Analyze Diet

Experimental studies on equine herpesvirus type 1 infections.

Abstract: The EHV-1 viruses of fetal origin grew better and had a wider tissue culture host range than those isolated from horses with respiratory diseases. Comparisons of a fetal isolate (F/304) and a respiratory disease isolate (R/NM-3) in partly immune horses showed that the F/304 virus infected horses more readily, grew better in the nasopharynx, was more likely to cause abortion, and was excreted to a greater extent into the environment.
Publication Date: 1975-10-01 PubMed ID: 173849
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The article analyzes the behavior of different strains of Equine Herpesvirus (EHV-1), particularly those isolated from fetal tissues and respiratory disease samples, highlighting that fetal-derived strains are more successful in growth, transmission, and causing complications like abortion in partly immune horses.

Strains of EHV-1

  • The research focused on two particular strains of the Equine Herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1)—one obtained from horse fetuses (referred to as F/304) and the other from horses with respiratory diseases (designated as R/NM-3).
  • The EHV-1 virus is a serious pathogen in horses, causing a range of symptoms from respiratory disease to abortion in pregnant mares.

Growth and Host Range

  • The study found that the fetal strain (F/304) of the virus grew more effectively and had a broader tissue culture host range compared to the respiratory-disease strain (R/NM-3).
  • Meaning, the F/304 strain was found to be more capable of infecting various types of cells within the horse.

Infection in Partly Immune Horses

  • Upon exposure to both EHV-1 strains, horses that were partly immune were more readily infected by the fetal isolate (F/304) as opposed to the respiratory disease isolate (R/NM-3).

Influence on Abortion

  • Further, it was observed that horses infected with the fetal isolate were more prone to experience abortion, demonstrating the higher pathogenicity of the F/304 strain.

Excretion into the Environment

  • The research also established the fetal isolate, F/304, was excreted into the environment more extensively than the R/NM-3 strain, indicating its higher transmissibility or ability to spread.

Implications of the Study

  • The markedly different behaviors of these two strains underline the importance of understanding the source of the virus when dealing with an EHV-1 outbreak.
  • The higher virulence and contagiousness of the fetal strain could necessitate different treatment or prevention strategies for the infection.

Cite This Article

APA
Burrows R, Goodridge D. (1975). Experimental studies on equine herpesvirus type 1 infections. J Reprod Fertil Suppl(23), 611-615.

Publication

ISSN: 0449-3087
NlmUniqueID: 0225652
Country: England
Language: English
Issue: 23
Pages: 611-615

Researcher Affiliations

Burrows, R
    Goodridge, D

      MeSH Terms

      • Abortion, Veterinary / microbiology
      • Animals
      • Culture Techniques
      • Female
      • Fetus
      • Herpesviridae / growth & development
      • Herpesviridae Infections / microbiology
      • Herpesviridae Infections / veterinary
      • Horse Diseases / microbiology
      • Horses
      • Pregnancy
      • Respiratory Tract Infections / microbiology
      • Respiratory Tract Infections / veterinary

      Citations

      This article has been cited 6 times.
      1. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar C, Herskin M, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Roberts HC, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Spoolder H, Ståhl K, Calvo AV, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Carvelli A, Paillot R, Broglia A, Kohnle L, Baldinelli F, Van der Stede Y. Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): infection with Equine Herpesvirus-1.. EFSA J 2022 Jan;20(1):e07036.
        doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7036pubmed: 35035581google scholar: lookup
      2. Brown LJ, Brown G, Kydd J, Stout TAE, Schulman ML. Failure to detect equid herpesvirus types 1 and 4 DNA in placentae and healthy new-born Thoroughbred foals.. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2019 May 30;90(0):e1-e5.
        doi: 10.4102/jsava.v90i0.1736pubmed: 31170779google scholar: lookup
      3. Studdert MJ. Restriction endonuclease DNA fingerprinting of respiratory, foetal and perinatal foal isolates of equine herpesvirus type 1.. Arch Virol 1983;77(2-4):249-58.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01309272pubmed: 6314938google scholar: lookup
      4. Allen GP, Turtinen LW. Assessment of the base sequence homology between the two subtypes of equine herpesvirus 1.. J Virol 1982 Oct;44(1):249-55.
        doi: 10.1128/JVI.44.1.249-255.1982pubmed: 6292488google scholar: lookup
      5. Yeargan MR, Allen GP, Bryans JT. Rapid subtyping of equine herpesvirus 1 with monoclonal antibodies.. J Clin Microbiol 1985 May;21(5):694-7.
        doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.5.694-697.1985pubmed: 2987299google scholar: lookup
      6. Browning GF, Ficorilli N, Studdert MJ. Asinine herpesvirus genomes: comparison with those of the equine herpesviruses.. Arch Virol 1988;101(3-4):183-90.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01310999pubmed: 2845891google scholar: lookup