Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2014; 75(3); 223-230; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.75.3.223

Effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibition on quality of recovery from isoflurane-induced anesthesia in horses.

Abstract: To compare effects of 2 acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on recovery quality of horses anesthetized with isoflurane. Methods: 6 horses in phase 1, 7 horses in phase 2A, and 14 horses in phase 2B. Methods: The study comprised 3 phases (2 randomized, blinded crossover phases in horses undergoing orthopedic procedures and 1 prospective dose-determining phase). In phase 1, horses were anesthetized with isoflurane and received neostigmine or saline (0.9% NaCl) solution prior to anesthetic recovery. Phase 2A was a physostigmine dose-determining phase. In phase 2B, horses were anesthetized with isoflurane and received neostigmine or physostigmine prior to recovery. Objective recovery events were recorded and subjective visual analogue scale scores of recovery quality were assigned from video recordings. Results: Recovery measures in phase 1 were not different between horses receiving neostigmine or saline solution. In phase 2A, 0.04 mg of physostigmine/kg was the highest cumulative dose that did not cause clinically relevant adverse behavioral or gastrointestinal effects. Horses receiving physostigmine had higher mean ± SD visual analogue scale recovery scores (70.8 ± 13.3 mm) than did horses receiving neostigmine (62.4 ± 12.8 mm) in phase 2B, with fewer attempts until sternal and standing recovery. Incidence of colic behavior did not differ among groups. Conclusions: Inhibition with physostigmine improved anesthetic recovery quality in horses anesthetized with isoflurane, compared with recovery quality for horses receiving neostigmine. Inhibition of central muscarinic receptors by inhalation anesthetics may underlie emergence delirium in horses recovering from anesthesia.
Publication Date: 2014-02-26 PubMed ID: 24564307DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.75.3.223Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discussed the comparison of two acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on the quality of recovery of horses anesthetized with isoflurane. The study concluded that physostigmine improved anesthetic recovery quality in horses compared to neostigmine.

Objective

The research aimed to compare the effects of two acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, neostigmine and physostigmine, on the quality of recovery of horses anesthetized with isoflurane.

  • It involved three phases of the experiment with different groups of horses in each phase.
  • Neostigmine or saline solution was used in phase 1 and physostigmine in phases 2.
  • A key goal was to observe any behavioral or gastrointestinal side-effects in response to the administered drugs.

Methodology

The research was split into three different phases:

  • In the first phase, six horses were anesthetized with isoflurane and received neostigmine or saline solution before their recovery from the anesthesia.
  • In the second phase, physostigmine doses were determined on seven horses, and in phase 2B, fourteen horses were anesthetized with isoflurane and received neostigmine or physostigmine prior to recovery.
  • The differences in the recovery process of the horses in the different phases were recorded. Recovery quality was measured using a visual analogue scale.

Results

The results of the study showed distinct results:

  • In phase 1, there was no significant difference in recovery measures between the horses who received neostigmine or the saline solution.
  • In phase 2, the highest dose of physostigmine that did not cause adverse behavioral or gastrointestinal effects was identified as 0.04 mg/kg.
  • Horses that received physostigmine showed higher recovery scores than those who received neostigmine, with fewer attempts until recovery to a sternal and standing position. Colic behavior incidence did not differ among the groups.

Conclusions

After comparing the effects of the two acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, the study concluded that physostigmine improved the anesthetic recovery quality in horses anesthetized with isoflurane compared to neostigmine. Further, the research speculated that the emergence of delirium in horses recovering from anesthesia might be due to the inhibition of central muscarinic receptors by inhalation anesthetics.

Cite This Article

APA
Wiese AJ, Brosnan RJ, Barter LS. (2014). Effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibition on quality of recovery from isoflurane-induced anesthesia in horses. Am J Vet Res, 75(3), 223-230. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.75.3.223

Publication

ISSN: 1943-5681
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 75
Issue: 3
Pages: 223-230

Researcher Affiliations

Wiese, Ashley J
  • Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
Brosnan, Robert J
    Barter, Linda S

      MeSH Terms

      • Anesthesia / adverse effects
      • Anesthesia / veterinary
      • Anesthesia Recovery Period
      • Anesthetics, Inhalation / administration & dosage
      • Animals
      • Cholinesterase Inhibitors / administration & dosage
      • Cholinesterase Inhibitors / pharmacology
      • Cross-Over Studies
      • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
      • Female
      • Horses / physiology
      • Isoflurane / administration & dosage
      • Male
      • Neostigmine / administration & dosage
      • Neostigmine / pharmacology
      • Physostigmine / administration & dosage
      • Physostigmine / pharmacology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 3 times.
      1. Gozalo-Marcilla M, Ringer SK. Recovery after General Anaesthesia in Adult Horses: A Structured Summary of the Literature. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 14;11(6).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11061777pubmed: 34198637google scholar: lookup
      2. Hussain G, Rasul A, Anwar H, Aziz N, Razzaq A, Wei W, Ali M, Li J, Li X. Role of Plant Derived Alkaloids and Their Mechanism in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Int J Biol Sci 2018;14(3):341-357.
        doi: 10.7150/ijbs.23247pubmed: 29559851google scholar: lookup
      3. Naser AS, Mohammad FK. Central depressant effects and toxicity of propofol in chicks. Toxicol Rep 2014;1:562-568.
        doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.08.003pubmed: 28962269google scholar: lookup