Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2026; 40(5); aalag216; doi: 10.1093/jvimsj/aalag216

Evaluation of a lateral flow immunoassay for the quantitative measurement of immunoglobulin G in foals compared with radial immunodiffusion.

Abstract: Reliable point-of-care diagnostic tests are essential for diagnosing failure of transfer of passive immunity (FTPI) in foals. Quantitative lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) could reduce subjectivity but have not been well validated in foals. Objective: To validate the performance and diagnostic accuracy of a LFIA for quantifying immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations in foals, using radial immunodiffusion (RID) as the reference standard. Methods: Forty-two neonatal foals were sampled within 24 h of birth. Methods: This prospective exploratory diagnostic accuracy study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of an LFIA for neonatal foal IgG measurement in accordance with the STARD guidelines. Blood samples were analyzed by LFIA, RID, and a SNAP-based ELISA. Primary analyses used serum samples. Diagnostic performance was evaluated for serum, plasma, and whole blood at predefined RID thresholds (<400 and ≤ 800 mg/dL) using receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: Lateral flow immunoassays results were strongly correlated with RID (R2 = 0.91) within the analytical range (100-1000 mg/dL). The assay demonstrated good linearity, precision, and accuracy. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed high point estimates for diagnostic performance across sample matrices, with AUCs ranging from 0.988 to 1.000, although estimates were imprecise because of the limited number of FTPI-positive foals. Conclusions: Lateral flow immunoassays demonstrated good agreement with RID for FTPI classification and could be suitable as a point-of-care screening tool, but is not interchangeable with RID for quantitative measurement. Although the limited number of FTPI-positive foals warrants cautious interpretation, these findings support LFIA as a screening tool for FTPI classification.
Publication Date: 2026-09-21 PubMed ID: 42765740PubMed Central: PMC13591481DOI: 10.1093/jvimsj/aalag216Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Comparative Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for measuring immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels in newborn foals to detect failure of transfer of passive immunity (FTPI), comparing it to the standard radial immunodiffusion (RID) method.
  • The LFIA showed strong correlation with RID and demonstrated potential as a practical point-of-care screening tool for FTPI, though it is not a complete substitute for RID in precise quantitative measurements.

Background and Objective

  • Newborn foals receive IgG antibodies from their mothers through colostrum, providing essential early immune protection.
  • Failure of transfer of passive immunity (FTPI) happens when a foal does not acquire sufficient IgG, increasing the risk for infections and mortality.
  • Timely diagnosis of FTPI is critical for appropriate treatment and management.
  • Radial immunodiffusion (RID) is the reference standard for measuring IgG but is time-consuming and requires lab facilities.
  • Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) offer rapid, point-of-care testing but have not been thoroughly validated for foals.
  • The study aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of a quantitative LFIA in measuring IgG concentrations in neonatal foals, benchmarked against RID.

Methods

  • Sample Population: Forty-two neonatal foals were sampled within 24 hours after birth.
  • Sample Types: Serum, plasma, and whole blood samples were collected for analysis.
  • Testing Methods:
    • LFIA for quantitative IgG measurement.
    • RID as the reference standard IgG measurement.
    • SNAP-based ELISA also performed for comparison.
  • Diagnostic Accuracy Evaluation:
    • Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess performance at clinically relevant RID threshold values (<400 mg/dL and ≤800 mg/dL), which define FTPI risk categories.
    • Correlations (R²) calculated between LFIA and RID results.
    • Bland-Altman analysis conducted to evaluate agreement and bias between methods.
    • Evaluation conformed with STARD (Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) guidelines.

