Analyze Diet

Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV ™ compared to the ADVIA ® 2120 for its use in dogs, cats, and horses. Part II: Accuracy of leukocyte differential and reticulocyte count, impact of anticoagulant and sample aging.

Abstract: The automated laser-based hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV™ provides a 5-part differential count and specific cytograms that are of great interest for large veterinary laboratories. The aim of the study was to validate the Sysmex XT-2000iV compared to the laser-based hematology analyzer ADVIA® 2120 and manual differential in dogs, cats, and horses as well as the impact of anticoagulant (heparin, ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid [EDTA], and citrate) and storage at 22°C and 4°C. Consecutive fresh K(3)-EDTA blood samples from 216 cats, 314 dogs, and 174 horses were included. The impact of anticoagulant and sample storage was assessed in specimens obtained from an additional 9 cats, 10 dogs, and 10 horses. Agreement between both analyzers was excellent to good except for monocytes and canine reticulocytes. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (r (s)) between Sysmex XT-2000iV and manual differential were good to fair and ranged from 0.91 (cat lymphocytes) to 0.44 (cat monocytes). Hematocrit value (Hct), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), MCH concentration (MCHC; all: P < 0.001), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV; P < 0.01) were higher in canine citrated blood compared to heparin and EDTA. In cats, lymphocytes and monocytes were lower in heparinized blood compared to EDTA (P < 0.05), whereas in horses no significant effect was seen. Regarding storage time and temperature, white and red blood cell counts, hemoglobin, and MCH were stable. Hct, MCV, and MCHC were influenced by erythrocyte swelling. Differential count remained stable for 24 hr (22°C) and nearly 72 hr (4°C) except for monocytes. The overall performance of the Sysmex XT-2000iV was excellent and compared favorably with that of the ADVIA 2120. A special strength was the excellent detection of feline eosinophils.
Publication Date: 2012-03-01 PubMed ID: 22362937DOI: 10.1177/1040638711436243Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focused on the evaluation of the Sysmex XT-2000iV, an automated laser-based hematology analyzer, for its application in veterinary laboratories, specifically for dogs, cats, and horses. The analyzer provides a 5-part differential count and specific cytograms. It was compared to the ADVIA 2120 and manual differential, considering the influence of specific anticoagulants and sample storage conditions. On the whole, the analyzer’s performance compared favorably to the ADVIA 2120, with noteworthy precision in detecting feline eosinophils.

Objective of Study and Analyzers Compared

  • The study sought to validate the performance and accuracy of the Sysmex XT-2000iV automated laser-based hematology analyzer in comparison with the ADVIA 2120 hematology analyzer and manual differential.
  • The Sysmex XT-2000iV is notable for its detailed 5-part differential count and specific cytograms.
  • These systems were compared based on their use in dogs, cats, and horses.

Sample Selection and Storage Conditions

  • Blood samples were collected from 216 cats, 314 dogs, and 174 horses for this study.
  • The study also looked at the effect of anticoagulant use—the effect of heparin, ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), and citrate was assessed—and temperature storage conditions (22°C and 4°C) on the results.
  • A sample composed of blood samples from an additional 9 cats, 10 dogs, and 10 horses were used to determine this impact.

Validation Results and Impact of Anticoagulated and Stored Samples

  • Results showed excellent to good agreement between the two analyzers, except for monocytes and canine reticulocytes.
  • The impact of anticoagulant samples in dogs showed higher hematocrit value (Hct), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and MCH concentration (MCHC) in samples with canine citrated blood in contrast with samples with heparin and EDTA.
  • The study also found that in cats, a lower lymphocyte and monocyte count was seen in samples of heparinized blood as opposed to those with EDTA. In horses, no significant impact was observed due to anticoagulant use.
  • The study findings indicate that certain key factors, including white and red blood cell counts, hemoglobin, and MCH, remain stable regardless of storage time and temperature. However, factors such as Hct, MCV, and MCHC were influenced by erythrocyte swelling.
  • The differential count remained stable for 24 hours at 22°C and nearly 72 hours at 4°C, with the exception of monocytes.

Overall Performance of Sysmex XT-2000iV

  • This study found the performance of the Sysmex XT-2000iV to be excellent and comparable to the ADVIA 2120 for use in large veterinary laboratories.
  • One special strength demonstrated by the Sysmex XT-2000iV is the precise detection of feline eosinophils.

