Factors influencing oocyte recovery during ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration in mares: A postmortem study.
Abstract: The objectives of this study were to investigate the influence of different OPU variables (vacuum and injection pressures during follicle aspiration and flushing, needle twisting to scrape follicles, number of follicle flushes and type of flushing media) on oocyte recovery rate (ORR) and morphology. Overall, 120 postmortem excised ovaries were processed in 62 replicates (1.9 ± 0.7 ovaries per replicate), with a total of 1336 follicles punctured and aspirated (11.1 ± 6.2 follicles per ovary) by ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration resembling the OPU procedure from live mares. The aspiration pressure (50 vs. 300 mmHg) did not influence (P > 0.1) ORR (57.1 and 55.1 %, respectively) but the higher pressure (1.9 mL/s aspiration flow) resulted in the recovery of more denuded oocytes than the lower pressure (0.8 mL/s) (66 % vs 42 %, P < 0.05). High injection pressure to flush follicles (1.5 mL/s) was associated with lower (P < 0.05) ORR (31 %) and higher loss of oocytes in the leaked fluid (10 % of aspirated follicles) than lower pressures (37 % and 47 % ORR for 0.3 and 0.8 mL/s injection flow rates, respectively). The number of flushes per follicle influenced (P < 0.05) the ORR: 28.8, 46.1, 42.7, 43.0 and 64.2 % for x0, x1, x3, ×6 and ×10 flushes groups. More oocytes (P < 0.05) were lost in the leaked fluid outside the ovary in groups ≥ ×3 (5-7%) than in ×0 and ×1 flushes (<1 %). The ORR was superior following scraping of follicle wall by twisting the needle (55.2 %) than no scraping (42.9 % ORR), while the type of flushing media (0.9%NaCl + heparin vs commercial flushing media with PVA) did not influence ORR. In conclusion, follicle scraping by needle twisting and follicle flushing during 10 times yielded the highest oocyte recovery. Repeated follicle flushing with high injection pressure was associated with a higher loss of oocytes outside the ovary in the leaked fluid.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2024-12-31 PubMed ID: 39756114DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.12.032Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research examined how different variables during an ovum pick-up (OPU) procedure in horses, such as vacuum and injection pressures, needle twisting, the number of follicle flushes, and the type of flushing media, affect the oocyte recovery rate and morphology. It found that the highest oocyte recovery was achieved by scraping the follicle with the needle and flushing the follicle up to ten times, while high injection pressures resulted in more oocytes being lost in leaked fluid.
Study Design and Methodology
- The researchers studied 120 post-mortem excised ovaries from mares, performing a procedure that mimicked an ovum pick-up (OPU) operation that would be carried out on a living mare. In total, 1336 follicles were punctured and aspirated.
- The researchers manipulated several variables: the aspiration pressure, the injection pressure used to flush follicles, the number of times each follicle was flushed, and the type of flushing media used. Quantities were varied in a controlled manner to observe the effects on the oocyte recovery rate (ORR), a measure of the number of viable eggs retrieved.
Findings and Conclusions
- Aspiration pressure did not significantly affect the ORR. However, high pressure resulted in more denuded (naked or stripped) oocytes than low pressure.
- A high injection pressure for flushing follicles was associated with a lower ORR and more oocytes lost in the leaked fluid.
- The number of flushes per follicle significantly influenced the ORR. The ORR was maximized when the follicle was flushed ten times.
- More oocytes were lost outside the ovary in leaked fluid when the number of flushes was three or more.
- Scraping the follicle wall by twisting the needle resulted in a better ORR than not scraping.
- The type of flushing media used did not significantly impact the ORR.
- The study concluded that the best results in oocyte recovery are achieved when scraping the follicle with the needle and flushing it ten times.
Implications
- The results provide valuable insight into optimizing OPU in horses. This information could lead to better fertility treatments and breeding practices, improving the efficiency and success rates of these procedures.
- However, the findings must be confirmed with further research before changes in practice can be fully endorsed. This study was conducted on post-mortem ovaries, so real-world factors in live mares might yield different results.
Cite This Article
APA
Márquez-Moya A, Sala-Ayala L, Carreras-Vico N, Martínez-Boví R, Cuervo-Arango J.
(2024).
Factors influencing oocyte recovery during ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration in mares: A postmortem study.
Theriogenology, 235, 39-45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.12.032 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Equine Fertility Group, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara Del Patriarca, Spain.
- Equine Fertility Group, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara Del Patriarca, Spain.
- Equine Fertility Group, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara Del Patriarca, Spain.
- Equine Fertility Group, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara Del Patriarca, Spain.
- Equine Fertility Group, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara Del Patriarca, Spain. Electronic address: juan.cuervo@uchceu.es.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Conflict of interest statement The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists