FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Iran J Parasitol / Evaluation of Benzimidazole Resistance in Equine Cyathostomi...
Iranian journal of parasitology2025; 20(3); 389-399; doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v20i3.19614

Evaluation of Benzimidazole Resistance in Equine Cyathostomins in the Kermanshah Province of Iran Using Coprological Analysis and Allele-Specific PCR.

Abstract: Resistance to benzimidazole (BZ) by cyathostomin nematodes has become a major threat to equine health around the world. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BZ drugs against small strongyle nematodes in horses of western Iran using coprological and molecular examination. Unassigned: Faecal egg count reduction tests were performed on 398 horses kept in 16 stables in western Iran (Kermanshah Province), to detect benzimidazole resistance in small strongyle nematodes. Allele-specific PCR was used to identify the F200Y (TAC/TTC) SNP in the beta-tubulin gene codon in cyathostomin larvae. Unassigned: There was a 96.1%-98.3% (90% CI) reduction in faecal egg counts following mebendazole treatment and a 96.6% - 98.7% (90% CI) reduction in faecal egg counts following fenbendazole treatment. The allele-specific PCR showed BZ-susceptible homozygote genotypes in all examined samples (Two pools of 10 to 50 L of cyathostomin nematodes from each of the 18 selected horses). Unassigned: Benzimidazole resistance in equine small strongyles has been reported globally, and the results of the present study were unexpected. The probable reasons for the slow development of BZ-resistance are climatic conditions in the country that have significant negative effects on the ability of free stages of the resistant strongyle nematode to survive and develop.
© 2025 Jamshidpour et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-11-03 PubMed ID: 41181201PubMed Central: PMC12579469DOI: 10.18502/ijpa.v20i3.19614Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Evaluation of benzimidazole resistance in equine cyathostomin nematodes in western Iran shows that these parasites currently remain susceptible to benzimidazole drugs based on fecal egg count reduction and molecular testing, contrasting with global trends of increasing resistance.

Background and Purpose of the Study

  • Cycling nematode parasites called cyathostomins infect horses worldwide posing significant health issues.
  • Benzimidazole (BZ) class anthelmintics are commonly used to control these small strongyle nematodes.
  • Resistance to BZ drugs has increasingly been documented globally, threatening effective equine parasite management.
  • This study aimed to evaluate the current status of BZ resistance in cyathostomin populations infecting horses in the Kermanshah Province of Iran.
  • The researchers sought to assess drug efficacy using traditional coprological (fecal egg count reduction) and molecular (allele-specific PCR) methods.

Methods

  • 398 horses from 16 different stables in western Iran were included in the study to capture a representative sample.
  • Fecal Egg Count Reduction Tests (FECRT) were conducted after treatment with two common benzimidazole drugs: mebendazole and fenbendazole.
  • FECRT involved measuring parasite egg counts in feces before and after treatment to quantify drug efficacy.
  • Allele-specific PCR focused on detecting the F200Y single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the beta-tubulin gene linked to benzimidazole resistance.
  • Samples for PCR were grouped larvae pools from cyathostomin nematodes isolated from 18 selected horses.

Key Findings

  • Both mebendazole and fenbendazole treatments resulted in over 96% reduction in fecal egg counts, indicating high efficacy of these drugs against cyathostomins in this region.
  • Allele-specific PCR detected only benzimidazole-susceptible genotypes (homozygous susceptible) in all tested larvae pools.
  • No molecular evidence was found for the specific mutation (F200Y) commonly associated with resistance despite thorough testing.
  • The combination of coprological and molecular data confirmed the absence of benzimidazole resistance in this population.

Interpretation and Implications

  • The findings contrast with reports from many other countries where BZ resistance in equine small strongyles is well documented.
  • One hypothesis provided for this unexpected susceptibility is the specific climatic conditions in Iran.
  • Iran’s environment may negatively impact survival and development of resistant free-living nematode stages, slowing resistance selection and spread.
  • Maintenance of BZ susceptibility is beneficial as it preserves an effective, affordable treatment option for horse owners in the region.
  • The study highlights the importance of regional surveillance and indicates that resistance dynamics can vary significantly based on ecology and management.

Conclusion

  • This research demonstrates that benzimidazole drugs are still effective against equine cyathostomins in the Kermanshah Province of Iran.
  • The absence of the F200Y resistance mutation and high fecal egg count reduction suggest low or no resistance currently.
  • Ongoing monitoring is recommended to detect emerging resistance and to aid informed parasite control strategies adapting to local conditions.
  • Understanding environmental influences on resistance evolution may guide sustainable anthelmintic use worldwide.