Results

  • Correlation:
    • LFIA IgG results showed strong correlation with RID results within the analytical range (100-1000 mg/dL), with an R² of 0.91, indicating excellent agreement in quantification.
  • Linearity, Precision, and Accuracy:
    • The LFIA demonstrated good linearity across the measured range, ensuring consistent and reliable detection.
    • Precision tests showed repeatable results.
    • Accuracy was satisfactory when compared to RID.
  • Diagnostic Performance:
    • ROC analysis yielded very high Area Under the Curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.988 to 1.000 across serum, plasma, and whole blood matrices.
    • These values indicate excellent diagnostic ability to discriminate between foals with and without FTPI.
    • Sensitivity and specificity were high, although confidence intervals were wide due to a limited number of foals with confirmed FTPI.
  • Sample Matrices:
    • The LFIA performed well across different blood sample types, making it adaptable for practical clinical use.
  • Bland-Altman Analysis:
    • Showed good agreement with RID but suggested that LFIA should not replace RID when precise quantification is needed.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The quantitative LFIA offers a rapid, convenient, and reliable screening tool for identifying foals at risk of FTPI, which can facilitate early intervention.
  • Strong agreement with RID supports LFIA use in clinical settings for initial classification of passive immunity status.
  • LFIA is not interchangeable with RID for exact IgG quantification—RID remains necessary for detailed diagnostic confirmation.
  • Given the limited number of FTPI-positive foals in this study, further research is advised to confirm performance in larger and more diverse populations.
  • The LFIA’s ability to work with serum, plasma, and whole blood enhances its practical applicability in field or hospital environments.
  • Integration of this LFIA in veterinary practice could improve timely detection and management of FTPI, reducing disease risk and mortality in neonatal foals.

Cite This Article

APA
Sohn Y, An SJ, Oh HS, Kim J, Forbes E, Ryu SH. (2026). Evaluation of a lateral flow immunoassay for the quantitative measurement of immunoglobulin G in foals compared with radial immunodiffusion. J Vet Intern Med, 40(5), aalag216. https://doi.org/10.1093/jvimsj/aalag216

Publication

ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 40
Issue: 5
PII: aalag216

Researcher Affiliations

Sohn, Yongwoo
  • Veterinary Department, Korea Racing Authority, Gwacheon 13822, Republic of Korea.
An, Sung Jun
  • Department of Artificial Intelligence, Cheju Halla University, Jeju 63092, Republic of Korea.
Oh, Han Sang
  • R&D Center, BioNote, Inc, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do 18449, Republic of Korea.
Kim, Jungho
  • R&D Center, BioNote, Inc, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do 18449, Republic of Korea.
Forbes, Eliot
  • Racing Integrity Board, Greenlane, Private Bag 17902, Auckland 1546, New Zealand.
Ryu, Seung-Ho
  • Department of Equine Resources Science, Cheju Halla University, Jeju 63092, Republic of Korea.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / immunology
  • Horses / blood
  • Immunodiffusion / veterinary
  • Immunodiffusion / methods
  • Immunoglobulin G / blood
  • Immunoassay / veterinary
  • Immunoassay / methods
  • Animals, Newborn / immunology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Immunity, Maternally-Acquired
  • Prospective Studies
  • Female
  • Rapid Diagnostic Tests

