Analyze Diet
Veterinary clinical pathology2008; 37(1); 21-30; doi: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2008.00012.x

Evaluation of equine hemograms using the ADVIA 120 as compared with an impedance counter and manual differential count.

Abstract: The ADVIA 120 is an automated laser cell counter widely used in veterinary medicine. Although specific software for equine samples is available and validated, only a few reports have been published comparing the ADVIA 120 with other methods for equine hemogram evaluation. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the hematologic values and reference intervals obtained on the ADVIA 120 with those obtained on an impedance cell counter and manual differential counts in healthy horses. Methods: EDTA-anticoagulated blood samples were obtained from 114 clinically healthy horses of various breeds, both sexes, and 2-6 years of age. Samples were stored for up to 12 hours at 4 degrees C and then analyzed on the ADVIA 120 and the Hemat 8. A 100-cell to 200-cell differential leukocyte count was performed by 3 independent observers on May-Grünwald-Giemsa-stained smears. Intra-assay precision of the ADVIA 120 was determined by analyzing 5 replicates each of 10 of the blood samples. Results: Results from the ADVIA were significantly higher than those from the impedance counter for RBC count, total WBC count, hemoglobin concentration, red cell distribution width, MCH, and MCHC, and significantly lower for HCT and platelet count. Significantly higher neutrophil and basophil counts and significantly lower lymphocyte counts were obtained with the ADVIA 120 compared with manual counts. Based on Passing-Bablok regression analysis, RBC and platelet counts were in good agreement between the 2 analyzers; a constant and proportional bias was present for other values. Coefficients of variation for erythrocyte parameters on the ADVIA were <1%, but were higher for platelet (6%), total WBC (2%), differential WBC (4%-30%), and reticulocyte (75%) counts. Conclusions: Results obtained with equine samples on the ADVIA 120 were comparable with those obtained on an impedance counter; reference intervals differed statistically but overlapped. The ADVIA had poor precision for reticulocyte and differential leukocyte counts such that the latter should always be verified on smears.
Publication Date: 2008-03-28 PubMed ID: 18366541DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-165X.2008.00012.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research compared an automated laser cell counter (ADVIA 120) with an impedance counter and manually conducted differential cell counts, in evaluating equine blood samples. The cell counters were used to measure various hematological parameters in the samples sourced from healthy horses.

Methodology

  • The research was conducted using blood samples from 114 clinically healthy horses of varying breeds, both males and females, aged between 2 and 6 years.
  • The blood samples were anticoagulated with EDTA and stored at 4°C for up to 12 hours before analysis.
  • The blood samples were analyzed using two methods: ADVIA 120 and Hemat 8 impedance cell counter.
  • In parallel, a manual differential leukocyte count was performed by three independent observers. These individual observers analyzed 100 to 200 cells in May-Grünwald-Giemsa-stained blood smears.
  • The intra-assay precision of ADVIA 120 was measured by analyzing five replicates of ten of the blood samples.

Results

  • The results showed that ADVIA 120 provided significantly higher readings than the impedance counter for red blood cell (RBC) count, total white blood cell (WBC) count, hemoglobin concentration, red cell distribution width, and mean corpuscular volume and hemoglobin concentration. In contrast, hematocrit and platelet count results were significantly lower on ADVIA 120.
  • When comparing ADVIA 120 results with manual counts, the automated counter gave higher neutrophil and basophil counts but lower lymphocyte counts.
  • Regression analysis showed that RBC and platelet counts were in good agreement between the two analyzers; however, other measurements displayed both constant and proportional biases.
  • Coefficients of variation for erythrocyte parameters on the ADVIA were less than 1%, but were higher for platelet (6%), total WBC (2%), differential WBC (4%-30%), and reticulocyte (75%) counts.

Conclusions

  • The results obtained from the ADVIA 120 were comparable to those from the impedance counter. Even though the reference intervals showed statistical differences, they overlapped.
  • The ADVIA 120 showed poor precision for reticulocyte and differential leukocyte counts, which suggests manual verification of these counts might still be necessary.

Cite This Article

APA
Giordano A, Rossi G, Pieralisi C, Paltrinieri S. (2008). Evaluation of equine hemograms using the ADVIA 120 as compared with an impedance counter and manual differential count. Vet Clin Pathol, 37(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-165X.2008.00012.x

Publication

ISSN: 0275-6382
NlmUniqueID: 9880575
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 37
Issue: 1
Pages: 21-30

Researcher Affiliations

Giordano, Alessia
  • Dipartimento di Patologia Animale, Igiene e Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria, Milan, Italy. alessia.giordano@unimi.it
Rossi, Gabriele
    Pieralisi, Cristina
      Paltrinieri, Saverio

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Blood Cell Count / instrumentation
        • Blood Cell Count / veterinary
        • Electric Impedance
        • Female
        • Horses / blood
        • Male
        • Reference Standards
        • Sensitivity and Specificity

        Citations

        This article has been cited 6 times.
        1. Bonsembiante F, Guglielmini C, Berlanda M, Fiocco P, Biancani B, Genovese C, Bedin S, Gelain ME. Biological Variation and Reference Change Value of Routine Hematology Measurands in a Population of Managed Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 11;13(8).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13081313pubmed: 37106876google scholar: lookup
        2. Leidinger EF, Leidinger J, Figl J, Rumpler B, Schwendenwein I. Application of the ASVCP guidelines for the establishment of haematologic and biochemical reference intervals in Icelandic horses in Austria. Acta Vet Scand 2015 Jun 14;57(1):30.
          doi: 10.1186/s13028-015-0120-4pubmed: 26070944google scholar: lookup
        3. Giordano A, Meazza C, Salvadori M, Paltrinieri S. Thromboelastometric profiles of horses affected by exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhages. Vet Med Int 2010 Sep 30;2010.
          doi: 10.4061/2010/945789pubmed: 20953331google scholar: lookup
        4. Mau A, Keller SM, Kol A. A clinical and hematologic approach to basophilia in dogs, cats, and horses. Vet Clin Pathol 2025 Mar;54(1):24-34.
          doi: 10.1111/vcp.13404pubmed: 39617948google scholar: lookup
        5. Oddsdóttir C, Jónsdóttir HK, Sturludóttir E, Vilanova XM. The Effect of Repeated Blood Harvesting from Pregnant Mares on Haematological Variables. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 28;14(5).
          doi: 10.3390/ani14050745pubmed: 38473131google scholar: lookup
        6. Carlier S, Depuydt E, Van Hecke L, Martens A, Saunders J, Spaas JH. Safety assessment of equine allogeneic tenogenic primed mesenchymal stem cells in horses with naturally occurring tendon and ligament injuries. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1282697.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1282697pubmed: 38468694google scholar: lookup