Cite This Article

APA
Jamshidpour R, Nabavi R, Moadab H, Rezaie F, Chale AC, Sargison N. (2025). Evaluation of Benzimidazole Resistance in Equine Cyathostomins in the Kermanshah Province of Iran Using Coprological Analysis and Allele-Specific PCR. Iran J Parasitol, 20(3), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijpa.v20i3.19614

Publication

Iranian journal of parasitology
ISSN: 1735-7020
NlmUniqueID: 101464309
Country: Iran
Language: English
Volume: 20
Issue: 3
Pages: 389-399

Researcher Affiliations

Jamshidpour, Rezvan
  • Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Nabavi, Reza
  • Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bu-Ali Sina University, 6517658978, Hamedan, Iran.
Moadab, Hossein
  • Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Rezaie, Farid
  • Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Chale, Abdolali Chale
  • Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Sargison, Neil
  • Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and RoslinInstitute, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

This article includes 53 references
  1. Corning S. Equine cyathostomins: a review of biology, clinical significance and therapy. Parasit Vectors. 2009; 2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1.
    pmc: PMC2751837pubmed: 19778462
  2. Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Drudge JH. Historical perspective of cyathostomes: prevalence, treatment and control programs. Vet Parasitol. 1999;85(2–3):97–111.
    pubmed: 10485357
  3. Reinemeyer CR, Nielsen MK. Parasitism and colic. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2009;25(2):233–245.
    pubmed: 19580936
  4. Drudge JH, Elam G. Preliminary observations on the resistance of horse strongyles to phenothiazine. J Parasitol. 1961;47(4):38–39.
  5. Traversa D, Castagna G, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, et al. Efficacy of major anthelmintics against horse cyathostomins in France. Vet Parasitol. 2012;188(3–4):294–300.
    pubmed: 22538094
  6. Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK. An evidence-based approach to equine parasite control: it ain’t the 60s anymore. Equine Vet Educ. 2010;22(6):306–316.
  7. Relf VE, Lester HE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB. Anthelmintic efficacy on UK Thoroughbred stud farms. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44(8):507–514.
    pubmed: 24746779
  8. Bellaw JL, Krebs K, Reinemeyer CR, et al. Anthelmintic therapy of equine cyathostomin nematodes-larvicidal efficacy, egg reappearance period, and drug resistance. Int J Parasitol. 2018;48(2):97–105.
    pubmed: 29050919
  9. Raza A, Qamar AG, Hayat K, et al. Anthelmintic resistance and novel control options in equine gastrointestinal nematodes. Parasitology. 2019;146(4):425–437.
    pubmed: 30392477
  10. Pook JF, Power ML, Sangster NC, et al. Evaluation of tests for anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomes. Vet Parasitol. 2002;106(4):331–343.
    pubmed: 12079739
  11. Kaplan RM, Denwood MJ, Nielsen MK, et al. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) guideline for diagnosing anthelmintic resistance using the faecal egg count reduction test in ruminants, horses and swine. Vet Parasitol. 2023; 318:109936.
    pubmed: 37121092
  12. Vidyashankar AN, Hanlon BM, Kaplan RM. Statistical and biological considerations in evaluating drug efficacy in equine strongyle parasites using fecal egg count data. Vet Parasitol. 2012;185(1):45–56.
    pubmed: 22119386
  13. Ihler CE. A field survey on anthelmintic resistance in equine small strongyles in Norway. Acta Vet Scand. 1995; 36:135–143.
    pmc: PMC8095490pubmed: 7572451
  14. Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Pape M, Von Witzendorff C, Schnieder T. Allele-specific PCR for the beta-tubulin codon 200 TTC/TAC polymorphism using single adult and larval small strongyle (Cyathostominae) stages. J Parasitol. 2002;88(2):254–257.
    pubmed: 12053994
