Analyze Diet
International journal of molecular sciences2020; 21(17); doi: 10.3390/ijms21176415

Effect of Seminal Plasma Protein Fractions on Stallion Sperm Cryopreservation.

Abstract: Seminal plasma (SP) is the natural environment for spermatozoa and contains a number of components, especially proteins important for successful sperm maturation and fertilization. Nevertheless, in standard frozen stallion insemination doses production, SP is completely removed and is replaced by a semen extender. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of the selected seminal plasma protein groups that might play an important role in reducing the detrimental effects on spermatozoa during the cryopreservation process. SP proteins were separated according to their ability to bind to heparin into heparin-binding (Hep+) and heparin-non-binding (Hep-) fractions. The addition of three concentrations-125, 250, and 500 µg/mL-of each protein fraction was tested. After thawing, the following parameters were assessed: sperm motility (by CASA), plasma membrane integrity (PI staining), and acrosomal membrane integrity (PNA staining) using flow cytometry, and capacitation status (anti-phosphotyrosine antibody) using imaging-based flow cytometry. Our results showed that SP protein fractions had a significant effect on the kinematic parameters of spermatozoa and on a proportion of their subpopulations. The 125 µg/mL of Hep+ protein fraction resulted in increased linearity (LIN) and straightness (STR), moreover, with the highest values of sperm velocities (VAP, VSL), also this group contained the highest proportion of the fast sperm subpopulation. In contrast, the highest percentage of slow subpopulation was in the groups with 500 µg/mL of Hep+ fraction and 250 µg/mL of Hep- fraction. Interestingly, acrosomal membrane integrity was also highest in the groups with Hep+ fraction in concentrations of 125 µg/mL. Our results showed that the addition of protein fractions did not significantly affect the plasma membrane integrity and capacitation status of stallion spermatozoa. Moreover, our results confirmed that the effect of SP proteins on the sperm functionality is concentration-dependent, as has been reported for other species. Our study significantly contributes to the lack of studies dealing with possible use of specific stallion SP fractions in the complex puzzle of the improvement of cryopreservation protocols. It is clear that improvement in this field still needs more outputs from future studies, which should be focused on the effect of individual SP proteins on other sperm functional parameters with further implication on the success of artificial insemination in in vivo conditions.
Publication Date: 2020-09-03 PubMed ID: 32899253PubMed Central: PMC7504567DOI: 10.3390/ijms21176415Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research explores the effect of seminal plasma protein fractions on the cryopreservation of stallion sperm. The proteins were separated into two fractions based on their ability to bind to heparin and the effects of varying concentrations were studied. The results indicated significant effects on sperm kinetics and sub-populations, though no significant impact on plasma membrane integrity and capacitation status was observed.

Introduction

  • This research investigates the role of seminal plasma (SP) proteins on stallion sperm during the cryopreservation process. SP is the natural environment for spermatozoa and houses crucial components for successful sperm maturation and fertilization.
  • However, in standard frozen stallion insemination doses production, SP is entirely removed and replaced by a semen extender. The study aims to analyze the effects of SP protein groups that may contribute towards reducing the detrimental effects that occur to the spermatozoa during cryopreservation.

Methodology

  • The researchers separated SP proteins according to their ability to bind to heparin into heparin-binding (Hep+) and heparin-non-binding (Hep-) fractions. Three concentrations – 125, 250, and 500 µg/mL – of each protein fraction were tested.
  • To determine the effects of SP protein fractions on cryopreserved sperm, several parameters like sperm motility, plasma membrane integrity, acrosomal membrane integrity, and capacitation status were assessed post-thawing.

Results and Discussion

  • Results indicated a significant effect of the SP protein fractions on the kinematic parameters of spermatozoa and the proportions of their subpopulations. The study showed increased linearity and straightness, with the highest values of sperm velocities in the group subjected to 125 µg/mL of Hep+ protein fraction.
  • Interestingly, the acrosomal membrane integrity was also highest in the groups with Hep+ fraction in concentrations of 125 µg/mL. This suggests a potential protective effect of these fractions during the cryopreservation process.
  • Despite the effects observed on kinematics and acrosomal integrity, the addition of protein fractions did not significantly affect the plasma membrane integrity and capacitation status of stallion spermatozoa.

Conclusion

  • The study confirms that the effect of SP proteins on sperm functionality is concentration-dependent. It contributes significantly to the limited research on the possible use of specific stallion SP fractions in Cryopreservation protocols.
  • However, for more concrete improvement in this field, the researchers recommend further studies on the effect of individual SP proteins on other sperm functional parameters with an implication on the success of artificial insemination in in vivo conditions.

