Analyze Diet
Theriogenology2018; 117; 34-39; doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.05.023

Effects of seminal plasma and flash-freezing on DNA structure of stallion epididymal sperm exposed to different potentiators of DNA damage.

Abstract: The tolerance of sperm DNA structure to seminal plasma and freezing conditions has both clinical and basic biologic relevance. In this study, fresh (FS) or flash-frozen (FZ) stallion epididymal sperm were exposed (SP) or unexposed (SP) to seminal plasma. Sperm were then evaluated to monitor the degree of change in DNA structure following challenge with chemical (dithiothreitol-DTT), oxidative (iron sulfate; FeSO) or enzymatic (DNase I) potentiators of DNA damage. For sperm not treated with potentiators (controls), there was no effect of SP treatment (SP vs. SP) or freezing treatment (FS vs. FZ; non-significant) on measures of any DNA assays (i.e., 8-hydroxy, 2'deoxyguanosine [8OHdG], TUNEL, or sperm chromatin structure [SCSA] assays). Group FZ was more susceptible than Group FS to potentiators of DNA damage. Percent 8OHdG-positive sperm was higher in Group FZ/SP treated with FeSO than all other groups (P < 0.05). Percent TUNEL-positive sperm was similar among FZ/SP groups treated with DTT, FeSO, or DNase (non-significant) and was higher in these groups than all other treatments (P < 0.05). Percent COMP-α was higher following treatment with DNase or DTT, as compared to their respective controls, regardless of prior exposure to SP (P < 0.05). Overall, sperm DNA structure was unaffected by seminal plasma or freezing treatment when samples were not exposed to potentiators of sperm DNA damage; however, marked differences were identified in DNA structure when sperm were challenged with chemical, oxidative or enzymatic treatments. These results highlight the importance of challenging DNA structure prior to analysis. The use of potentiators of DNA damage provided a model to evaluate sperm DNA structure following exposure of sperm to various experimental treatments.
Publication Date: 2018-05-24 PubMed ID: 29807256DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.05.023Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study investigated the effects of seminal plasma and freezing conditions on the DNA structure of fresh and flash-frozen stallion epididymal sperm when exposed to potentiators of DNA damage. The study found that while seminal plasma and freezing did not affect the sperm DNA structure, when the sperm samples were exposed to potentiators of DNA damage, significant changes in DNA structure were noticed.

Objective and Methodology of the Study

  • This study aimed to understand the impact of seminal plasma and freezing conditions on the DNA structure of stallion sperm by exposing them to different DNA damage potentiators.
  • The researchers conducted tests on both fresh (FS) and flash-frozen (FZ) stallion epididymal sperm, with and without exposure to seminal plasma (SP).
  • The sperm samples were then subjected to three types of DNA damage potentiators: chemical (dithiothreitol-DTT), oxidative (iron sulfate; FeSO), and enzymatic (DNase I).

Key Findings

  • The study found no significant impact on sperm DNA structure when exposed to seminal plasma or freezing conditions, without any potentiators of DNA damage.
  • When exposed to DNA damage potentiators, the flash-frozen sperm group (FZ) was more susceptible to DNA damage than the fresh sperm group (FS).
  • The highest DNA damage was observed in the FZ/SP group treated with FeSO, as indicated by the higher percentage of 8-hydroxy, 2’deoxyguanosine (8OHdG) positive sperm.
  • Similarly high percentage of TUNEL-positive sperm was observed in the FZ/SP group treated with all three types of potentiators, indicating their higher susceptibility to DNA damage.

Conclusion

  • The findings of the study highlight the necessity of testing sperm DNA structure after challenging it with chemical, oxidative, or enzymatic treatments.
  • Without inducing DNA damage, both seminal plasma and freezing conditions did not significantly affect the DNA structure of the sperm.
  • However, marked differences in the DNA structure were observed when the sperm was exposed to DNA damaging potentiators. Thus, challenging the DNA structure prior to analysis is important to identify potential susceptibilities.

Cite This Article

APA
Serafini R, Varner DD, Blanchard TL, Teague SR, LaCaze K, Love CC. (2018). Effects of seminal plasma and flash-freezing on DNA structure of stallion epididymal sperm exposed to different potentiators of DNA damage. Theriogenology, 117, 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.05.023

Publication

ISSN: 1879-3231
NlmUniqueID: 0421510
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 117
Pages: 34-39
PII: S0093-691X(18)30224-3

Researcher Affiliations

Serafini, R
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, TX, USA. Electronic address: rosanna.serafini@gmail.com.
Varner, D D
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, TX, USA.
Blanchard, T L
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, TX, USA.
Teague, S R
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, TX, USA.
LaCaze, K
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, TX, USA.
Love, C C
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, TX, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cryopreservation / methods
  • Cryopreservation / veterinary
  • DNA / ultrastructure
  • DNA Damage
  • Deoxyribonuclease I / pharmacology
  • Dithiothreitol / pharmacology
  • Horses
  • In Situ Nick-End Labeling
  • Male
  • Oxidative Stress
  • Semen
  • Semen Analysis / veterinary
  • Semen Preservation / methods
  • Semen Preservation / veterinary
  • Sulfates / pharmacology

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Soria-Meneses PJ, Jurado-Campos A, Gómez-Rubio V, Sánchez-Ajofrín I, Soler AJ, Garde JJ, Fernández-Santos MDR. Determination of Ram (Ovis aries) Sperm DNA Damage Due to Oxidative Stress: 8-OHdG Immunodetection Assay vs. SCSA(®). Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 25;12(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12233286pubmed: 36496807google scholar: lookup
  2. Abah KO, Ligocka-Kowalczyk Z, Itodo JI, Ameh G, Partyka A, Nizanski W. Association between sperm DNA fragmentation and fertility parameters in farm animals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Vet Res 2025 Mar 26;21(1):204.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04652-9pubmed: 40133892google scholar: lookup