  15. Pape M, Posedi J, Failing K, Schnieder T, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Analysis of the beta-tubulin codon 200 genotype distribution in a benzimidazole-susceptible and-resistant cyathostome population. Parasitology. 2003; 127(Pt 1):53–9.
    pubmed: 12885188
  16. Hodgkinson JE, Clark HJ, Kaplan RM, Lake SL, Matthews JB. The role of polymorphisms at beta tubulin isotype 1 codons 167 and 200 in benzimidazole resistance in cyathostomins. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38(10):1149–1160.
    pubmed: 18367189
  17. Sazmand A, Bahari A, Papi S, Otranto D. Parasitic diseases of equids in Iran (1931–2020): a literature review. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:586.
    pmc: PMC7676409pubmed: 33213507
  18. Bello TR, Allen TM. Comparison of two faecal egg recovery techniques and larval culture for cyathostomins in horses. Am J Vet Res. 2009;70(5):571–573.
    pubmed: 19405894
  19. Wagner EL, Tyler PJ. A comparison of weight estimation methods in adult horses. J Equine Vet Sci. 2011;31(12):706–710.
  20. Nielsen M, Mittel L, Grice A, et al. AAEP internal parasite control guidelines, American Association of Equine Practitioners. 2019.
  21. Coles GC, Bauer C, Borgsteede FH, et al. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol. 1992;44(1–2):35–44.
    pubmed: 1441190
  22. Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK, Levecke B, et al. Online tools for planning FECRT studies and analysing FECRT data. http://www.fecrt.com. 2023; Accessed 12 May 2024.
  23. Denwood MJ, Kaplan RM, McKendrick LJ, et al. A statistical framework for calculating prospective sample sizes and classifying efficacy results for faecal egg count reduction tests in ruminants, horses and swine. Vet Parasitol. 2023;314:109867.
    pubmed: 36621042
  24. Varady M, Königová A, Čorba J. Benzimidazole resistance in equine cyathostomes in Slovakia. Vet Parasitol. 2000;94(1–2):67–74.
    pubmed: 11078945
  25. Lichtenfels JR. Helminths of domestic equids, illustrated keys to genera and species with emphasis on North American forms. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington. 1975; 42:92.
  26. Cernea M, Carvalho LMM, Cozma V, et al. Atlas of diagnosis of equine strongylidosis. 1st ed. Edutura Academic Press, Cluj-Napoca; 2008.
  27. Santos DW, De Castro LLD, Giese EG, Molento MB. Morphometric study of infective larvae of cyathostomins of horses and their distribution. J Equine Vet Sci. 2016; 44:49–53.
  28. Kaplan RM, Vidyashankar AN. An inconvenient truth: global worming and anthelmintic resistance. Vet Parasitol. 2012;186(1–2):70–78.
    pubmed: 22154968
  29. Denwood MJ, Love S, Innocent GT, et al. Quantifying the sources of variability in equine faecal egg counts: Implications for improving the utility of the method. Vet Parasitol. 2012;188(1–2):120–126.
    pubmed: 22469484
  30. Van Wyk JA, Mayhew E. Morphological identification of parasitic nematode infective larvae of small ruminants and cattle: A practical lab guide. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2013;80(1):539.
    pubmed: 23718204
  31. Craven J, Bjørn H, Henriksen S, et al. Survey of anthelmintic resistance on Danish horse farms, using 5 different methods of calculating faecal egg count reduction. Equine Vet J. 1998;30(4):289–293.
    pubmed: 9705110
  32. Cirak VY, Güleğen E, Bauer C. Benzimidazole resistance in cyathostomin populations on horse farms in western Anatolia, Turkey. Parasitol Res. 2004; 93:392–395.
    pubmed: 15221466
  33. Slocombe JOD, Cote JF, De Gannes RV. The persistence of benzimidazole-resistant cyathostomes on horse farms in Ontario over 10 years and the effectiveness of ivermectin and moxidectin against these resistant strains. Can Vet J. 2008;49(1):56–60.
    pmc: PMC2147695pubmed: 18320979
  34. Elard L, Humbert JF.nImportance of the mutation of amino acid 200 of the isotype 1 β-tubulin gene in the benzimidazole resistance of the small-ruminant parasite nParasitol Res. 1999; 85:452–456.n
    pubmed: 10344538
  35. Gholamian A, Galehdari H, Eslami A, Nabavi L.nStudy of β-tubulin gene polymorphisms in isolated from sheep populations in Khouzestan, southwestern Iran. Iran J Vet Res. 2007;8(3):239–243.