Cite This Article

APA
Bauer N, Nakagawa J, Dunker C, Failing K, Moritz A. (2012). Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV ™ compared to the ADVIA ® 2120 for its use in dogs, cats, and horses. Part II: Accuracy of leukocyte differential and reticulocyte count, impact of anticoagulant and sample aging. J Vet Diagn Invest, 24(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638711436243

Publication

ISSN: 1943-4936
NlmUniqueID: 9011490
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 24
Issue: 1
Pages: 74-89

Researcher Affiliations

Bauer, Natali
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Clinical Pathology and Clinical Pathophysiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Frankfurterstr. 129, 35392 Giessen, Germany. Natali.Bauer@vetmed.uni-giessen.de
Nakagawa, Julia
    Dunker, Cathrin
      Failing, Klaus
        Moritz, Andreas

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Anticoagulants
          • Autoanalysis / instrumentation
          • Autoanalysis / veterinary
          • Blood Preservation / methods
          • Blood Preservation / veterinary
          • Cat Diseases / blood
          • Cat Diseases / diagnosis
          • Cats
          • Dog Diseases / blood
          • Dog Diseases / diagnosis
          • Dogs
          • Horse Diseases / blood
          • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
          • Horses
          • Leukocyte Count / instrumentation
          • Leukocyte Count / veterinary
          • Reproducibility of Results
          • Reticulocyte Count / instrumentation
          • Reticulocyte Count / veterinary
          • Temperature
          • Time Factors