Cite This Article

APA
Bubenickova F, Postlerova P, Simonik O, Sirohi J, Sichtar J. (2020). Effect of Seminal Plasma Protein Fractions on Stallion Sperm Cryopreservation. Int J Mol Sci, 21(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21176415

Publication

ISSN: 1422-0067
NlmUniqueID: 101092791
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 17

Researcher Affiliations

Bubenickova, Filipa
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Postlerova, Pavla
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, 252 50 Vestec, Czech Republic.
Simonik, Ondrej
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, 252 50 Vestec, Czech Republic.
Sirohi, Jitka
  • Department of Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Sichtar, Jiri
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cryopreservation / veterinary
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Semen Preservation / methods
  • Semen Preservation / veterinary
  • Seminal Plasma Proteins / metabolism
  • Serum Albumin, Human / metabolism
  • Serum Globulins / metabolism
  • Spermatozoa / physiology

Grant Funding

  • SV19-05-21230 / Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague
  • GA-18-11275S / Grantová Agentura České Republiky
  • RVO:86652036 / BIOCEV (CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109) from ERDF and Institute of Biotechnology

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 80 references
  1. Vidament M, Dupere AM, Julienne P, Evain A, Noue P, Palmer E. Equine frozen semen: Freezability and fertility field results.. Theriogenology 1997;48:907–917.
    doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00319-1pubmed: 16728182google scholar: lookup
  2. Samper JC, Morris CA. Current methods for stallion semen cryopreservation: A survey.. Theriogenology 1998;49:895–903.
    doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00039-9pubmed: 10732098google scholar: lookup
  3. Loomis PR. The equine frozen semen industry.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2001;68:191–200.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(01)00156-7pubmed: 11744264google scholar: lookup
  4. Love CC, Brinsko SP, Rigby SL, Thompson JA, Blanchard TL, Varner DD. Relationship of seminal plasma level and extender type to sperm motility and DNA integrity.. Theriogenology 2005;63:1584–1591.
  5. Topfer-Petersen E, Ekhlasi-Hundrieser M, Kirchhoff C, Leeb T, Sieme H. The role of stallion seminal proteins in fertilisation.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2005;89:159–170.
  6. Centurion F, Vazquez JM, Calvete JJ, Roca J, Sanz L, Parrilla I, Garcia EM, Martinez EA. Influence of porcine spermadhesins on the susceptibility of boar spermatozoa to high dilution.. Biol. Reprod. 2003;69:640–646.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.016527pubmed: 12724275google scholar: lookup
  7. Lessard C, Parent S, Leclerc P, Bailey JL, Sullivan R. Cryopreservation alters the levels of the bull sperm surface protein P25b.. J. Androl. 2000;21:700–707.
    pubmed: 10975417
  8. Morris GJ, Acton E, Murray BJ, Fonseca F. Freezing injury: The special case of the sperm cell.. Cryobiology 2012;64:71–80.
  9. Deleeuw FE, Chen HC, Colenbrander B, Verkleij AJ. Cold-Induced ultrastructural-changes in bull and boar sperm plasma-membranes.. Cryobiology 1990;27:171–183.
    doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(90)90009-Spubmed: 2331890google scholar: lookup
  10. Bailey JL, Bilodeau JF, Cormier N. Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals: A damaging and capacitating phenomenon.. J. Androl. 2000;21:1–7.
    pubmed: 10670514
  11. Srivastava N, Srivastava SK, Ghosh SK, Jerome A, Das GK, Mehrotra S. Sequestration of PDC-109 Protein by Specific Antibodies and Egg Yolk Cryoprotects Bull Spermatozoa.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2013;48:724–731.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.12151pubmed: 23438047google scholar: lookup
  12. D’Amours O, Frenette G, Fortier M, Leclerc P, Sullivan R. Proteomic comparison of detergent-extracted sperm proteins from bulls with different fertility indexes.. Reproduction 2010;139:545–556.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-09-0375pubmed: 19952166google scholar: lookup
