Effects of chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorous acid-chlorine dioxide on equine fibroblasts and Staphylococcus aureus.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research study investigates the impact of varying concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate, chlorous acid-chlorine dioxide irrigation solution, and chlorous acid-chlorine dioxide disinfectant on equine fibroblasts and Staphylococcus aureus, a common bacteria. The study discovered that different concentrations of these substances have varying effects on the viability of equine fibroblasts, and also their efficacy in inhibiting the growth of Staphylococcus aureus.
Examination Process
The study involved exposing equine fibroblasts and Staphylococcus aureus to different concentrations of three substances, namely, chlorhexidine gluconate and two types of chlorous acid-chlorine dioxide solutions. Exposure lasted for 30 minutes.
- Cell viability was assessed through trypsinization, staining with trypan blue, and counting cells which did not absorb the stain.
- Phosphate buffered saline controls were used for comparison purposes.
Impact on Equine Fibroblasts
The research provided insight into how the viability of equine fibroblasts was affected by each substance.
- High concentrations of 1.0% and 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate were found to kill all fibroblast cells.
- Decreasing the concentration of chlorhexidine gluconate improved the survival rate linearly, with 50% cell survival observed at 0.005%.
- The chlorous acid-chlorine dioxide irrigation solution showed the least toxicity to fibroblasts, with cell survival rates similar to the controls.
- The chlorous acid-chlorine dioxide disinfectant, on the other hand, was completely cytotoxic, killing all cells in a 1:1 dilution with phosphate buffered saline.
Impact on Staphylococcus aureus
How the substances impacted Staphylococcus aureus growth was also a prominent component of the study.
- Staphylococcus aureus growth was hindered by 1.0% and 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate.
- Lower concentrations of 0.05%, 0.01%, and 0.005% did not show much difference from the sterile water controls.
- The chlorous acid-chlorine dioxide irrigation solution did not impede the growth of Staphylococcus aureus in the brain-heart infusion broth.
- Conversely, the chlorous acid-chlorine dioxide disinfectant was effective in inhibiting the growth of Staphylococcus aureus.
Cite This Article
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Iowa State University, Ames.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Cell Line
- Cell Survival / drug effects
- Chlorhexidine / analogs & derivatives
- Chlorhexidine / pharmacology
- Chlorides / pharmacology
- Chlorine / pharmacology
- Chlorine Compounds
- Colony Count, Microbial
- Disinfectants / pharmacology
- Drug Combinations
- Fibroblasts / drug effects
- Horses
- Oxides / pharmacology
- Skin / cytology
- Staphylococcus aureus / drug effects
- Staphylococcus aureus / growth & development
Citations
This article has been cited 1 times.- Láng O, Nagy KS, Láng J, Perczel-Kovách K, Herczegh A, Lohinai Z, Varga G, Kőhidai L. Comparative study of hyperpure chlorine dioxide with two other irrigants regarding the viability of periodontal ligament stem cells. Clin Oral Investig 2021 May;25(5):2981-2992.