Analyze Diet

Ertapenem Pharmacokinetics in Equine Plasma and Synovial Fluid Following a Single Intravenous Dose.

Abstract: This study describes the pharmacokinetics of ertapenem, a carbapenem antimicrobial that has not been previously studied in equids. Administered as a 30 mg/kg intravenous bolus to six healthy horses, serial blood and synovial samples were obtained over 8 h after administration. Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma and synovial fluid was performed. In plasma, the AUC was 353.10 h × μg/mL (CV = 49.02%), Vss 79.34 mL/kg (CV = 22.85%), CL 84.96 mL/h/kg (CV = 31.31%) and t1/2 2.03 h (CV = 15.32%). In synovial fluid, the AUC was 524.10 h × μg/mL (CV = 16.03%), VD 206.32 mL/kg (CV = 30.55%), CL 57.24 mL/h/kg (CV = 16.03%) and t1/2 2.50 h (CV = 32.47%). Synovial fluid maintained higher concentrations of ertapenem for longer, although exhibited a lower maximum concentration compared to plasma. The six most common surgical site infection isolates at a tertiary care center in equine orthopedic cases, and their susceptibility to ertapenem were evaluated. The isolates identified were largely consistent with previous reports. The drug was well tolerated, although it caused transient soft feces. Carbapenems remain a protected class of antimicrobials which should be reserved for cases where culture and susceptibility results support their administration. This study helps inform appropriate dosage and dosing intervals.
Publication Date: 2026-02-16 PubMed ID: 41697045DOI: 10.1111/jvp.70053Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated how the antibiotic ertapenem behaves in the blood and joint fluid of healthy horses after a single intravenous dose.
  • Its findings provide important information for determining safe and effective dosing of ertapenem in horses, especially for treating infections in joints.

Introduction to the Study

  • Ertapenem is a carbapenem antibiotic, a class of drugs often reserved for serious infections due to their broad-spectrum activity and importance in human medicine.
  • Prior to this research, the pharmacokinetics of ertapenem had not been studied in horses (equids).
  • Understanding how the drug distributes and clears in horses is essential for safe and effective therapeutic use, especially for infections involving joints or surgical sites.

Methods

  • Six healthy horses were given a single intravenous bolus of ertapenem at a dose of 30 mg/kg.
  • Blood (plasma) and synovial fluid (joint fluid) samples were collected serially over an 8-hour period post-administration.
  • Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to assess drug concentration over time, volume of distribution, clearance rates, and half-life in both plasma and synovial fluid.
  • Additionally, the study evaluated the susceptibility of common bacterial isolates from equine orthopedic surgical infections to ertapenem.

Key Pharmacokinetic Findings

  • Plasma (blood) results:
    • AUC (Area Under Curve): 353.10 h×μg/mL — represents overall drug exposure over time.
    • Volume of distribution at steady state (Vss): 79.34 mL/kg — describing how the drug disperses in the body.
    • Clearance (CL): 84.96 mL/h/kg — rate of drug elimination from plasma.
    • Half-life (t1/2): Approximately 2.03 hours — the time for the drug concentration in plasma to reduce by half.
    • Coefficient of Variation (CV) values indicate some variability among horses, especially for AUC and clearance.
  • Synovial fluid (joint fluid) results:
    • AUC: 524.10 h×μg/mL — higher total drug exposure in joint fluid compared to plasma.
    • Volume of distribution (VD): 206.32 mL/kg — larger than plasma volume, indicating significant penetration into joint fluid.
    • Clearance: 57.24 mL/h/kg — slower elimination from synovial fluid compared to plasma.
    • Half-life: 2.50 hours — longer persistence in joint fluid than in plasma.
    • The maximum drug concentration (Cmax) in synovial fluid was lower than in plasma, but concentrations remained higher for a longer period.

Clinical Implications

  • The longer half-life and greater AUC in synovial fluid suggest ertapenem may maintain therapeutic concentrations in joints for an extended period after IV administration.
  • This makes ertapenem potentially effective for treating joint infections or surgical site infections in horses.
  • The six most common bacterial isolates from equine orthopedic surgical infections were tested, and susceptibility patterns were consistent with earlier reports, supporting the drug’s relevance in these infections.
  • Ertapenem was generally well tolerated, although a transient side effect of soft feces was noted, which is important for monitoring during clinical use.
  • The study emphasizes that carbapenems like ertapenem are a protected class of antibiotics and should be reserved for cases with confirmed bacterial susceptibility to avoid antimicrobial resistance development.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • This study fills a knowledge gap by providing pharmacokinetic data on ertapenem in horses, particularly regarding its behavior in plasma and synovial fluid.
  • The findings guide veterinarians in making informed decisions about appropriate dosing and intervals of ertapenem to achieve effective and sustained drug levels, especially in joint infections.
  • Given the importance of stewardship for carbapenem antibiotics, culture and susceptibility testing remain crucial before their clinical use.
  • Further research might be needed to assess multiple dosing regimens, efficacy in actual infected horses, and safety over longer treatment courses.

Cite This Article

APA
Bish-Jones AR, Papich MG, Orsini JA. (2026). Ertapenem Pharmacokinetics in Equine Plasma and Synovial Fluid Following a Single Intravenous Dose. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.70053

Publication

ISSN: 1365-2885
NlmUniqueID: 7910920
Country: England
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Bish-Jones, Alexa R
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Department of Large Animal Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Papich, Mark G
  • Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
Orsini, James A
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Grant Funding

  • Roemer Foundation

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. Ambrose PG. Monte Carlo Simulation in the Evaluation of Susceptibility Breakpoints: Predicting the Future: Insights From the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy 26, no. 1: 129–134.
  2. Asin‐Prieto E, Rodriguez‐Gascon A, Isla A. Applications of the Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analysis of Antimicrobial Agents. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 21, no. 5: 319–329.
  3. Boulamery A, Marouani H, Guilhaumou R, Rocher E, Simon N, Bruguerolle B. Effects of Hyperthermia on Pharmacokinetics of Ertapenem in Rats. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 22, no. 3: 285–289.
  4. Boulamery A, Marsot A, Bruguerolle B, Simon N. Population Pharmacokinetics of Ertapenem in Juvenile and Old Rats. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 28, no. 2: 144–150.
    doi: 10.1111/fcp.12017google scholar: lookup
  5. Bulik CC, Nicolau DP. Double‐Carbapenem Therapy for Carbapenemase‐Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 55, no. 6: 3002–3004.
    doi: 10.1128/aac.01420‐10google scholar: lookup
  6. Catena F, Ansaloni L, Gazzotti F. Effect of Early Antibiotic Prophylaxis With Ertapenem and Meropenem in Experimental Acute Pancreatitis in Rats. Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery 16, no. 3: 328–332.
  7. Chambers HF, Basuino L, Hamilton SM, Choo EJ, Moise P. Daptomycin‐Beta‐Lactam Combinations in a Rabbit Model of Daptomycin‐Nonsusceptible Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Endocarditis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 60, no. 7: 3976–3979.
    doi: 10.1128/aac.00589‐16google scholar: lookup
  8. Cheminet G, De Lastours V, Poirel L. Dimercaptosuccinic Acid in Combination With Carbapenems Against Isogenic Strains of Escherichia coli Producing or Not Producing a Metallo‐β‐Lactamase In Vitro and in Murine Peritonitis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 75, no. 12: 3593–3600.
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa347google scholar: lookup
  9. Connelly S, Fanelli B, Hasan NA, Colwell RR, Kaleko M. Oral Metallo‐Beta‐Lactamase Protects the Gut Microbiome From Carbapenem‐Mediated Damage and Reduces Propagation of Antibiotic Resistance in Pigs. Frontiers in Microbiology 10: 101.
    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00101google scholar: lookup
  10. Connelly S, Subramanian P, Hasan NA, Colwell RR, Kaleko M. Distinct Consequences of Amoxicillin and Ertapenem Exposure in the Porcine Gut Microbiome. Anaerobe 53: 82–93.
  11. Crosby CE, Redding LE, Ortved KF. Current Treatment and Prevention of Orthopaedic Infections in the Horse. Equine Veterinary Education 35, no. 8: 437–448.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13770google scholar: lookup
  12. De Azavedo JC, Dresser L, Duncan CL, Walker SE, Low DE, Bast DJ. Antipneumococcal Activity of Ertapenem Compared With Gatifloxacin in a Temperature‐Sensitive Murine Model of Acute Pneumonia. Journal of Chemotherapy 19, no. 4: 392–397.
    doi: 10.1179/joc.2007.19.4.392google scholar: lookup
  13. de Castro WV, Marchand S, Lamarche I, Couet W. Effect of Experimentally Induced Hypovolemia on Ertapenem Tissue Distribution Using Microdialysis in Rats. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 51: 45–50.
  14. Fontenot RL, Langston VC, Zimmerman JA, Wills RW, Sloan PB, Mochal‐King CA. Meropenem Synovial Fluid Concentrations After Intravenous Regional Limb Perfusion in Standing Horses. Veterinary Surgery 47, no. 6: 852–860.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12940google scholar: lookup
  15. Keating GM, Perry CM. Ertapenem: A Review of Its Use in the Treatment of Bacterial Infections. Drugs 65, no. 15: 2151–2178.
  16. Kelmer G, Tatz AJ, Kdoshim E, Britzi M, Segev G. Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics of Imipenem Following Regional Limb Perfusion Using the Saphenous and the Cephalic Veins in Standing Horses. Research in Veterinary Science 114: 64–68.
  17. Langston VC, Fontenot RL, Byers JA, Andrews CM, Mochal‐King CA. Plasma and Synovial Fluid Pharmacokinetics of a Single Intravenous Dose of Meropenem in Adult Horses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 42, no. 5: 525–529.
    doi: 10.1111/jvp.12770google scholar: lookup
  18. Li C, Kuti JL, Nightingale CH, Nicolau DP. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis and Dosing Regimen Optimization of Meropenem in Adult Patients. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 46, no. 10: 1171–1178.
    doi: 10.1177/0091270006291035google scholar: lookup
  19. Mosichuk AP, Smith JS, Tatarniuk DM, Troy JR, Kreuder AJ. Meropenem Administered via Intravenous Regional Limb Perfusion for Orthopedic Sepsis in Horses: A Clinical Retrospective Study. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8: 629627.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.629627google scholar: lookup
