Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2015; 48(6); 727-731; doi: 10.1111/evj.12534

Efficacy and effects of various anti-crib devices on behaviour and physiology of crib-biting horses.

Abstract: Crib-biting is a common oral stereotypy. Although most treatments involve prevention, the efficacy of various anti-crib devices, including surgically implanted gingival rings, has thus far not been empirically tested. Objective: Demonstrate the effect that 2 anti-crib collars, muzzle and gingival rings have on crib-biting, other maintenance behaviours, and cortisol levels in established crib-biting horses. Methods: Randomised, crossover clinical trial. Methods: In Experiment I, 2 anti-crib collars and a muzzle were used on 8 established crib-biting horses; horses wore each of 3 devices for 7 days, with a 7-day device-free period between treatments. Horses were video recorded for 24 h at least 3 times each week prior to any device placement, and always the day after a device was removed. In Experiment II, gingival rings were used in 6 established crib-biting horses; horses were video recorded for 3 days prior to ring implantation and the day after surgery until the rings became ineffective. Plasma cortisol levels were assessed every day during Experiment II and on Days 1, 3 and 5 of each week during Experiment I. Results: All devices significantly reduced crib-biting compared with control periods. There was no significant difference in crib-bite reduction amongst devices in Experiment I, or between pre-device periods and the first day the device was removed. The only increase in plasma cortisol occurred on the day of surgery in Experiment II. Conclusions: Common anti-crib devices are effective in reducing crib-biting and significant distress was not evident from our findings. We did not find a post inhibitory rebound effect. Surgical rings were successful only temporarily and implantation was probably painful to the horses. Because stereotypies involve suboptimal environmental conditions, efforts should be made to improve husbandry factors previously shown to contribute to crib-biting, and research into decreasing horses' motivation to crib-bite should continue.
Publication Date: 2015-12-11 PubMed ID: 26537825DOI: 10.1111/evj.12534Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research discussed in the article investigates the effect of various anti-crib devices, including surgical rings, on crib-biting behavior, other maintenance behaviors, and cortisol levels in horses. The study demonstrates that these devices significantly reduce crib-biting, but the surgical rings were only effective temporarily and likely caused pain to the horses.

Research Methodology

  • The research was carried out over two experiments in a randomized, crossover clinical trial involving established crib-biting horses.
  • In the first experiment, two anti-crib collars and a muzzle were used on eight horses, each wearing three different devices for seven days, with a week-long device-free period between each treatment.
  • The horses were video recorded for 24 hours at least three times each week before the placement of any device, and again the day after the removal of a device.
  • In the second experiment, surgical gingival rings were implanted in six horses. These horses were video recorded for three days preceding the surgery and every day post-surgery until the rings became ineffective.
  • Plasma cortisol levels were measured every day during the second experiment and on the first, third and fifth days of each week during the first experiment.

Key Findings

  • All the tested devices led to a significant reduction in the crib-biting behavior compared to control periods when the horses were not wearing any devices.
  • There was no significant variant in crib-bite reduction among the devices in the first experiment, or between pre-device periods and the first day the device was removed.
  • The only notable increase in plasma cortisol levels, indicative of stress, occurred on the day of the gingival ring surgeries in the second experiment, suggesting that the surgical procedure was likely painful to the horses.
  • The surgical rings were only temporarily successful.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • The research concluded that common anti-crib devices are successful in reducing crib-biting in horses, but did not induce significant distress, as per the findings.
  • The effectiveness of surgical rings was temporary and the procedure was probably painful for the horses, suggesting a need for alternate long-term solutions.
  • The authors recommend improving husbandry factors shown to contribute to crib-biting and emphasize the continuation of research into ways to decrease horses’ motivation to display this behavior.

Cite This Article

APA
Albright JD, Witte TH, Rohrbach BW, Reed A, Houpt KA. (2015). Efficacy and effects of various anti-crib devices on behaviour and physiology of crib-biting horses. Equine Vet J, 48(6), 727-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12534

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 48
Issue: 6
Pages: 727-731

Researcher Affiliations

Albright, J D
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, USA. jalbrig1@utk.edu.
  • Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA. jalbrig1@utk.edu.
Witte, T H
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, USA.
  • Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, UK.
Rohrbach, B W
  • Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, The University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, USA.
Reed, A
  • Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, The University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, USA.
Houpt, K A
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horses / physiology
  • Stereotyped Behavior

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.