Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal. Supplement2000; (30); 425-429; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05259.x

Electrolyte vs. glucose-electrolyte isotonic solutions for oral rehydration therapy in horses.

Abstract: An isotonic electrolyte solution with a composition similar to equine sweat was compared to an isotonic glucose-glycine-electrolyte solution for oral rehydration therapy in exercising horses. Ten horses were dehydrated by using frusemide and allocated randomly to receive 4 different oral solutions: isotonic sweat-like electrolyte solution, half-strength hypotonic electrolyte solution, isotonic glucose-glycine-electrolyte solution, and plain water. Solutions were given by nasogastric tube using the same volume as the bodyweight lost by each horse. Blood samples were collected before and throughout 6 h of the rehydration period. Results showed that all solutions recovered pre-frusemide values of packed cell volume (PCV) and total plasma protein (TP) in a similar fashion. No changes for Na+ values were observed during the rehydration period when the isotonic sweat-like solution was used. However, a significant hyponatraemia was induced throughout rehydration when the other 3 solutions were given, especially when hypotonic solution and water were used. Osmolality values did not change when both isotonic solutions were administered; but a significant hypotonicity was observed when hypotonic solution and water were given. When the isotonic sweat-like solution was used, plasma Cl-, K+ and creatinine values recovered to premedication values significantly faster than the other 3 solutions. In conclusion, the isotonic sweat-like electrolyte was the best solution because it restored rapidly the fluid and plasma electrolyte imbalances. In contrast, the isotonic glucose-glycine-electrolyte solution impaired the plasma electrolyte imbalances.
Publication Date: 2000-02-05 PubMed ID: 10659293DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05259.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research compares the effectiveness of an isotonic electrolyte solution designed to resemble equine sweat to that of an isotonic glucose-glycine-electrolyte solution for rehydrating exercising horses. The isotonic sweat-like electrolyte solution demonstrated a faster recovery of fluid and plasma electrolyte balances, making it the most effective solution tested.

Study Design and Methodology

  • The researchers used ten horses in the study. The horses were dehydrated using frusemide, a medication often used as a diuretic, forcing the horses to lose fluids.
  • These horses were then randomly allocated different rehydration solutions: an isotonic sweat-like electrolyte solution, a half-strength hypotonic electrolyte solution, an isotonic glucose-glycine-electrolyte solution, or plain water.
  • Each solution was administered to the horses via a nasogastric tube and the volume of fluid provided was equivalent to the body weight lost by each horse due to dehydration.
  • The researchers took blood samples both before and during a 6-hour rehydration period to monitor changes in the horses’ hydration and electrolyte levels.

Results and Findings

  • All four solutions helped the horses recover their pre-frusemide levels of packed cell volume (PCV) and total plasma protein (TP) at similar rates. These parameters are used as indicators of the horse’s hydration status.
  • The use of the isotonic sweat-like solution resulted in no changes to sodium (Na+) levels during rehydration. However, when other solutions were given, particularly the hypotonic solution and water, the horses showed significant reductions in sodium levels (hyponatraemia).
  • Osmolality, a measure of solute concentration, remained stable when the isotonic solutions were given but decreased significantly when either hypotonic solution or water was used.
  • The isotonic sweat-like solution was also seen to help plasma chloride (Cl-), potassium (K+) and creatinine levels return to premedication values significantly faster than the other three solutions.
  • In conclusion, the isotonic sweat-like electrolyte solution outperformed the other solutions by swiftly restoring fluid and electrolyte imbalances; on the other hand, the isotonic glucose-glycine-electrolyte solution seemingly worsened the electrolyte imbalances in the studied horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Monreal L, Garzón N, Espada Y, Ruíz-Gopegui R, Homedes J. (2000). Electrolyte vs. glucose-electrolyte isotonic solutions for oral rehydration therapy in horses. Equine Vet J Suppl(30), 425-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05259.x

Publication

NlmUniqueID: 9614088
Country: United States
Language: English
Issue: 30
Pages: 425-429

Researcher Affiliations

Monreal, L
  • Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Garzón, N
    Espada, Y
      Ruíz-Gopegui, R
        Homedes, J

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Dehydration / chemically induced
          • Dehydration / veterinary
          • Diuretics
          • Electrolytes / therapeutic use
          • Female
          • Fluid Therapy / veterinary
          • Furosemide
          • Glucose / therapeutic use
          • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
          • Horses
          • Isotonic Solutions
          • Male
          • Sports Medicine
          • Sweat

          Citations

          This article has been cited 2 times.
          1. Lindinger MI. Oral Electrolyte and Water Supplementation in Horses.. Vet Sci 2022 Nov 10;9(11).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci9110626pubmed: 36356103google scholar: lookup
          2. Crabtree NE, Epstein KL. Current Concepts in Fluid Therapy in Horses.. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:648774.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.648774pubmed: 33855057google scholar: lookup