Effects of different animal manures on attraction and reproductive behaviors of common house fly, Musca domestica L.
Abstract: Insects rely mainly on their well-developed and highly sophisticated olfactory system to discriminate volatile cues released from host and nonhost substances, mates, oviposition substrates, and food sources. Onset of first mating, mating duration, and onset of first oviposition, oviposition period, fecundity (number of eggs laid by a female), and longevity of freshly emerged Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) adults were observed in the presence of different animal manures: cow, horse, donkey, poultry, and an artificial diet. The M. domestica adults exposed to horse manure showed a delay in onset of first mating and first oviposition, prolonged mating duration, and reduced fecundity compared to the artificial diet (control). Likewise, the fecundity was reduced in the presence of donkey manure as compared to artificial diet. The onset of first mating was delayed and duration of first mating was shortened in the presence of cow manure as compared to artificial diet and no oviposition was observed throughout the duration of the experiment. However, the reproductive behaviors and all fitness measures in adults exposed to poultry manure were similar or even better, compared to the artificial diet. Surprisingly, in a free-choice attraction assay, the highest numbers of adult flies were attracted toward the cow manure as compared to all other manures as well as the artificial diet. However, the numbers of flies captured in all other types of manures were not different than the artificial diet (control). Furthermore, chemical analysis of headspace samples of manures revealed qualitative differences in odor (volatile) profiles of all manures and artificial diet, indicating that behavioral differences could be due to the differences in the volatile chemistry of the adult ovipositional substrates and larval growth mediums. This study may contribute toward both understanding the linkage between ecological adaptations and host selection mechanisms and the development of pest management strategies against this serious pest of medical and veterinary importance.
Publication Date: 2016-05-20 PubMed ID: 27206657DOI: 10.1007/s00436-016-5124-0Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research study investigates the effect of different animal manures on the behaviors and reproduction of common house flies. The study finds that different animal manures have different impacts on the fly’s mating and oviposition (egg-laying) timing, duration, and frequency, potentially due to differences in their odors. The findings may aid in developing pest control strategies.
Research Methodology
- The research team monitored the behaviors of freshly emerged Musca domestica L. (common housefly) adults in the presence of different animal manures such as cow, horse, donkey, poultry, as well as an artificial diet which served as control.
- The team observed onset of first mating, mating duration, onset of first oviposition, oviposition period, fecundity (number of eggs laid), and lifecycle duration (longevity).
- A free-choice attraction assay was also performed, where the number of adult flies attracted to each type of manure and the artificial diet was recorded.
- A chemical analysis of the volatile compounds present in the manures and the artificial diet was also performed to understand its linkage with the flies’ behavioral differences.
Key Findings
- Horse manure was found to delay the onset of first mating and first oviposition, prolonged mating duration, and reduced fecundity compared to the artificial diet.
- Donkey manure resulted in reduced fecundity compared to the artificial diet.
- Flies exposed to cow manure showed a delayed onset of first mating and shortened first mating duration compared to the artificial diet, and no oviposition was observed.
- Reproductive behaviors in adult flies exposed to poultry manure were similar or even superior compared to the artificial diet.
- Despite poor reproductive outcomes, the largest number of flies was attracted to cow manure.
- Chemical analysis revealed variation in the odor profiles of all manures and the artificial diet, indicating that the differences in behaviors could be due to the different volatiles present in ovipositional substrates and larval growth mediums.
Implications of the Research
- Understanding these behavioral responses of flies could assist in the development of pest management strategies. For example, cow manure could be used as an attractant in traps.
- These findings shed light on the relationship between ecological adaptations of flies like Musca domestica and their host selection mechanisms.
- The results provide vital information for further research in biological, agricultural, and environmental sciences, particularly for those interested in insect biology, pest control, and manure management.
Cite This Article
APA
Shah RM, Azhar F, Shad SA, Walker WB, Azeem M, Binyameen M.
(2016).
Effects of different animal manures on attraction and reproductive behaviors of common house fly, Musca domestica L.
Parasitol Res, 115(9), 3585-3598.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5124-0 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan. rizwanmustafa20@gmail.com.
- Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
- Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
- Unit of Chemical Ecology, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O.Box 102, SE-23053, Alnarp, Sweden.
- Department of Chemistry, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad, 22060, Pakistan.
- Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan. mbinyameen@bzu.edu.pk.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Cattle
- Feeding Behavior
- Female
- Fertility
- Horses
- Houseflies / growth & development
- Larva
- Longevity
- Male
- Manure / parasitology
- Oviposition
- Reproduction
- Species Specificity
References
This article includes 41 references
- Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Dec;110 Suppl 6:901-9
- Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):857-72
- J Environ Sci Health B. 2007 May;42(4):453-69
- J Econ Entomol. 1996 Aug;89(4):940-5
- J Chem Ecol. 2007 Aug;33(8):1528-41
- Acta Trop. 1958;15(1):1-14
- J Chem Ecol. 2013 Jan;39(1):120-8
- Parasitol Res. 2014 Apr;113(4):1343-52
- PLoS One. 2010 Aug 17;5(8):e12219
- Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Nov;82(4):591-605
- PLoS One. 2013 Sep 24;8(9):e77225
- J Chem Ecol. 2010 Jan;36(1):80-100
- Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006 Jul;63(14 ):1579-85
- Ecotoxicology. 2013 Apr;22(3):522-7
- J Chem Ecol. 2013 Oct;39(10):1273-83
- J Econ Entomol. 2001 Oct;94(5):1308-17
- Parasitol Res. 2015 Feb;114(2):487-94
- Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 12;363(1491):495-515
- Parasitol Res. 2007 Jun;101(1):243-6
- Pak J Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 15;10(8):1301-4
- J Econ Entomol. 2015 Apr;108(2):826-33
- Pest Manag Sci. 2010 Jul;66(7):693-5
- Oecologia. 2011 Jul;166(3):703-11
- J Econ Entomol. 2002 Dec;95(6):1251-60
- Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:123-46
- Med Vet Entomol. 2007 Sep;21(3):209-16
- Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006 Sep;37(5):915-31
- Parasitol Res. 2008 Aug;103(3):535-44
- Se Pu. 2007 May;25(3):425-9
- Pest Manag Sci. 2010 Aug;66(8):816-24
- J Econ Entomol. 2003 Aug;96(4):1300-6
- J Chromatogr A. 2007 Jan 19;1139(2):279-84
- Environ Entomol. 2008 Feb;37(1):11-5
- Parasitol Res. 2012 Sep;111(3):1165-71
- Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 7;272(1580):2499-503
- J Med Entomol. 2012 Jan;49(1):198-209
- PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32798
- J Chem Ecol. 2008 Jul;34(7):882-97
- Annu Rev Entomol. 2007;52:375-400
- Pak J Biol Sci. 2007 Oct 15;10 (20):3549-56
- Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2002;49(2):163-4
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists