Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2023; 53(1); 38-44; doi: 10.1111/vsu.13997

Evaluation of frontal and infratrochlear nerve blocks for standing sedated frontonasal sinusotomy in horses.

Abstract: To determine if targeted blocking of frontal and infratrochlear nerves provided anesthesia for the approach to a frontonasal sinusotomy. Methods: Two part study: Part 1 randomized crossover design; Part 2 proof of concept. Methods: N = 12; six each in Parts 1 and 2. Methods: Part 1: Each horse had either frontal and infratrochlear nerve blocks or a line block performed with 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride. Mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNT) were obtained at five sites along a proposed frontonasal sinusotomy prior to injection, and at 10, 60, and 120 min after blocking. After a 4 day washout period, the opposite procedure was performed. Order of procedure and side of face were randomized. MNTs were analyzed using mixed-model ANOVA with p < .05. Part 2: Frontal and infratrochlear nerve blocks were performed followed by creation of a skin/periosteal incision, which was closed at 2 h. Ability to create and suture the incision, and the size of the incision were recorded. Results: For part 1, both line and targeted blocks resulted in at least two times an increase in median MNT values at each of the five sites, as compared to baseline MNT values (p < .0025). In Part 2, incisions could be completed in five of six horses, with median incision size of 6.5 × 5 cm. Conclusions: Following frontal and infratrochlear nerve blocks, MNTs were increased along a proposed frontonasal sinusotomy, and skin incisions could be created in the majority of horses. Conclusions: Frontal and infratrochlear nerve blocks provide an alternative technique to create a frontonasal sinusotomy.
Publication Date: 2023-07-22 PubMed ID: 37483085DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13997Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study aims to ascertain if blocking the frontal and infratrochlear nerves in horses can successfully provide anesthesia for a surgical procedure called frontonasal sinusotomy. The findings demonstrate that this method does indeed increase the mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNTs) – a measure of the response to potentially painful stimuli – and enables the creation of skin incisions in most cases.

Research Methodology

  • The research was divided into two parts, with 6 horses participating in each part of the study.
  • Part 1 was a randomized crossover design study. Each horse was given nerve blocks in either the frontal and infratrochlear nerves or a line block using 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride, an anesthetic drug. MNTs were obtained at 5 different sites along the proposed frontonasal sinusotomy line before the injection, and then again at 10, 60, and 120 minutes after blocking. There was a washout period of 4 days between the two nerve block procedures.
  • In Part 2, a proof-of-concept study, frontal and infratrochlear nerve blocks were performed on each horse, followed by the creation of skin and periosteal incisions. The area was sutured after 2 hours. The researchers recorded whether the incision site could be successfully created and sutured, as well as the size of the incision.

Findings

  • Part 1 of the study found that both line and targeted blocks resulted in at least a two-fold increase in median MNT values at all tested sites in comparison to baseline MNT values.
  • During Part 2, incisions were successfully completed in five of the six horses, with a median incision size of 6.5×5 cm.

Conclusions

  • The study found that when frontal and infratrochlear nerves were blocked, MNTs increased along a proposed frontonasal sinusotomy line and skin incisions could be created successfully in most cases.
  • The research concludes that the blocking of frontal and infratrochlear nerves provides an alternative anesthetic method to carry out a frontonasal sinusotomy, a surgical operation of the sinuses in a horse’s head.

Cite This Article

APA
Elliott SM, Giancola SC, Moorman V. (2023). Evaluation of frontal and infratrochlear nerve blocks for standing sedated frontonasal sinusotomy in horses. Vet Surg, 53(1), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13997

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 53
Issue: 1
Pages: 38-44

Researcher Affiliations

Elliott, Singen M
  • College of Veterinary Medicine, Large Animal Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Giancola, Shyla C
  • College of Veterinary Medicine, Large Animal Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Moorman, Valerie
  • College of Veterinary Medicine, Large Animal Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses / surgery
  • Animals
  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Mepivacaine
  • Nerve Block / veterinary
  • Nerve Block / methods

Grant Funding

  • For the Love of the Horse, University of Georgia

References

This article includes 12 references
  1. Barakzai SZ, Dixon PM. Standing equine sinus surgery.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2014;30:45-62.
  2. Hart SK, Sullins KE. Evaluation of a novel post operative treatment for sinonasal disease in the horse (1996-2007).. Equine Vet J 2011;43:24-29.
  3. Quinn GC, Kidd JA, Lane JG. Modified frontonasal sinus flap surgery in standing horses: surgical findings and outcomes of 60 cases.. Equine Vet J 2005;37:138-142.
  4. Schumacher J, Dutton DM, Murphy DJ, Hague BA, Taylor TS. Paranasal sinus surgery through a frontonasal flap in sedated, standing horses.. Vet Surg 2000;29:173-177.
  5. Nickels FA, O'Neill H. Nasal passages and paranasal sinuses.. 2019:698-710.
  6. Ribeiro PD, Sanches MG, Okamoto T. Comparative analysis of tissue reactions to anesthetic solutions: histological analysis in subcutaneous tissue of rats.. Anesth Prog 2003;50:169-180.
  7. Erkert RS, Macallister CG, Campbell G, Payton ME, Shawley R, Clarke CR. Comparison of topical lidocaine/prilocaine anesthetic cream and local infiltration of 2% lidocaine for episioplasty in mares.. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2005;28:299-304.
  8. Skarda RT, Muir WW, Hubbell JAE. Local anesthetic drugs and techniques.. 2009:210-242.
  9. Colbath AC, Wittenburg L, Gold JR, McIlwraith CW, Moorman VJ. The effects of mepivacaine hydrochloride on antimicrobial activity and mechanical nocicpeptive threshold during amikacin sulfate regional limb perfusion in the horse.. Vet Surgery 2016;45:798-803.
  10. Levine JM, Levine JL, Hoffman AG, Bratton G. Comparative anatomy of the horse, ox, and dog: the brain and associated vessels.. Compend Equine 2008;3:153-164.
  11. Staszyk C, Bienert A, Baumer W. Simulation of local anaesthetic nerve block of the infraorbital nerve within the pterygopalatine fossa: anatomical landmarks defined by computed tomography.. Res Vet Sci 2008;85:399-406.
  12. Hoerdemann M, Smith RL, Hosgood G. Duration of action of mepivacaine and lidocaine in equine palmar digital perineural blocks in an experimental lameness model.. Vet Surg 2017;46:986-993.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.