Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2019; 48(6); 985-996; doi: 10.1111/vsu.13228

Evaluation of surgical models for training veterinary students to perform enterotomies.

Abstract: To compare surgical models for teaching enterotomies to students. Methods: Prospective, randomized study. Methods: Second-year veterinary students (n = 59) and faculty surgeons/surgery residents (n = 19). Methods: Participants performed an enterotomy on each of 3 models (equine cadaver intestine, SurgiReal small intestine simulator, and SynDaver canine bowel) and completed a survey comparing them to either an enterotomy on an anesthetized pig (students) or intestinal surgery experience (faculty/residents). Surveys results were compiled and analyzed. Results: Both student and faculty/resident groups rated cadaver intestine as more similar to live intestine compared with the synthetic models for incision, tissue handling, mucosal eversion, needle passage, knot tying, and best preparing for live intestine. Students rated SynDaver as more similar to live intestine than SurgiReal for incision and ranked SurgiReal as more similar to live intestine than SynDaver for mucosal eversion. There was no difference between the ranks assigned to SurgiReal and SynDaver for faculty/residents. Faculty/residents responded most often that cadaver intestine would be the model they recommend for training students. Conclusions: Cadaver intestine was the model most similar to live intestine for all variables tested. SurgiReal and SynDaver models were comparable to each other but did not simulate live intestine as well as cadaver intestine. Conclusions: Cadaver intestine more closely approximated live intestine compared with either synthetic model. SurgiReal and SynDaver may be adequate alternatives if cadaver intestine is unavailable.
Publication Date: 2019-05-17 PubMed ID: 31099106DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13228Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper is a study comparing different surgical models for training veterinary students in performing enterotomies, a type of gastrointestinal surgery. The paper concluded that using a cadaver intestine for training was the most similar to live intestine surgery, while synthetic models could be used if a cadaver wasn’t available.

Research Methodology

  • The study is a prospective and randomized one, involving 59 second-year veterinary students and 19 faculty surgeons/surgery residents.
  • The participants of the study were tasked with performing an enterotomy, a surgical procedure involving an incision into the intestines, on three different models – an equine cadaver intestine, a SurgiReal small intestine simulator, and a SynDaver canine bowel simulator.
  • After performing the surgeries, the participants were then asked to fill out a survey comparing the models to a real-life surgery scenario, either an enterotomy performed on an anesthetized pig (for the students) or their own experiences with intestinal surgery (for the faculty and residents).

Results Analysis

  • The research findings revealed that both the student and faculty/resident groups rated the cadaver intestine model as the most similar to a live intestine surgery. This was based on factors such as incision, tissue handling, mucosal eversion, needle passage, knot tying, and overall preparedness for live intestine surgery.
  • The students rated the SynDaver synthetic model to be more like a live intestine surgery for incisions, while they felt the SurgiReal simulator was closer to the real-life procedure for mucosal eversion. However, for the faculty and residents, there was no difference noted between the SurgiReal and SynDaver models.
  • Most notably, the faculty and surgery residents recommended the cadaver intestine model as the best training tool for students learning to perform enterotomies.

Conclusions

  • The study concluded that the cadaver intestine was the model that most closely resembled a live intestine surgery for all the variables tested.
  • The SurgiReal and SynDaver synthetic models were found to be comparable to each other but failed to simulate live intestine surgery as closely as the cadaver intestine model.
  • The researchers pointed out that in scenarios where cadaver intestine is not available, the SurgiReal and SynDaver synthetic models could serve as adequate alternatives for teaching veterinary students how to perform enterotomies.

Cite This Article

APA
Grimes JA, Wallace ML, Schmiedt CW, Parks AH. (2019). Evaluation of surgical models for training veterinary students to perform enterotomies. Vet Surg, 48(6), 985-996. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13228

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 48
Issue: 6
Pages: 985-996

Researcher Affiliations

Grimes, Janet A
  • Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Wallace, Mandy L
  • Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Schmiedt, Chad W
  • Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Parks, Andrew H
  • Department of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cadaver
  • Clinical Competence
  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures / veterinary
  • Dogs
  • Education, Veterinary / methods
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency
  • Intestine, Small
  • Models, Anatomic
  • Prospective Studies
  • Students
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Swine

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Farrell RM, Gilbert GE, Betance L, Huck J, Hunt JA, Dundas J, Pope E. Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment. Vet Surg 2022 Jul;51(5):788-800.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13791pubmed: 35261056google scholar: lookup
  2. Humpenöder M, Corte GM, Pfützner M, Wiegard M, Merle R, Hohlbaum K, Erickson NA, Plendl J, Thöne-Reineke C. Alternatives in Education-Rat and Mouse Simulators Evaluated from Course Trainers' and Supervisors' Perspective. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 22;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11071848pubmed: 34206243google scholar: lookup
  3. Souza GV, Hespanha ACV, Paz BF, Sá MAR, Carneiro RK, Guaita SAM, Magalhães TV, Minto BW, Dias LGGG. Impact of the internet on veterinary surgery. Vet Anim Sci 2021 Mar;11:100161.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2020.100161pubmed: 33511303google scholar: lookup