FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Transbound Emerg Dis / Equine babesiosis: seroprevalence, risk factors and comparis...
Transboundary and emerging diseases2011; 59(1); 72-78; doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01244.x

Equine babesiosis: seroprevalence, risk factors and comparison of different diagnostic methods in Jordan.

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to estimate the seroprevalence and distribution of horse piroplasmosis, to evaluate risk factors associated with the occurrence of the disease and to compare the different diagnostic methods used for this disease. A total of 253 clinically normal horses were sampled, and a collection form was completed for each horse from five of six different climatic zones of Jordan. The sixth zone was not sampled because it did not include horse population. Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) revealed 37 horses (14.6%) positive for Theileria equi, and none of the horses was positive for Babesia caballi. Microscopic examination of thin blood smears and PCR test revealed no positive results for either parasite. Grazing was the only risk factor that was associated with being seropositive to the disease; horses that graze are 11.5 more likely to be seropositive (P<0.05, OR=11.5, CI: 3.292, 39.962). This is the first study to estimate the prevalence of horse babesiosis using serological test and to identify risk factors associated with the disease in Jordan. Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) test appears to be more reliable than microscopic examination and PCR in estimating the seroprevalence of the disease as well as identifying carrier horses to babesiosis.
© 2011 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2011-07-19 PubMed ID: 21771287DOI: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01244.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research is on equine babesiosis, a parasitic disease in horses, in Jordan. The study aimed to determine its prevalence, associated risk factors, and efficacy of different diagnostic techniques. Grazing was identified as a significant risk factor, and cELISA test appeared more reliable in identifying carrier horses than other diagnostic methods.

Study Objectives and Methodology

  • The researchers aimed to estimate the prevalence (seroprevalence) and distribution of horse piroplasmosis, a disease also known as equine babesiosis, which is caused by parasitic protozoa — specifically Theileria equi and Babesia caballi.
  • They also intended to evaluate the risk factors connected with the occurrence of the disease and to compare the effectiveness of different diagnostic methods used for this disease.
  • A total of 253 clinically normal horses were sampled from five of the six different climate zones in Jordan. The horses in the sixth zone weren’t included as there was no horse population present.

Main Findings

  • The testing method used — a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) — revealed that Theileria equi was present in 14.6% (37) of the sampled horses, though none was found positive for Babesia caballi.
  • Other diagnostic methods used, including the microscopic examination of thin blood smears and the PCR test, didn’t yield positive results for either parasite, making cELISA seem like a more reliable diagnostic method for these parasites in particular.
  • It was found that the practice of grazing was the only risk factor associated with the disease, as horses that graze were found to be 11.5 times more likely to carry the disease. This statistical significance was confirmed by a P-value < 0.05 with confidence intervals ranging from 3.292 to 39.962.

Significance of the Study

  • This was the first study to estimate the prevalence of horse babesiosis in Jordan using serological tests (blood tests used to detect the presence of an antibody for a specific antigen or the presence of a specific antigen) and to identify risk factors associated with the disease in the country.
  • The study revealed that cELISA testing is more efficient than microscopy and PCR testing in approximating the prevalence of the disease and in identifying carrier horses of babesiosis. This finding could influence the future management and control of the disease.

Cite This Article

APA
Abutarbush SM, Alqawasmeh DM, Mukbel RM, Al-Majali AM. (2011). Equine babesiosis: seroprevalence, risk factors and comparison of different diagnostic methods in Jordan. Transbound Emerg Dis, 59(1), 72-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01244.x

Publication

Transboundary and emerging diseases
ISSN: 1865-1682
NlmUniqueID: 101319538
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 59
Issue: 1
Pages: 72-78

Researcher Affiliations

Abutarbush, S M
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. sameeh75@hotmail.com
Alqawasmeh, D M
    Mukbel, R M
      Al-Majali, A M

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Babesia / isolation & purification
        • Babesiosis / blood
        • Babesiosis / diagnosis
        • Babesiosis / epidemiology
        • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / veterinary
        • Female
        • Horse Diseases / blood
        • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
        • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
        • Horses
        • Jordan / epidemiology
        • Logistic Models
        • Male
        • Risk Factors
        • Theileria / isolation & purification
        • Theileriasis / blood
        • Theileriasis / diagnosis
        • Theileriasis / epidemiology

