FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) / Evaluation of the Effects of Detomidine on Equine Myoelectri...
Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)2025; 35(2); 120-130; doi: 10.1111/vec.13464

Evaluation of the Effects of Detomidine on Equine Myoelectrical Activity Using Electrointestinography.

Abstract: To evaluate the effects of detomidine on equine intestinal slow-wave activity and frequency distribution measured by electrointestinography (EIG). Methods: Prospective, experimental study. Methods: University teaching hospital. Methods: A convenience sample of twelve 7- to 21-year-old clinically normal horses. Methods: Horses were randomly assigned to saline control (four horses) or detomidine treatment (eight). After obtaining a 30-min baseline EIG, a saline or detomidine bolus was administered, followed by a constant rate infusion, and another EIG was recorded. Ultrasonographic examinations monitored cecal and left ventral colon contractions. Spectral analysis was performed to evaluate changes in dominant frequency, dominant power, total power, percent frequency distribution, and changes in slow-wave rhythmic activity. Results: Median (interquartile range [IQR]) dominant frequency in cycles per minute (cpm) was similar for the cecum (2.4 cpm; IQR: 0.51 cpm) and left ventral colon (2.13 cpm; IQR: 0.16 cpm) and unchanged by either treatment (P > 0.074). Compared with saline, which was unchanged, detomidine reduced dominant power ratios for both cecum (0.45; IQR: 0.18) and left ventral colon (0.63; IQR: 0.35; P = 0.002). Detomidine decreased total power for the cecum in the 2-4 cpm frequency range from 55.0% (IQR: 4.4%) to 43.1% (IQR: 6.7%) and for the left ventral colon from 54.4% (IQR: 5.5%) to 27.3% (IQR: 9.3%; P  0.08). Dominant power correlated with the rate of contractions measured ultrasonographically (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Detomidine decreased dominant power ratios for both the cecum and left ventral colon and produced tachyarrhythmias in cecal slow-wave activity. The correlation of dominant power with intestinal contractions supports the clinical development of EIG to diagnose equine motility disorders.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-04-20 PubMed ID: 40254911PubMed Central: PMC12065429DOI: 10.1111/vec.13464Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Veterinary

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examines the effects of detomidine, a medication often used in equine medicine, on the activity of horse intestines, using a technique called electrointestinography (EIG). The study found that detomidine decreased power ratios of the cecum and left ventral colon and caused increased heart rate in cecal (a portion of the large intestine) slow-wave activity.

Study Methods and Participants

  • The research was a prospective, experimental study conducted at a university teaching hospital.
  • It involved twelve clinically normal horses aged between 7 and 21 years.
  • The horses were randomly assigned to either a control group (which received a saline solution) or a treatment group (which received detomidine).
  • Before and after the administration of either the saline or detomidine, an EIG was performed to measure the electrical activity in the intestines. Ultrasonographic examinations were also used to monitor contractions in the cecum and left ventral colon.

Data Analysis

  • A spectral analysis was conducted to evaluate changes in dominant frequency, dominant power, total power, percent frequency distribution, and changes in slow-wave rhythmic activity.
  • The results from the saline group were then compared to those from the detomidine group to determine the effects of the drug.

Results and Conclusion

  • The study’s results showed that the dominant frequency in the cecum and left ventral colon was similar and was not changed by either treatment.
  • Detomidine, however, reduced the dominant power ratios in both the cecum and left ventral colon compared to the saline solution, which showed no change.
  • The total power for the cecum was decreased in the 2-4 cpm frequency range and for the left ventral colon with detomidine. However, there was an increase for the cecum in the 8-12 cpm frequency range.
  • There were no changes in frequency distribution noted for the controls.
  • The dominant power was found to be correlated with the rate of contractions measured with ultrasonography.
  • From these results, the researchers concluded that detomidine decreased the dominant power ratios for both the cecum and left ventral colon, and it caused a form of tachycardia (increased heart rate) in cecal slow-wave activity.
  • The correlation between dominant power and intestinal contractions could be useful in developing EIG techniques to diagnose equine motility disorders in clinical settings.

