Analyze Diet

Evaluation of peritoneal fluid following intestinal resection and anastomosis in horses.

Abstract: Postoperative abdominal fluid changes were compared in 2 groups of horses; those undergoing double small-colon resection and anastomosis (n = 10) and those undergoing exploratory celiotomy alone (n = 5). Peritoneal fluid was collected before surgery and on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Total and differential nucleated cell counts, RBC numbers, and total protein and fibrinogen concentrations were evaluated. In both groups, all values were significantly higher than normal on the first postoperative day (after small-colon resection and anastomoses, WBC = 130,350 +/- 23,310 cells/microliters, RBC = 7,389,000 +/- 6,234,000 cells/microliters, total protein = 3.63 +/- 0.16 g/dl; after exploratory celiotomy alone, WBC = 166,620 +/- 34,340 cells/microliters, RBC = 295,000 +/- 86,070 cells/microliters, total protein 4.38 +/- 0.54 g/dl). The number of total peritoneal nucleated cells and RBC significantly decreased after the first postoperative day, whereas total protein and fibrinogen concentrations, percent neutrophils, and percent mononuclear cells remained unchanged. None of the values had returned to normal by postoperative day 7 (after small-colon resection and anastomoses, WBC = 45,600 +/- 8,765 cells/microliters, RBC = 95,390 +/- 53,380 cells/microliters, total protein = 4.39 +/- 0.23 g/dl; after exploratory celiotomy alone, WBC = 43,340 +/- 7,746 cells/microliters, RBC = 12,860 +/- 11,790 cells/microliters, total protein = 3.92 +/- 2.20 g/dl.) The resection and anastomosis group had a significantly lower total protein concentration on the first postoperative day and a significantly higher mean total RBC count over the entire 7-day postoperative evaluation than did horses that underwent celiotomy alone. Other values in the 2 groups of horses did not differ significantly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Publication Date: 1992-02-01 PubMed ID: 1575387
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study investigates how postoperative abdominal fluid changes between two groups of horses; one group had a specific surgical procedure (double small-colon resection and anastomosis) while the other just had their abdomen opened and examined (exploratory celiotomy). The researchers found abnormal values of various biological parameters in the fluid samples right after the surgery that gradually normalized except for a few ones, over a 7-day postoperative period.

Methodology

  • The research involved two groups of horses. One group, consisting of 10 horses, underwent a surgical procedure known as double small-colon resection and anastomosis. The other group, made up of 5 horses, underwent a simpler procedure of exploratory celiotomy where the abdominal cavity was opened and examined without any resection.
  • Peritoneal fluid samples, a liquid found in the abdominal cavity that lubricates the surface of tissue, were collected from the horses before the surgery and on the first, third, fifth, and seventh postoperative days.
  • These samples were then examined for total and differential nucleated cell counts, red blood cell (RBC) numbers, total protein, and fibrinogen (a protein involved in the blood clotting process) concentrations.

Findings

  • All the evaluated bio parameters in the fluid samples of both groups were found to be significantly higher than normal levels on the first postoperative day.
  • The total nucleated cell count and the RBC numbers saw a significant reduction after the first day, however, the levels of total protein, fibrinogen concentrations, percent neutrophils, and percent mononuclear cells (all types of white blood cells) remained constant.
  • Even by the seventh postoperative day, most values had not returned to normal levels.
  • Comparing the two groups, the research found that the group that underwent resection and anastomosis showed a significantly lower total protein concentration on the first postoperative day and a significantly higher mean total red blood cell count over the entire seven-day postoperative evaluation period.
  • No other significant differences were found between the two groups.

Significance

  • The research could potentially help in better postoperative care of horses as the biological changes observed in peritoneal fluid could be used as biomarkers to monitor the recovery process in post-surgery horses and detect any complications at an early stage.

Cite This Article

APA
Hanson RR, Nixon AJ, Gronwall R, Meyer D, Pendergast J. (1992). Evaluation of peritoneal fluid following intestinal resection and anastomosis in horses. Am J Vet Res, 53(2), 216-221.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 53
Issue: 2
Pages: 216-221

Researcher Affiliations

Hanson, R R
  • Department of Surgical Sciences, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.
Nixon, A J
    Gronwall, R
      Meyer, D
        Pendergast, J

          MeSH Terms

          • Anastomosis, Surgical / veterinary
          • Animals
          • Ascitic Fluid / chemistry
          • Ascitic Fluid / cytology
          • Ascitic Fluid / veterinary
          • Cell Count / veterinary
          • Colon / surgery
          • Erythrocyte Count / veterinary
          • Female
          • Fibrinogen / analysis
          • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
          • Horses / surgery
          • Leukocyte Count
          • Leukocytes, Mononuclear
          • Male
          • Neutrophils
          • Peritoneal Cavity / pathology
          • Peritonitis / diagnosis
          • Peritonitis / veterinary
          • Postoperative Complications / diagnosis
          • Postoperative Complications / veterinary
          • Proteins / analysis

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.