          Citations

          This article has been cited 24 times.
          1. Jung JH, Yang Y, Seo D, Cho S, Choi G, Kim Y. Clinical utility of immature reticulocyte fraction for identifying early red blood cell regeneration in anemic dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2023 Mar;37(2):484-489.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.16641pubmed: 36762697google scholar: lookup
          2. Zelmer KC, Bauer N, Moritz A. Evaluation of the scil vCell 5, a novel laser- and impedance-based point-of-care hematology analyzer, for use in dogs and cats. J Vet Diagn Invest 2022 May;34(3):504-517.
            doi: 10.1177/10406387221083621pubmed: 35331075google scholar: lookup
          3. Bergstrand E, Tvedten HW, Lilliehöök I. Detection of frequent neutrophil misclassification by the ProCyte Dx in sick dogs and how to avoid it. J Small Anim Pract 2022 Aug;63(8):603-608.
            doi: 10.1111/jsap.13499pubmed: 35316864google scholar: lookup
          4. Betting A, Schweighauser A, Francey T. Diagnostic value of reticulocyte indices for the assessment of the iron status of cats with chronic kidney disease. J Vet Intern Med 2022 Mar;36(2):619-628.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.16367pubmed: 35090061google scholar: lookup
          5. Grebert M, Granat F, Braun JP, Leroy Q, Bourgès-Abella N, Trumel C. Validation of the Sysmex XN-V hematology analyzer for canine specimens. Vet Clin Pathol 2021 Jun;50(2):184-197.
            doi: 10.1111/vcp.12936pubmed: 34152026google scholar: lookup
          6. Chen X, Luo P, Hu C, Yan S, Lu D, Li Y, Chu K, Smith ZJ. Nanometer precise red blood cell sizing using a cost-effective quantitative dark field imaging system. Biomed Opt Express 2020 Oct 1;11(10):5950-5966.
            doi: 10.1364/BOE.405510pubmed: 33149998google scholar: lookup
          7. Kämpf S, Seiler E, Bujok J, Hofmann-Lehmann R, Riond B, Makhro A, Bogdanova A. Aging Markers in Equine Red Blood Cells. Front Physiol 2019;10:893.
            doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00893pubmed: 31379601google scholar: lookup
          8. Dondi F, Vasylyeva K, Serafini F, Gruarin M, Troìa R, Giunti M, Agnoli C. Heinz body-related interference with leukocyte and erythrocyte variables obtained by an automated hematology analyzer in cats. J Vet Diagn Invest 2019 Sep;31(5):704-713.
            doi: 10.1177/1040638719863088pubmed: 31291839google scholar: lookup
          9. Herman N, Trumel C, Geffré A, Braun JP, Thibault M, Schelcher F, Bourgès-Abella N. Hematology reference intervals for adult cows in France using the Sysmex XT-2000iV analyzer. J Vet Diagn Invest 2018 Sep;30(5):678-687.
            doi: 10.1177/1040638718790310pubmed: 30027829google scholar: lookup
          10. Kaufhold AE, Hirschberger J, Reese S, Foerster G, Hein J. A comparison of manual counting of rabbit reticulocytes with ADVIA 2120i analyzer counting. J Vet Diagn Invest 2018 May;30(3):337-341.
            doi: 10.1177/1040638717750428pubmed: 29601777google scholar: lookup
          11. Tvedten HW, Andersson V, Lilliehöök IE. Feline Differential Leukocyte Count with ProCyte Dx: Frequency and Severity of a Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Error and How to Avoid It. J Vet Intern Med 2017 Nov;31(6):1708-1716.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.14815pubmed: 28862354google scholar: lookup
          12. Lee JM, Kang JS. Changes of hematological references depends on storage period and temperature conditions in rats and dogs. Lab Anim Res 2016 Dec;32(4):241-248.
            doi: 10.5625/lar.2016.32.4.241pubmed: 28053618google scholar: lookup
          13. Stirn M, Moritz A, Bauer N. Rate of manual leukocyte differentials in dog, cat and horse blood samples using ADVIA 120 cytograms. BMC Vet Res 2014 Jun 5;10:125.
            doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-125pubmed: 24903909google scholar: lookup
          14. Fujino Y, Nakamura Y, Matsumoto H, Fukushima K, Takahashi M, Ohno K, Tsujimoto H. Development and evaluation of a novel in-clinic automated hematology analyzer, ProCyte Dx, for canine erythrocyte indices, leukogram, platelet counts and reticulocyte counts. J Vet Med Sci 2013 Nov;75(11):1519-24.
            doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0264pubmed: 23811854google scholar: lookup
          15. Dulli RJ, Yore K, Hammond J, DeNicola DB, Nabity MB. Comparison of the IDEXX ProCyte One to the ProCyte Dx and ADVIA 120 in Dogs and Cats. Vet Clin Pathol 2025 Dec;54(4):338-354.
            doi: 10.1111/vcp.70071pubmed: 41186159google scholar: lookup
          16. O Toole DS, Williams TL, Hare CHZ. The Value of Neutrophil Cell Population Data Parameters as Markers of Systemic Inflammation in Dogs and Cats. Vet Clin Pathol 2025 Jun;54(2):78-86.
            doi: 10.1111/vcp.70029pubmed: 40476643google scholar: lookup
          17. Guse B, Langenstein J, Bauer N, Hazuchova K. Signalment, clinicopathological findings, management practices and comorbidities in cats with diabetes mellitus in Germany: cross-sectional study of 144 cases. J Feline Med Surg 2025 Jan;27(1):1098612X241303303.
            doi: 10.1177/1098612X241303303pubmed: 39772828google scholar: lookup
          18. Guse B, Langenstein J, Bauer N, Hazuchova K. Signalment and laboratory findings in cats with diabetes mellitus in Germany: a retrospective review of laboratory submissions of 129,505 cats. J Feline Med Surg 2024 Sep;26(9):1098612X241262669.
            doi: 10.1177/1098612X241262669pubmed: 39286966google scholar: lookup
          19. Rong N, Wu J, Zhao B, Peng W, Yang H, Zhang G, Ruan D, Wei X, Liu J. Comparison of the pathogenicity and neutrophil and monocyte response between SARS-CoV-2 prototype and Omicron BA.1 in a lethal mouse model. Animal Model Exp Med 2025 Apr;8(4):707-717.
            doi: 10.1002/ame2.12419pubmed: 38760905google scholar: lookup
          20. Oddsdóttir C, Jónsdóttir HK, Sturludóttir E. Haematological reference intervals for pregnant Icelandic mares on pasture. Acta Vet Scand 2023 Dec 15;65(1):57.
            doi: 10.1186/s13028-023-00721-xpubmed: 38102616google scholar: lookup
          21. Zelmer KC, Moritz A, Bauer N. Evaluation of canine and feline leukocyte differential counts obtained with the scil vCell 5 compared to the Advia 2120 hematology analyzer and a manual method. J Vet Diagn Invest 2023 Nov;35(6):679-697.
            doi: 10.1177/10406387231187899pubmed: 37612877google scholar: lookup
          22. Winzelberg Olson S, Hohenhaus AE. Feline non-regenerative anemia: Diagnostic and treatment recommendations. J Feline Med Surg 2019 Jul;21(7):615-631.
            doi: 10.1177/1098612X19856178pubmed: 31234748google scholar: lookup
          23. Paltrinieri S, Fossati M, Menaballi V. Diagnostic performances of manual and automated reticulocyte parameters in anaemic cats. J Feline Med Surg 2018 Feb;20(2):122-127.
            doi: 10.1177/1098612X17699067pubmed: 29172918google scholar: lookup
          24. Granat F, Geffré A, Bourgès-Abella N, Braun JP, Trumel C. Changes in haematology measurements with the Sysmex XT-2000iV during storage of feline blood sampled in EDTA or EDTA plus CTAD. J Feline Med Surg 2013 Jun;15(6):433-44.
            doi: 10.1177/1098612X12469967pubmed: 23264612google scholar: lookup