Cite This Article

APA
Munsterman AS, Dias Moreira AS, Kottwitz J. (2025). Evaluation of the Effects of Detomidine on Equine Myoelectrical Activity Using Electrointestinography. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio), 35(2), 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.13464

Publication

Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
ISSN: 1476-4431
NlmUniqueID: 101152804
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 35
Issue: 2
Pages: 120-130

Researcher Affiliations

Munsterman, Amelia S
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Dias Moreira, Ana S
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Kottwitz, Jack
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
  • Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / physiology
  • Imidazoles / pharmacology
  • Female
  • Male
  • Electromyography / veterinary
  • Prospective Studies
  • Cecum / drug effects
  • Cecum / physiology
  • Colon / drug effects
  • Colon / physiology
  • Gastrointestinal Motility / drug effects

Grant Funding

  • Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society Research Grant
  • University of Wisconsin Companion Animal Fund

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 61 references
  1. Fintl C, Hudson N P H. The Interstitial Cells of Cajal of the Equine Gastrointestinal Tract: What We Know so Far. Equine Veterinary Journal 42, no. 4 (2010): 372–377.
    pubmed: 20525058
  2. Farrugia G. Interstitial Cells of Cajal in Health and Disease. Neurogastroenterology and Motility 20, Suppl no. 1 (2008): 54–63.
    pubmed: 18402642
  3. Hamilton J W, Bellahsene B E, Reichelderfer M, Webster J G, Bass P. Human Electrogastrograms. Comparison of Surface and Mucosal Recordings. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 31, no. 1 (1986): 33–39.
    pubmed: 2934238
  4. Pezzolla F, Riezzo G, Maselli M A, Giorgio I. Electrical Activity Recorded From Abdominal Surface After Gastrectomy or Colectomy in Humans. Gastroenterology 97, no. 2 (1989): 313–320.
    pubmed: 2744354
  5. Familoni B O, Kingma Y J, Bowes K L. Study of Transcutaneous and Intraluminal Measurement of Gastric Electrical Activity in Humans. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 25, no. 4 (1987): 397–402.
    pubmed: 3450990
  6. Chen J, McCallum R W. The Response of Electrical Activity in the Human Stomach to Water and a Solid Meal. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 29, no. 4 (1991): 351–357.
    pubmed: 1787749
  7. DiBaise J K, Park F L, Lyden E, Brand R E, Brand R M. Effects of Low Doses of Erythromycin on the 13C Spirulina Platensis Gastric Emptying Breath Test and Electrogastrogram: A Controlled Study in Healthy Volunteers. American Journal of Gastroenterology 96, no. 7 (2001): 2041–2050.
    pubmed: 11467630
  8. Xu X, Wang Z, Hayes J, Chen J D Z. Is There a One‐to‐One Correlation Between Gastric Emptying of Liquids and Gastric Myoelectrical or Motor Activity in Dogs?. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 47, no. 2 (2002): 365–372.
    pubmed: 11858233
  9. Camilleri M, Hasler W L, Parkman H P, Quigley E M, Soffer E. Measurement of Gastrointestinal Motility in the GI Laboratory. Gastroenterology 115, no. 3 (1998): 747–762.
    pubmed: 9721173
  10. Bortoff A. Electrical Transmission of Slow Waves From Longitudinal to Circular Intestinal Muscle. American Journal of Physiology 209, no. 6 (1965): 1254–1260.
    pubmed: 5846928
  11. Smout A J, van der Schee E J, Grashuis J L. What Is Measured in Electrogastrography?. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 25, no. 3 (1980): 179–187.
    pubmed: 7371462
  12. Chen J D. Spectral Analysis of Electrogastrogram and Its Clinical Significance. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2, Suppl no. 1 (1996): 9–11.
