Analyze Diet
Animal genetics2026; 57(2); e70083; doi: 10.1002/age.70083

Evidence That GYPA (Glycophorin A) Encodes the K Blood Group System in Horses.

Abstract: Although serological and genetic studies of equine blood group systems have been conducted for many years, the molecular basis of erythrocyte antigens' variability has remained largely unexplored. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the genetic basis of serological variation within equine blood group K. Using mRNA extracted from peripheral blood samples (n = 100) collected from horses with known serological blood types (Ka or K-), we performed a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS), which revealed a significantly associated region on equine chromosome 2 (ECA2). A detailed analysis of this region identified GYPA (glycophorin A) as the most promising candidate gene. Resequencing its entire coding sequence revealed the presence of a dinucleotide missense variant in exon 3 (ENSECAT00000026370.3:c.145_146delinsAT; p.Asp49Ile), which is predicted to potentially alter the function of the GYPA protein. Genotyping this variant in a large, breed-diverse cohort, which included family-based samples, confirmed perfect cosegregation between the identified GYPA missense substitution and serological K blood group typing results. Our findings demonstrate that blood transcriptome-based approaches, despite certain limitations, can effectively reveal the molecular basis of equine erythrocyte antigen variability.
Publication Date: 2026-03-16 PubMed ID: 41837461DOI: 10.1002/age.70083Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study identifies the gene GYPA as responsible for the K blood group system in horses by linking a specific genetic variant to blood type differences seen in horse blood samples.

Background

  • Previous research has characterized equine blood group systems through serological (blood serum) and genetic studies, but the precise molecular causes of blood group antigen differences in horses had not been fully identified.
  • Blood groups in horses are important for transfusions and breeding but the genetic variations that cause the different blood group antigen profiles were unclear, especially for the K blood group.

Research Goal

  • The primary aim was to discover the genetic basis underlying the serological variation observed in the equine K blood group system.
  • Understanding this could improve blood typing accuracy and inform veterinary medicine practices regarding blood transfusions and compatibility.

Methods

  • Peripheral blood samples were collected from 100 horses, all previously typed for the K blood group antigen as either positive (Ka) or negative (K-).
  • Extracted messenger RNA (mRNA) from these blood samples was used to perform a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS), which analyzes gene expression patterns to find genetic regions linked to the blood types.
  • A statistically significant association between the K blood group phenotype and a region on chromosome 2 (ECA2) was found.
  • Within this region, the GYPA gene, which encodes glycophorin A, a known erythrocyte (red blood cell) membrane protein involved in human blood group systems, emerged as the top candidate gene.
  • The full coding sequence of GYPA was resequenced to identify genetic variants; a dinucleotide missense mutation (a precise substitution of two nucleotides leading to an amino acid change) was discovered in exon 3 of GYPA.
  • This mutation changes amino acid 49 from aspartic acid (Asp) to isoleucine (Ile), which is predicted to affect protein function.
  • The presence of this genetic variant was assessed in a large, genetically diverse horse population, including related individuals (family-based samples), to verify its inheritance pattern and association with the K blood group status.

Key Findings

  • The identified GYPA missense mutation perfectly co-segregated with serologically determined K blood group types in all tested horses, showing a strong genetic correlation.
  • This co-segregation means that horses carrying the mutation expressed the K antigen whereas those lacking it did not, confirming GYPA as the genetic basis for the K blood group.
  • This discovery links a specific genetic variant in the GYPA gene to the phenotypic variation in equine blood groups, which had not been molecularly confirmed before in horses.

Implications and Conclusions

  • The study demonstrates that transcriptome-based genomic approaches can successfully uncover molecular determinants of erythrocyte antigen variability in equine species despite challenges such as sample diversity and gene expression complexity.
  • Identification of the genetic cause of the K blood group can improve accuracy in blood typing and transfusion compatibility testing in horses, which are critical for veterinary care and breeding management.
  • Understanding the molecular basis can also serve as a foundation for developing genetic tests to predict K blood group status without relying solely on serological assays.
  • This research paves the way for further molecular investigations of other equine blood group systems to enhance veterinary hematology and immunogenetics.

Cite This Article

APA
Mackowski M, Kajdasz A, Laskowska K, Cieslak J. (2026). Evidence That GYPA (Glycophorin A) Encodes the K Blood Group System in Horses. Anim Genet, 57(2), e70083. https://doi.org/10.1002/age.70083

Publication

ISSN: 1365-2052
NlmUniqueID: 8605704
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 57
Issue: 2
Pages: e70083

Researcher Affiliations

Mackowski, Mariusz
  • Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Kajdasz, Arkadiusz
  • Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Laskowska, Kaja
  • Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Cieslak, Jakub
  • Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / genetics
  • Horses / blood
  • Glycophorins / genetics
  • Blood Group Antigens / genetics

Grant Funding

  • 2022/47/B/NZ9/02331 / Narodowe Centrum Nauki

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting Functional Effect of Human Missense Mutations Using PolyPhen‐2. Current Protocols in Human Genetics 76: 7–20.
  2. Andersson L, Sandberg K. Genetic Linkage in the Horse. II. Distribution of Male Recombination Estimates and the Influence of Age, Breed and Sex on Recombination Frequency. Genetics 106, no. 1: 109–122.
  3. Bailey E. Prevalence of Anti‐Red Blood Cell Antibodies in the Serum and Colostrum of Mares and Its Relationship to Neonatal Isoerythrolysis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 43, no. 11: 1917–1921.
  4. Bellone RR, Avila F. Genetic Testing in the Horse. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Equine Practice 36, no. 2: 211–234.
  5. Bowling AT. The Use and Efficacy of Horse Blood Typing Tests. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 5, no. 4: 195–199.
  6. Casenave P, Leclere M, Beauchamp G, Blais MC. Modified Stall‐Side Crossmatch for Transfusions in Horses. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 33, no. 4: 1775–1783.
  7. Castilho L. Molecular Typing of Blood Group Genes in Diagnostics. Ann Blood 6: 20.
  8. Correia CN, McLoughlin KE, Nalpas NC. RNA Sequencing (RNA‐Seq) Reveals Extremely Low Levels of Reticulocyte‐Derived Globin Gene Transcripts in Peripheral Blood From Horses (Equus caballus) and Cattle (Bos taurus). Frontiers in Genetics 9: 278.
  9. Cothran EG, MacCluer JW, Weitkamp LR, Bailey E. Genetic Differentiation Associated With Gait Within American Standardbred Horses. Animal Genetics 18, no. 4: 285–296.
  10. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G. The Variant Call Format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, no. 15: 2156–2158.
  11. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J. Twelve Years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10, no. 2: giab008.
  12. Daniels G. The Molecular Genetics of Blood Group Polymorphism. Transplant Immunology 14, no. 3–4: 143–153.
  13. Daniels G. The Molecular Genetics of Blood Group Polymorphism. Human Genetics 126, no. 6: 729–742.
  14. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F. STAR: Ultrafast Universal RNA‐seq Aligner. Bioinformatics 29, no. 1: 15–21.
  15. Goh SH, Josleyn M, Lee YT. The Human Reticulocyte Transcriptome. Physiological Genomics 30, no. 2: 172–178.
  16. Gu F, Harbitz I, Chowdhary BP, Chaudhary R, Gustavsson I. Localization of the 6‐Phosphogluconate Dehydrogenase (PGD) Gene in Horses by In Situ Hybridization. Hereditas 117, no. 1: 93–95.
  17. Kakoi H, Kikuchi M, Ishige T. Investigation of Erythrocyte Antigen Frequencies in Draft Horse Populations in Japan to Assess Blood Donor Suitability. Journal of Equine Science 32, no. 1: 17–19.
  18. Kalbfleisch TS, Rice ES, DePriest MS Jr. Improved Reference Genome for the Domestic Horse Increases Assembly Contiguity and Composition. Communications Biology 1: 197.
  19. Knaus BJ, Grünwald NJ. Vcfr: A Package to Manipulate and Visualize Variant Call Format Data in R. Molecular Ecology Resources 17, no. 1: 44–53.
  20. Koressaar T, Remm M. Enhancements and Modifications of Primer Design Program Primer3. Bioinformatics 23, no. 10: 1289–1291.
  21. Kumar SD, Kar D, Akhtar MN. Evidence for Low‐Level Translation in Human Erythrocytes. Molecular Biology of the Cell 33, no. 12: br21.
  22. Lane WJ, Gleadall NS, Aeschlimann J. Multiple GYPB Gene Deletions Associated With the U‐Phenotype in Those of African Ancestry. Transfusion 60, no. 6: 1294–1307.
  23. Lee E, Choi HS, Hwang JH, Hoh JK, Cho YH, Baek EJ. The RNA in Reticulocytes Is Not Just Debris: It Is Necessary for the Final Stages of Erythrocyte Formation. Blood Cells, Molecules & Diseases 53, no. 1–2: 1–10.
  24. Lee J. ggmanh: Visualization Tool for GWAS Result. R package version 1.12.0.
    doi: 10.18129/b9.bioc.ggmanhgoogle scholar: lookup
  25. Li H. Tabix: Fast Retrieval of Sequence Features From Generic TAB‐Delimited Files. Bioinformatics 27, no. 5: 718–719.
  26. Lippi AS, Mortari N. Studies of Blood Groups and Protein Polymorphisms in the Brazilian Horse Breeds Mangalarga Marchador and Mangalarga (Equus caballus). Genetics and Molecular Biology 26: 431–434.
  27. Lopez GH, Hyland CA, Flower RL. Glycophorins and the MNS Blood Group System: A Narrative Review. Annals of Blood 6, no. 39: 39.
  28. Mai J, Lu M, Gao Q, Zeng J, Xiao J. Transcriptome‐Wide Association Studies: Recent Advances in Methods, Applications and Available Databases. Communications Biology 6: 899.
  29. Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: Predicting Amino Acid Changes That Affect Protein Function. Nucleic Acids Research 31, no. 13: 3812–3814.
  30. Noda H, Watanabe Y. Relationship Between Blood Groups and Haemolytic Disease of Newborn Foals. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 46: 180.
  31. Ouragh L, Mériaux JC, Braun JP. Genetic Blood Markers in Arabian, Barb and Arab‐Barb Horses in Morocco. Animal Genetics 25, no. 1: 45–47.
  32. Payne SH. The Utility of Protein and mRNA Correlation. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 40, no. 1: 1–3.
  33. Penedo MC, Millon LV, Bernoco D. International Equine Gene Mapping Workshop Report: A Comprehensive Linkage Map Constructed With Data From New Markers and by Merging Four Mapping Resources. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 111, no. 1: 5–15.
  34. Poplin R, Ruano‐Rubio V, MA DP. Scaling Accurate Genetic Variant Discovery to Tens of Thousands of Samples. bioRxiv .
  35. Sandberg K. Linkage Between the K Blood Group Locus and the 6‐PGD Locus in Horses. Animal Blood Groups and Biochemical Genetics 5, no. 3: 137–141.
  36. Sandberg K. Guidelines for the Interpretation of Blood Typing Tests in Horses. International Society for Animal Genetics.
  37. Sandberg K, Andersson L. Genetic Linkage in the Horse. I. Linkage Relationships Among 15 Blood Marker Loci. Hereditas 100, no. 2: 199–208.
  38. Sandberg K, Cothran EG. Blood Groups and Biochemical Polymorphisms. In The Genetics of the Horse, edited by Bowling and Ruvinsky, 85–108. CABI.
  39. Scott A, Jeffcott L. Haemolytic Disease of the Newborn Foal. Veterinary Record 103, no. 4: 71–74.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.103.4.71google scholar: lookup
  40. Seltsam A, Doescher A. Sequence‐Based Typing of Human Blood Groups. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy 36, no. 3: 204–212.
  41. Southcott MJ, Tanner MJ, Anstee DJ. The Expression of Human Blood Group Antigens During Erythropoiesis in a Cell Culture System. Blood 93, no. 12: 4425–4435.
  42. Stormont C. Current Status of Equine Blood Groups and Their Applications. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners 18: 402–408.
  43. Stormont C, Suzuki Y, Rhode E. Serology of Horse Blood Groups. Cornell Veterinarian 54: 439–452.
  44. Stormont C. Neonatal Isoerythrolysis in Domestic Animals: A Comparative Review. Advances in Veterinary Science and Comparative Medicine 19: 23–45.
  45. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: The Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Research 53, no. D1: 609–617.
  46. Tournamille C, Colin Y, Cartron J, Cartron JP, Le Van Kim C. Disruption of a GATA Motif in the Duffy Gene Promoter Abolishes Erythroid Gene Expression in Duffy–Negative Individuals. Nature Genetics 10: 224–228.
  47. Trommershausen Bowling A, Clark RS. Blood Group and Protein Polymorphism Gene Frequencies for Seven Breeds of Horses in the United States. Animal Blood Groups and Biochemical Genetics 16, no. 2: 93–108.
  48. Wagner FF, Flegel WA. RHD Gene Deletion Occurred in the Rhesus Box. Blood 95, no. 12: 3662–3668.
  49. Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. A Program for Annotating and Predicting the Effects of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the Genome of Drosophila melanogaster Strain w1118; Iso‐2; Iso‐3. Fly 6, no. 2: 80–92.
  50. Zheng X, Levine D, Shen J, Gogarten SM, Laurie C, Weir BS. A High‐Performance Computing Toolset for Relatedness and Principal Component Analysis of SNP Data. Bioinformatics 28, no. 24: 3326–3328.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.