Analyze Diet

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, using staphylococcal protein A for detecting virus antibodies.

Abstract: A modification of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed which used staphylococcal protein A linked to horseradish peroxidase. Virus antibodies in equine, bovine, porcine, feline, canine, lagomorphic (rabbit), and human sera were detected, using the indirect ELISA in which the antiglobulin enzyme conjugate was replaced by protein A linked to horseradish peroxidase. Results of the ELISA were compared with the results of the serum-virus neutralization test. The application of the test in laboratories performing serologic assays with sera from diverse animal species is discussed.
Publication Date: 1980-06-01 PubMed ID: 6776853
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov't
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article presents a modification in an existing diagnostic test (ELISA) wherein staphylococcal protein A linked to horseradish peroxidase has been used to detect different virus antibodies in serum samples from various animal species.

Modification of Indirect ELISA

  • This research focus hinges on improving the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a prevalent diagnostic tool in immune-disease studies. A change was made to the ELISA to increase its efficiency and applicability across a wide range of species.
  • The central modification lies in the use of staphylococcal protein A, linked to horseradish peroxidase. Protein A has special binding properties, given its capability to bind to antibodies from a variety of species, significantly expanding the test’s range.

Detecting Virus Antibodies

  • The revised ELISA was used to detect virus antibodies in several species’ serum samples, including horses, cattle, pigs, cats, dogs, rabbits, and humans.
  • This advancement implies that the same test can effectively assess the presence of virus antibodies across different species, potentially simplifying serological testing in medical and veterinary practices.

Comparison with Serum-Virus Neutralization Test

  • The study also compared the altered ELISA’s results with the standard serum-virus neutralization test. The comparison helps evaluate the modified ELISA’s efficacy and accuracy against a conventional diagnostic tool.

Application of the Test

  • The potential application of this modified ELISA in labs conducting serological assays is discussed. Given its broad usability across various animal species, it could prove beneficial for labs conducting versatile serological studies.
  • This test could streamline routine checks, accelerating disease detection, and subsequent treatment regimes by simplifying the operation and interpretation of serological assays.

Cite This Article

APA
Potgieter LN, Rouse BT, Webb-Martin TA. (1980). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, using staphylococcal protein A for detecting virus antibodies. Am J Vet Res, 41(6), 978-980.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 41
Issue: 6
Pages: 978-980

Researcher Affiliations

Potgieter, L N
    Rouse, B T
      Webb-Martin, T A

        MeSH Terms

        • Antibodies, Viral / analysis
        • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
        • Immunoenzyme Techniques
        • Staphylococcal Protein A
        • Viruses / immunology

        Grant Funding

        • RR-09012 / NCRR NIH HHS

        Citations

        This article has been cited 1 times.
        1. Charan S, Gautam OP. Applications of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in veterinary medicine: a bibliography.. Vet Res Commun 1984 Nov;8(4):255-67.
          doi: 10.1007/BF02214720pubmed: 6393563google scholar: lookup