Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 106094; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106094

Equine upper limb kinematics: Comparison between biplanar high-speed fluoroscopic kinematography and optoelectronic motion capture in one Mini Shetland Pony.

Abstract: There are no studies describing the kinematics of the proximal limb skeleton in living equids. In horses like in all other therian mammals studied so far, the scapula rotates around an instantaneous center of rotation rather than a fixed pivot point, which increases the susceptibility of skin marker-based methods to inaccuracies. Objective: The aim of the study was to describe the skeletal movement of the proximal equine limb and to overcome limitations traditionally associated with skin marker displacement errors. Methods: Optoelectronic motion capture (OMC) and biplanar high-speed fluoroscopic kinematography (FluoKin) of the proximal limbs have been performed simultaneously in one pony walking and trotting on a treadmill. Data analysis followed scientific rotoscoping. Results: In FluoKin, the mean range of motion (ROM) of the scapula was 27.6° (± 0.9, n=2) during walking and 23.3° (± 3.7, n=9) during trotting. The mean ROM of the hip joint was 29.5° (± 2.3, n=3) during walking and 33.2° (± 3.8, n=7) during trotting. In comparison to OMC, the ROM derived from FluoKin data always showed higher values. This was most pronounced in the elbow joint and stifle with a deviation between both systems of up to 33.0 and 28.1°, respectively. Conclusions: First insights into the detailed skeletal movements of a pony's proximal limb during walking and trotting have been obtained.
Publication Date: 2026-07-14 PubMed ID: 42448007DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106094Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Equine proximal limb skeletal movements were analyzed in a Mini Shetland Pony using two methods—biplanar high-speed fluoroscopy (FluoKin) and optoelectronic motion capture (OMC)—revealing that FluoKin detected greater ranges of motion than OMC, highlighting limitations in skin marker-based methods.

Background and Motivation

  • There is a lack of studies describing the kinematics of the proximal limb skeleton (shoulder, hip region) in living horses and related equids.
  • In horses, the scapula does not rotate around a fixed pivot, but rather an instantaneous center of rotation—a complex movement pattern seen in all therian mammals.
  • This complex scapular movement challenges traditional kinematic analysis techniques that rely on skin markers placed on the surface, as skin movement relative to bone can cause inaccuracies.
  • The study aims to improve accuracy in measuring bone movement by overcoming limitations related to skin marker displacement errors through advanced imaging techniques.

Research Objective

  • To describe in detail the skeletal movement of the proximal limbs in a living equid (Mini Shetland Pony) during locomotion.
  • To compare two measurement methods: optoelectronic motion capture (OMC) and biplanar high-speed fluoroscopic kinematography (FluoKin).
  • To evaluate the range of motion (ROM) differences detected by these two methods.

Methodology

  • Simultaneous measurement of limb movement using:
    • Optoelectronic motion capture (OMC) — a non-invasive method using skin markers and cameras to track motion.
    • Biplanar high-speed fluoroscopic kinematography (FluoKin) — an X-ray based imaging technique that visualizes bones directly with two synchronized fluoroscopic cameras, allowing precise tracking of skeletal movement.
  • The subject was a single Mini Shetland Pony walking and trotting on a treadmill to ensure controlled and repeatable gaits.
  • Data analysis was conducted using scientific rotoscoping, a technique aligning fluoroscopic images with 3D bone models for precise motion quantification.

Key Findings

  • Range of Motion (ROM) measured using FluoKin:
    • Scapula ROM during walking: 27.6° (± 0.9°)
    • Scapula ROM during trotting: 23.3° (± 3.7°)
    • Hip joint ROM during walking: 29.5° (± 2.3°)
    • Hip joint ROM during trotting: 33.2° (± 3.8°)
  • Comparing FluoKin with OMC:
    • FluoKin consistently measured higher ROM values than OMC.
    • The greatest discrepancies were found in the elbow and stifle joints, with ROM differences up to 33.0° and 28.1°, respectively.
    • This suggests that OMC underestimates actual bone movement likely due to skin marker errors caused by skin displacement relative to underlying bones.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The study provides the first detailed insights into the proximal limb skeletal kinematics of a live pony during walking and trotting.
  • FluoKin proves to be a superior method for accurately capturing the complex rotations and movements of proximal limb bones compared to traditional skin marker-based OMC.
  • Findings highlight the limitations of using skin markers in animals where the scapula and other limb bones do not move around fixed pivot points, emphasizing the necessity of bone-based imaging for precise biomechanical studies.
  • The improved accuracy in measuring equine limb kinematics could inform veterinary diagnostics, rehabilitation, and the design of assistive devices or treatment strategies in horses and related species.

Cite This Article

APA
Wagner FC, Hannig J, Bauer FW, Mülling CKW, Fischer MS. (2026). Equine upper limb kinematics: Comparison between biplanar high-speed fluoroscopic kinematography and optoelectronic motion capture in one Mini Shetland Pony. J Equine Vet Sci, 106094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106094

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 106094
PII: S0737-0806(26)00329-1

Researcher Affiliations

Wagner, F C
  • Institute of Veterinary Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig University, An den Tierkliniken 43, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: franziska.wagner@vetmed.uni-leipzig.de.
Hannig, J
  • Institute of General Kinesiology and Athletics Training, Department of Biomechanics, Leipzig University, Jahnallee 59, 04109 Leipzig, Germany.
Bauer, F W
  • Institute of Zoology and evolutionary Research, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Erbertstraße 1, 07743 Jena, Germany.
Mülling, C K W
  • Institute of Veterinary Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leipzig University, An den Tierkliniken 43, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Fischer, M S
  • Institute of Zoology and evolutionary Research, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Erbertstraße 1, 07743 Jena, Germany.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.