  13. Chang F Y. Electrogastrography: Basic Knowledge, Recording, Processing and Its Clinical Applications. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 20, no. 4 (2005): 502–516.
    pubmed: 15836697
  14. Levanon D, Zhang M, Orr W C, Chen J D. Effects of Meal Volume and Composition on Gastric Myoelectrical Activity. American Journal of Physiology 274, no. 2 (1998): G430–434.
    pubmed: 9486200
  15. Koch K L, Stewart W R, Stern R M. Effect of Barium Meals on Gastric Electromechanical Activity in Man. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 32, no. 11 (1987): 1217–1222.
    pubmed: 3665676
  16. Parkman H P, Harris A D, Miller M A, Fisher R S. Influence of Age, Gender, and Menstrual Cycle on the Normal Electrogastrogram. American Journal of Gastroenterology 91, no. 1 (1996): 127–133.
    pubmed: 8561112
  17. Stoddard C J, Smallwood R H, Duthie H L. Electrical Arrhythmias in the Human Stomach. Gut 22, no. 9 (1981): 705–712.
    pmc: PMC1419876pubmed: 7028578
  18. Guo J-P, Bonapace E S, Parkman H P, Fisher R S. The Value of the Second Postprandial Hour During Electrogastrography (EGG) in Symptomatic Patients With and Without Gastroparesis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 44 (1999): 2150.
  19. Lin Z Y, Sarosiek I, Denton S, Loftiss M, McCallum R W. Gastric Dysrhythmia During the Second Postprandial Hour Correlates With Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients With Gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 118, no. 4 (2000): A850.
  20. Ekstrand C, Michanek P, Gehring R. Plasma Atropine Concentrations Associated With Decreased Intestinal Motility in Horses. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9 (2022): 951300.
    pmc: PMC9478751pubmed: 36118347
  21. Koenig J B, Martin C E, Nykamp S G, Mintchev M P. Use of Multichannel Electrointestinography for Noninvasive Assessment of Myoelectrical Activity in the Cecum and Large Colon of Horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 69, no. 6 (2008): 709–715.
    pubmed: 18518649
  22. Okamura K, Sasaki N, Kikuchi T. Effects of Mosapride on Motility of the Small Intestine and Caecum in Normal Horses After Jejunocaecostomy. Journal of Veterinary Science 10, no. 2 (2009): 157–160.
    pmc: PMC2801111pubmed: 19461212
  23. Okamura K, Sasaki N, Yamada M, Yamada H, Inokuma H. Effects of Mosapride Citrate, Metoclopramide Hydrochloride, Lidocaine Hydrochloride, and Cisapride Citrate on Equine Gastric Emptying, Small Intestinal and Caecal Motility. Research in Veterinary Science 86, no. 2 (2009): 302–308.
    pubmed: 18723200
  24. Sasaki N, Murata A, Lee I, Yamada H. Evaluation of Equine Cecal Motility by Auscultation, Ultrasonography and Electrointestinography After Jejunocecostomy. Research in Veterinary Science 84, no. 2 (2008): 305–310.
    pubmed: 17570455
  25. Hasler W L, Kim M S, Chey W D, Stevenson V, Stein B, Owyang C. Central Cholinergic and Alpha‐Adrenergic Mediation of Gastric Slow Wave Dysrhythmias Evoked During Motion Sickness. American Journal of Physiology 268, no. 4 Pt 1 (1995): G539–547.
    pubmed: 7733281
  26. Sasaki N, Mizuno Y, Yoshihara T. The Application of Electrocecography for Evaluation of Cecum Motility in Horses. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 60, no. 11 (1998): 1221–1226.
    pubmed: 9853303
  27. Roger T, Ruckebusch Y. Colonic Alpha 2‐Adrenoceptor‐Mediated Responses in the Pony. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 10, no. 4 (1987): 310–318.
    pubmed: 2893840
  28. Sasaki N, Yoshihara T, Hara S. Difference in the Motile Reactivity of Jejunum, Cecum, and Right Ventral Colon to Xylazine and Medetomidine in Conscious Horses. Journal of Equine Science 11, no. 3 (2000): 63–68.
  29. Hendrickson E H, Malone E D, Sage A M. Identification of Normal Parameters for Ultrasonographic Examination of the Equine Large Colon and Cecum. Canadian Veterinary Journal 48, no. 3 (2007): 289–291.
    pmc: PMC1800949pubmed: 17436906
