Analyze Diet
PloS one2021; 16(8); e0255247; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255247

Evaluation of a new portable 1-lead digital cardiac monitor (eKuore) compared with standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy horses.

Abstract: Recently, the use of smartphone ECG devices has been reported in humans and animals. Nevertheless, as the electrodes of these devices are inseparable, they can create only a precordial reading in veterinary species. Thus, although the smartphone ECG devices are considered valuable as a screening tool for the detection of some common arrhythmias, they are not always a reliable method for the measurement of the duration of the electrical deflections. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of a novel smartphone ECG device, to report the readings obtained recorded simultaneously with a reference ECG system, and to compare the heart rate and duration of cardiac deflections obtained with the two methods. A total of 28 healthy mares of different breeds and age were included in this study and ECG recordings were obtained simultaneously with a reference ECG telemetry system with surface electrodes attached to the skin with alligator clips using a standard base-apex system and a smartphone ECG device with electrodes positioned alternatively with a standard and a modified base apex derivation. All the recordings obtained were considered acceptable for interpretation. An excellent agreement was found between the two methods for the evaluation of heart rate and polarity of cardiac deflections. No differences regarding number, duration and percentage of artifacts were found. This technology could become a valid diagnostic tool in the cardiological assessment of horses, in particular on the field.
Publication Date: 2021-08-03 PubMed ID: 34343184PubMed Central: PMC8330948DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255247Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study explored the reliability of a new portable smartphone ECG device in diagnosing cardiac anomalies in horses by comparing its readings with those of a standard ECG system. The results indicated an excellent agreement between the two devices in heart rate measurements and cardiac deflection evaluations.

Objectives and Methods of the Study

  • The prime aim of this study was to ascertain the effectiveness of a fresh out-of-the-box smartphone ECG device and compare its readings with a standard ECG system. These studies intended to provide valuable insights into whether this new tool can be used as a reliable and accessible means for veterinaries to accurately detect cardiac irregularities in horses.
  • In order to deliver a fair comparison between the two devices, the researchers adopted a cohort of 28 healthy mares belonging to different breeds and ages. Electrocardiograph recordings were made for all horses simultaneously using the smartphone ECG device and the standard ECG system.
  • The standard ECG telemetry device was mounted onto the horses using surface electrodes that were clasped to the skin using alligator clips, while the smartphone ECG device was configured with electrodes that were alternatively placed with a standard and modified base apex derivation.

Findings of the Study

  • The researchers noticed an impressive agreement between the evaluations made by the smartphone ECG device and the standard ECG system regarding heart rates and cardiac deflections’ polarities.
  • There was no discernible variance regarding the number, duration, and percentage of artifacts found when comparing the data between the two devices. This demonstrates that the smartphone ECG device was able to accurately evaluate and record the cardiac patterns just as effectively as the standard ECG system.
  • All recordings obtained from the smartphone ECG device were deemed appropriate for interpretation, which validates its potential as a feasible diagnostic tool.

Implications of the Study

  • This pioneering study propounds the potential use of mobile, easily accessible devices such as the smartphone ECG device for veterinary diagnostics – particularly in equine cardiological assessments.
  • Given their portability and straightforward usage, these devices may offer efficient, field-friendly alternatives to the current standard base-apex ECG systems.
  • However, though the findings from this study are promising, more expansive and diverse studies might further confirm the device’s reliability over a wide range of horses’ breeds, ages, and health conditions.
  • The successful adoption of these novel diagnostic tools might revolutionize the veterinary world by making quality care for large animals like horses more accessible and efficient.

Cite This Article

APA
Vitale V, Vezzosi T, Tognetti R, Fraschetti C, Sgorbini M. (2021). Evaluation of a new portable 1-lead digital cardiac monitor (eKuore) compared with standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy horses. PLoS One, 16(8), e0255247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255247

Publication

ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 8
Pages: e0255247
PII: e0255247

Researcher Affiliations

Vitale, Valentina
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.
Vezzosi, Tommaso
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.
Tognetti, Rosalba
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.
Fraschetti, Carlotta
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.
Sgorbini, Micaela
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Artifacts
  • Electrocardiography / veterinary
  • Electrodes
  • Heart / physiology
  • Heart Rate / physiology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Smartphone

