved in one specific joint, the hind limb distal interphalangeal joint.
  • The therapeutic concentration (160 μg/ml) for the resistant pathogens was not achieved in any cases.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that a perfusate volume of 60 ml or 120 ml is recommended to treat infections due to susceptible pathogens in the joints of a horse’s hind limb.
  • For resistant pathogens, these volumes did not result in effective treatment. Given these findings, additional investigation is recommended, possibly adjusting the dosage of amikacin or the perfusate volume.

Cite This Article

APA
Jurek KA, Schoonover MJ, Williams MR, Rudra P. (2022). Effect of perfusate volume on amikacin concentrations after saphenous intravenous regional limb perfusion in standing, sedated horses. Vet Surg, 51(4), 665-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13789

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 4
Pages: 665-673

Researcher Affiliations

Jurek, Kelsey A
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Oklahoma State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Schoonover, Mike J
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Oklahoma State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Williams, Megan R
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Oklahoma State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Rudra, Pratyaydipta
  • Department of Statistics, Oklahoma State University, College of Arts and Sciences, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Administration, Intravenous / veterinary
  • Amikacin / pharmacology
  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Forelimb
  • Horses
  • Perfusion / veterinary
  • Synovial Fluid

Grant Funding

  • Aurora Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  • Research Advisory Committee, Oklahoma State University, College of Veterinary Medicine