  30. Gozalo-Marcilla M, Luna S P L, Crosignani N, Puoli Filho J N P, Pelligand L, Taylor P M. The Importance of Measuring Skin Resistance for Electrical Nociceptive Stimulation in Standing Horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 49, no. 6 (2017): 836.
    pubmed: 29027745
  31. Serpa P B S, Garbade P, Natalini C C. Energy Imbalance and Physiological Changes During Detomidine Hydrochloride Constant Rate Infusion in Standing Horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 35, no. 3 (2015): 232–237.
  32. Chen J D, McCallum R W. Electrogastrographic Parameters and Their Clinical Significance. in Electrogastrography: Principles and Applications, ed. Chen J. D. and McCallum R. W. (Raven, 1994), 45–73.
  33. Pfaffenbach B, Adamek R J, Kuhn K, Wegener M. Electrogastrography in Healthy Subjects. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 40 (1995): 1445–1450.
    pubmed: 7628266
  34. Lin Z, Eaker E Y, Sarosiek I, McCallum R W. Gastric Myoelectrical Activity and Gastric Emptying in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia. American Journal of Gastroenterology 94, no. 9 (1999): 2384–2389.
    pubmed: 10483996
  35. O'Grady G, Wang T H, Du P, Angeli T, Lammers W J, Cheng L K. Recent Progress in Gastric Arrhythmia: Pathophysiology, Clinical Significance and Future Horizons. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology 41, no. 10 (2014): 854–862.
    pmc: PMC4359928pubmed: 25115692
  36. Fintl C, Hudson N P, Mayhew I G, Edwards G B, Proudman C J, Pearson G T. Interstitial Cells of Cajal (ICC) in Equine Colic: An Immunohistochemical Study of Horses With Obstructive Disorders of the Small and Large Intestines. Equine Veterinary Journal 36, no. 6 (2004): 474–479.
    pubmed: 15460070
  37. O'Grady G, Angeli T R, Du P. Abnormal Initiation and Conduction of Slow‐Wave Activity in Gastroparesis, Defined by High‐Resolution Electrical Mapping. Gastroenterology 143, no. 3 (2012): 589–598.
    pmc: PMC3429650pubmed: 22643349
  38. Angeli T R, Cheng L K, Du P. Loss of Interstitial Cells of Cajal and Patterns of Gastric Dysrhythmia in Patients With Chronic Unexplained Nausea and Vomiting. Gastroenterology 149, no. 1 (2015): 56–66.
    pmc: PMC4617790pubmed: 25863217
  39. Grover M, Farrugia G, Lurken M S. Cellular Changes in Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 140, no. 5 (2011): 1575–1585.
    pmc: PMC3081914pubmed: 21300066
  40. Gharibans A A, Coleman T P, Mousa H, Kunkel D C. Spatial Patterns From High‐Resolution Electrogastrography Correlate With Severity of Symptoms in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia and Gastroparesis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 17, no. 13 (2019): 2668–2677.
    pubmed: 31009794
  41. Scheibner J, Trendelenburg A U, Hein L, Starke K, Blandizzi C. Alpha 2‐Adrenoceptors in the Enteric Nervous System: A Study in Alpha 2A‐Adrenoceptor‐Deficient Mice. British Journal of Pharmacology 135, no. 3 (2002): 697–704.
    pmc: PMC1573176pubmed: 11834617
  42. Lester G D, Merritt A M, Neuwirth L, Vetro-Widenhouse T, Steible C, Rice B. Effect of Alpha 2‐Adrenergic, Cholinergic, and Nonsteroidal Anti‐Inflammatory Drugs on Myoelectric Activity of Ileum, Cecum, and Right Ventral Colon and on Cecal Emptying of Radiolabeled Markers in Clinically Normal Ponies. American Journal of Veterinary Research 59, no. 3 (1998): 320–327.
    pubmed: 9522952
  43. Adams S B, Lamar C H, Masty J. Motility of the Distal Portion of the Jejunum and Pelvic Flexure in Ponies: Effects of Six Drugs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 45, no. 4 (1984): 795–799.
    pubmed: 6731996
  44. Merritt A M, Burrow J A, Hartless C S. Effect of Xylazine, Detomidine, and a Combination of Xylazine and Butorphanol on Equine Duodenal Motility. American Journal of Veterinary Research 59, no. 5 (1998): 619–623.
    pubmed: 9582967
