Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record1996; 138(16); 393-395; doi: 10.1136/vr.138.16.393

Evaluation of a one-step test for rapid, in practice detection of rotavirus in farm animals.

Abstract: An immunochromatographic test for the detection of group A rotavirus was evaluated against a reference group A rotavirus ELISA, by using a panel of 161 bovine, porcine and equine faecal samples submitted for routine examination. The sensitivity of the test was 89 per cent and the specificity 99 per cent compared with the ELISA. Its reproducibility was 100 per cent. The simplicity and rapidity of the test procedure make it suitable for use in practice.
Publication Date: 1996-04-20 PubMed ID: 8732193DOI: 10.1136/vr.138.16.393Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses the evaluation of an immunochromatographic test used to rapidly detect group A rotavirus in farm animals. The effectiveness of this test, compared to that of a reference rotavirus ELISA, was examined using faecal samples from bovines, porcines, and equines.

Outline of methodology

  • The researchers used an immunochromatographic test designed to identify group A rotavirus, a common cause of diarrhoea in young farm animals.
  • A total of 161 faecal samples were collected from farm animals (cows, pigs, and horses) undergoing routine examination.
  • The samples were tested with both the immunochromatographic test and a reference group A rotavirus ELISA, a widely used diagnostic technique.

Findings of the study

  • When comparing the new immunochromatographic test to the standard ELISA method, the researchers found the new test to have 89% sensitivity. This means it correctly identifies 89% of the samples that contain rotavirus.
  • The test demonstrated 99% specificity, showing that it could correctly identify 99% of the samples that did not contain the rotavirus.
  • The test achieved 100% reproducibility, indicating that when the same sample was tested multiple times, the result was consistent.

Implication of the research

  • The high performance of the fresh immunochromatographic test stands it in good stead to be used in regular veterinary practice due to its simplicity and speed.
  • Quick detection of rotavirus can prevent the spread of infection among farm animals, which could potentially reduce losses caused by disease outbreaks.
  • Given its substantial sensitivity and specificity, this test will notably limit both false positive and false negative results, providing a more accurate outline of the health profile of farms.

Cite This Article

APA
de Verdier Klingenberg K, Esfandiari J. (1996). Evaluation of a one-step test for rapid, in practice detection of rotavirus in farm animals. Vet Rec, 138(16), 393-395. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.138.16.393

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 138
Issue: 16
Pages: 393-395

Researcher Affiliations

de Verdier Klingenberg, K
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Cattle and Sheep Diseases, Uppsala, Sweden.
Esfandiari, J

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Cattle / virology
    • Chromatography
    • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
    • Evaluation Studies as Topic
    • Feces / virology
    • Horses / virology
    • Immunoassay
    • Reference Standards
    • Reproducibility of Results
    • Rotavirus / isolation & purification
    • Sensitivity and Specificity
    • Swine / virology

    Citations

    This article has been cited 5 times.
    1. Kim YK, Lim SI, Cho IS, Cheong KM, Lee EJ, Lee SO, Kim JB, Kim JH, Jeong DS, An BH, An DJ. A novel diagnostic approach to detecting porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: The lateral immunochromatography assay.. J Virol Methods 2015 Dec 1;225:4-8.
    2. Al-Ruwaili MA, Khalil OM, Selim SA. Viral and bacterial infections associated with camel (Camelus dromedarius) calf diarrhea in North Province, Saudi Arabia.. Saudi J Biol Sci 2012 Jan;19(1):35-41.
      doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2011.10.001pubmed: 23961160google scholar: lookup
    3. Peruski AH, Peruski LF Jr. Immunological methods for detection and identification of infectious disease and biological warfare agents.. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003 Jul;10(4):506-13.
    4. Melin L, Wallgren P. Aspects on feed related prophylactic measures aiming to prevent post weaning diarrhoea in pigs.. Acta Vet Scand 2002;43(4):231-45.
      doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-43-231pubmed: 12831176google scholar: lookup
    5. Maes RK, Grooms DL, Wise AG, Han C, Ciesicki V, Hanson L, Vickers ML, Kanitz C, Holland R. Evaluation of a human group a rotavirus assay for on-site detection of bovine rotavirus.. J Clin Microbiol 2003 Jan;41(1):290-4.
      doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.1.290-294.2003pubmed: 12517863google scholar: lookup