  36. Mohseni H, Taghavi RA, Borji H, Rashtibaf M. Study on the efficacy of albendazole and levamisole against gastrointestinal helminthes in sheep flocks in Mashhad. Iran J Vet Clin Sci. 2019;13(1):23–29.
  37. Ebrahimi R, Yakhchali M, Malekinejad H. Anthelmintic resistance to albendazole and fenbendazole in gastrointestinal nèmatodes of sheep in Saghez Municipality, Iran. J Vet Res. 2020;75(1):1–7.
  38. Nabavi R, Shayan P, Shokrani HR, Eslami A, Bokaie S.nEvaluation of benzimidazole resistance in using comparative PCR-RFLP methods. Iran J Parasitol. 2011;6(2):45–53.n
    pmc: PMC3279878pubmed: 22347287
  39. Shokrani HR, Shayan P, Eslami A, Nabavi R.nBenzimidazole-Resistance in : New PCR-RFLP method for the detection of point mutation at codon 167 of isotype 1 β-tubulin gene. Iran J Parasitol. 2012;7(4):41–48.n
    pmc: PMC3537475pubmed: 23323090
  40. Hosseini M, Sanjarani Z, Nabavi R, et al. Morpho-Molecular characterization of cattle Haemonchus nematodes from southeast of Iran. Iran J Vet Med. 2022;16(4):364–371.
  41. Flores AG, Osmari V, Ramos F, et al. Multiple resistance in equine cyathostomins: a case study from military establishments in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2020;29(3):e003820.
    pubmed: 33027421
  42. Saemi Soudkolaei A, Kalidari GA, Borji H. Anthelmintic efficacy of fenbendazole and levamisole in native fowl in northern Iran. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):104.
    pmc: PMC7871369pubmed: 33557928
  43. Ashrafzadeh-Shiraz M, Tavassoli M, Dalir-Naghadeh B, Sazmand A. Impaired efficacy of fenbendazole and ivermectin against intestinal nematodes in adult horses in Iran. Res Vet Sci. 2024;166:105078.
    pubmed: 37952299
  44. Mfitilodze MW, Hutchinson GW. Development and survival of free-living stages of equine strongyles under laboratory conditions. Vet Parasitol. 1987; 23(1–2):121–133.
    pubmed: 3564339
  45. Genchi C, Carrara L, Malnati G. Epidemiological aspects of the gastrointestinal nematodes of animals in pasture [horses]. Clin Vet. 1978; 101:175–184.
  46. Craig TM, Bowen JM, Ludwig KG. Transmission of equine cyathostomes (Strongylidae) in central Texas. Am J Vet Res. 1983;44(10):1867–1869.
    pubmed: 6638646
  47. Sargison N, Chambers A, Chaudhry U, et al. Faecal egg counts and nemabiome metabarcoding highlight the genomic complexity of equine cyathostomin communities and provide insight into their dynamics in a Scottish native pony herd. Int J Parasitol. 2022;52(12):763–774.
    pubmed: 36208676
  48. Scott L, Bishop RM, Pomroy WE. Anthelmintic resistance in equine helminth parasites- a growing issue for horse owners and veterinarians in New Zealand? N Z Vet J. 2015;63(4):188–198.
    pubmed: 25608588
  49. Bartram DJ, Leathwick DM, Taylor MA, et al. The role of combination anthelmintic formulations in the sustainable control of sheep nematodes. Vet Parasitol. 2012;186(3–4):151–158.
    pubmed: 22245073
  50. Kaplan RM, West EM, Norat-Collazo LM, Vargas J. A combination treatment strategy using pyrantel pamoate and oxibendazole demonstrates additive effects for controlling equine cyathostomins. Equine Vet Educ. 2014;26(9):485–491.
  51. Scare JA, Leathwick DM, Sauermann CW, Lyons ET, Steuer AE, Jones BA, Clark M, Nielsen MK. Dealing with double trouble: Combination deworming against double-drug resistant cyathostomins. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2020;12:28–34.
    pmc: PMC7139983pubmed: 31883485
  52. Nielsen MK, Kaplan RM, Thamsborg SM, Monrad J, Olsen SN. Climatic influences on development and survival of free-living stages of equine strongyles: implications for worm control strategies and managing anthelmintic resistance. Vet J. 2007;174(1):23–32.
    pubmed: 16815051
  53. Mitchell CJ, O’Sullivan CM, Pinloche E, Wilkinson T, Morphew RM, McEwan NR. Using next-generation sequencing to determine diversity of horse intestinal worms: identifying the equine ‘nemabiome’. J Equine Sci. 2019;30(1):1–5.
    pmc: PMC6445754pubmed: 30944540

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,001 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.