Evaluation of skin bacterial flora before and after aseptic preparation of clipped and nonclipped arthrocentesis sites in horses.
Abstract: This study evaluates skin bacterial flora before and after aseptic preparation of clipped and nonclipped arthrocentesis sites in horses. Methods: The hair over one midcarpal joint and one distal interphalangeal joint on each horse was clipped. The contralateral joint served as the nonclipped comparison. Methods: Twelve adult horses. Methods: A prescrub sample for microbial culture was taken from the dorsal surface of all four joints for each horse. Each site was aseptically prepared with povidone iodine and 70% alcohol, followed by postscrub sampling for microbial culture. Colony forming units (CFUs) were determined for each sample, 24 hours after inoculation of blood agar plates. Results: There was no significant difference (P > .05) in number of postscrub CFUs between clipped and nonclipped skin over the midcarpal or distal interphalangeal joints. Percent bacterial reduction (mean +/- SD%) after aseptic preparation differed significantly (P = .02) between clipped (99.8 +/- .003%) and nonclipped (96.2 +/- .05%) skin at the midcarpal joint, but not at the distal interphalangeal joint (clipped, 98.5 +/- .03% and nonclipped, 97.8 +/- 0.21%). There was a significant difference (P = .009) in number of prescrub CFUs obtained from clipped and nonclipped skin for the midcarpal joint. There was no significant difference in number of prescrub CFUs between clipped and nonclipped skin at the distal interphalangeal joint. Bacteria isolated from both clipped and nonclipped skin sampled postscrub included Bacillus sp, nonhemolytic Staphylococcus sp, and Micrococcus sp. Conclusions: The presence of hair over the midcarpal and distal interphalangeal joints does not appear to inhibit the ability of antiseptics to effectively reduce bacterial flora to an acceptable level for arthrocentesis. Conclusions: Aseptic preparation of the skin over the midcarpal and distal interphalangeal joints can be accomplished without hair removal in horses.
Publication Date: 1997-03-01 PubMed ID: 9068162DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1997.tb01474.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research examines if hair removal from horses’ joints affects the efficacy of antiseptics in reducing bacterial growth when preparing for an arthrocentesis procedure.
Methodology
The following steps were undertaken in the research:
- The study involved twelve adult horses. The hair above one midcarpal joint (wrist joint) and one distal interphalangeal joint (joint at the base of the tail) of each horse were clipped. The corresponding joint on the opposite side was left unclipped, acting as a control.
- A pre-scrub sample for a microbial culture was taken from the dorsal surface of all four joints for each horse, providing an initial reading of the bacterial colonies present.
- Each site was then prepared aseptically with povidone iodine and 70% alcohol, and a second sample was collected for microbial culture to determine the number of colony forming units (CFUs) remaining.
- The number of CFUs was recorded for each sample 24 hours after the inoculation of blood agar plates.
Results
The findings of the research were as follows:
- No significant difference was found in the number of post-scrub CFUs between the clipped and non-clipped regions around the midcarpal or distal interphalangeal joints, indicating that hair presence did not impede the effectiveness of antiseptic preparation.
- However, bacterial reduction after aseptic preparation was significantly higher in clipped regions (99.8%) than in non-clipped regions (96.2%) for the midcarpal joint. The difference was not significant for the distal interphalangeal joint.
- Interestingly, a significant difference was found in the number of prescrub CFUs between clipped and non-clipped regions for the midcarpal joint, but not for the distal interphalangeal joint.
- Post-scrub samples from both clipped and non-clipped areas cultured Bacillus sp, nonhemolytic Staphylococcus sp, and Micrococcus sp.
Conclusions
The study concludes that the presence of hair over the midcarpal and distal interphalangeal joints does not prevent antiseptics from effectively reducing bacterial flora to a safe level for performing an arthrocentesis. Therefore, aseptic preparation of these joints can be done without clipping the horse’s hair.
Cite This Article
APA
Hague BA, Honnas CM, Simpson RB, Peloso JG.
(1997).
Evaluation of skin bacterial flora before and after aseptic preparation of clipped and nonclipped arthrocentesis sites in horses.
Vet Surg, 26(2), 121-125.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.1997.tb01474.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Anti-Infective Agents, Local / administration & dosage
- Anti-Infective Agents, Local / therapeutic use
- Arthritis, Infectious / prevention & control
- Asepsis / methods
- Bacillus / isolation & purification
- Evaluation Studies as Topic
- Hair / microbiology
- Horses
- Injections, Intra-Articular / adverse effects
- Micrococcus / isolation & purification
- Paracentesis / methods
- Paracentesis / veterinary
- Povidone-Iodine / administration & dosage
- Povidone-Iodine / therapeutic use
- Skin / microbiology
- Staphylococcus / isolation & purification
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists