FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2015; 97(6); 484-493; doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00404

Evaluation of articular cartilage progenitor cells for the repair of articular defects in an equine model.

Abstract: We sought to determine the effectiveness of chondroprogenitor cells derived from autologous and allogenic articular cartilage for the repair of cartilage defects in an equine model. Methods: Cartilage defects (15 mm) were created on the medial trochlear ridge of the femur. The following experimental treatments were compared with empty-defect controls: fibrin only, autologous chondroprogenitor cells plus fibrin, and allogenic chondroprogenitor cells plus fibrin (n = 4 or 12 per treatment). Horses underwent strenuous exercise throughout the twelve-month study, and evaluations included lameness (pain) and arthroscopic, radiographic, gross, histologic, and immunohistochemical analyses. Results: Arthroscopy and microscopy indicated that defects in the autologous cell group had significantly better repair tissue compared with defects in the fibrin-only and control groups. Repair tissue quality in the allogenic cell group was not superior to that in the fibrin-only group with the exception of the percentage of type-II collagen, which was greater. Radiographic changes in the allogenic cell group were poorer on average than those in the autologous cell group. Autologous cells significantly reduced central osteophyte formation compared with fibrin alone. Conclusions: On the basis of the arthroscopic, radiographic, and histologic scores, autologous cells in fibrin yielded better results than the other treatments; allogenic cells cannot be recommended at this time.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2015-03-20 PubMed ID: 25788305DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00404Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores the use of cartilage-derived progenitor cells in repairing cartilage defects in horses, showing that autologous cells (from the same individual) were more effective than allogenic ones (from a different individual).

Approach towards Experiment

  • This study was carried out using an equine (horse) model. Cartilage defects were artificially induced in horses to evaluate the effectiveness of cartilage-derived progenitor cells, both autologous (coming from the subject itself) and allogenic (coming from a different individual).
  • To compare the performance of these cellular treatments, defects were examined post-intervention with three different conditions: sealed with fibrin alone, sealed with fibrin plus autologous cells, and sealed with fibrin plus allogenic cells.
  • Throughout the study (lasting twelve months), the horses were subjected to strenuous exercise. As part of the evaluation, various analyses were conducted, including assessment of lameness (an indirect measure of pain), radiographic imaging, gross inspection, as well as histological and immunohistochemical analyses.

Results Analysis

  • The findings suggest that the use of autologous cells proved to be the most effective treatment. This was determined by observing that the repair tissue in defects treated with autologous cells had a significantly improved quality compared to those in the fibrin-only and control groups.
  • Though allogenic cells did not prove superior to fibrin only treatment in most aspects, there was a greater percentage of type-II collagen in the repairs done using allogenic cells.
  • Radiographic changes (which provide information about the bone structure below the cartilage) showed that the allogenic cell group had, on average, poorer results than the autologous cell group.
  • Treatment with autologous cells significantly reduced the formation of central osteophytes (bony lumps formed as part of the body’s response to joint damage) compared to fibrin alone.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded, based on scores from arthroscopy, radiography, and histology, that autologous cells embedded in fibrin offered better results than other treatments examined in the study.
  • At this time, the use of allogenic cells cannot be recommended due to their inferior performance in promoting effective cartilage repair.

Cite This Article

APA
Frisbie DD, McCarthy HE, Archer CW, Barrett MF, McIlwraith CW. (2015). Evaluation of articular cartilage progenitor cells for the repair of articular defects in an equine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 97(6), 484-493. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00404

Publication

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
ISSN: 1535-1386
NlmUniqueID: 0014030
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 97
Issue: 6
Pages: 484-493

Researcher Affiliations

Frisbie, David D
  • Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences (D.D.F. and C.W.M.), and Department of Radiological and Health Sciences (M.F.B.), College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 West Drake Road, Fort Collins, CO 80523. E-mail address for D.D. Frisbie: david.frisbie@colostate.edu.
McCarthy, Helen E
  • Division of Pathophysiology and Repair, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, United Kingdom.
Archer, Charles W
  • Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, United Kingdom.
Barrett, Myra F
  • Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences (D.D.F. and C.W.M.), and Department of Radiological and Health Sciences (M.F.B.), College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 West Drake Road, Fort Collins, CO 80523. E-mail address for D.D. Frisbie: david.frisbie@colostate.edu.
McIlwraith, C Wayne
  • Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences (D.D.F. and C.W.M.), and Department of Radiological and Health Sciences (M.F.B.), College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, 300 West Drake Road, Fort Collins, CO 80523. E-mail address for D.D. Frisbie: david.frisbie@colostate.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Arthroscopy
  • Cartilage, Articular / injuries
  • Cartilage, Articular / pathology
  • Chondrocytes / transplantation
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Femur
  • Fibrin
  • Horses
  • Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Transplantation, Autologous
  • Transplantation, Homologous
  • Wound Healing