  13. Kumar A, Singh LP, Harshan HM, Majumdar AC. Seminal plasma non-heparin binding proteins (NHBP) reduce the cryoinjury to buffalo cauda epididymal spermatozoa induced by heparin binding proteins (HBP). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008;104:220–226.
  14. Singh LP, Harshan HM, Ansari MR. Effect of egg yolk and seminal plasma heparin binding protein interaction on the freezability of buffalo cauda epididymal spermatozoa.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2007;99:395–400.
  15. Harshan HM, Singh LP, Arangasamy A, Ansari MR, Kumar S. Effect of buffalo seminal plasma heparin binding protein (HBP) on freezability and in vitro fertility of buffalo cauda spermatozoa.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2006;93:124–133.
  16. Ramirez-Vasquez R, Cesari A, Greco MB, Cano A, Hozbor F. Extenders modify the seminal plasma ability to minimize freeze-thaw damage on ram sperm.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2019;54:1621–1629.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.13571pubmed: 31573694google scholar: lookup
  17. Aurich JE, Kuhne A, Hoppe H, Aurich C. Seminal plasma affects membrane integrity and motility of equine spermatozoa after cryopreservation.. Theriogenology 1996;46:791–797.
    doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(96)00237-3pubmed: 16727943google scholar: lookup
  18. Al-Essawe EM, Johannisson A, Wulf M, Aurich C, Morrell JM. Improved cryosurvival of stallion spermatozoa after colloid centrifugation is independent of the addition of seminal plasma.. Cryobiology 2018;81:145–152.
  19. Moore AI, Squires EL, Graham JK. Effect of seminal plasma on the cryopreservation of equine spermatozoa.. Theriogenology 2005;63:2372–2381.
  20. Arruda RP, Andrade AFC, Raphael CF, Peres KR, Nascimento J, Martins S, Bianconi LL. Effects of addition of seminal plasma on lifespan of frozen-thawed equine spermatozoa.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008;107:307–308.
  21. Neuhauser S, Dorfel S, Handler J. Motility of frozen-thawed stallion epididymal sperm after the addition of homologous seminal plasma from stallions with different semen quality.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2014;49:83–84.
  22. Sichtar J, Bubenickova F, Sirohi J, Simonik O. How to Increase Post-Thaw Semen Quality in Poor Freezing Stallions: Preliminary Results of the Promising Role of Seminal Plasma Added after Thawing.. Animals 2019;9:414.
    doi: 10.3390/ani9070414pmc: PMC6680634pubmed: 31277261google scholar: lookup
  23. De Andrade AFC, Zaffalon FG, Celeghini ECC, Nascimento J, Tarrago OFB, Martins S, Alonso MA, Arruda RP. Addition of Seminal Plasma to Post-thawing Equine Semen: What is the Effect on Sperm Cell Viability.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2011;46:682–686.
  24. Caballero I, Vazquez JM, Garcia EM, Parrilla I, Roca J, Calvete JJ, Sanz L, Martinez EA. Major proteins of boar seminal plasma as a tool for biotechnological preservation of spermatozoa.. Theriogenology 2008;70:1352–1355.
  25. Katila T, Kareskoski M. Components of stallion seminal plasma and their influence on spermatozoa.. Pferdeheilkunde 2006;22:193.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20060214google scholar: lookup
  26. Al-Essawe E, Tsikis G, Labas V, Druart X, Wulf M, Aurich C, Morrell JM. Seminal plasma components differ between “good freezer” and “poor freezer” stallions.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2016;169:113.
  27. Calvete JJ, Nessau S, Mann K, Sanz L, Sieme H, Klug E, Topferpetersen E. isolation and biochemical-characterization of stallion seminal-plasma proteins.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 1994;29:411–426.
  28. Reinert M, Calvete JJ, Sanz L, Mann K, TopferPetersen E. Primary structure of stallion seminal plasma protein HSP-7, a zona-pellucida-binding protein of the spermadhesin family.. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996;242:636–640.
  29. Magdaleno L, Gasset M, Varea J, Schambony AM, Urbanke C, Raida M, Topfer-Petersen E, Calvete JJ. Biochemical and conformational characterisation of HSP-3, a stallion seminal plasma protein of the cysteine-rich secretory protein (CRISP) family.. FEBS Lett. 1997;420:179–185.
    doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01514-7pubmed: 9459306google scholar: lookup
  30. Ekhlasi-Hundrieser M, Schafer B, Kirchhoff C, Hess O, Bellair S, Muller P, Topfer-Petersen E. Structural and molecular characterization of equine sperm-binding fibronectin-II module proteins.. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2005;70:45–57.
