Evaluation of an intravaginal triptorelin acetate gel for inducing ovulation in mares.

Abstract: The objective of these studies was to investigate the efficacy of an intravaginal triptorelin acetate (TA) gel as an ovulation-inducing agent in mares. In Exp. 1, 24 mares were blocked using a combination of parity and age and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 5 mL TA gel (TA5), 10 mL TA gel (TA10), or 5 mL vehicle gel only (CON). Following the appearance of a follicle ≥ 25 mm, a blood sample was obtained for measurement of LH from each mare every 24 h until treatment administration. When a follicle ≥ 35 mm was observed, treatments were administered intravaginally. Following treatment, blood samples were collected for measurement of LH and ovaries were scanned via ultrasonography every 12 h until 48 h post-ovulation. Mares in both TA5 and TA10 tended ( = 0.08) to experience a brief surge in LH by 12 h post-treatment. There was a treatment by time interaction ( < 0.005). The interval from treatment to ovulation was not different between groups ( > 0.05). We hypothesized that duration of elevated LH was not sufficient to induce ovulation in most mares. In Exp. 2, 23 mares were blocked by parity/age and randomly assigned to 3 treatment groups: the CON ( = 7) and TA5 ( = 8) treatment groups remained the same, but the TA10 treatment was split into two 5-mL doses administered 24 h apart (TA5×2; = 8). Blood collection and ultrasonography occurred every 12 h on detection of a follicle ≥ 25 mm in diameter. Once a follicle ≥ 35 mm was detected, treatment was administered and ultrasonography and blood collection for measurement of LH occurred every 6 h until 48 h post-ovulation to get a more robust characterization of the effect of TA on LH and a more accurate timeframe in which ovulation was occurring. Mares in both TA5 and TA5×2 had an increase ( < 0.05) in LH by 6 h post-treatment, which was declining by 12 h post-treatment. Following the second dose in TA5×2, another rise in LH occurred, but to a lesser magnitude ( > 0.05) compared with the initial dose. Again there was a treatment by time interaction ( < 0.005) and in Exp. 2 the interval from treatment to ovulation was shorter in TA5 (61.5 ± 8.8 h) and TA5×2 (61.5 ± 9.6 h) compared with CON (123.1 ± 21.7 h; < 0.01). In Exp. 2, administration of TA gel increased LH concentrations and hastened the interval from treatment to ovulation in mares, without an advantage in the timing of ovulation noted between the 5 or 10-mL doses, or administration of two 5-mL doses given 24 h apart.