Citations

This article has been cited 25 times.
  1. Vinod E, Padmaja K, Ramasamy B, Sathishkumar S. Systematic review of articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors for cartilage repair in animal models. J Orthop 2023 Jan;35:43-53.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.10.012pubmed: 36387762google scholar: lookup
  2. Liu W, Feng M, Xu P. From regeneration to osteoarthritis in the knee joint: The role shift of cartilage-derived progenitor cells. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022;10:1010818.
    doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1010818pubmed: 36340024google scholar: lookup
  3. Yu L, Lin YL, Yan M, Li T, Wu EY, Zimmel K, Qureshi O, Falck A, Sherman KM, Huggins SS, Hurtado DO, Suva LJ, Gaddy D, Cai J, Brunauer R, Dawson LA, Muneoka K. Hyaline cartilage differentiation of fibroblasts in regeneration and regenerative medicine. Development 2022 Jan 15;149(2).
    doi: 10.1242/dev.200249pubmed: 35005773google scholar: lookup
  4. Wang HC, Lin TH, Hsu CC, Yeh ML. Restoring Osteochondral Defects through the Differentiation Potential of Cartilage Stem/Progenitor Cells Cultivated on Porous Scaffolds. Cells 2021 Dec 14;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/cells10123536pubmed: 34944042google scholar: lookup
  5. Peláez P, Damiá E, Torres-Torrillas M, Chicharro D, Cuervo B, Miguel L, Del Romero A, Carrillo JM, Sopena JJ, Rubio M. Cell and Cell Free Therapies in Osteoarthritis. Biomedicines 2021 Nov 19;9(11).
    doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111726pubmed: 34829953google scholar: lookup
  6. Angele P, Docheva D, Pattappa G, Zellner J. Cell-based treatment options facilitate regeneration of cartilage, ligaments and meniscus in demanding conditions of the knee by a whole joint approach. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022 Apr;30(4):1138-1150.
    doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06497-9pubmed: 33666685google scholar: lookup
  7. Schmidt S, Abinzano F, Mensinga A, Teßmar J, Groll J, Malda J, Levato R, Blunk T. Differential Production of Cartilage ECM in 3D Agarose Constructs by Equine Articular Cartilage Progenitor Cells and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2020 Sep 25;21(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms21197071pubmed: 32992847google scholar: lookup
  8. Vinod E, Parameswaran R, Ramasamy B, Kachroo U. Pondering the Potential of Hyaline Cartilage-Derived Chondroprogenitors for Tissue Regeneration: A Systematic Review. Cartilage 2021 Dec;13(2_suppl):34S-52S.
    doi: 10.1177/1947603520951631pubmed: 32840123google scholar: lookup
  9. Jiang Z, Yu S, Lin H, Bi R. Expression and function of cartilage-derived pluripotent cells in joint development and repair. Stem Cell Res Ther 2020 Mar 12;11(1):111.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01604-ypubmed: 32160923google scholar: lookup
  10. Lin Y, Qin J, Zhao H, Xia C. Construction and analysis of finite element model of defected articular cartilage. Saudi J Biol Sci 2020 Jan;27(1):556-560.
    doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.11.020pubmed: 31889881google scholar: lookup
  11. Xue K, Zhang X, Gao Z, Xia W, Qi L, Liu K. Cartilage progenitor cells combined with PHBV in cartilage tissue engineering. J Transl Med 2019 Mar 29;17(1):104.
    doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1855-xpubmed: 30925884google scholar: lookup
  12. Li J, Huang Y, Song J, Li X, Zhang X, Zhou Z, Chen D, Ma PX, Peng W, Wang W, Zhou G. Cartilage regeneration using arthroscopic flushing fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells encapsulated in a one-step rapid cross-linked hydrogel. Acta Biomater 2018 Oct 1;79:202-215.
    doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.029pubmed: 30165202google scholar: lookup
  13. Lo Monaco M, Merckx G, Ratajczak J, Gervois P, Hilkens P, Clegg P, Bronckaers A, Vandeweerd JM, Lambrichts I. Stem Cells for Cartilage Repair: Preclinical Studies and Insights in Translational Animal Models and Outcome Measures. Stem Cells Int 2018;2018:9079538.
    doi: 10.1155/2018/9079538pubmed: 29535784google scholar: lookup
  14. Vinod E, Boopalan PRJVC, Sathishkumar S. Reserve or Resident Progenitors in Cartilage? Comparative Analysis of Chondrocytes versus Chondroprogenitors and Their Role in Cartilage Repair. Cartilage 2018 Apr;9(2):171-182.
    doi: 10.1177/1947603517736108pubmed: 29047310google scholar: lookup
  15. Levato R, Webb WR, Otto IA, Mensinga A, Zhang Y, van Rijen M, van Weeren R, Khan IM, Malda J. The bio in the ink: cartilage regeneration with bioprintable hydrogels and articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells. Acta Biomater 2017 Oct 1;61:41-53.
    doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.005pubmed: 28782725google scholar: lookup
  16. Huang YZ, Xie HQ, Silini A, Parolini O, Zhang Y, Deng L, Huang YC. Mesenchymal Stem/Progenitor Cells Derived from Articular Cartilage, Synovial Membrane and Synovial Fluid for Cartilage Regeneration: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2017 Oct;13(5):575-586.
    doi: 10.1007/s12015-017-9753-1pubmed: 28721683google scholar: lookup
  17. Berebichez-Fridman R, Gómez-García R, Granados-Montiel J, Berebichez-Fastlicht E, Olivos-Meza A, Granados J, Velasquillo C, Ibarra C. The Holy Grail of Orthopedic Surgery: Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Their Current Uses and Potential Applications. Stem Cells Int 2017;2017:2638305.
    doi: 10.1155/2017/2638305pubmed: 28698718google scholar: lookup
  18. Anderson DE, Markway BD, Weekes KJ, McCarthy HE, Johnstone B. Physioxia Promotes the Articular Chondrocyte-Like Phenotype in Human Chondroprogenitor-Derived Self-Organized Tissue. Tissue Eng Part A 2018 Feb;24(3-4):264-274.
    doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2016.0510pubmed: 28474537google scholar: lookup
  19. Bertone AL, Reisbig NA, Kilborne AH, Kaido M, Salmanzadeh N, Lovasz R, Sizemore JL, Scheuermann L, Kopp RJ, Zekas LJ, Brokken MT. Equine Dental Pulp Connective Tissue Particles Reduced Lameness in Horses in a Controlled Clinical Trial. Front Vet Sci 2017;4:31.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00031pubmed: 28344975google scholar: lookup
  20. Joswig AJ, Mitchell A, Cummings KJ, Levine GJ, Gregory CA, Smith R 3rd, Watts AE. Repeated intra-articular injection of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells causes an adverse response compared to autologous cells in the equine model. Stem Cell Res Ther 2017 Feb 28;8(1):42.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0503-8pubmed: 28241885google scholar: lookup
  21. Anderson DE, Markway BD, Bond D, McCarthy HE, Johnstone B. Responses to altered oxygen tension are distinct between human stem cells of high and low chondrogenic capacity. Stem Cell Res Ther 2016 Oct 20;7(1):154.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0419-8pubmed: 27765063google scholar: lookup
  22. Goodrich LR, Chen AC, Werpy NM, Williams AA, Kisiday JD, Su AW, Cory E, Morley PS, McIlwraith CW, Sah RL, Chu CR. Addition of Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Autologous Platelet-Enhanced Fibrin Scaffolds in Chondral Defects: Does It Enhance Repair?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016 Jan 6;98(1):23-34.
    doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00407pubmed: 26738900google scholar: lookup
  23. Tarasova K, Arteaga MB, Kidtiwong A, Nivarthi H, Gamauf J, Corso G, Gültekin S, Bileck A, Rothbauer M, Toegel S, Hackl M, Kau-Strebinger S, Gerner C, Grillari R, Gerner I, Jenner F. Ontogenetic stage and type of donor cells shape extracellular vesicles' therapeutic potential for osteoarthritis. Stem Cell Res Ther 2025 Sep 1;16(1):478.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-025-04585-ypubmed: 40890860google scholar: lookup
  24. Juhász KZ, Hajdú T, Kovács P, Vágó J, Matta C, Takács R. Hypoxic Conditions Modulate Chondrogenesis through the Circadian Clock: The Role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α. Cells 2024 Mar 14;13(6).
    doi: 10.3390/cells13060512pubmed: 38534356google scholar: lookup
  25. Zhang C, Wang G, An Y. Achieving Nasal Septal Cartilage In Situ Regeneration: Focus on Cartilage Progenitor Cells. Biomolecules 2023 Aug 25;13(9).
    doi: 10.3390/biom13091302pubmed: 37759702google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,727 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.