Analyze Diet
Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho2023; 94(1); e13854; doi: 10.1111/asj.13854

Evaluation of parentage testing using single nucleotide polymorphism markers for draft horses in Japan.

Abstract: We evaluated the utility of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for parentage testing in Breton (BR) and Percheron (PR) horses in Japan using the proposed International Society for Animal Genetics (P-ISAG) 147 SNP panel and 414 autosomal SNPs. Genomic DNA was extracted from 98 horses of two breeds, BR (n = 47) and PR (n = 51), and sequenced using next-generation sequencing. The average minor allele frequencies for the P-ISAG panel for BR and PR were 0.306 and 0.301, respectively. The combined probabilities of exclusion (PEs) given two parents and one offspring: exclude a relationship (PE01) and given one parent and one offspring: exclude their relationship (PE02) were over 0.9999 for both breeds. Using the P-ISAG panel, no exclusion or doubtful cases were identified in 35 valid parent-offspring pairs, suggesting that the P-ISAG panel is helpful for parentage verification in both breeds. In contrast, as 0.18% of falsely accepted parentages were observed in the parentage discovery cases, additional markers such as the combination of the P-ISAG panel and 414 autosomal SNPs (561-SNP set) presented here should be used to identify valid parent-offspring pairs of horses with unknown parentage relationships.
Publication Date: 2023-07-10 PubMed ID: 37427667DOI: 10.1111/asj.13854Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research tests the effectiveness of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for determining the parentage of Breton and Percheron draft horses in Japan.

Study Purpose and Methodology

  • By using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, the researchers evaluated the potential of parentage testing in two breeds of draft horses in Japan: Breton and Percheron.
  • The researchers ensured to use a resourceful 147 SNP panel recommended by the International Society for Animal Genetics (P-ISAG), as well as 414 other autosomal SNPs.
  • This was done by extracting genomic DNA from 98 horses from both breeds (47 Breton horses and 51 Percheron horses), and then sequencing this DNA using next-generation sequencing methodologies.

Findings

  • The researchers found that in both breeds, the average minor allele frequencies for the P-ISAG panel were around 0.3.
  • The probabilities of exclusion (PEs)—statistics that demonstrate the chance of excluding an incorrectly assigned parent—were incredibly high. In situations where two parents and one offspring are given (PE01) or one parent and one offspring are given (PE02), these probabilities were over 0.9999 for both breeds.
  • These findings suggest that the P-ISAG panel can efficiently exclude incorrect parent-offspring relationships in both of these breeds, making it an effective tool for parentage verification.

Implications

  • Whilst the results from this study are promising, the researchers noted that in some cases there was a small chance of false acceptance of parentage (0.18% of cases).
  • Because of this limitation, the researchers recommend using the P-ISAG panel in combination with other marker sets, such as the 414 other autosomal SNPs (forming a 561-SNP set), for more accurate parentage identification in situations where the parent-offspring relationship is not known.

Cite This Article

APA
Ishige T, Kikuchi M, Kakoi H, Hirota KI, Ohnuma A, Tozaki T, Hirosawa Y, Tanaka S, Nagata SI. (2023). Evaluation of parentage testing using single nucleotide polymorphism markers for draft horses in Japan. Anim Sci J, 94(1), e13854. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13854

Publication

ISSN: 1740-0929
NlmUniqueID: 100956805
Country: Australia
Language: English
Volume: 94
Issue: 1
Pages: e13854

Researcher Affiliations

Ishige, Taichiro
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Kikuchi, Mio
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Kakoi, Hironaga
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Hirota, Kei-Ichi
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Ohnuma, Aoi
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Tozaki, Teruaki
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Hirosawa, Yuko
  • National Livestock Breeding Center Tokachi Station, Otofuke, Japan.
Tanaka, Shoko
  • National Livestock Breeding Center Tokachi Station, Otofuke, Japan.
Nagata, Shun-Ichi
  • Genetic Analysis Department, Laboratory of Racing Chemistry, Utsunomiya, Japan.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses / genetics
  • Animals
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / genetics
  • Japan
  • Gene Frequency / genetics
  • Base Sequence
  • DNA