    doi: 10.1002/mrd.20187pubmed: 15515052google scholar: lookup
  31. Schambony A, Gentzel M, Wolfes H, Raida M, Neumann U, Topfer-Petersen E. Equine CRISP-3: Primary structure and expression in the male genital tract.. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1998;1387:206–216.
    doi: 10.1016/S0167-4838(98)00122-8pubmed: 9748582google scholar: lookup
  32. Usuga A, Rojano BA, Restrepo G. Association of the cysteine-rich secretory protein-3 (CRISP-3) and some of its polymorphisms with the quality of cryopreserved stallion semen.. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2018;30:563–569.
    doi: 10.1071/RD17044pubmed: 28855043google scholar: lookup
  33. Patel M, Gandotra VK, Cheema RS, Bansal AK, Kumar A. Seminal Plasma Heparin Binding Proteins Improve Semen Quality by Reducing Oxidative Stress during Cryopreservation of Cattle Bull Semen.. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016;29:1247–1255.
    doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0586pmc: PMC5003984pubmed: 26954172google scholar: lookup
  34. Roncoletta M, Morani EDC, Esper CR, Barnabe VH, Franceschini PH. Fertility-associated proteins in Nelore bull sperm membranes.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2006;91:77–87.
  35. Sarsaifi K, Haron A, Vejayan J, Yusoff R, Hani H, Omar MA, Hong LW, Yimer N, Ju TY, Othman AM. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of Bali bull (Bos javanicus) seminal plasma proteins and their relationship with semen quality.. Theriogenology 2015;84:956–968.
  36. Novak S, Smith TA, Paradis F, Burwash L, Dyck MK, Foxcroft GR, Dixon WT. Biomarkers of in vivo fertility in sperm and seminal plasma of fertile stallions.. Theriogenology 2010;74:956–967.
  37. Jobim MIM, Trein C, Zirkler H, Gregory RM, Sieme H, Mattos RC. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of equine seminal plasma proteins and their relation with semen freezability.. Theriogenology 2011;76:765–771.
  38. Restrepo G, Rojano B, Usuga A. Relationship of cysteine-rich secretory protein-3 gene and protein with semen quality in stallions.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2019;54:39–45.
    doi: 10.1111/rda.13309pubmed: 30099787google scholar: lookup
  39. Doty A, Buhi WC, Benson S, Scoggin KE, Pozor M, Macpherson M, Mutz M, Troedsson MHT. Equine CRISP3 Modulates Interaction Between Spermatozoa and Polymorphonuclear Neutrophils.. Biol. Reprod. 2011;85:157–164.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.084491pubmed: 21389342google scholar: lookup
  40. Singh A, Brar P, Cheema R. Effect of purified seminal plasma heparin binding proteins on in vitro acrosome reaction of frozen-thawed buffalo bull semen.. Indian Vet. J. 2016;93:69–70.
  41. Srivastava N, Jerome A, Srivastava SK, Ghosh SK, Kumar A. Bovine seminal PDC-109 protein: An overview of biochemical and functional properties.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2013;138:1–13.
  42. Bedford SJ, Jasko DJ, Graham JK, Amann RP, Squires EL, Pickett BW. Effect of seminal extenders containing egg-yolk and glycerol on motion characteristics and fertility of stallion spermatozoa.. Theriogenology 1995;43:955–967.
    doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(95)00045-Apubmed: 16727684google scholar: lookup
  43. Celeghini ECC, de Arruda RP, de Andrade AFC, Nascimento J, Raphael CF. Practical techniques for bovine sperm simultaneous fluorimetric assessment of plasma, acrosomal and mitochondrial membranes.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2007;42:479–488.
  44. Heise A, Thompson PN, Gerber D. Influence of seminal plasma on fresh and post-thaw parameters of stallion epididymal spermatozoa.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011;123:192–201.
  45. De Lazari FL, Sontag ER, Schneider A, Moura AAA, Vasconcelos FR, Nagano CS, Mattos RC, Jobim MIM, Bustamante IC. Seminal plasma proteins and their relationship with sperm motility and morphology in boars.. Andrologia 2019:51.
    doi: 10.1111/and.13222pubmed: 30592081google scholar: lookup
  46. Suárez UA, Rojano B, Restrepo G. Lyophilized seminal plasma can improve stallion semen freezability.. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2020;90:171–175.
