Analyze Diet
Journal of animal science2003; 81(12); 3202-3210; doi: 10.2527/2003.81123202x

Experiential learning in the animal sciences: development of a multispecies large-animal management and production practicum.

Abstract: Students enrolled in an introductory animal science course (ASG 3003) at the University of Florida were surveyed (n = 788) over a 3-yr period to ascertain their current experience and career goals in animal agriculture. Sixty-one percent of the students indicated that they were from an urban background. Only 4% were raised on a farm or ranch where the majority of family income was attributed to production agriculture. Eighty-six percent of the students had minimal or no experience working with large domestic farm animals, but nearly 64% of the students wanted to pursue a career in veterinary medicine. Disciplinary and species interests of the students were highly associated with previous background experiences. Students from nonagricultural backgrounds, who were most likely to indicate a career interest involving veterinary medicine, were most interested (P < 0.05) in animal behavior, whereas the students of rural background were more interested (P < 0.05) in animal management. Thirty-three percent of students were primarily interested in small companion animals; 22% in horses; 20% in domestic farm animals, including beef, dairy, swine, or sheep; and 24% in undomesticated zoo animals or wildlife. The career goals indicated by most students necessitate practical application of animal husbandry skills that are often assumed as general knowledge. Thus, a multispecies large animal management and production practicum (ANS 3206) was developed to provide students with hands-on experience. It was an elective course, and students were encouraged to enroll for two consecutive semesters. Teams of students rotated responsibilities among four livestock species (beef, dairy, equine, and swine). Daily responsibilities at each of the units included feeding and monitoring growth of feedlot cattle and finishing swine, farrowing assistance and baby pig processing, and equine training and foaling assistance. Students were also involved with all facets of a working dairy. Additionally, students completed written assignments specific to their individual species responsibilities that included daily journals, worksheets, or calculation of performance measures. Weekly class meetings allowed for instruction and were used to manage the varied course activities. Using a 5-point scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent), students indicated that the course further stimulated their interest (4.73) and facilitated their learning (4.63) of animal science concepts. Overall course evaluations ranged from 4.54 +/- 0.55 to 4.85 +/- 0.38 over a 4-yr period. As more students enter animal science programs with nonagricultural backgrounds, it will become necessary to reemphasize basic animal-handling skills and practical applications through experiential learning activities.
Publication Date: 2003-12-18 PubMed ID: 14677876DOI: 10.2527/2003.81123202xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study reports on a three-year survey undertaken at the University of Florida to understand students’ existing experience and career objectives within animal agriculture. Findings revealed that 86% of the students had limited or no experience working with large domestic farm animals but wanted to pursue a career in veterinary medicine. Hence, a large animal management and production practicum was developed to provide students with hands-on experience with different types of livestock. This course significantly stimulated students’ interest and facilitated their learning of animal science concepts.

Background and Purpose of the Research

  • In an increasingly urban world, many students entering animal sciences have limited or no hands-on experience with domestic farm animals. This survey aimed to understand students’ existing experiences and career goals in animal agriculture.
  • The study was mainly designed to assess the experiential learning needs of these students. Secondly, it sought to determine if a comprehensive teaching strategy designed to impart real-world experience could fill this gap.

Survey Methodology and Participants

  • The participants in this survey were students enrolled in an introductory animal science course at the University of Florida. A total of 788 students were surveyed over a three-year period.
  • The survey sought to find out the students’ demographic background, their past experience with agricultural practices, and their future career interests related to animal agriculture.

Findings of the Survey

  • A significant number of students (86%) had minimal or no experience working with large domestic farm animals, despite showing an interest in pursuing a career in veterinary medicine.
  • Differences in interests were found between students from urban, rural, agricultural, and nonagricultural backgrounds. Students from nonagricultural backgrounds were most interested in animal behavior, while students from rural backgrounds showed more interest in animal management.
  • The survey made it evident that there’s a great need for practical application of animal husbandry skills that are often assumed to be general knowledge.

Response to the Findings

  • In response to the survey findings, a multispecies large animal management and production practicum was developed. This course was aimed at providing students with hands-on experience and stimulating their interest in animal science concepts.
  • Students participated in feeding, monitoring growth, farrowing assistance, baby pig processing, and equine training. They also performed duties in a functioning dairy.
  • Students completed assignments relevant to their individual species responsibilities and attended weekly class meetings that facilitated instruction and course management.

Outcome of the Initiative

  • The students who enrolled in the course found it very beneficial. They indicated that the course further stimulated their interest in animal science concepts and facilitated their learning.
  • Overall evaluations for the course were high, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach in providing students with valuable hands-on experience in their field of study.
  • The research suggests that as more students without agricultural backgrounds enter animal science programs, it will be necessary to emphasize basic animal-handling skills and practical applications through similar experiential learning programs.

Cite This Article

APA
Reiling BA, Marshall TT, Brendemuhl JH, McQuagge JA, Umphrey JE. (2003). Experiential learning in the animal sciences: development of a multispecies large-animal management and production practicum. J Anim Sci, 81(12), 3202-3210. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81123202x

Publication

ISSN: 0021-8812
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 81
Issue: 12
Pages: 3202-3210

Researcher Affiliations

Reiling, B A
  • Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-0910, USA. breiling2@unl.edu
Marshall, T T
    Brendemuhl, J H
      McQuagge, J A
        Umphrey, J E

          MeSH Terms

          • Agriculture / education
          • Animal Husbandry / education
          • Animal Husbandry / methods
          • Animals
          • Animals, Domestic
          • Education, Veterinary
          • Humans
          • Problem-Based Learning
          • Teaching / methods
          • Universities

          Citations

          This article has been cited 7 times.
          1. Ragland EC, Radcliffe S, Karcher EL. A review of the application of active learning pedagogies in undergraduate animal science curricula. J Anim Sci 2023 Jan 3;101.
            doi: 10.1093/jas/skac352pubmed: 36692203google scholar: lookup
          2. Sullivan P, Davis M, Smith CL, Delmore R, Román-Muñiz N, Cramer C, Stallones L, Edwards-Callaway L. A preliminary exploration of the impact of experiential learning on animal science undergraduates' perceptions of humane stunning and slaughter. Transl Anim Sci 2022 Jul;6(3):txac108.
            doi: 10.1093/tas/txac108pubmed: 36046091google scholar: lookup
          3. Erickson M, Wattiaux MA, Marks D, Karcher EL. Brief, Written Reflections Improve Interest of Introductory Animal Science Undergraduates. CBE Life Sci Educ 2021 Jun;20(2):ar28.
            doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-08-0164pubmed: 33938765google scholar: lookup
          4. Erickson MG, Ranathunga SD, Wattiaux MA. Animal sciences undergraduate education since the ASAS centennial: a national survey and scoping review. Transl Anim Sci 2020 Oct;4(4):txaa202.
            doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa202pubmed: 33336155google scholar: lookup
          5. Bundy JM, Sterle JA, Johnson AK, Krahn GT. The impact of an introductory animal handling course on undergraduate students who lack previous livestock handling experience. J Anim Sci 2019 Mar 23;97(8):3588-95.
            doi: 10.1093/jas/skz095pubmed: 30903657google scholar: lookup
          6. Vemulapalli TH, Donkin SS, Lescun TB, O'Neil PA, Zollner PA. Considerations When Writing and Reviewing a Higher Education Teaching Protocol Involving Animals. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2017 Sep 1;56(5):500-508.
            pubmed: 28903820
          7. Valverde A, González-Miranda JA, Sevilla F, Mora S, Roldan ERS, Vargas C, González R. Perceptions of Animal Welfare on Livestock: Evidence from College Agronomy Students in Costa Rica. Animals (Basel) 2024 May 7;14(10).
            doi: 10.3390/ani14101398pubmed: 38791616google scholar: lookup