Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2026; 106049; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106049

Evaluation of autologous fecal microbiota transplantation for restoring equine gut microbiota after antibiotic-induced dysbiosis.

Abstract: Microbial resilience is important to maintain a healthy gut environment in horses, especially after antibiotic administration, but the efficacies of post-antibiotic recovery strategies remain poorly characterized. We used microbial amplicon sequencing to compare spontaneous recovery, autologous fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and probiotic administration in 18 horses following antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Clinically healthy horses received a combination of cephalothin and minocycline for 5 consecutive days before intervention. Fecal microbial recovery was longitudinally evaluated by using community-level dissimilarity metrics. Antibiotic treatment induced marked dysbiosis in all horses. Autologous FMT resulted in significantly faster recovery toward individual pre-treatment baselines compared with spontaneous recovery (significantly lower dissimilarity at day 3 post-treatment, P < 0.05), whereas the effects of probiotics were only evident in cumulative recovery metrics and not at specific time points. These findings indicate that autologous FMT has the potential to accelerate the recovery of the equine gut microbiota following antibiotic-induced dysbiosis.
Publication Date: 2026-06-05 PubMed ID: 42250826DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106049Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study investigated how well different recovery methods restore the gut microbiota in horses after disruption caused by antibiotics.
  • It compared natural recovery, autologous fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and probiotic administration to evaluate which approach best facilitates restoration of a healthy gut microbial community.

Background and Significance

  • Equine gut health depends heavily on a balanced microbial community.
  • Antibiotic treatments, while sometimes necessary, disrupt this balance, leading to a condition called dysbiosis.
  • Restoring the microbiota after antibiotic use is important to maintain overall health and avoid gastrointestinal issues.
  • Current strategies to support recovery include letting microbiota recover naturally, administering probiotics, or performing fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).
  • The effectiveness of these methods in horses, particularly after antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, was not well characterized prior to this study.

Study Design

  • The research involved 18 clinically healthy horses.
  • Each horse was treated with a combination of two antibiotics: cephalothin and minocycline, for 5 consecutive days, to induce gut microbial dysbiosis.
  • Following antibiotic treatment, horses were split into three recovery groups:
    • Spontaneous recovery without intervention
    • Autologous FMT using the horse’s own pre-antibiotic fecal material
    • Probiotic administration
  • Gut microbiota changes were tracked over time using microbial amplicon sequencing.
  • Bacterial community differences were measured using dissimilarity metrics to quantify how closely the post-treatment microbiota resembled the pre-treatment baseline of each individual horse.

Key Findings

  • Antibiotic treatment caused significant dysbiosis in all horses, disrupting their gut microbiota.
  • Autologous FMT significantly accelerated the recovery of the gut microbiota compared to spontaneous recovery.
    • By day 3 post-treatment, FMT-treated horses showed a microbial community more similar to their original pre-antibiotic state than those recovering naturally (P < 0.05).
  • The probiotic group showed benefits only when assessed with cumulative recovery metrics over a longer time period, but not at specific single time points.
  • These results suggest that autologous FMT leads to faster and more robust restoration of an individual horse’s native microbial community after antibiotics.

Implications and Conclusions

  • Autologous FMT holds promise as an effective clinical intervention to manage antibiotic-induced gut microbiota disturbances in horses.
  • Given the faster microbial recovery post-FMT, this method could help reduce complications associated with dysbiosis, such as diarrhea or colic.
  • Probiotics alone may provide some benefits but appear less effective or slower compared to FMT in restoring the microbiota to its original state.
  • Further research could refine protocols for equine FMT and examine long-term health outcomes following this therapy.
  • This study underscores the importance of personalized microbiota restoration strategies tailored to individual horses after antibiotic use.

Cite This Article

APA
Kinoshita Y, Sato W, Ueno T. (2026). Evaluation of autologous fecal microbiota transplantation for restoring equine gut microbiota after antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. J Equine Vet Sci, 106049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2026.106049

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Pages: 106049
PII: S0737-0806(26)00284-4

Researcher Affiliations

Kinoshita, Yuta
  • Microbiology Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, 1400-4 Shiba, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0412, Japan. Electronic address: kinoshita@equinst.go.jp.
Sato, Wataru
  • Microbiology Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, 1400-4 Shiba, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0412, Japan.
Ueno, Takanori
  • Microbiology Division, Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, 1400-4 Shiba, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 329-0412, Japan.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this publication, and the authors received no financial support for their research or authorship of this article.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.