Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2024; 11; 1236476; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1236476

Fecal microbiota characterization of an Italian local horse breed.

Abstract: The Bardigiano horse is a traditional native Italian breed with a rich history and peculiar characteristics. Local breeds are proven to have unique genetic traits developed over generations to adapt to defined geographical regions and/or conditions. The specific microbial communities that coexist within these animals are unraveled by studying their microbiota, which permits a further step in the characterization of local heritage. This work aimed to characterize Bardigiano horse fecal microbiota composition. The data obtained were then compared with published data of a mix of athlete breeds to evaluate potential differences among local and specialized breeds. The study involved 11 Bardigiano mares between 3 and 4 years of age, from which stool was sampled for the study. Samples were processed for 16S rRNA sequencing. Data obtained were analyzed and plotted using R, RStudio, and FastTree software. The samples analyzed were similar to what literature has reported on horses of other breeds and attitudes at higher taxonomic levels (from phylum to genera). While at lower taxonomic levels, the difference was more marked highlighting specific families found in the Bardigiano breed only. Weight, province of origin, and breeding sites significantly affected microbiota composition (-value ≤0.02, -value ≤0.04, and -value ≤0.05, respectively). The comparison with athlete breed showed a significant difference confirming that animal and environmental factors are crucial in determining fecal microbiota composition (-value <0.001). Understanding the microbiota composition in local breeds like the Bardigiano horse is crucial for preserving biodiversity, managing animal health, and promoting sustainable farming practices.
Publication Date: 2024-02-15 PubMed ID: 38425839PubMed Central: PMC10902133DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1236476Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The article presents research focused on the unique fecal microbiota characteristics found in the Bardigiano horse, an indigenous Italian breed, comparing its microbial makeup with that of a mix of athlete breeds to highlight differences.

Objective of the Study

  • The main aim of this scientific study was to understand and describe the composition of the fecal microbiota in Bardigiano horses, which is a local Italian breed with its unique set of genetic traits. Furthermore, this data was compared with available data on a mix of athlete horse breeds to identify any significant differences between the microbiota of local and specialized breeds.

Methodology

  • The research team used a sample of 11 Bardigiano mares, aged between 3 and 4 years, as subjects for the study. The feces from these horses were collected and processed for 16S rRNA sequencing, a method often used to analyze microbial communities.
  • The researchers used various software tools like R, RStudio, and FastTree to interpret and visually represent the sequencing data.

Findings and Observations

  • The study found that the analyzed samples were consistent with what literature has pointed out about other horse breeds’ taxonomic makeup at higher levels ranging from the phylum to genera.
  • However, more significant differences were found at lower taxonomic levels. Particularly, specific families of microbes were identified that were found only in the Bardigiano breed.
  • It was noted that factors such as the horse’s weight, its province of origin, and the breeding sites had a significant impact on the composition of the microbiota (with p-values ≤0.02, ≤0.04, and ≤0.05 respectively).
  • The fecal microbiota composition of the Bardigiano breed when compared with athlete breeds showed a substantial difference. This outcome reveals the pivotal role animal-specific and environmental factors play in shaping the fecal microbiota composition (p-value <0.001).

Implications of the Study

  • The insights gained from understanding the microbiota composition of local horse breeds such as the Bardigiano horse are invaluable for preserving biodiversity, managing animal health, and promoting sustainable farming practices.

Cite This Article

APA
Carrillo Heredero AM, Sabbioni A, Asti V, Ablondi M, Summer A, Bertini S. (2024). Fecal microbiota characterization of an Italian local horse breed. Front Vet Sci, 11, 1236476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1236476