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Aoki T, Chiba A, Itoh M, Nambo Y, Yamagishi N, Shibano KI, Cheong SH. Colostral and foal serum immunoglobulin G levels and associations with perinatal abnormalities in heavy draft horses in Japan. Journal of Equine Science 31(2), 29-34.
    doi: 10.1294/jes.31.29google scholar: lookup
  2. Binns MM, Holmes NG, Rolliman A, Scott AM. The identification of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the horse and their use in thoroughbred parentage testing. British Veterinary Journal 151(1), 9-15.
  3. de Groot M, Anderson H, Bauer H, Bauguil C, Bellone RR, Brugidou R, Buckley RM, Dovč P, Forman O, Grahn RA, Kock L, Longeri M, Mouysset-Geniez S, Qiu J, Sofronidis G, van der Goor LHP, Lyons LA. Standardization of a SNP panel for parentage verification and identification in the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus). Animal Genetics 52(5), 675-682.
    doi: 10.1111/age.13100google scholar: lookup
  4. de Groot M, van Haeringen WA. An evaluation of the International Society for Animal Genetics recommended parentage and identification panel for the domestic pigeon (Columba livia domestica). Animal Genetics 48(4), 431-435.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12555google scholar: lookup
  5. Flynn P, Morrin-O'Donnell R, Weld R, Gargan LM, Carlsson J, Daly S, Suren H, Siddavatam P, Gujjula KR. Comparative analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellite markers for parentage verification and discovery within the equine Thoroughbred breed. bioRxiv 2021-07.
    doi: 10.1101/2021.07.28.453868google scholar: lookup
  6. Heaton MP, Harhay GP, Bennett GL, Stone RT, Grosse WM, Casas E, Keele JW, Smith TP, Chitko-McKown CG, Laegreid WW. Selection and use of SNP markers for animal identification and paternity analysis in US beef cattle. Mammalian Genome 13(5), 272-281.
    doi: 10.1007/s00335-001-2146-3google scholar: lookup
  7. Heaton MP, Leymaster KA, Kalbfleisch TS, Kijas JW, Clarke SM, McEwan J, Maddox JF, Basnayake V, Petrik DT, Simpson B, Smith TP, Chitko-McKown CG, International Sheep Genomics Consortium. SNPs for parentage testing and traceability in globally diverse breeds of sheep. PLoS ONE 9(4), e94851.
  8. Hirota K, Kakoi H, Gawahara H, Hasegawa T, Tozaki T. Construction and validation of parentage testing for thoroughbred horses by 53 single nucleotide polymorphisms. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 72, 719-726.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.09-0486google scholar: lookup
  9. Holl HM, Vanhnasy J, Everts RE, Hoefs-Martin K, Cook D, Brooks SA, Carpenter ML, Bustamante CD, Lafayette C. Single nucleotide polymorphisms for DNA typing in the domestic horse. Animal Genetics 48(6), 669-676.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12608google scholar: lookup
  10. Ishii M. The history and production of heavy draft horses (in Japanese). The Hip 49, 26-33.
  11. Jamieson A, Taylor SC. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Animal Genetics 28(6), 397-400.
  12. Jones AG, Small CM, Paczolt KA, Ratterman NL. A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources 10(1), 6-30.
  13. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16(5), 1099-1106.
  14. Lee JC, Tsai LC, Chu PC, Lin YY, Lin CY, Huang TY, Yu YJ, Linacre A, Hsieh HM. The risk of false inclusion of a relative parentage testing-An in silico population study. Croatian Medical Journal 54(3), 257-262.
    doi: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.257google scholar: lookup
  15. Lipinski MJ, Amigues Y, Blasi M, Broad TE, Cherbonnel C, Cho GJ, Corley S, Daftari P, Delattre DR, Dileanis S, Flynn JM, Grattapaglia D, Guthrie A, Harper C, Karttunen PL, Kimura H, Lewis GM, Longeri M, Meriaux JC, Lyons LA. An international parentage and identification panel for the domestic cat (Felis catus). Animal Genetics 38(4), 371-377.
  16. Marklund S, Ellegren H, Eriksson S, Sandberg K, Andersson L. Parentage testing and linkage analysis in the horse using a set of highly polymorphic microsatellites. Animal Genetics 25(1), 19-23.
  17. Morin PA, Luikart G, Wayne RK, the SNP workshop group. SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 19(4), 208-216.
  18. Perlin MW, Lancia G, Ng SK. Toward fully automated genotyping: Genotyping microsatellite markers by deconvolution. American Journal of Human Genetics 57(5), 1199-1210.
  19. Schaefer RJ, Schubert M, Bailey E, Bannasch DL, Barrey E, Bar-Gal GK, Brem G, Brooks SA, Distl O, Fries R, Finno CJ, Gerber V, Haase B, Jagannathan V, Kalbfleisch T, Leeb T, Lindgren G, Lopes MS, Mach N, McCue ME. Developing a 670k genotyping array to tag~ 2M SNPs across 24 horse breeds. BMC Genomics 18(1), 565.
    doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3943-8google scholar: lookup
  20. Tokarska M, Marshall T, Kowalczyk R, Wójcik JM, Pertoldi C, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V, Gregersen VR, Bendixen C. Effectiveness of microsatellite and SNP markers for parentage and identity analysis in species with low genetic diversity: The case of European bison. Heredity 103(4), 326-332.
    doi: 10.1038/hdy.2009.73google scholar: lookup
  21. Tozaki T, Ohnuma A, Kikuchi M, Ishige T, Kakoi H, Hirota K, Kusano K, Nagata S. Rare and common variant discovery by whole-genome sequencing of 101 thoroughbred racehorses. Scientific Reports 11(1), 16057.
  22. Väli U, Einarsson A, Waits L, Ellegren H. To what extent do microsatellite markers reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations?. Molecular Ecology 17(17), 3808-3817.
  23. van Asch B, Alves C, Gusmão L, Pereira V, Pereira F, Amorim A. A new autosomal STR nineplex for canine identification and parentage testing. Electrophoresis 30(2), 417-423.
    doi: 10.1002/elps.200800307google scholar: lookup
  24. Wade CM, Giulotto E, Sigurdsson S, Zoli M, Gnerre S, Imsland F, Lear TL, Adelson DL, Bailey E, Bellone RR, Blöcker H, Distl O, Edgar RC, Garber M, Leeb T, Mauceli E, MacLeod JN, Penedo MC, Raison JM, Lindblad-Toh K. Genome sequence, comparative analysis, and population genetics of the domestic horse. Science 326(5954), 865-867.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1178158google scholar: lookup
  25. Wu XL, Xu J, Li H, Ferretti R, He J, Qiu J, Xiao Q, Simpson B, Michell T, Kachman SD, Tait RGJ, Bauk S. Evaluation of genotyping concordance for commercial bovine SNP arrays using quality-assurance samples. Animal Genetics 50(4), 367-371.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12800google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Valera M, Karlau A, Anaya G, Bugno-Poniewierska M, Molina A, Encina A, Azor PJ, Demyda-Peyrás S. The Use of Genomic Screening for the Detection of Chromosomal Abnormalities in the Domestic Horse: Five New Cases of 65,XXY Syndrome in the Pura Raza Español Breed. Animals (Basel) 2024 Sep 3;14(17).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14172560pubmed: 39272345google scholar: lookup