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 24 references
  1. Reef VB, Marr CM. Chapter 13—Dysrhythmias: assessment and medical management. 2010:159–178.
  2. Vezzosi T, Sgorbini M, Bonelli F. Evaluation of a Smartphone Electrocardiograph in Healthy Horses: Comparison With Standard Base-apex Electrocardiography. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 2018;67:61–65.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15396pubmed: 0google scholar: lookup
  3. Corradini I, Fernández-Ruiz A, Barba M, Engel-Manchado J. Stall-side screening potential of a smartphone electrocardiogram recorded over both sides of the thorax in horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Sep;34(5):2101-2108.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15795pmc: PMC7517866pubmed: 32639655google scholar: lookup
  4. Vezzosi T, Buralli C, Marchesotti F, Porporato F, Tognetti R, Zini E, Domenech O. Diagnostic accuracy of a smartphone electrocardiograph in dogs: Comparison with standard 6-lead electrocardiography.. Vet J 2016 Oct;216:33-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.06.013pubmed: 27687923google scholar: lookup
  5. Bonelli F, Vezzosi T, Meylan M, Nocera I, Ferrulli V, Buralli C, Meucci V, Tognetti R. Comparison of smartphone-based and standard base-apex electrocardiography in healthy dairy cows.. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Mar;33(2):981-986.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.15396pmc: PMC6430901pubmed: 30592089google scholar: lookup
  6. Gropler MRF, Dalal AS, Van Hare GF, Silva JNA. Can smartphone wireless ECGs be used to accurately assess ECG intervals in pediatrics? A comparison of mobile health monitoring to standard 12-lead ECG.. PLoS One 2018;13(9):e0204403.
  7. Haberman ZC, Jahn RT, Bose R, Tun H, Shinbane JS, Doshi RN, Chang PM, Saxon LA. Wireless Smartphone ECG Enables Large-Scale Screening in Diverse Populations.. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2015 May;26(5):520-6.
    doi: 10.1111/jce.12634pubmed: 25651872google scholar: lookup
  8. Kraus MS, Gelzer AR, Rishniw M. Detection of heart rate and rhythm with a smartphone-based electrocardiograph versus a reference standard electrocardiograph in dogs and cats.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016 Jul 15;249(2):189-94.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.249.2.189pubmed: 27379594google scholar: lookup
  9. Bruining N, Caiani E, Chronaki C, Guzik P, van der Velde E. Acquisition and analysis of cardiovascular signals on smartphones: potential, pitfalls and perspectives: by the Task Force of the e-Cardiology Working Group of European Society of Cardiology.. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014 Nov;21(2 Suppl):4-13.
    pubmed: 25354948doi: 10.1177/2047487314552604google scholar: lookup
  10. Saxon LA. Ubiquitous wireless ECG recording: a powerful tool physicians should embrace.. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2013 Apr;24(4):480-3.
    doi: 10.1111/jce.12097pubmed: 23421574google scholar: lookup
  11. Alberti E, Stucchi L, Pesce V, Stancari G, Ferro E, Ferrucci F, Zucca E. Evaluation of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device accuracy in field and in hospital conditions in horses.. Vet Rec Open 2020;7(1):e000441.
    doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2020-000441pmc: PMC7754639pubmed: 33381302google scholar: lookup
  12. Kraus MS, Rishniw M, Divers TJ, Reef VB, Gelzer AR. Utility and accuracy of a smartphone-based electrocardiogram device as compared to a standard base-apex electrocardiogram in the horse.. Res Vet Sci 2019 Aug;125:141-147.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.05.018pubmed: 31228737google scholar: lookup
  13. Van Loon G, Patteson M. Electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis. 2010:59–73.
  14. Welch-Huston B, Durward-Akhurst S, Norton E, Ellingson L, Rendahl A, McCue M. Comparison between smartphone electrocardiography and standard three-lead base apex electrocardiography in healthy horses.. Vet Rec 2020 Oct 31;187(9):e70.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.105759pmc: PMC7606555pubmed: 32414909google scholar: lookup
  15. Verheyen T, Decloedt A, van der Vekens N, Sys S, De Clercq D, van Loon G. Ventricular response during lungeing exercise in horses with lone atrial fibrillation.. Equine Vet J 2013 May;45(3):309-14.
  16. Kraus MS, Rishniw MR, Gelzer AR. Comparison of the smartphone electrocardiogram device with a reference standard base apex electrocardiogram in horses. 2013;271–272.
  17. Vera L, Van Steenkiste G, Decloedt A. Comparison of smartphone‐based and standard electrocardiography in healthy horses. 2019.
  18. Huynh M. Smartphone-Based Device in Exotic Pet Medicine.. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2019 Sep;22(3):349-366.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cvex.2019.05.001pubmed: 31395319google scholar: lookup
  19. Walsh JA 3rd, Topol EJ, Steinhubl SR. Novel wireless devices for cardiac monitoring.. Circulation 2014 Aug 12;130(7):573-81.
  20. Verheyen T, Decloedt A, De Clercq D. Electrocardiography in horses–part 1: how to make a good recording. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift 2010;79:331–336.
  21. Young L. Diseases of the heart and vessels. 2004; p. 728–767.
  22. Vezzosi T, Vitale V, Sgorbini M, Tognetti R, Bonelli F. Two Methods for 24-hour Holter Monitoring in Horses: Evaluation of Recording Performance at Rest and During Exercise.. J Equine Vet Sci 2019 Aug;79:127-130.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.06.001pubmed: 31405491google scholar: lookup
  23. Vezzosi T, Tognetti R, Buralli C, Marchesotti F, Patata V, Zini E, Domenech O. Home monitoring of heart rate and heart rhythm with a smartphone-based ECG in dogs.. Vet Rec 2019 Jan 19;184(3):96.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.104917pubmed: 30559174google scholar: lookup
  24. Gyles C. Veterinary telemedicine.. Can Vet J 2019 Feb;60(2):119-122.
    pmc: PMC6340261pubmed: 30705446

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Al Khamis T, Shawaf T, Almubarak A, Al-Ali MA. Comparison between a fitness tracker (Equimetre(TM)) and standard base-apex electrocardiography in dromedary camels.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:963732.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.963732pubmed: 36713881google scholar: lookup
  2. Turini L, Bonelli F, Lanatà A, Vitale V, Nocera I, Sgorbini M, Mele M. Validation of a new smart textiles biotechnology for heart rate variability monitoring in sheep.. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:1018213.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1018213pubmed: 36483489google scholar: lookup
  3. Kenchaiwong W, Sangpo P, Kusol A, Pontaema T, Lerdweeraphon W. The position of ground electrode affects electrocardiographic parameters in horses.. Vet World 2022 Apr;15(4):1107-1112.