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Pages: 1236476
PII: 1236476

Researcher Affiliations

Carrillo Heredero, Alicia Maria
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Sabbioni, Alberto
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Asti, Vittoria
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Ablondi, Michela
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Summer, Andrea
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Bertini, Simone
  • Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 40 references
  1. Stasiol LD, Perrotta G, Blasi M, Lisa C. Genetic characterization of the Bardigiano horse using microsatellite markers. Ital J Anim Sci (2008) 7:243–50.
    doi: 10.4081/ijas.2008.243google scholar: lookup
  2. Ablondi M, Vasini M, Beretti V, Superchi P, Sabbioni A. Exploring genetic diversity in an Italian horse native breed to develop strategies for preservation and management. J Anim Breed Genet (2018) 135:450–9.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12357pubmed: 30136312google scholar: lookup
  3. Ablondi M, Dadousis C, Vasini M, Eriksson S, Mikko S, Sabbioni A. Genetic diversity and signatures of selection in a native italian horse breed based on SNP data. Animals (2020) 10:1–15.
    doi: 10.3390/ani10061005pmc: PMC7341496pubmed: 32521830google scholar: lookup
  4. Ablondi M, Summer A, Vasini M, Simoni M, Sabbioni A. Genetic parameters estimation in an Italian horse native breed to support the conversion from agricultural uses to riding purposes. J Anim Breed Genet (2020) 137:200–10.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12425pubmed: 31310049google scholar: lookup
  5. Masaf – Cavallo bardigiano . Available at: https://www.politicheagricole.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/6179#main (Accessed November 16, 2023).
  6. Capomaccio S, Ablondi M, Colombi D, Sartori C, Giontella A, Cappelli K. Exploring the Italian equine gene pool via high-throughput genotyping. Front Genet (2023) 14:1099896.
    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1099896pmc: PMC9900106pubmed: 36755577google scholar: lookup
  7. Rajilić‐Stojanović M, Smidt H, De Vos WM. Diversity of the human gastrointestinal tract microbiota revisited. Environ Microbiol (2007) 9:2125–36.
  8. De Jesús-Laboy KM, Godoy-Vitorino F, Piceno YM, Tom LM, Pantoja-Feliciano IG, Rivera-Rivera MJ. Comparison of the fecal microbiota in feral and domestic goats. Genes (Basel) (2011) 3:1–18.
    doi: 10.3390/genes3010001pmc: PMC3899958pubmed: 24704840google scholar: lookup
  9. Zierer J, Jackson MA, Kastenmüller G, Mangino M, Long T, Telenti A. The fecal metabolome as a functional readout of the gut microbiome. Nat Genet (2018) 50:790–5.
    doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0135-7pmc: PMC6104805pubmed: 29808030google scholar: lookup
  10. Kylie J, Weese JS, Turner PV. Comparison of the fecal microbiota of domestic commercial meat, laboratory, companion, and shelter rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculi). BMC Vet Res (2018) 14:143.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1464-6pmc: PMC5924505pubmed: 29703196google scholar: lookup
  11. Suzuki TA, Ley RE. The role of the microbiota in human genetic adaptation. Science (2020) 370:eaaz6827.
    doi: 10.1126/science.aaz6827pubmed: 33273073google scholar: lookup
  12. Ceccarelli S. Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions. Euphytica (1994) 77:101–27.
  13. Hooper LV, Littman DR, Macpherson AJ. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science (2012) 336:1268–73.
    doi: 10.1126/science.1223490pmc: PMC4420145pubmed: 22674334google scholar: lookup
  14. Yoo J, Groer M, Dutra S, Sarkar A, McSkimming D. Gut microbiota and immune system interactions. Microorganisms (2020) 8:1587.
  15. Levy M, Kolodziejczyk AA, Thaiss CA, Elinav E. Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol (2017) 17:219–32.
    doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.7pubmed: 28260787google scholar: lookup
  16. Mach N, Lansade L, Bars-Cortina D, Dhorne-Pollet S, Foury A, Moisan MP. Gut microbiota resilience in horse athletes following holidays out to pasture. Sci Rep (2021) 11:5007.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84497-ypmc: PMC7930273pubmed: 33658551google scholar: lookup
  17. Holmes E, Li JV, Marchesi JR, Nicholson JK. Gut microbiota composition and activity in relation to host metabolic phenotype and disease risk. Cell Metab (2012) 16:559–64.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.007pubmed: 23140640google scholar: lookup
  18. Massacci FR, Clark A, Ruet A, Lansade L, Costa M, Mach N. Inter-breed diversity and temporal dynamics of the faecal microbiota in healthy horses. J Anim Breed Genet (2020) 137:103–20.
    doi: 10.1111/jbg.12441pubmed: 31523867google scholar: lookup
  19. Goal 15 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal15 (Accessed July 10, 2023).
  20. Plancade S, Clark A, Philippe C, Helbling JC, Moisan MP, Esquerré D. Unraveling the effects of the gut microbiota composition and function on horse endurance physiology. Sci Rep (2019) 9:9620.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46118-7pmc: PMC6610142pubmed: 31270376google scholar: lookup
  21. Marcenac LN, Aublet H. Encyclopedie du cheval. Paris, France: Librairie Maloine; (1964).
  22. DADA2 Pipeline Tutorial (1.16) . Available at: https://benjjneb.github.io/dada2/tutorial.html (Accessed July 10, 2023).
  23. Edgar RC, Flyvbjerg H. Error filtering, pair assembly and error correction for next-generation sequencing reads. Bioinformatics (2015) 31:3476–82.
    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv401pubmed: 26139637google scholar: lookup
  24. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods (2016) 13:581–3.
    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869pmc: PMC4927377pubmed: 27214047google scholar: lookup
  25. De Almeida MLM, Feringer WH, Carvalho JRG, Rodrigues IM, Jordão LR, Fonseca MG. Intense exercise and aerobic conditioning associated with chromium or L-carnitine supplementation modified the fecal microbiota of fillies. PLoS One (2016) 11:e0167108.
  26. Hu D, Chao Y, Zhang B, Wang C, Qi Y, Ente M. Effects of Gasterophilus pecorum infestation on the intestinal microbiota of the rewilded Przewalski’s horses in China. PLoS One (2021) 16:e0251512.
  27. Żak-Bochenek A, Bajzert J, Sambor D, Siwińska N, Szponar B, Łaczmański Ł. Homeostasis of the intestinal mucosa in healthy horses—correlation between the fecal microbiome, secretory immunoglobulin a and fecal egg count. Animals (Basel) (2022) 12:3094.
    doi: 10.3390/ANI12223094pmc: PMC9687066pubmed: 36428322google scholar: lookup
  28. Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes (2012) 3:289–306.
    doi: 10.4161/gmic.19897pmc: PMC3463488pubmed: 22572875google scholar: lookup
  29. O’ donnell MM, HMB H, Ross RP, O’Toole PW. Core fecal microbiota of domesticated herbivorous ruminant, hindgut fermenters, and monogastric animals. Microbiology (2017) 6:e00509.
    doi: 10.1002/mbo3.509pmc: PMC5635170pubmed: 28834331google scholar: lookup
  30. Stewart CS, Flint HJ. Bacteroides (Fibrobacter) succinogenes, a cellulolytic anaerobic bacterium from the gastrointestinal tract. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (1989) 30:433–9.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00263846google scholar: lookup
  31. Shin S, Cho KY. Altered gut microbiota and shift in Bacteroidetes between young obese and Normal-weight Korean children: a cross-sectional observational study. Biomed Res Int (2020) 2020:1–19.
    doi: 10.1155/2020/6587136pmc: PMC7450312pubmed: 32908903google scholar: lookup
  32. Ley RE, Bäckhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Gordon JI. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci (2005) 102:11070–5.
    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504978102pmc: PMC1176910pubmed: 16033867google scholar: lookup
  33. Vacca M, Celano G, Calabrese FM, Portincasa P, Gobbetti M, De Angelis M. The controversial role of human gut Lachnospiraceae. Microorganisms (2020) 8:573.
  34. Louis P, Flint HJ. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol Lett (2009) 294:1–8.
  35. Gao Z, Yin J, Zhang J, Ward RE, Martin RJ, Lefevre M. Butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in mice. Diabetes (2009) 58:1509–17.
    doi: 10.2337/db08-1637pmc: PMC2699871pubmed: 19366864google scholar: lookup
  36. Schulz N, Belheouane M, Dahmen B, Ruan VA, Specht HE, Dempfle A. Gut microbiota alteration in adolescent anorexia nervosa does not normalize with short-term weight restoration. Int J Eat Disord (2021) 54:969–80.
    doi: 10.1002/eat.23435pubmed: 33314258google scholar: lookup
  37. Ikeda-Ohtsubo W, Brugman S, Warden CH, Rebel JMJ, Folkerts G, Pieterse CMJ. How can we define “optimal microbiota?” A comparative review of structure and functions of microbiota of animals, fish, and plants in agriculture. Front Nutr (2018) 5:90.
  38. Metcalf JL, Song SJ, Morton JT, Weiss S, Seguin-Orlando A, Joly F. Evaluating the impact of domestication and captivity on the horse gut microbiome. Sci Rep (2017) 7:15497.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15375-9pmc: PMC5686199pubmed: 29138485google scholar: lookup
  39. Garber A, Hastie P, Murray J-A. Factors influencing equine gut microbiota: current knowledge. J Equine Vet (2020) 88:102943.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102943pubmed: 32303307google scholar: lookup
  40. Zhu Y, Wang X, Deng L, Chen S, Zhu C, Li J. Effects of pasture grass, silage, and Hay diet on equine fecal microbiota. Animals (2021) 11:1330.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051330pmc: PMC8148540pubmed: 34066969google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.