Analyze Diet
The Journal of veterinary medical science2012; 75(3); 369-371; doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0127

Evaluation of motion correction processing in equine bone scintigraphy by Scheffé’s method of paired comparisons.

Abstract: Equine bone scintigraphy is usually performed with horses in standing position under sedation. However, swaying motion often leads to poor-quality images. To examine the usefulness of motion correction (MC) processing, equine bone scintigrams were evaluated using Scheffé's method of paired comparisons. A significant difference in evaluation scores was detected by analysis of variance (F test, P<0.01). According to all observers, Yardstick analysis scores were higher for images use of MC processing than for those no use of MC processing, for all parts. Overall scores of 5 observers were as follows: without MC 100% acquisition time (AT, lowest), use of MC with 25% AT, MC 50% AT, MC 75% AT and MC 100% AT (highest). Thus, MC processing shortens AT in equine bone scintigraphy, and it contributes to a reduction in the external radiation exposure of nurses/technicians.
Publication Date: 2012-10-23 PubMed ID: 23090690DOI: 10.1292/jvms.12-0127Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The researchers investigated the use of motion correction (MC) processing in equine bone scintigraphy, a type of imaging technique, and found it significantly improved the quality of the images and reduced radiation exposure.

Overview of the Study

  • The researchers were examining the impact of motion correction (MC) processing in equine (horse) bone scintigraphy, an imaging technique used to diagnose conditions in the bones of horses that often produces poor-quality images due to the movement of the sedated animals.

Methodology

  • The research team used the Scheffé’s method of paired comparisons, a statistical method that uses pairwise comparisons to determine whether any significant difference exists between groups, to evaluate the scintigrams (an image of the distribution of radioactive material in a specimen) when using MC processing.

Findings

  • The findings were analyzed through the F test, an analysis of variance, and it was found that there was a significant difference (p<0.01) in the evaluation scores between the groups.
  • The Yardstick analysis scores, which all the observers used, were consistently higher for images obtained with the use of MC processing than those without.

Conclusions

  • The overall scores given by the five observers showed a pattern, with 100% acquisition time (AT, which refers to how long the scanner acquires data) without MC being the lowest, followed by usage of MC with 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% AT. This indicated that images achieved with MC were of a higher quality.
  • The research also indicated that MC processing’s usage can reduce acquisition time, leading to less radiation exposure for medical staff such as nurses and technicians.

Cite This Article

APA
Yamaguchi T, Endo Y, Nambo Y, Sato F, Sasaki N, Yamada K. (2012). Evaluation of motion correction processing in equine bone scintigraphy by Scheffé’s method of paired comparisons. J Vet Med Sci, 75(3), 369-371. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.12-0127

Publication

ISSN: 1347-7439
NlmUniqueID: 9105360
Country: Japan
Language: English
Volume: 75
Issue: 3
Pages: 369-371

Researcher Affiliations

Yamaguchi, Toshiro
  • Gifu University, The United Graduate School of Veterinary Science, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1193, Japan.
Endo, Yoshiro
    Nambo, Yasuo
      Sato, Fumio
        Sasaki, Naoki
          Yamada, Kazutaka

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Bone and Bones / metabolism
            • Horses / physiology
            • Image Enhancement / methods
            • Motion
            • Observer Variation
            • Radionuclide Imaging / methods
            • Radionuclide Imaging / veterinary

            Citations

            This article has been cited 0 times.