Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1998; 30(3); 260-266; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb04498.x

Ex vivo simulation of in vivo strain distributions in the equine metacarpus.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to examine several simple ex vivo loading conditions for the equine metacarpus, and to evaluate their ability to reproduce the mid-diaphyseal bone surface strain distributions previously reported in vivo at the walk and trot. Distributed axial compressive loads, and 9 different axial compressive point loads at -7.5 kN and -15 kN were applied to metacarpal-distal carpal bone preparations from 6 Thoroughbred horses, aged 1-5 years. The resulting dorsal, medial, palmar, and lateral mid-diaphyseal bone surface axial and shear strains were compared with previously reported in vivo surface strain distributions using a root mean square error (RMSE) protocol. The effects of loading condition and load magnitude on RMSE were assessed with a mixed-model analysis of variance. There were significant differences between loading conditions, and, in most cases, between load magnitudes, in the fit of the ex vivo to the in vivo strain distributions. In vivo mid-diaphyseal bone surface strain distributions at the walk can be well approximated ex vivo by a distributed axial compressive load, or by a point load positioned 0.5 cm medial to the sagittal midline, at -7.5 kN loads. In vivo mid-diaphyseal bone surface strain distributions at the trot can be well approximated by the -15 kN loads applied to the same locations. These simplified loading conditions can be used in designing biologically relevant loading protocols for ex vivo mechanical testing studies, as well as in developing boundary conditions for finite element analysis. As such, these loading conditions may be considered as tools to be used as a means of replicating in vivo loading conditions during the initial design and testing stages in the development of fracture fixation devices, as well as in the theoretical mechanical analysis of the metacarpal structure.
Publication Date: 1998-06-11 PubMed ID: 9622329DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb04498.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov\'t
  • Research Support
  • U.S. Gov\'t
  • P.H.S.

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on analyzing different loading conditions on horse metacarpal bones to simulate the strain experienced during walking and trotting. The outcomes of this study could help design relevant load protocols for mechanical testing studies and finite element analysis, and recreate in vivo conditions in the initial phases of testing and designing fracture fixation devices.

Study Overview

  • The study aimed to replicate and analyze the strain distribution experienced by the metacarpal bones of horses during walking and trotting by creating several ex vivo loading conditions. This was done by applying distributed axial compressive loads, or compressive point loads at -7.5 kN and -15 kN, on metacarpal-distal carpal bone preparations from 6 Thoroughbred horses aged 1-5 years.

Methodology

  • The dorsal, medial, palmar, and lateral mid-diaphyseal bone surface axial and shear strains were then compared with previously reported in vivo surface strain distributions using a root mean square error (RMSE) protocol.
  • Using mixed-model analysis of variance, the study analyzed the effects of load magnitude and loading conditions on RMSE to understand whether the strain distributions could be well approximated ex vivo.

Findings

  • There existed significant differences between loading conditions and in most cases, between load magnitudes, regarding the suitability of the ex vivo to the in vivo strain distributions.
  • The researchers found that strain distributions experienced during walking could be accurately approximated by utilizing a distributed axial compressive load or by a point load positioned 0.5 cm medial to the sagittal midline, at -7.5 kN loads, in the ex vivo setting.
  • The same in vivo strain distributions experienced while trotting could be replicated by applying -15 kN loads at the same locations in an ex vivo environment.

Implications

  • The findings validate these ex vivo loading conditions as an efficient tool that can be utilized in the initial phases of designing and testing fracture fixation devices, and for theoretical mechanical analysis of the metacarpal structure.
  • This approach could also be used to develop relevant boundary conditions for finite element analysis and to plan mechanically relevant load protocols for ex vivo testing studies.

Cite This Article

APA
Les CM, Stover SM, Taylor KT, Keyak JH, Willits NH. (1998). Ex vivo simulation of in vivo strain distributions in the equine metacarpus. Equine Vet J, 30(3), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb04498.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 30
Issue: 3
Pages: 260-266

Researcher Affiliations

Les, C M
  • Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
Stover, S M
    Taylor, K T
      Keyak, J H
        Willits, N H

          MeSH Terms

          • Analysis of Variance
          • Animals
          • Carpus, Animal / physiology
          • Female
          • Gait
          • Horses / physiology
          • Male
          • Metacarpus / physiology
          • Models, Biological
          • Reference Values
          • Weight-Bearing

          Grant Funding

          • AR08180 / NIAMS NIH HHS

          Citations

          This article has been cited 1 times.
          1. Huang L, Korhonen RK, Turunen MJ, Finnilä MAJ. Experimental mechanical strain measurement of tissues. PeerJ 2019;7:e6545.
            doi: 10.7717/peerj.6545pubmed: 30867989google scholar: lookup