Analyze Diet
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia2019; 46(6); 780-788; doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.04.016

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure alone or an open-lung approach on recruited lung volumes and respiratory mechanics of mechanically ventilated horses.

Abstract: To evaluate the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) alone and PEEP preceded by lung recruitment manoeuvre (LRM) on lung volumes and respiratory system mechanics in healthy horses undergoing general anaesthesia. Methods: Controlled, prospective clinical study. Methods: A group of 15 horses undergoing arthroscopy. Methods: Following anaesthetic induction, initial ventilatory settings were: tidal volume 15 mL kg, inspiratory:expiratory ratio 1:2, respiratory rate to maintain end-tidal CO between 5.3-6.6 kPa (40-50 mmHg). The following settings were implemented sequentially: zero PEEP (ZEEP); PEEP 10 cmHO (PEEP); LRM (50 cmHO for 20 seconds) followed by 10 cmHO of PEEP (LRM + PEEP). Static compliance (C), driving pressure, delta end-expiratory (ΔEELV) and recruited lung volumes (RLV) were obtained 30 minutes after initiating each ventilatory strategy. Data were analyzed with paired t test or analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: PEEP induced ΔEELV of 6.68 ± 3.36 mL kg; ΔEELV during LRM + PEEP was 14.28 ± 5.59 mL kg (p < 0.0001). The RLV was greater during the LRM + PEEP phase (12.30 ± 5.85 mL kg) than during PEEP (4.47 ± 3.97 mL kg; p < 0.0001). The C was unchanged from ZEEP to PEEP (0.75 ± 0.21 and 0.85 ± 0.22 mL cmHO kg, respectively, p = 0.36) but increased using LRM + PEEP (1.11 ± 0.25 mL cmHO kg, p = 0.0004). Driving pressure was lower during LRM + PEEP than during PEEP and ZEEP (16 ± 2, 19 ± 2 and 21 ± 4 cmHO, respectively, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Unlike PEEP alone, PEEP preceded by LRM increased RLV and C and reduced driving pressure in horses under anaesthesia.
Publication Date: 2019-06-26 PubMed ID: 31477474DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.04.016Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Veterinary
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates the impact of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) both alone and preluded by a lung recruitment manoeuvre (LRM) on lung volumes and mechanics of horses under general anaesthesia. The results demonstrate that pairing PEEP with LRM effectively increases lung volumes, enhances lung compliance, and reduces driving pressure in anaesthetized horses.

Study Methodology

  • The study was a controlled, clinical study that was prospectively conducted on 15 horses undergoing arthroscopy.
  • Post anaesthetic induction, the initial ventilatory settings were set with specific parameters. These included a tidal volume of 15 mL kg, an inspiratory:expiratory ratio of 1:2, and a respiratory rate designed to maintain end-tidal CO levels between 5.3-6.6 kPa (40-50 mmHg).
  • The researchers applied different ventilatory strategies sequentially: zero PEEP (ZEEP), PEEP of 10 cmHO (PEEP), and LRM (50 cmHO for 20 seconds) followed by 10 cmHO of PEEP (LRM + PEEP).
  • Various assessments for static compliance (C), driving pressure, delta end-expiratory volumes (ΔEELV), and recruited lung volumes (RLV) were executed 30 minutes after each ventilatory strategy’s initiation.
  • Data extracted was analyzed using paired t test or analysis of variance, followed by further analysis with Tukey’s post hoc test. Any p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Study Results

  • Application of PEEP resulted in a ΔEELV of 6.68 ± 3.36 mL kg. However, this volume was significantly increased to 14.28 ± 5.59 mL kg (p < 0.0001) in the case of LRM + PEEP.
  • RLV was found to be greater during the LRM + PEEP phase (12.30 ± 5.85 mL kg) than during PEEP (4.47 ± 3.97 mL kg; p < 0.0001).
  • The C was unaffected from ZEEP to PEEP but increased when applying LRM + PEEP.
  • Driving pressure was recorded to be lesser during the LRM + PEEP phase than during PEEP and ZEEP.

Study Conclusion

  • The study concluded that PEEP, when executed alone, did not enhance RLV or C or reduce driving pressure in horses under anaesthesia.
  • However, PEEP administered following LRM significantly increased RLV and C while reducing driving pressure in anaesthetized horses.

Cite This Article

APA
(2019). Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure alone or an open-lung approach on recruited lung volumes and respiratory mechanics of mechanically ventilated horses. Vet Anaesth Analg, 46(6), 780-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2019.04.016

Publication

ISSN: 1467-2995
NlmUniqueID: 100956422
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 46
Issue: 6
Pages: 780-788
PII: S1467-2987(19)30165-5

Researcher Affiliations

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Arthroscopy / veterinary
  • Horses / physiology
  • Lung / physiology
  • Positive-Pressure Respiration / veterinary
  • Respiration, Artificial / veterinary
  • Respiratory Mechanics
  • Respiratory Rate
  • Tidal Volume

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.