Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound-guided twin reduction in the mare by embryonic or fetal stabbing compared with yolk sac or allantoic fluid aspiration.
Abstract: Transvaginal ultrasound-guided pregnancy reduction (TUGR) is a procedure described for the management of twins post-fixation in the horse. Success rates are often disappointing but are reported to be more favorable for bilaterally situated twins and when intervention takes place before day 35 of gestation. This study aimed to determine whether stabbing the embryo/fetus rather than aspirating conceptus fluids improved the likelihood of success, measured as the birth of a normal live singleton foal. Data from 103 TUGR interventions were analyzed by logistic regression analysis; method of treatment, relative conceptus location (i.e., uni- vs. bilateral), and stage of gestation were included as interdependent factors that potentially influence the outcome. Overall, 34/103 (33%) TUGR interventions resulted in a single live foal. There was no significant difference (P = 0.14) in the outcome between TUGR based on fetal stabbing (12/28: 42.9%) versus fluid aspiration (22/75: 29.3%). There was also no significant influence (P = 0.11) of the conceptuses being located unilaterally (19/65: 29.2%) versus bilaterally (15/38: 39.5%). However, TUGR was numerically more successful (P = 0.05) when performed ≤ Day 35 of gestation (21/53: 39.6%), as opposed to > Day 35 (13/50: 26%). Day 45 may represent an even more critical time point because only 2 out of 15 TUGRs (13.3%) performed beyond this day resulted in the birth of a live foal, compared with 11/35 (31.4%) performed between Days 36 and 45. Although the numbers are low, this suggests that TUGR is not the method of choice for reducing > Day 45 twins. Four pregnancy losses were recorded 1 to 7 months post-TUGR (4/38: 10.5%), and although it is tempting to attribute the losses to TUGR, this rate of late gestation pregnancy loss is normal. We conclude that TUGR by fetal stabbing does not offer significant advantages over fluid aspiration. However, TUGR should be performed before Day 35 of gestation and is considered primarily a salvage procedure to be used when re-breeding is not a viable alternative.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2013-06-06 PubMed ID: 23746694DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.04.021Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Evaluation Study
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research study investigates the efficacy of different methods for transvaginal ultrasound-guided pregnancy reduction (TUGR) in horses, particularly when managing twins after fixation. The study reveals no significant advantage of fetal stabbing over fluid aspiration, but advises performing TUGR before day 35 of gestation as it presents a better probability of success.
Transvaginal Ultrasound-Guided Pregnancy Reduction (TUGR)
- Transvaginal ultrasound-guided pregnancy reduction is a procedure employed in the management of twin pregnancies in horses, especially after fixation. However, success rates for this intervention are often low.
- Twin pregnancies in horses can lead to complications, often resulting in miscarriage or the birth of undersized foals. This is where TUGR is effective, reducing the pregnancy to manage these challenges.
Comparing Efficacy of Method: Fetal Stabbing vs Fluid Aspiration
- The study scrutinized the data from 103 TUGR interventions, aiming to determine whether stabbing the embryo/fetus was any better than aspirating conceptus fluids.
- Success was measured by the birth of a healthy, single foal. The data did not show any significant difference in birth outcomes between fetal stabbing and fluid aspiration techniques.
Influence of Gestation Stage and Location of Conceptus on success
- Relative conceptus location (i.e., uni- vs. bilateral), stage of gestation, and treatment method were considered interdependent factors that possibly influence the outcome of TUGR.
- The study found that neither the location of conception (whether unilateral or bilateral) nor the intervention method had significant influence on the outcome.
- However, it was noted that TUGR was numerically more successful when performed at or before Day 35 of gestation as opposed to after Day 35.
Time Constraints and Risks
- The study suggests that Day 45 may be a critical threshold as TUGR interventions beyond this day yielded far less successful outcomes. Therefore, it was concluded that TUGR is not the preferred method for reducing twins beyond Day 45 of gestation.
- Despite four recorded pregnancy losses 1 to 7 months post-TUGR, the researchers did not firmly attribute these to the procedure itself due to this being a normal rate of late gestation pregnancy loss.
Conclusion from the Study
- The study concluded that TUGR by fetal stabbing does not offer any significant advantages over fluid aspiration.
- The research recommends that TUGR should be performed before Day 35 of gestation. It also describes TUGR as a salvage procedure, advisory when re-breeding is not a feasible alternative resort for the management of twins in horses.
Cite This Article
APA
Journée SL, de Ruijter-Villani M, Hendriks WK, Stout TA.
(2013).
Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound-guided twin reduction in the mare by embryonic or fetal stabbing compared with yolk sac or allantoic fluid aspiration.
Theriogenology, 80(4), 346-349.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.04.021 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
MeSH Terms
- Abortion, Veterinary / pathology
- Allantois / pathology
- Animals
- Female
- Fetus / surgery
- Horses / embryology
- Horses / physiology
- Litter Size / physiology
- Pregnancy
- Pregnancy Reduction, Multifetal / methods
- Pregnancy Reduction, Multifetal / veterinary
- Retrospective Studies
- Suction / veterinary
- Treatment Outcome
- Ultrasonography, Interventional / methods
- Ultrasonography, Interventional / veterinary
- Ultrasonography, Prenatal / veterinary
- Yolk Sac / pathology
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists