Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2015; 204(3); 247-254; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.004

Evidence of horsemanship and dogmanship and their application in veterinary contexts.

Abstract: This review collates peer-reviewed evidence for desirable attributes for those who work with dogs and horses. It is written with a particular focus on the veterinary profession. Although veterinarians and veterinary nurses (VNs) occupy variable roles when interacting with their patients, several behavioural attributes emerge as helpful across the range of such roles. In light of recent research on the value of considering animals' arousal and affective state as predictors of behaviour and welfare, best practice in human-horse and human-dog-interactions is outlined. The attributes of affiliation, safety and positive reinforcement seem to contribute greatly to the development and maintenance of moderate arousal and positive affect in animals. The information in this review article is offered in an attempt to show why veterinary professionals with good horsemanship are likely to remain safe, and to introduce the concept of dogmanship. In the light of the peer-reviewed evidence assembled here, it is arguable that veterinary teams, comprising both veterinarians and VNs, can become scholars in these areas. The benefits of this approach for practitioner safety, animal welfare and client satisfaction are likely to be significant.
Publication Date: 2015-04-08 PubMed ID: 25959129DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.004Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research review paper delves into the characteristics that make individuals effective at building positive connections with dogs and horses, particularly in a veterinary context. It explains why these traits are especially beneficial for veterinary professionals, for their own safety and the animals’ well-being.

Objective of the Study

  • The research article synthesizes several peer-reviewed studies, concentrating on the desired qualities in individuals working with dogs and horses, giving emphasis to those within the veterinary field. It aims to highlight the underlying attributes that are beneficial across the varied roles these medical professionals play in patient interaction.

Key Findings

  • The study illuminates recent findings regarding the importance of considering animals’ arousal and emotional states as signals of both behavior and welfare. This leads the researchers to provide a brief outline concerning the best practices in human-horse and human-dog interactions.
  • The attributes of affiliation, safety, and the use of positive reinforcement are deemed critical in fostering a moderate level of arousal and positive emotion in animals. These traits are further explained as valuable in developing and maintaining strong and positive human-animal relationships.

Introduction of “Dogmanship”

  • The term “dogmanship” is introduced to echo the parallels of “horsemanship” in the context of dogs. Like horsemanship, dogmanship refers to the skills and attributes required to create positive and functional relationships with dogs.
  • The article posits that veterinary professionals displaying good horsemanship and dogmanship are more likely to ensure their own safety and that of the animals they handle.

Implications and Benefits

  • In the light of the compiled peer-reviewed evidence, the study strongly suggests that veterinary teams – comprising both veterinarians and veterinary nurses – can utilize this knowledge to become scholars in horse and dog behavior.
  • The benefits of possessing such skills and knowledge can be multi-pronged, enhancing the safety of practitioners, improving animal welfare, and boosting client satisfaction.

Cite This Article

APA
Payne E, Boot M, Starling M, Henshall C, McLean A, Bennett P, McGreevy P. (2015). Evidence of horsemanship and dogmanship and their application in veterinary contexts. Vet J, 204(3), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.004

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 204
Issue: 3
Pages: 247-254
PII: S1090-0233(15)00146-X

Researcher Affiliations

Payne, E
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science (B19), University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Electronic address: epay1031@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Boot, M
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science (B19), University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Starling, M
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science (B19), University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Henshall, C
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science (B19), University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
McLean, A
  • Australian Equine Behaviour Centre, Broadford, Vic. 3658, Australia.
Bennett, P
  • School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Vic. 3552, Australia.
McGreevy, P
  • Faculty of Veterinary Science (B19), University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Husbandry / methods
  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Dogs / physiology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Humans
  • Ownership
  • Veterinary Medicine

Citations

This article has been cited 12 times.
  1. Carroll SL, Sykes BW, Mills PC. Moving toward Fear-Free Husbandry and Veterinary Care for Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 24;12(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212907pubmed: 36359031google scholar: lookup
  2. Kelly KJ, McD○ LA, Mears K. The Effect of Human-Horse Interactions on Equine Behaviour, Physiology, and Welfare: A Scoping Review. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 24;11(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11102782pubmed: 34679804google scholar: lookup
  3. Hartmann E, Rehn T, Christensen JW, Nielsen PP, McGreevy P. From the Horse's Perspective: Investigating Attachment Behaviour and the Effect of Training Method on Fear Reactions and Ease of Handling-A Pilot Study. Animals (Basel) 2021 Feb 9;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020457pubmed: 33572351google scholar: lookup
  4. Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE, McLean AN, McGreevy PD, Jones B, Wilkins C. The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human-Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 14;10(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101870pubmed: 33066335google scholar: lookup
  5. Scopa C, Contalbrigo L, Greco A, Lanatà A, Scilingo EP, Baragli P. Emotional Transfer in Human-Horse Interaction: New Perspectives on Equine Assisted Interventions. Animals (Basel) 2019 Nov 26;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9121030pubmed: 31779120google scholar: lookup
  6. Kydd E, Padalino B, Henshall C, McGreevy P. An analysis of equine round pen training videos posted online: Differences between amateur and professional trainers. PLoS One 2017;12(9):e0184851.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184851pubmed: 28922395google scholar: lookup
  7. Gronqvist G, Rogers C, Gee E, Martinez A, Bolwell C. Veterinary and Equine Science Students' Interpretation of Horse Behaviour. Animals (Basel) 2017 Aug 15;7(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani7080063pubmed: 28809810google scholar: lookup
  8. Rossman ZT, Padfield C, Young D, Hart LA. Elephant-Initiated Interactions with Humans: Individual Differences and Specific Preferences in Captive African Elephants (Loxodonta africana). Front Vet Sci 2017;4:60.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00060pubmed: 28503553google scholar: lookup
  9. Starling M, McLean A, McGreevy P. The Contribution of Equitation Science to Minimising Horse-Related Risks to Humans. Animals (Basel) 2016 Feb 23;6(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani6030015pubmed: 26907354google scholar: lookup
  10. Jung Y, Yoon M. The Effects of Human-Horse Interactions on Oxytocin and Cortisol Levels in Humans and Horses. Animals (Basel) 2025 Mar 21;15(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15070905pubmed: 40218299google scholar: lookup
  11. Moser AY, Welch M, Brown WY, McGreevy P, Bennett PC. Methods of behavioral testing in dogs: a scoping review and analysis of test stimuli. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1455574.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1455574pubmed: 39479206google scholar: lookup
  12. Fenner K, Wilson BJ, Ermers C, McGreevy PD. Reported Agonistic Behaviours in Domestic Horses Cluster According to Context. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 16;14(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14040629pubmed: 38396597google scholar: lookup