Conflict of Interest Statement

BioNote, Inc is the manufacturer of the Vcheck foal IgG test evaluated in this study. BioNote, Inc. performed laboratory testing but had no role in study design, data interpretation, statistical analysis, and manuscript preparation. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Arfuso F, Quartuccio M, Bazzano M, Fazio F, Piccione G. Erythrocyte osmotic fragility and selected hematologic variables in postparturient mares and their foals. Vet Clin Pathol 2016;45:260–270.
    doi: 10.1111/vcp.12344pubmed: 26990116google scholar: lookup
  2. Perkins GA, Wagner B. The development of equine immunity: current knowledge on immunology in the young horse. Equine Vet J 2015;47:267–274.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12387pubmed: 25405920google scholar: lookup
  3. Piccione G, Rizzo M, Arfuso F. Leukocyte modifications during the first month after foaling in mares and their newborn foals. Pol J Vet Sci 2015;18:621–625.
    doi: 10.1515/pjvs-2015-0080pubmed: 26618596google scholar: lookup
  4. Raidal SL. The incidence and consequences of failure of passive transfer of immunity on a Thoroughbred breeding farm. Aust Vet J 1996;73:201–206.
  5. Koterba AM, Brewer BD, Tarplee FA. Clinical and clinicopathological characteristics of the septicaemic neonatal foal: review of 38 cases. Equine Vet J 1984;16:376–382.
  6. Bedenice D, Avila B, Paradis MR. Comparative evaluation of clinical findings and prognostic outcome parameters in hospitalized, critically ill neonatal foals and crias. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2021;31:619–628.
    doi: 10.1111/vec.13093pubmed: 34324773google scholar: lookup
  7. Davis DG, Schaefer DM, Hinchcliff KW, Wellman ML, Willet VE, Fletcher JM. Measurement of serum IgG in foals by radial immunodiffusion and automated turbidimetric immunoassay. J Vet Intern Med 2005;19:93–96.
  8. Rinnovati R, Butina BB, Lanci A, Mariella J. Diagnosis, treatment, surgical management, and outcome of septic arthritis of the tarsocrural joint in 16 foals. J Equine Vet Sci 2018;67:128–132.
  9. Liepman RS, Dembek KA, Slovis NM, Reed SM, Toribio RE. Validation of IgG cut-off values and their association with survival in neonatal foals. Equine Vet J 2015;47:526–530.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12428pubmed: 25683641google scholar: lookup
  10. Hollis AR, Wilkins PA, Palmer JE, Boston RC. Bacteremia in equine neonatal diarrhea: a retrospective study (1990–2007). J Vet Intern Med 2008;22:1203–1209.
  11. Hoffman AM, Staempfli HR, Willan A. Prognostic variables for survival of neonatal foals under intensive care. J Vet Intern Med 1992;6:89–95.
  12. Rohrbach BW, Buchanan BR, Drake JM. Use of a multivariable model to estimate the probability of discharge in hospitalized foals ≤ 7 days of age. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;228:1748–1756.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.228.11.1748pubmed: 16740076google scholar: lookup
  13. Furr M, Tinker MK, Edens L. Prognosis for neonatal foals in an intensive care unit. J Vet Intern Med 1997;11:183–188.
  14. Giguère S, Weber EJ, Sanchez LC. Factors associated with outcome and gradual improvement in survival over time in equine neonates admitted to an intensive care unit. Equine Vet J 2017;49:45–50.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12536pubmed: 26538009google scholar: lookup
  15. Sievert M, Schuler G, Büttner K, Wehrend A. Comparison of different methods to determine the absorption of colostral IgG in newborn foals. J Equine Vet Sci 2022;114:104008.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104008pubmed: 35577108google scholar: lookup
  16. Kasap S, Babaeski S, Yildirim KN, Orman A, Temizel EM, Kennerman E. Evaluation of glutaraldehyde coagulation test and colostrum BRIX refractometer compared with SNAP foal IgG test in neonatal foals. Equine Vet J 2024;56:1077–1082.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14011pubmed: 37778870google scholar: lookup
  17. Davis R, Giguère S. Evaluation of five commercially available assays and measurement of serum total protein concentration via refractometry for diagnosis of failure of passive transfer of immunity in foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:1640–1645.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.1640pubmed: 16313044google scholar: lookup
  18. Tscheschlok L, Venner M, Howard J. Comparison of IgG concentrations by radial immunodiffusion, electrophoretic gamma globulin concentrations, and total globulins in neonatal foals. Equine Vet J 2017;49:149–154.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12575pubmed: 27037614google scholar: lookup
  19. Mak WC, Beni V, Turner APF. Lateral-flow technology: from visual to instrumental. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 2016;79:297–305.
  20. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015;351:h5527.
    doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527pmc: PMC4623764pubmed: 26511519google scholar: lookup
  21. Valentin MA, Ma S, Zhao A, Legay F, Avrameas A. Validation of immunoassay for protein biomarkers: bioanalytical study plan implementation to support preclinical and clinical studies. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2011;55:869–877.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.03.033pubmed: 21530130google scholar: lookup
  22. Tate J, Ward G. Interferences in immunoassay. Clin Biochem Rev 2004;25:105–120.
    pmc: PMC1904417pubmed: 18458713
  23. Wong DM, Giguère S, Wendel MA. Evaluation of a point-of-care portable analyzer for measurement of plasma IgG, total protein, and albumin in ill neonatal foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013;242:812–819.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.242.6.812pubmed: 23445294google scholar: lookup
  24. Wilkins PA, Dewan-Mix S. Efficacy of intravenous plasma to transfer passive immunity in equine neonates with failure of passive transfer. Cornell Vet 1994;84:7–14.
    pubmed: 8313712
  25. Liu IK, Brown C, Myers RC, Hao YL. Evaluation of intravenous administration of concentrated immunoglobulin G to colostrum-deprived foals. Am J Vet Res 1991;52:709–712.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.1991.52.05.709pubmed: 1854093google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.