        Citations

        This article has been cited 18 times.
        1. Almaqhawi AA, El-Jalii IM, Al-Sabi MNS, Al-Ali A, Khalid AM, Abduljawad M, Shawaf T. Treatment evaluation using ultrasonographic scanning of the spleen in Arabian horses affected by babesiosis. Open Vet J 2025 Nov;15(11):5799-5805.
          doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2025.v15.i11.35pubmed: 41630728google scholar: lookup
        2. Mohammad-Naseri A, Shokrani H, Rahmani-Shahraki A. Equine Piroplasmosis in Asymptomatic Horses of Western Iran: Comparison of Microscopic Examination and Multiplex PCR. Acta Parasitol 2024 Mar;69(1):813-818.
          doi: 10.1007/s11686-024-00804-3pubmed: 38424400google scholar: lookup
        3. Tirosh-Levy S, Mazuz ML, Savitsky I, Pinkas D, Gottlieb Y, Steinman A. Serological and Molecular Prevalence of Babesia caballi in Apparently Healthy Horses in Israel. Pathogens 2021 Apr 8;10(4).
          doi: 10.3390/pathogens10040445pubmed: 33917822google scholar: lookup
        4. Tirosh-Levy S, Gottlieb Y, Fry LM, Knowles DP, Steinman A. Twenty Years of Equine Piroplasmosis Research: Global Distribution, Molecular Diagnosis, and Phylogeny. Pathogens 2020 Nov 8;9(11).
          doi: 10.3390/pathogens9110926pubmed: 33171698google scholar: lookup
        5. Zhao S, Wang H, Zhang S, Xie S, Li H, Zhang X, Jia L. First report of genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of equine piroplasm infection in equids in Jilin, China. Parasit Vectors 2020 Sep 9;13(1):459.
          doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04338-1pubmed: 32907616google scholar: lookup
        6. Kiouani A, Azzag N, Tennah S, Ghalmi F. Infection with Babesia canis in dogs in the Algiers region: Parasitological and serological study. Vet World 2020 Jul;13(7):1351-1357.
          doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.1351-1357pubmed: 32848310google scholar: lookup
        7. Onyiche TE, Taioe MO, Molefe NI, Biu AA, Luka J, Omeh IJ, Yokoyama N, Thekisoe O. Equine piroplasmosis: an insight into global exposure of equids from 1990 to 2019 by systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitology 2020 Nov;147(13):1411-1424.
          doi: 10.1017/S0031182020001407pubmed: 32741382google scholar: lookup
        8. Onyiche TE, Taioe MO, Ogo NI, Sivakumar T, Biu AA, Mbaya AW, Xuan X, Yokoyama N, Thekisoe O. Molecular evidence of Babesia caballi and Theileria equi in equines and ticks in Nigeria: prevalence and risk factors analysis. Parasitology 2020 Sep;147(11):1238-1248.
          doi: 10.1017/S0031182020000992pubmed: 32605687google scholar: lookup
        9. Onyiche TE, Suganuma K, Igarashi I, Yokoyama N, Xuan X, Thekisoe O. A Review on Equine Piroplasmosis: Epidemiology, Vector Ecology, Risk Factors, Host Immunity, Diagnosis and Control. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019 May 16;16(10).
          doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101736pubmed: 31100920google scholar: lookup
        10. Afridi MJK, Mian AH, Saqib M, Abbas G, Ali J, Mansoor MK, Sial AUR, Rasheed I, Hussain MH. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Theileria equi Infection in Equines from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. Iran J Parasitol 2017 Oct-Dec;12(4):597-605.
          pubmed: 29317885
        11. Montes Cortés MG, Fernández-García JL, Habela Martínez-Estéllez MÁ. Seroprevalence of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in horses in Spain. Parasite 2017;24:14.
          doi: 10.1051/parasite/2017015pubmed: 28497743google scholar: lookup
        12. Haghi MM, Etemadifar F, Fakhar M, Teshnizi SH, Soosaraei M, Shokri A, Hajihasani A, Mashhadi H. Status of babesiosis among domestic herbivores in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitol Res 2017 Apr;116(4):1101-1109.
          doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5368-8pubmed: 28054180google scholar: lookup
        13. Sumbria D, Das Singla L, Sharma A. Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infection of equids in Punjab, India: a serological and molecular survey. Trop Anim Health Prod 2016 Jan;48(1):45-52.
          doi: 10.1007/s11250-015-0917-1pubmed: 26387094google scholar: lookup
        14. Miró G, Checa R, Paparini A, Ortega N, González-Fraga JL, Gofton A, Bartolomé A, Montoya A, Gálvez R, Mayo PP, Irwin P. Theileria annae (syn. Babesia microti-like) infection in dogs in NW Spain detected using direct and indirect diagnostic techniques: clinical report of 75 cases. Parasit Vectors 2015 Apr 10;8:217.
          doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0825-2pubmed: 25890106google scholar: lookup
        15. Guidi E, Pradier S, Lebert I, Leblond A. Piroplasmosis in an endemic area: analysis of the risk factors and their implications in the control of Theileriosis and Babesiosis in horses. Parasitol Res 2015 Jan;114(1):71-83.
          doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4161-9pubmed: 25280516google scholar: lookup
        16. Ribeiro AJ, Cardoso L, Maia JM, Coutinho T, Cotovio M. Prevalence of Theileria equi, Babesia caballi, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in horses from the north of Portugal. Parasitol Res 2013 Jul;112(7):2611-7.
          doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3429-9pubmed: 23591484google scholar: lookup
        17. Peckle M, Pires MS, Dos Santos TM, Roier EC, da Silva CB, Vilela JA, Santos HA, Massard CL. Molecular epidemiology of Theileria equi in horses and their association with possible tick vectors in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Parasitol Res 2013 May;112(5):2017-25.
          doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3360-0pubmed: 23474658google scholar: lookup
        18. Onmaz AC, Beutel RG, Schneeberg K, Pavaloiu AN, Komarek A, van den Hoven R. Vectors and vector-borne diseases of horses. Vet Res Commun 2013 Mar;37(1):65-81.
          doi: 10.1007/s11259-012-9537-7pubmed: 23054414google scholar: lookup
        Subscribe to our newsletter
        Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.