  47. Quintero-Moreno A, Miro J, Rigau AT, Rodriguez-Gil JE. Identification of sperm subpopulations with specific motility characteristics in stallion ejaculates.. Theriogenology 2003;59:1973–1990.
    doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01297-9pubmed: 12600734google scholar: lookup
  48. Ferrusola CO, Fernandez LG, Morrell JM, Sandoval CS, Garcia BM, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Tapia JA, Pena FJ. Lipid Peroxidation, Assessed with BODIPY-C11, Increases after Cryopreservation of Stallion Spermatozoa, is Stallion-dependent and is Related to Apoptotic-like Changes.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009;44:88.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-08-0484pubmed: 19380427google scholar: lookup
  49. Martinez-Pastor F, Jorge Tizado E, Julian Garde J, Anel L, de Paz P. Statistical Series: Opportunities and challenges of sperm motility subpopulation analysis.. Theriogenology 2011;75:783–795.
  50. Taberner E, Morato R, Mogas T, Miro J. Ability of Catalonian donkey sperm to penetrate zona pellucida-free bovine oocytes matured in vitro.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2010;118:354–361.
  51. Ferraz M, Morato R, Yeste M, Arcarons N, Pena AI, Tamargo C, Hidalgo CO, Muino R, Mogas T. Evaluation of sperm subpopulation structure in relation to in vitro sperm-oocyte interaction of frozen-thawed semen from Holstein bulls.. Theriogenology 2014;81:1067–1072.
  52. Gibb Z, Lambourne SR, Aitken RJ. The Paradoxical Relationship Between Stallion Fertility and Oxidative Stress.. Biol. Reprod. 2014;91:2415–2426.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.118539pubmed: 25078685google scholar: lookup
  53. Caballero I, Parrilla I, Alminana C, del Olmo D, Roca J, Martinez EA, Vazquez JM. Seminal Plasma Proteins as Modulators of the Sperm Function and Their Application in Sperm Biotechnologies.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012;47:12–21.
  54. Zigo M, Maňsková-Postlerov P, Zuidema D, Kerns K, Joňkov V, Tumov L, Bubeníckov F, Sutovsky P. Porcine model for the study of sperm capacitation, fertilization and male fertility.. Cell Tissue Res. 2020;380:237–262.
    doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03181-1pubmed: 32140927google scholar: lookup
  55. Visconti PE, Galantino-Homer H, Moore GD, Bailey JL, Ning XP, Fornes M, Kopf GS. The molecular basis of sperm capacitation.. J. Androl. 1998;19:242–248.
    pubmed: 9570749
  56. Therien I, Moreau R, Manjunath P. Bovine seminal plasma phospholipid-binding proteins stimulate phospholipid efflux from epididymal sperm.. Biol. Reprod. 1999;61:590–598.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.3.590pubmed: 10456833google scholar: lookup
  57. Moreau R, Manjunath P. Characteristics of the cholesterol efflux induced by novel seminal phospholipid-binding proteins.. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2000;1487:24–32.
    doi: 10.1016/S1388-1981(00)00080-9pubmed: 10962285google scholar: lookup
  58. Manjunath P, Villemure M, Lazure C. Isolation and characterization of phospholipid-binding proteins from goat seminal plasma.. Biol. Reprod. 2002;66:332.
    pmc: PMC155548pubmed: 12737634
  59. Sellem E, Broekhuijse MLWJ, Chevrier L, Camugli S, Schmitt E, Schibler L, Koenen EPC. Use of combinations of in vitro quality assessments to predict fertility of bovine semen.. Theriogenology 2015;84:1447–1454.
  60. Ordonez-Leon EA, Kjelland ME, Moreno JF, Welsh TH, Randel RD, Lammoglia MA, Ducolomb Y, Romo S. In vitro fertilization using frozen-thawed sexed semen treated with recombinant heparin-binding proteins.. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2012;24:197–198.
    doi: 10.1071/RDv24n1Ab171google scholar: lookup
  61. Pena FJ, O’Flaherty C, Rodriguez JMO, Cano FEM, Gaitskell-Phillips GL, Gil MC, Ferrusola CO. Redox Regulation and Oxidative Stress: The Particular Case of the Stallion Spermatozoa.. Antioxidants 2019;8:567.
    doi: 10.3390/antiox8110567pmc: PMC6912273pubmed: 31752408google scholar: lookup
  62. Watson PF. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000;60:481–492.
    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3pubmed: 10844218google scholar: lookup
  63. Gadella BM, Harrison RAP. The capacitating agent bicarbonate induces protein kinase A-dependent changes in phospholipid transbilayer behavior in the sperm plasma membrane.. Development 2000;127:2407–2420.
    pubmed: 10804182