References

This article includes 31 references
  1. Ahern BJ, Richardson DW. Surgical site infection and the use of antimicrobials. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, eds. Equine Surgery. Fourth ed. W.B. Saunders; 2012:68-84.
  2. Kelmer G. Regional limb perfusion in horses. Vet Rec 2016;178(23):581-584.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.i3082google scholar: lookup
  3. Rubio-Martínez LM, Elmas CR, Black B, Monteith G. Clinical use of antimicrobial regional limb perfusion in horses: 174 cases (1999-2009). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012;241(12):1650-1658.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.241.12.1650google scholar: lookup
  4. Rubio-Martínez LM, Cruz AM. Antimicrobial regional limb perfusion in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;228(5):706-655.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.228.5.706google scholar: lookup
  5. Harvey A, Kilcoyne I, Byrne BA, Nieto J. Effect of dose on intra-articular amikacin sulfate concentrations following intravenous regional limb perfusion in horses. Vet Surg 2016;45(8):1077-1082.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12564google scholar: lookup
  6. Kelmer G, Bell GC, Martin-Jimenez T. Evaluation of regional limb perfusion with amikacin using the saphenous, cephalic, and palmar digital veins in standing horses. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2013;36(3):236-240.
  7. Levine DG, Epstein KL, Ahern BJ, Richardson DW. Efficacy of three tourniquet types for intravenous antimicrobial regional limb perfusion in standing horses. Vet Surg 2010;39(8):1021-1024.
  8. Schoonover MJ, Moser DK, Young JM, Payton ME, Holbrook TC. Effects of tourniquet number and exsanguination on amikacin concentrations in the radiocarpal and distal interphalangeal joints after low volume intravenous regional limb perfusion in horses. Vet Surg 2017;46(5):675-682.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12662google scholar: lookup
  9. Aristizabal FA, Nieto JE, Guedes AG. Comparison of two tourniquet application times for regional intravenous limb perfusions with amikacin in sedated or anesthetized horses. Vet J 2016;208:50-54.
  10. Kilcoyne I, Dechant JE, Nieto JE. Evaluation of 10-minute versus 30-minute tourniquet time for intravenous regional limb perfusion with amikacin sulfate in standing sedated horses. Vet Rec 2016;178(23):585.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.103609google scholar: lookup
  11. Mahne AT, Rioja E, Marais HJ, Villarino NF, Rubio-Martinez LM. Clinical and pharmacokinetic effects of regional or general anaesthesia on intravenous regional limb perfusion with amikacin in horses. Equine Vet J 2014;46(3):375-379.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12125google scholar: lookup
  12. Moser DK, Schoonover MJ, Holbrook TC, Payton ME. Effect of regional intravenous limb perfusate volume on synovial fluid concentration of amikacin and local venous blood pressure in the horse. Vet Surg 2016;45(7):851-858.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12521google scholar: lookup
  13. Oreff GL, Dahan R, Tatz AJ, Raz T, Britzi M, Kelmer G. The effect of perfusate volume on amikacin concentration in the metacarpophalangeal joint following cephalic regional limb perfusion in standing horses. Vet Surg 2016;45(5):625-630.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12490google scholar: lookup
  14. Hyde RM, Lynch TM, Clark CK, Slone DE, Hughes FE. The influence of perfusate volume on antimicrobial concentration in synovial fluid following intravenous regional limb perfusion in the standing horse. Can Vet J 2013;54(4):363-367.
  15. Godfrey JL, Hardy J, Cohen ND. Effects of regional limb perfusion volume on concentrations of amikacin sulfate in synovial and interstitial fluid samples from anesthetized horses. Am J Vet Res 2016;77(6):582-588.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.77.6.582google scholar: lookup
  16. Stewart S, Richardson D. Surgical site infection and the use of antimicrobials. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, eds. Equine Surgery. Fifth ed. Elsevier; 2019:77-103.
  17. Kelmer G, Tatz AJ, Kdoshim E, Britzi M, Segev G. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of imipenem following regional limb perfusion using the saphenous and the cephalic veins in standing horses. Res Vet Sci 2017;114:64-68.
  18. Kelmer G, Tatz AJ, Famini S, Bdolah-Abram T, Soback S, Britzi M. Evaluation of regional limb perfusion with chloramphenicol using the saphenous or cephalic vein in standing horses. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2015;38(1):35-40.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.12140google scholar: lookup
  19. Kelmer G, Martin-Jimenez T, Saxton AM, Catasus C, Elliot SB, Lakritz J. Evaluation of regional limb perfusion with erythromycin using the saphenous, cephalic, or palmar digital veins in standing horses. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2013;36(5):434-440.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.12028google scholar: lookup
  20. Kilcoyne I, Nieto JE, Galuppo LD, Dechant JE. Time required to achieve maximum amikacin concentration in the synovial fluid of the tarsocrural joint following administration of the drug by intravenous regional limb perfusion in horses. Am J Vet Res 2021;82(2):99-104.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.82.2.99google scholar: lookup
  21. Snowden RT, Schumacher J, Blackford JT. Tarsocrural joint polymyxin B concentrations achieved following intravenous regional limb perfusion of the drug via a saphenous vein to healthy standing horses. Am J Vet Res 2019;80(12):1099-1106.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.80.12.1099google scholar: lookup
  22. Scheuch BC, Van Hoogmoed LM, Wilson WD. Comparison of intraosseous or intravenous infusion for delivery of amikacin sulfate to the tibiotarsal joint of horses. Am J Vet Res 2002;63(3):374-380.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.374google scholar: lookup
  23. Moyer W, Schumacher J, Schumacher J. Part 2: regional anesthesia. In: Moyer W, Schumacher J, Schumacher J, eds. Equine Joint Injection and Regional Anesthesia. Fifth ed. Academic Veterinary Solutions, LLC; 2011:90-144.
  24. Moyer W, Schumacher J, Schumacher J. Part 1: joint injection. In: Moyer W, Schumacher J, Schumacher J, eds. Equine Joint Injection and Regional Anesthesia. Fifth ed. Academic Veterinary Solutions, LLC; 2011:4-89.
  25. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. CLSI Supplement VET01S. Fifth ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020.
  26. Beccar-Varela AM, Epstein KL, White CL. Effect of experimentally induced synovitis on amikacin concentrations after intravenous regional limb perfusion. Vet Surg 2011;40(7):891-897.
  27. Kilcoyne I, Nieto JE, Knych HK, Dechant JE. Time required to achieve maximum concentration of amikacin in synovial fluid of the distal interphalangeal joint after intravenous regional limb perfusion in horses. Am J Vet Res 2018;79(3):282-286.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.79.3.282google scholar: lookup
  28. Gustafsson K, Tatz AJ, Dahan R. Time to peak concentration of amikacin in the antebrachiocarpal joint following cephalic intravenous regional limb perfusion in standing horses. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2020;33(5):327-332.
    doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714418google scholar: lookup
  29. Whithair KJ, Bowersock TL, Blevins WE, Fessler JF, White MR, Van Sickle DC. Regional limb perfusion for antibiotic treatment of experimentally induced septic arthritis. Vet Surg 1992;21(5):367-373.
  30. Grice SC, Morell RC, Balestrieri FJ, Stump DA, Howard G. Intravenous regional anesthesia: evaluation and prevention of leakage under the tourniquet. Anesthesiology 1986;65(3):316-320.
  31. Pezzanite L, Chow L, Soontararak S, Phillips J, Goodrich L, Dow S. Amikacin induces rapid dose-dependent apoptotic cell death in equine chondrocytes and synovial cells in vitro. Equine Vet J 2020;52(5):715-724.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13243google scholar: lookup