  45. Lester G D, Bolton J R, Cullen L K, Thurgate S M. Effects of General Anesthesia on Myoelectric Activity of the Intestine in Horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 53, no. 9 (1992): 1553–1557.
    pubmed: 1416353
  46. Lin X, Chen J D Z. Abnormal Gastric Slow Waves in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia Assessed by Multichannel Electrogastrography. American Journal of Physiology Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 280, no. 6 (2001): G1370–G1375.
    pubmed: 11352832
  47. Ross M W, Donawic W J, Sellers A F, Lowe J E. Normal Motility of the Cecum and Right Ventral Colon in Ponies. American Journal of Veterinary Research 47, no. 8 (1986): 1756–1762.
    pubmed: 3752686
  48. Ross M W, Ruthkowski J A, Cullen K K. Myoelectrical Activity of the Cecum and Right Ventral Colon in Female Ponies. American Journal of Veterinary Research 50, no. 3 (1989): 374–379.
    pubmed: 2930024
  49. Ouyang H, Xing J, Chen J D Z. Tachygastria Induced by Gastric Electrical Stimulation Is Mediated via Alpha‐and Beta‐Adrenergic Pathway and Inhibits Antral Motility in Dogs. Neurogastroenterology and Motility 17, no. 6 (2005): 846–853.
    pubmed: 16336500
  50. Carson D A, O'Grady G, Du P, Gharibans A A, Andrews C N. Body Surface Mapping of the Stomach: New Directions for Clinically Evaluating Gastric Electrical Activity. Neurogastroenterology and Motility 33, no. 3 (2021): e14048.
    pubmed: 33274564
  51. Yin J, Chen J D Z. Electrogastrography: Methodology, Validation and Applications. Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 19, no. 1 (2013): 5–17.
    pmc: PMC3548127pubmed: 23350042
  52. Sasaki N, Lee I, Ayukawa Y, Yamada H. Clinical Applications of Electrointestinography in the Horse. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 15, no. 4 (2004): 85–92.
  53. Liang H, Lin Z, McCallum R W. Artifact Reduction in Electrogastrogram Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition Method. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 38, no. 1 (2000): 35–41.
    pubmed: 10829388
  54. Ideker R E, Smith W M, Blanchard S M. The Assumptions of Isochronal Cardiac Mapping. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 12, no. 3 (1989): 456–478.
    pubmed: 2466272
  55. Downar E, Janse M J, Durrer D. The Effect of Acute Coronary Artery Occlusion on Subepicardial Transmembrane Potentials in the Intact Porcine Heart. Circulation 56, no. 2 (1977): 217–224.
    pubmed: 872313
  56. Kimber S, Downar E, Masse S. A Comparison of Unipolar and Bipolar Electrodes During Cardiac Mapping Studies. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 19, no. 8 (1996): 1196–1204.
    pubmed: 8865217
  57. Sevaptsidis E, Massé S, Parson I D, Downar E, Kimber S. Simultaneous Unipolar and Bipolar Recording of Cardiac Electrical Activity. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 15, no. 1 (1992): 45–51.
    pubmed: 1370999
  58. Verhagen M A, Van Schelven L J, Samsom M, Smout A J. Pitfalls in the Analysis of Electrogastrographic Recordings. Gastroenterology 117, no. 2 (1999): 453–460.
    pubmed: 10419928
  59. Parkman H P, Hasler W L, Barnett J L, Eaker E Y. Electrogastrography: A Document Prepared by the Gastric Section of the American Motility Society Clinical GI Motility Testing Task Force. Neurogastroenterology and Motility 15, no. 2 (2003): 89–102.
    pubmed: 12680908
  60. Mintchev M P, Bowes K L. Impact of External Factors on the Stability of Human Electrogastrograms. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 34, no. 3 (1996): 270–272.
    pubmed: 8762839
  61. Sanders K M, Perrino B A. Smooth Muscle and Pacemakers of the Gut. in Yamada's Textbook of Gastroenterology, 7th ed., ed. Wang T. C., Camilleri M., Lebwohl B., et al. (John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2022), 213–241.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.