  20. Nix DE, Majumdar AK, DiNubile MJ. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ertapenem: An Overview for Clinicians. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 53, no. Suppl 2: ii23–ii28.
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh205google scholar: lookup
  21. Nix DE, Matthias KR, Ferguson EC. Effect of Ertapenem Protein Binding on Killing of Bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 48, no. 9: 3419–3424.
  22. Orsini JA, Moate PJ, Boston RC. Pharmacokinetics of Imipenem‐Cilastatin Following Intravenous Administration in Healthy Adult Horses. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 28, no. 4: 355–361.
  23. Pandey N, Cascella M. Beta‐Lactam Antibiotics. StatPearls .
  24. Pearson GB, Papa B, Mosaddegh A. Equine Synovial Sepsis Laboratory Submissions Yield a Low Rate of Positive Bacterial Culture and a High Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance. American Journal of Veterinary Research 84, no. 8: 85.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.23.05.0085google scholar: lookup
  25. Pimenta J, Pinto AR, Saavedra MJ, Cotovio M. Equine Gram‐Negative Oral Microbiota: An Antimicrobial Resistances Watcher?. Antibiotics 12, no. 4: 792.
  26. Pletz MWR, Rau M, Bulitta J. Ertapenem Pharmacokinetics and Impact on Intestinal Microflora, in Comparison to Those of Ceftriaxone, After Multiple Dosing in Male and Female Volunteers. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 48, no. 10: 3765–3772.
  27. Raidal S. Antimicrobial Stewardship in Equine Practice. Australian Veterinary Journal 97, no. 7: 238–242.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.12833google scholar: lookup
  28. Saroglou M, Tryfon S, Ismailos G. Pharmacokinetics of Linezolid and Ertapenem in Experimental Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion. Journal of Inflammation 7, no. 1: 22.
  29. Shah PM, Isaacs RD. Ertapenem, the First of a New Group of Carbapenems. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 52, no. 4: 538–542.
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg404google scholar: lookup
  30. Sime FB, Udy AA, Roberts JA. Augmented Renal Clearance in Critically Ill Patients: Etiology, Definition and Implications for Beta‐Lactam Dose Optimization. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 24: 1–6.
  31. Smith JS, Borts DJ, Slagel CC. Pharmacokinetics of Ertapenem in Sheep Ovis aries With Experimentally Induced Urinary Tract Infection. Comparative Medicine 69, no. 5: 413–418.
  32. Sobkowich K, Poljak Z, Weese JS, Plum A, Szlosek D, Bernardo TM. Prevalence and Distribution of Carbapenem‐Resistant Enterobacterales in Companion Animals: A Nationwide Study in the United States Using Commercial Laboratory Data. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 38, no. 5: 2642–2653.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.17171google scholar: lookup
  33. Tam VH, Kabbara S, Yeh RF, Leary RH. Impact of Sample Size on the Performance of Multiple‐Model Pharmacokinetic Simulations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 50, no. 11: 3950–3952.
    doi: 10.1128/aac.00337‐06google scholar: lookup
  34. Trang M, Dudley MN, Bhavnani SM. Use of Monte Carlo Simulation and Considerations for PK‐PD Targets to Support Antibacterial Dose Selection. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 36: 107–113.
  35. Turnidge J, Paterson DL. Setting and Revising Antibacterial Susceptibility Breakpoints. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 20, no. 3: 391–408.
    doi: 10.1128/cmr.00047‐06google scholar: lookup
  36. Wang C, Zhou Y, Zhou Y, Ye C. Ertapenem‐Induced Neurotoxicity: A Literature Review of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes. Infection and Drug Resistance 16: 3649–3658.
    doi: 10.2147/idr.s406852google scholar: lookup
  37. Wexler HM. In Vitro Activity of Ertapenem: Review of Recent Studies. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 53, no. 2: ii11–ii21.
    doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh204google scholar: lookup
  38. WHO. WHO'S List of Medically Important Antimicrobials: A Risk Management Tool for Mitigating Antimicrobial Resistance due to Non‐Human Use. World Health Organization .
  39. Wong BK, Sahly Y, Mistry G. Comparative Disposition of [14C]Ertapenem, a Novel Carbapenem Antibiotic, in Rat, Monkey and Man. Xenobiotica 34, no. 4: 379–389.
  40. Xuan D, Banevicius M, Capitano B, Kim M‐K, Nightingale C, Nicolau D. Pharmacodynamic Assessment of Ertapenem (MK‐0826) Against Streptococcus pneumoniae in a Murine Neutropenic Thigh Infection Model. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 46, no. 9: 2990–2995.
  41. Zhanel GG, Wiebe R, Dilay L. Comparative Review of the Carbapenems. Drugs 67, no. 7: 1027–1052.
  42. Zhang W, Zhang N, Wang W. Efficacy of Cefepime, Ertapenem and Norfloxacin Against Leptospirosis and for the Clearance of Pathogens in a Hamster Model. Microbial Pathogenesis 77: 78–83.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.