Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2021; 107; 103778; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103778

Evaluation of Stallion Testicular Cell Types by Flow Cytometry.

Abstract: Flow cytometry procedures can be used for evaluation of both spermatogenic efficiency and diagnose disorders of stallion spermatogenesis. Aims of this study were to compare two testicular sample acquisition techniques (needle aspirate-N and tissue wedge-T) and results when using flow cytometry and histology procedures. Testicular cell types were stained with acridine orange, and nine regions (R2 to R10) were identified and enumerated following acquisition by either N or T. Testes were also grouped and analyzed by size and sexual maturity (Small [immature] compared with Large [mature]) and used to determine if flow cytometry procedures could be used to detect differences. For both N and T, percentages of 2n cell types were greater in the Small than Large testes, whereas percentages of 1n cell types in N were greater in the Large than Small testes (P < .05). Testicular cell types in N regions were correlated to similar T regions (r between 0.51 and 0.99; P < .05) in both groups. Flow cytometry and histology scores were correlated in both groups (r between -0.95 and 0.93, P < .05). There were small differences in number of testicular cell types from N and T. With both sample acquisition methods, there was discrimination between the Small and Large testes, therefore, evaluation of testicular cell types using flow cytometry procedures might have clinical applications. Results with comparison of flow cytometry to histology procedures indicate that flow cytometry can be applied clinically to identify changes in testicular cell types of stallions using a needle aspirate.
Publication Date: 2021-09-24 PubMed ID: 34802628DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103778Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research reveals that flow cytometry, a technique used for counting and examining microscopic particles, can effectively analyze stallion testicular cell types and potentially identify problems in sperm production. The study also explores the comparative efficiency of two cell-gathering techniques – needle aspiration and tissue wedge – while emphasizing the technique’s clinical applications.

Research Objective and Methods

  • In this study, the researchers aimed to compare two testicular sample acquisition techniques, namely needle aspiration (NAsp) and tissue wedge (TW) biopsy, using flow cytometry and histology procedures.
  • Flow cytometry involves the process of studying cell characteristics while suspended in a fluid, passing them through a focused beam of light.
  • Testicular cell types were stained with acridine orange, a fluorescent dye often used in cytogenetics, and nine regions identified and examined for both acquisition methods.
  • The researchers also categorized testes into two groups according to size and sexual maturity – small (immature) and large (mature) – to see if flow cytometry could detect any significant differences.

Findings and Interpretation

  • The research revealed that for both sample gathering methods, the percentage of 2n cell types were greater in smaller than larger testes. Here, ‘2n’ refers to a diploid set of chromosomes, which are usually found in body cells.
  • Conversely, the percentage of 1n cell types in needle aspiration was higher in larger than smaller testes. ‘1n’ signifies a haploid set of chromosomes, which are typically found in sex cells.
  • Interestingly, testicular cell types in the needle aspirate regions showed correlation to the same regions in tissue wedge samples, which held true for both groups. This suggests that either method could potentially provide consistent testicular cell information.
  • The study also revealed a correlation between flow cytometry and histology scores, implying that flow cytometry could successfully substitute traditional histology for identifying changes in testicular cell types.
  • While both needle aspiration and tissue wedge biopsy displayed slight differences in the number of testicular cell categories identified, they were alike in distinguishing between small and large testes, which suggests clinical applicability.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The research suggests that flow cytometry might have valuable clinical applications in the analysis and diagnosis of testicular cell concerns in stallions, possibly offering an alternative to traditional histology analyses.
  • The comparative study on two methods of sample acquisition implies a standardization in the analysis of testicular cells, regardless of whether needle aspiration or a tissue wedge is applied, which could pave the way for method flexibility in practice.

Cite This Article

APA
Serafini R, Varner DD, Love CC. (2021). Evaluation of Stallion Testicular Cell Types by Flow Cytometry. J Equine Vet Sci, 107, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103778

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 107
Pages: 103778
PII: S0737-0806(21)00408-1

Researcher Affiliations

Serafini, Rosanna
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A & M University, TX.
Varner, Dickson D
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A & M University, TX.
Love, Charles C
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A & M University, TX.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Flow Cytometry / veterinary
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Spermatogenesis
  • Testis / cytology

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.