  64. Cormier N, Sirard MA, Bailey JL. Premature capacitation of bovine spermatozoa is initiated by cryopreservation.. J. Androl. 1997;18:461–468.
    pubmed: 9283961
  65. Kumaresan A, Siqueira AP, Hossain MS, Bergqvist AS. Cryopreservation-induced alterations in protein tyrosine phosphorylation of spermatozoa from different portions of the boar ejaculate.. Cryobiology 2011;63:137–144.
  66. Bedford JM, Mock OB, Nagdas SK, Winfrey VP, Olson GE. Reproductive characteristics of the African pygmy hedgehog, Atelerix albiventris.. J. Reprod. Fertil. 2000;120:143–150.
    doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1200143pubmed: 11006156google scholar: lookup
  67. Kadirvel G, Periasamy S, Kumar S. Effect of Cryopreservation on Apoptotic-like Events and its Relationship with Cryocapacitation of Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Sperm.. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012;47:143–150.
  68. Vieira LA, Gadea J, Garcia-Vazquez FA, Aviles-Lopez K, Matas C. Equine spermatozoa stored in the epididymis for up to 96 h at 4 degrees C can be successfully cryopreserved and maintain their fertilization capacity.. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2013;136:280–288.
  69. Leemans B, Stout TAE, De Schauwer C, Heras S, Nelis H, Hoogewijs M, Van Soom A, Gadella BM. Update on mammalian sperm capacitation: How much does the horse differ from other species.. Reproduction 2019;157:R181–R197.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-18-0541pubmed: 30721132google scholar: lookup
  70. Pommer AC, Rutllant J, Meyers SA. Phosphorylation of protein tyrosine residues in fresh and cryopreserved stallion spermatozoa under capacitating conditions.. Biol. Reprod. 2003;68:1208–1214.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.011106pubmed: 12606471google scholar: lookup
  71. Lusignan MF, Bergeron A, Crete MH, Lazure C, Manjunath P. Induction of epididymal boar sperm capacitation by pB1 and BSP-A1/-A2 proteins, members of the BSP protein family.. Biol. Reprod. 2007;76:424–432.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.055624pubmed: 17123943google scholar: lookup
  72. Therien I, Bleau G, Manjunath P. Phosphatidylcholine-binding proteins of bovine seminal plasma modulate capacitation of spermatozoa by heparin.. Biol. Reprod. 1995;52:1372–1379.
    doi: 10.1095/biolreprod52.6.1372pubmed: 7632845google scholar: lookup
  73. Suzuki K, Asano A, Eriksson B, Niwa K, Nagai T, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Capacitation status and in vitro fertility of boar spermatozoa: Effects of seminal plasma, cumulus-oocyte-complexes-conditioned medium and hyaluronan.. Int. J. Androl. 2002;25:84–93.
  74. Vadnais ML, Roberts KP. Effects of seminal plasma on cooling-induced capacitative changes in boar sperm.. J. Androl. 2007;28:416–422.
    doi: 10.2164/jandrol.106.001826pubmed: 17192595google scholar: lookup
  75. Leahy T, Rickard JP, Bernecic NC, Druart X, de Graaf SP. Ram seminal plasma and its functional proteomic assessment.. Reproduction 2019;157:R243–R256.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-18-0627pubmed: 30844754google scholar: lookup
  76. Druart X, Rickard JP, Mactier S, Kohnke PL, Kershaw-Young CM, Bathgate R, Gibb Z, Crossett B, Tsikis G, Labas V. Proteomic characterization and cross species comparison of mammalian seminal plasma.. J. Proteom. 2013;91:13–22.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.05.029pubmed: 23748023google scholar: lookup
  77. Davis BK. Timing of fertilization in mammals—Sperm cholesterol phospholipid ratio as a determinant of the capacitation interval.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981;78:7560–7564.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7560pmc: PMC349308pubmed: 6950397google scholar: lookup
  78. Hoshi K, Aita T, Yanagida K, Yoshimatsu N, Sato A. Variation in the cholesterol phospholipid ratio in human spermatozoa and its relationship with capacitation.. Hum. Reprod. 1990;5:71–74.
  79. Barańska K, Tischner M. Evaluating Capacitation of Stallion Spermatozoa Obtained from the Mare’s Reproductive Tract.. Biol. Reprod. 1995;52:707–712.
  80. Manaskova P, Meszarosova A, Liberda J, Voburka Z, Ticha M, Jonakova V. Aggregated forms of heparin-binding and non-heparin-binding proteins of boar seminal plasma and their binding properties.. Folia Biol. 1999;45:193–201.
    pubmed: 10730888